Father Henri Boulad Calls a Spade a Spade on Islam


Christianity has traditionally defended the West from its enemies, both external and internal. But who will defend Christianity? Drained of conviction by political correctness, prominent clergy have been unwilling to resist both moral decadence and the rising threat of Islam, which historically has expanded mainly at the expense of Christianity (in Egypt, Syria, Asia Minor, the Balkans, Lebanon, etc.). Greek Melkite Jesuit Father Henri Boulad takes the bull by the horns:

Boulad believes that when it comes to dealing with Islam, the Catholic Church has succumbed to a “liberal left ideology which is destroying the West” based on the pretext of “openness, tolerance and Christian charity.”

In a June 10 interview with the Register, Father Boulad reveals that he shared these sentiments with Pope Francis in a letter he wrote to him last August, telling him that many think the Pope’s own views on Islam are “aligned with this ideology, and that, from complacency, you go from concessions to concessions, and compromises in compromises, at the expense of the truth.”

Truth is usually the first casualty of moonbattery. Other casualties soon follow, especially when the moonbattery enables Islam.

Father Boulad, an 85-year-old Egyptian, was asked, “What evidence is there to show that Islam is inherently violent?” His response lays the issue to rest:

Here are clear statements of the Koran itself :

“Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.” Koran 2:191

“Make war on the infidels living in your neighbourhood.” Koran 9:123

“When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.” Koran 9:5

“Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.” Koran 3:85

“The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.”… Koran 9:30

“Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam” Koran 5:33

“Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.” Koran 22:19

“The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.” Koran 8:65

“Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.” Koran 3:28

“Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an.” Koran 8:12

“Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.” Koran 8:60

Father Boulad then cited other Muslim sources that unsurprisingly back up the Koran, and gave historical examples that form a bridge of carnage and brutality between Islam’s origins and its current application.

Contrary to the piteous bleating we hear from clueless and cowardly Western “leaders” like Theresa May, terrorism is not a perversion of Islam. As Father Boulad puts it, “Extremists are just applying what their religion teaches them to do.”

From his letter to Pope Francis:

“It is high time to emerge from a shameful and embarrassed silence in the face of this Islamism that attacks the West and the rest of the world. A systematically conciliatory attitude is interpreted by the majority of Muslims as a sign of fear and weakness. If Jesus said to us: Blessed are the peacemakers, he did not say to us: Blessed are the pacifists.”

Well said. Pope Francis may not listen, but with luck, others will.

Father Henri Boulad speaks truth to moonbattery and dhimmitude.

Latham Calls to ban privacy curtains for Muslim women at public pool

“Tradition  under threat.”

FORMER Labor leader Mark Latham has launched a petition to ban privacy curtains installed at a Sydney public pool to allow Muslim women to swim comfortably.

Mr Latham says the curtains, which were installed by Cumberland Council at Auburn pool so Muslim women can swim without being seen by other pool users, is threatening age-old Australian traditions.

Writing for right-wing online publication The Rebel, Mr Latham said public pools are a “great Australian institution”.

“For many decades, the public swimming pool has been a great Australian institution: affordable, open and full of people mixing together, regardless of their background, race and religion,” he wrote for his petition, Tear Down That Curtain.

“Now, this tradition is under threat.”

Calls to ban privacy curtain for Muslim women at public pool
Former Federal Labor Leader Mark Latham has launched a petition to ban privacy curtains at a public swimming pool. Image: AAP/Dan HimbrechtsSource: AAP/ NEWS.COM.AU

He then went on to say that the privacy curtains are discriminating against non-Muslim men.
“For non-Muslim men, the discrimination is twofold: they pay their Council rates, they pay at the pool entry point, but they can’t access the entire pool facility. Public services must be available to all the public.”

Continue reading Latham Calls to ban privacy curtains for Muslim women at public pool

Tariq Ramadan wants an “internal discussion” about FGM

Tariq Ramadan Defends Female Genital Mutilation: ‘Part of Our Tradition’ and an ‘Internal Discussion’ for Muslims Only

by David M. Swindle

The infidels must have no say when it comes to Mohammedan mores, infidels don’t understand Islam. Hassan al Banna’s grandson is letting it all hang out. No “moderate Muslim” to see here.

Last week Imam Shaker Elsayed of the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church, Virginia, was roundly condemned after a video emerged, courtesy of the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), in which he recommends female genital mutilation to avoid “hypersexuality.”

