Jews Should Demand Compensation for Centuries of Abuse Under Islam

Until the late 1800s entire ancient Jewish communities had to flee Palestine to escape the brutality of Muslim authorities. The real colonialists were the Arabs.

Mohammedans are feeling the pulse of France

Giulio Meotti

France risks a breakdown according to ethnic and religious lines. It is a gradual process of balkanization, at best, or of open conquest in the worst case.

“Islamic ideologues work in the same way on both shores of the Mediterranean: what they did twenty or thirty years ago in the Maghreb, they do it today in France. If these Islamist ecosystems continue, they will speak for our Muslim companions. In the event of an extreme right reaction or electoral victory, we will be in a civil war scenario”.

More below the fold.

JIHADWATCH.ORG

Paterson, N.J. City Council ordinance will allow Islamic call to prayer over loudspeakers

.
This is what happens when those who are supposed to tell the truth, our so-called intellectuals, instead remain silent about the Islamization of the West, and who even go as far as denying that it’s actually happening as it’s happening. And from their silence comes the ugly Islamic call to prayer, in an American town where Muslims celebrated 9/11, blasted by loudspeakers, during a global jihad.

MSN.COM

This is the scenario outlined on Le Figaro by Bernard Rougier, academic and Arabist author of the new book “Les territoires conquis de l’Islamisme”. This is the scenario on which Emmanuel Macron spoke on Tuesday. He explained that French Muslims have their place in the national community, they are French among the French, but that [their intention is that] there will be laws of Islam on French soil.

Macron said that the republican ideal is not an empty space but a historical reality whose density is urgently needed and everyone must be respected. Macron said it from Mulhouse, in Alsace, where Islamists are working on a space that takes charge of all aspects of life by placing them under Islamist control, a real enclave – financed by Qatar and Turkey.

Macron launched a campaign against political Islam and what he calls “Islamist separatism” in some French cities, announcing measures to strengthen controls over the external financing of mosques, to end the nomination by Algeria, Morocco and Turkey of 300 imams per year in France and ban Turkish and Arabic courses. Imams, Macron said, are often related to Salafism or the Muslim Brotherhood and “preach against the republic”.

The Macron administration has designated 47 French districts for a “republican reconquest”. Macron also went down hard against Turkey. “We cannot have Turkey’s laws on French soil”, warned the head of the Elysée. In response, President of the Turkish parliament Mustafa Sentop chastised his “primitive Islamophobia”.

It is with a letter in the magazine Marianne that 60 French intellectuals turn to Macron. “Mr. President of the Republic, some of us support you, others oppose you. Any concessions will only convince secessionist Islam of our weakness and encourage it to ask for more and more”. The appeal was signed by Muslim authors such as Kamel Bencheikh, Zineb El Rhazoui and Mohamed Louizi; the philosopher Jean-François Braunstein and the essayist Pascal Bruckner; the sociologist Nathalie Heinich and the research director of Cnrs Philippe d’Iribarne; and again the journalist Yves Mamou and the Algerian novelist Boualem Sansal; rounded out with the historian of ideas Pierre-André Taguieff and Pierre Vermeren, professor of History at the Sorbonne.

Doubts remain. Why not decide on banning the Salafist groups and the Muslim Brotherhood? We are talking about imam training. But from whom? And to teach them what? It is not enough to have an intellectual knowledge of Republican rules to adhere to them and give up preaching a separatist Islam.

France is the great “patient” of Europe. It has the largest Islamic community on the Old Continent, one tenth of the total population; almost half of European Jews live in France; and the country has a tradition of freedom and intellectual and cultural secularism absent elsewhere. This has generated the chaos of civilizations that we see every day, unless we are looking in bad faith or blind..


If 20 years ago they had told us what is happening today, we would have laughed. Yet it happened. And it is happening with a 10 percent Islamic population.

.

We have the Islamization of entire neighborhoods (at least 150 for the government); daily anti-Semitism with massacres of French Jews, their flight to Israel (60,000 in ten years) and their internal departure, with large departments such as Seine-Saint-Denis now emptied of 80 per cent of their Jews; and then journalists, writers and intellectuals under police escort. And a significant part of the French Left is now lined up for electoral patronage with political Islam in the “neighborhoods”.

France risks a breakdown according to ethnic and religious lines. It is a gradual process of balkanization, at best, or of open conquest in the worst case.

