Full article below the fold.
Cultural enrichment from a follower of ‘the prophet’.
Raping infidel girls is just walking in the sadistic footsteps of the barbaric psychopath they hold as their moral example.
BY DAILY MAIL
The underlying assumption here is that the coronavirus is an expression of Allah’s wrath against those who do not obey his laws. So the solution is to implement Sharia. This kind of thinking leads to jihad violence, because a hadith depicts Muhammad telling his followers that no deed is greater than jihad (Bukhari 56.4.2785), which leads inexorably to the idea that jihad will be the best cure for coronavirus.
UK Islamic scholar: Even if wife licks husband’s bloody infected wounds, she won’t fulfill her obligations to him
Remember, you greasy Islamophobe, Islam respects women: “The prophets have explained with such emphasis, but if you had an ulcer that was bleeding with blood and pus from his head to his foot and she licked it, she would not have fulfilled the right that he had over her.”
Humble also says: “The Messenger of Islam said if a man calls his wife to bed and she refuses… For intimacy, she refuses and he goes to sleep up angry with her, the angels curse her until the morning comes. In another narration, until her husband is happy with her.”
This is not “extremism.” It is standard, mainstream Islam. A hadith depicts Muhammad saying: “If a husband calls his wife to his bed [i.e. to have sexual relation] and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning” (Bukhari 4.54.460).
And: “By him in Whose Hand lies my life, a woman can not carry out the right of her Lord, till she carries out the right of her husband. And if he asks her to surrender herself [to him for sexual intercourse] she should not refuse him even if she is on a camel’s saddle” (Ibn Majah 1854).
“U.K. Islamic Scholar Tim Humble: Women Must Completely Obey Their Husbands; Even Licking a Pus-Covered, Bleeding Ulcer That Covers Their Husband’s Body Would Not Fulfill Their Obligations unto Him; Husbands Have the Right to Immediate Sexual Gratification,” MEMRI, April 16, 2020 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
Ustadh Muhammad Tim Humble, a British Islamic scholar, said in a lesson that was uploaded to the Al-Madrasatu Al-Umariyyah YouTube channel on April 16, 2020 that women must do whatever their husbands tell them to do, unless it is something forbidden by Islam. He said that the Prophet Muhammad had said that if a woman were to lick a bleeding and pus-covered ulcer that covered her husband’s entire body, she would still not have fulfilled all of her obligations unto him. Furthermore, Ustadh Humble said that men have the right to immediate sexual gratification from their wives, even if it is inconvenient, that Allah and his angels are angered by women who refuse their husbands intimacy, that women are not allowed to fast without their husbands’ permission since their husbands might want to have sex with them, and that women cannot allow people into the house without their husband’s permission.
Ustadh Muhammad Tim Humble: “The prophets said if I was going to command someone to prostrate before I, to bow before someone, I would have commanded a woman to bow before her husband. If he’s not asking her to do something forbidden then she must do what she’s told.
“It’s very inconvenient and she is saddled up riding the camel whatever, you know, and he then asks her for intimacy, she then has to get down to make herself available for her husband.
“The right to immediate intimacy or immediate satisfaction of intimate desires, that needs to be with regard to the man. There is immediacy. There is an urgency…
“The prophets have explained with such emphasis, but if you had an ulcer that was bleeding with blood and pus from his head to his foot and she licked it, she would not have fulfilled the right that he had over her.
“The Messenger of Islam said if a man calls his wife to bed and she refuses… For intimacy, she refuses and he goes to sleep up angry with her, the angels curse her until the morning comes. In another narration, until her husband is happy with her
“There is no man who calls his wife to her bed and she refuses him except that the one in the heavens is angry with her until her husband is pleased with her. That the Messenger from Islam said it’s not allowed for a woman to fast while her husband is present except with his permission. In case of his need of intimacy nor to allow someone to come into his house except with his permission.”
‘White Whores’: Islam’s Unwavering View on Western Women
A British woman going by the pseudonym “Kate Elysia” recently revealed the extent of her sexual victimization by Muslim men. While this included the usual — including drugs, and gang-rapes by as many as 70 men — her story had an interesting twist to it.
According to the report: “[A]t one point during her abuse, she was trafficked to the North African country of Morocco where she was prostituted and repeatedly raped.” There she was kept in an apartment in Marrakesh, where another girl no more than 15 was also kept for sexual purposes. “I can’t remember how many times I’m raped that [first] night, or by who,” Kate recounted.
That she was seen as a piece of meat is evident in other ways: “The Pakistani men I came into contact with made me believe I was nothing more than a slut, a white whore. They treated me like a leper, apart from when they wanted sex. I was less than human to them, I was rubbish.”