Elsayed has since tried to withdraw his comments and apologized, saying “I admit that I should have avoided it. I hereby take it back. And I do apologize to all those who are offended by it.”

Elsayed’s weak-tea apology has not slowed the loud calls in the Muslim community for the Dar al-Hijrah mosque to fire him. But on Monday, influential Islamist thinker and activist Tariq Ramadan released a 10 minute video on Facebook expressing support for Elsayed staying on. Ramadan stated Muslim leaders who advocate for FGM should be understood as “brothers,” part of “our community” and Muslims who disagree should engage them with “internal discussion” and are instructed “not to expose them.” Here are some of the highlights from this video.

First Ramadan starts by framing opposition to FGM as a critique coming from “outside the community” and stating that he opposes the calls for firing Elsayed:

“I’m reacting to what I heard and some questions that I had about what happened in Washington with this controversy round a shaykh who was not yet fired – I hope he is not going to be, but he was asked to stop preaching and to stop being active within the community or within the mosque in Washington. And I think that some of the brothers and the sisters even wrote a letter after the controversy around female genital mutilation and excision asking for him to be fired from the mosque and reacting to a video that was posted about what he said in the gathering with Muslim students, men and women. Let me say three things about this because I think this [sic] are critical times and we have to be quite serious about the way we are reacting to controversies and the way we are reacting to some critiques that are coming from outside the community and we have to ask ourselves what we are doing.”

Next Ramadan makes his argument that because FGM is defended by some Muslim scholars it qualifies as “part of our tradition” and is therefore worthy of being “promoted”:

Continue reading Tariq Ramadan wants an “internal discussion” about FGM

Canberra: Lots of “faith twisting” & “hijacking religion” to end “Islamophobia”

A Muslim group in Canberra is having frank discussions with the public in a bid to counter “misconceptions that feed Islamophobia.”

Your taxpayer dollars at work. Taxpayer funded Muselprop. Here’s our treacherous  gov’t financing Mohammedan proselytizing.  Who in his right mind would want this cult to spread, when it is clear that it is poisonous to our society, our culture and civilization?

Canberra ‘Meet a Muslim’ forums aim to end Islamophobia

Why do women wear headscarfs? What is Sharia law? Why are all terrorists Muslim?

It’s not always easy to field these questions on behalf of millions of Muslims worldwide, but a group in Canberra is doing just that – having frank discussions with the public in a bid to counter misconceptions that feed Islamophobia.

Muslims for Progressive Values organiser Saba Awan has coordinated four ‘Meet a Muslim’ events where Canberrans can ask anything they’d been wondering about Islam.

The group is planning their fifth Meet a Muslim event on June 26 in Belconnen.

Continue reading Canberra: Lots of “faith twisting” & “hijacking religion” to end “Islamophobia”

How to be a useful idiot: Saudi funding in Australia

Petrodollars have corrupted all Middle Eastern study departments in the U.S. Australia is not immune. The soldiers of allah are well established here. There is hardly a university without ‘prayer rooms’ and foot wash facilities. Preemptive dhimmitude is a package deal.

The Griffith fiasco

In 2007 it was revealed that the Saudis were planning a $2.7 billion scholarship fund for Australian universities, designed to facilitate the entry of Saudi students into Australia to undertake tertiary education in the face of restrictions on their entry into the US and UK in the post-9/11 security environment.

It later emerged in The Australian that Griffith University “practically begged the Saudi Arabian embassy to bankroll its Islamic campus for $1.3 million”, assuring the Saudis that arrangements could be kept secret if required. The vice-chancellor promoted Griffith as the “university of choice” for Saudis and “offered the embassy an opportunity to reshape the Griffith Islamic Research Unit (GIRU) during its campaign to get ‘extra noughts’ added to the Saudi cheques”.

Continue reading How to be a useful idiot: Saudi funding in Australia

Erdogan owns this!

Turkish Islamist push may be (?)  to blame for removal of Atatürk inscription at Anzac Cove

Certainly not “may be”: Erdogan goons are most certainly to blame for this. For Islamic supremacists there is a big difference between   the Johnnies and the Mehmets.