If 20 years ago they had told us what is happening today, we would have laughed. Yet it happened. And it is happening with a 10 percent Islamic population. The Pew Forum, the world’s largest analytical institute, tells us that France will be 20 percent Islamic within a generation. What will happen then? And what will happen when, in two generations, if 30-40 per cent will be Muslims?

In 1970 there were a hundred mosques in France, today there are more than 2,450. “We are at the terminal stage of Catholicism”, said Jerome Fourquet, the most respected French sociologist of the moment. De-Christianization and Islamization go hand in hand.

The hour is serious, as Bernard Rougier said. Two days ago, waiting for Macron in Mulhouse, there was a woman in a niqab, the Islamic outfit from head to toe. It was forbidden by French law. But the Islamism of the conquest was feeling the pulse of France.

3 thoughts on “Jews Should Demand Compensation for Centuries of Abuse Under Islam”

  1. What utter faggotry (quel surprise, for France’s Msr. Micron).

    Islam is a global crime-gang; there is no “right” to practice it!

    AND, as for

    “This is what happens when those who are supposed to tell the truth, our so-called intellectuals, instead remain silent about the Islamization of the West, and who even go as far as denying that it’s actually happening as it’s happening. And from their silence comes the ugly Islamic call to prayer, in an American town where Muslims celebrated 9/11, blasted by loudspeakers, during a global jihad.”

    Academics – at least, the “soft”-science/humanities ones – NEVER TELL THE TRUTH.

    Here’s how the so-called “soft” sciences aka “humanities” (anthropology, psychology, sociology, and even Law or criminology) really work: They all started off by examining the various symptoms and EFFECTS of human behavior, thinking, group-thinking behavior, and of criminal free-will CHOICES, respectively, but then self-invalidated by looking for hidden mysterious predestined and predetermined inevitable force “CAUSES” of it all, which degraded them all into only one criminal, excuse-making alibi topic:

    “VICTIMOLOGY!”

    So we get these two, permanently opposed philosophical poles:

    Law-abiding Conservatives: “Criminal behavior is an effect of free-will choice!”

    Criminal libertines: “But what CAUSED that choice? There’s always a cause!”

    Their implication is that there are no crimes nor criminals because we’re all “victims.”

    In short: they went from studying HOW people CHOOSE to act, to focusing on WHY (ruling out free will choice entirely)!

    And that “why” PRESUMES a fear of pain will ALWAYS trump rationality! “So” we are all really ever only helpless victims! Asking “why” people (‘always’) give in to the fear of pain, presumes that: “SINCE anything CAN go wrong, SO it WILL always go wrong, SO we MUST pity and forgive everyone for their mistakes, as being equally helpless fellow victims!”

    But in reality, the only reason WHY people commit crimes, is that they still think they can have rights without responsibilities, and so they weigh all the risks and rewards in different situational circumstances first!

    And they only try to do so in each and every separate circumstantial situation, because they haven’t learned that rights ALWAYS only come with responsibilities, causes with effects, and effects with causes, and so they either remain ignorant of, or choose to ignore, the simple Golden Rule of Law moral Principle:
    “Do Not Attack First.”

    BOTTOM LINE:

    These days, uselessly PITYING the victims (and the criminals AS “fellow victims,”) is held up as the highest moral virtue, while being usefully ANGRY at, (or “hateful” towards) criminals and crime is deemed to be the most vile sin.

    But what is more useful in solving problems and remedying crime: being angry at criminals for their predatory choices, or encouraging them to commit more crimes, by pitying them as “equally-helpless fellow victims,” too?

    The answer is obvious.

    All soft-science humanities only “teach” excuse-making idolatry alibis, amounting to: “I didn’t do it! That tree hit my car!”

    In their publish-or-perish world, they have to regress every question, like little kids annoying their parents often do, to “But Why?” as they pretend to search for causes of causes, Ad infinitum. They are criminally-negligent frauds, whose motto has always been, still is, and always will be: “There’s No Money In Solutions, so Please Give Generously – AGAIN!”

    And pity never solves anything, which is yet another reason for them to always invoke it as the new gospel of the “woke” left.

    😉

  2. So then the jews owe the Ukrainians for the Holdomor, Russians for the bolshevik revolution, Africans for the tranAtlantic slavetrade.

Comments are closed.