What explains the ongoing victimization of European women by Muslim men — which exists well beyond the UK, and has become epidemic in Germany, Sweden, and elsewhere?
While these sordid accounts are routinely dismissed as the activities of “criminals,” they are in fact reflective of nearly fourteen centuries of Muslim views on and treatment of European women. Nothing in Kate’s account — not even the otherwise extreme aspect of taking her to Morocco to be a sex slave — has not happened countless times over the centuries.
For starters, Muslim men have long had an obsessive attraction for fair women of the European variety. This, as all things Islamic, traces back to their prophet, Muhammad. In order to entice his men to war against the Byzantines — who, as the Arabs’ nearest European neighbors came to represent “white” people — Muhammad told them they would be able to sexually enslave the “yellow” women (an apparent reference to their hair color).
For over a millennium after Muhammad, jihadi leaders — Arabs, Berbers, Turks, Tatars — also coaxed their men to jihad on Europe by citing (and later sexually enslaving) its fair women, as copiously documented in Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West. For one example, prior to invading Spain, jihadi hero Tarek bin Ziyad enticed his men by saying: “You must have heard numerous accounts of this island, you must know how the Grecian maidens, as beautiful as houris [sexual superwomen are awaiting your arrival, reclining on soft couches in the sumptuous palaces of crowned lords and princes.”
That the sexual enslavement of fair women was an aspect that always fueled the jihad is evident in other ways. Thus, for M.A. Khan, a former Muslim author, it is “impossible to disconnect Islam from the Viking slave-trade, because the supply was absolutely meant for meeting [the] Islamic world’s unceasing demand for the prized white slaves” and for “white sex-slaves.”
And just as Muslim rapists saw Kate as “nothing more than a slut, a white whore,” so did Muslim luminaries always describe the nearest white women of Byzantium. For Abu Uthman al-Jahiz (b. 776), a prolific court scholar, the females of Constantinople were the “most shameless women in the whole world … [T]hey find sex more enjoyable” and “are prone to adultery.” Abd al-Jabbar (b. 935), another prominent scholar, claimed that “adultery is commonplace in the cities and markets of Byzantium,” so much so that even “the nuns from the convents went out to the fortresses to offer themselves to monks.”
As Nadia Maria el-Cheikh, author of Byzantium Viewed by the Arabs, explains:
Our [Arab/Muslim] sources show not Byzantine women but writers’ images of these women, who served as symbols of the eternal female — constantly a potential threat, particularly due to blatant exaggerations of their sexual promiscuity. In our texts, Byzantine women are strongly associated with sexual immorality. … While the one quality that our [Muslim] sources never deny is the beauty of Byzantine women, the image that they create in describing these women is anything but beautiful.
Their depictions are, occasionally, excessive, virtually caricatures, overwhelmingly negative … The behavior of most women in Byzantium was a far cry from the depictions that appear in Arabic sources.
But even taking Kate to Morocco and turning her into a sex slave is a mirror reflection of history. Thanks to Ottoman support for the slave-raiding pirates of North Africa, the so-called “Barbary States,” by 1541 “Algiers teemed with Christian captives [from Europe], and it became a common saying that a Christian slave was scarce a fair barter for an onion.”
According to the conservative estimate of American professor Robert Davis: “[B]etween 1530 and 1780 [alone] there were almost certainly a million and quite possibly as many as a million and a quarter white, European Christians enslaved by the Muslims of the Barbary Coast,” of which Morocco was one. Women slaves — and not a few men and boys — were almost always sexually abused. With countless European women selling for the price of an onion, little wonder by the late 1700s, European observers noted how “the inhabitants of Algiers have a rather white complexion.”
It was the same elsewhere. The slave markets of the Ottoman sultanate were for centuries so inundated with European flesh that children sold for pennies, “a very beautiful slave woman was exchanged for a pair of boots, and four Serbian slaves were traded for a horse.” In Crimea — where some three million Slavs were enslaved by the Ottomans’ Muslim allies, the Tatars — an eyewitness described how Christian men were castrated and savagely tortured (including by gouging their eyes out), whereas “[t]he youngest women are kept for wanton pleasures.”
Such a long and unwavering history of sexually enslaving European women on the claim that, like Kate Elysia, they are all “nothing more than a slut, a white whore,” should place the ongoing sexual abuse of Western women in context — and suggest that there’s little chance of change along the horizon.
(Editor’s note: All quotes and historical facts appearing in the above article are documented in the author’s new book, Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West.)