Words likening Australia’s dead ‘Johnnies’ to Ottoman ‘Mehmets’ disappear as 1985 Gallipoli monument is restored

Left: tourists visit the memorial with the inscription of what are claimed to be Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’s words to the mothers in Anzac Cove in April 2015; right: the memorial in June 2017. Composite: The Guardian/Honest History

The Turkish government of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has removed from a revered Anzac Cove memorial the familiar words attributed to Turkey’s founding father, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, likening Australia’s dead “Johnnies” to Ottoman “Mehmets” and welcoming them to rest in his country’s soil.

The renovation of the 1985 monument has heightened suspicions in Australia and Turkey that the refurbished memorial could reflect a growing Islamist interpretation by the Erdoğan administration of Australia’s part in the 1915 British-commanded Anzac invasion of – and later retreat from – Gallipoli.

The near demolition of the monument bearing Atatürk’s words, which began in mid to late May, is part of a process of “restoration” of all Turkish memorials and epitaphs on the Gallipoli peninsula. But sources in Australia and Turkey believe the motivations behind the restorations could be in part political and are likely to reflect Turkey’s greater emphasis on religion in history and culture under Erdoğan.

Australian and Turkish sources, including historians in both countries, believe that when the restoration is complete the sentiments on the Anzac Cove Atatürk memorial may be markedly different.

While the precise words attributed to Atatürk – also inscribed on monuments in Australia and New Zealand – are most likely not those of the Turkish Gallipoli commander and first president of the republic, they have been afforded a special place in Anzac mythology and in close diplomatic relations between Canberra and Ankara.

They have been agreed to by Turkish and Australian governments, and have offered comfort to generations of descendants of the 8,000-plus Australian Anzacs buried at Gallipoli.

Until the words were demolished from the memorial in mid to late May, the Ari Burnu monument read:

Those heroes that shed their blood and lost their lives … You are now lying in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace. There is no difference between the Johnnies and the Mehmets to us where they lie side by side here in this country of ours … You, the mothers who sent their sons from faraway countries, wipe away your tears; your sons are now lying in our bosom and are in peace. After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well.

Continue reading Erdogan owns this!

U.S. Trying to Criminalize Free Speech – Again

“Hate speech hotlines operate as government enforcement of fascism,” former congresswoman Michele Bachmann said in an email to WND. “They are a denial of free speech and the very definition of government censorship.”

U.S. city installs Shariah hotline for ‘hate speech’ snitches
The city of Minneapolis has set up a hotline for residents to report suspected hate crimes, including “speech and actions,” according to statements on the city’s… WND.COM (Comments)
So who is behind this?
 Not the U.S., the usual suspects: Senator Kamala Harris and co-sponsored by Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Dianne Feinstein, and Senator Susan Collins.

by Judith Bergman

  • The law already prohibits violence and threats of violence, and law enforcement authorities are supposed to prosecute those — intimidation, destruction, damage, vandalism, simple and aggravated assault. What “hate crimes” are not already covered by the law?
  • Why would the House of Representatives find it necessary to make such redundant statements, if not in order to redefine the concept of a hate crime? Perhaps by including “hate speech”? The current resolution includes most of the major ethnic and religious minorities in the United States, so it will have a far better chance of passing, as it will more easily fool Representatives into thinking that the contents of the resolution are harmless.
  • Would it not be appropriate for the politicians sponsoring and voting for these resolutions first of all to find out what drives the organizations responsible for drafting them? The Investigative Project on Terrorism has authored a damning 88-page report about the Muslim Public Affairs Council. American politicians do not seem to have taken much interest in it.

On April 4, 2017, the US Senate passed Senate Resolution 118, “Condemning hate crime and any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States”. The resolution was drafted by a Muslim organization, EmgageUSA (formerly EmergeUSA) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC). On April 6, 2017, EmgageUSA wrote the following on their Facebook page:

“Thanks to the hard work of Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Susan Collins and Senator Kamala Harris we have achieved the approval of Senate Resolution 118, an anti-hate crimes bill drafted by Emerge-USA. It is days like this that Americans are reminded of this country’s founding principles: equal opportunity, freedom, justice. We are proud to help support the protection of these rights #amoreperfectunion #theamericandream”.

Senate Resolution 118 calls on

“…Federal law enforcement officials, working with State and local officials… to expeditiously investigate all credible reports of hate crimes and incidents and threats against minorities in the United States and to hold the perpetrators of those crimes, incidents, or threats accountable and bring the perpetrators to justice; encourages the Department of Justice and other Federal agencies to work to improve the reporting of hate crimes; and… encourages the development of an interagency task force led by the Attorney General to collaborate on the development of effective strategies and efforts to detect and deter hate crime in order to protect minority communities…”

The resolution refers to hate crimes against Muslims, Jews, African-Americans, Hindus, and Sikhs and was sponsored by Senator Kamala Harris and co-sponsored by Senator Marco Rubio, Senator Dianne Feinstein, and Senator Susan Collins.

Continue reading U.S. Trying to Criminalize Free Speech – Again

“Islamophobic attacks in Manchester surge by 500%” shrieks the Guardian


Reported incidents are not crimes. But the police and Guardian now live in Orwells’s 1984

Thanks to Paul Weston

Police vow to take tough action to curb hate crime and warn true number of incidents could be even higher

A mosque is seen above terraced houses in Greater Manchester.
A mosque is seen above terraced houses in Greater Manchester. Photograph: Alamy

Islamophobic attacks soared more than 500% in Greater Manchester after the suicide bombing at an Ariana Grande concert last month, police have said.

There were 224 reports of anti-Muslim hate crimes in the month after the attack compared with 37 in the same period in 2016, official figures show.

Greater Manchester Police (GMP) revealed the 505% rise in Islamophobic incidents as officers said they would take tough action to curb the increase in hate-fuelled incidents.

The figures came as police across Britain increased protection for Muslim communities after the Finsbury Park mosque attack in the early hours of Monday.

“Our House of House of Representatives does not represent anyone”

Not sure if Andrew Bolt understands the way Yassmin Abdel-Magied ticks. In her Islamo-supremaicist worldview, all the world and everything in it belongs to allah and only Muslims must be allowed to rule.  It is not seen as aggression or war when Muslims attack non-Muslims. On the contrary, it is seen as aggression when non-Muslims resist the Islamization of their lands and thus “place obstacles in the way” of the spread of Islam. They are defying the will of Allah. Since subjugation to Islam alone can bring peace, Muslims consider themselves to be “spreading peace” when they raid, maim and kill from Europe to Central Asia.

Yassmin, meet Lucy
Yassmin, meet Lucy

 Yassmin Abdel-Magied has trashed Anzac Day, praised Islam as “the most feminist religion” and now thinks democracy sucks. Why do institutions like the Australian National University give this Muslim shock-jock a stage?

See, the sad fact is that Abdel-Magied isn’t actually that bright. Let me go through her latest speech – more malice than analysis:

Muslim activist Yassmin Abdel-Magied … appeared on a panel at an Australian National University leadership forum in Canberra on Wednesday night.

Why was she invited? She is no leader and has no record of delivering insightful analysis. I can only conclude it’s because she is the token Muslim that makes the organisers feel wonderful broadminded.

Ms Abdel-Magied took a swipe at the media for taking the “easy option” and painting her as an “other” who poses a “threat”.

No, it is Abdel-Magied who takes the easy option by deliberately presenting herself as the “other”:

I spent all my life in this country building this narrative of this chick who’s like a Muslim revhead who works on rigs who digs with the boys and blah blah blah.

And she takes the easy option of the shock-jock – posing as the threat and throwing verbal bombs at exactly what has made us free and safe:

She also had a heated exchange with ANU Chancellor and former Labor foreign minister Gareth Evans, over the future of parliamentary democracy. “If you just play the GetUp! game or the social media game and don’t do the serious parliamentary game as well, if you don’t do that as well you’re missing a very important vehicle for actually getting decent policy,” Professor Evans said.

Ms Abdel-Magied said change was inevitable. “The traditional parliamentary system, I mean look at the photo of the House of Representatives,” she said. “It does not represent anyone.”



My editorial from The Bolt Report – Yassmin Abdel-Magied says our democracy isn’t working because there isn’t anyone in Parliament who looks just like her.

Continue reading “Our House of House of Representatives does not represent anyone”



Could it be that this is that mythical moderate Muslim we have all been waiting for? I won’t hold my breath, but so much truth coming from a Muselmans mouth is dangerous.


Following the vehicular attack outside a London mosque on June 19, Egyptian TV host Youssef Al-Husseini said: “Why do they hate us?! If they didn’t, there would be something mentally wrong with them.” Claiming that the Muslims have contributed nothing to the West except slaughter, massacres, and terror attacks, Al-Husseini said: “And you still expect them to love us?!” His address aired on ON TV on the day of the attack.