All posts by sheikyermami

Coup Against The White House

* Pamela Geller from Atlas has a take on the intelligence debakel designed to discredit Bush and to stop an attack on the mad Mullah’s of Iran, who can now peacefully assemble their nuclear bombs…

Who is in charge? The NIE report on Iran’s cessation of their nuclear program is a thinly veiled attempt to change the direction (if there is one) on how we handle Iran’s nukes. And that has clearly succeeded.

The permanent bureaucrats in these intelligence agencies are notoriously partisan and their intel is poor at best. These guys are running the country now? Yes, that’s a 21st century coup. Bush will not be able to get anything nothing done on Iran.

This, IMAO is sabotage, sedition. And it’s a very scary turn of the knife.

More here:

John Bolton on the O’Reilly Factor last night

Iran Declares Victory, IAEA Agrees

By Reza Derakhshi

TEHRAN (Reuters) Iran’s president declared victory over the United States on Wednesday and the head of a U.N. watchdog said Iran had been “somewhat vindicated” by a U.S. report that it halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003.

President George W. Bush called for Tehran to “come clean” on its nuclear activities and stop its enrichment of uranium which can potentially be used to make atomic bombs.


But Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Iran would press ahead with its nuclear program which the Islamic Republic says has only peaceful civilian aims.

“Today, the Iranian nation is victorious but you (the United States) are empty-handed,” Ahmadinejad said in a televised speech to a rally in the western Iranian city of Ilam.

Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said the report gave Iran a chance to resolve the crisis and former chief UN arms inspector Hans Blix said it meant there would be no military action against Iran “in the intermediate future”

The UN’s blind nuclear watchdog, sounding as usual like a sleazy apologist for Iran, agrees:

Mohamed El-Baradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the report gave Iran a chance to resolve the crisis.

“It opens a window of opportunity for Iran now because Iran obviously has been somewhat vindicated in saying they have not been working on a weapons program at least for the last few years,” El-Baradei told a news conference in Brazil’s capital.

* Hans Blix, as we all know is a completely deluded jackass. Anyone who reads this blog knows that Muhammad Al Babbledai supports the global jihad. This guy is in the opposite camp and we pay him to deceive us. The world is on skid row…



Israel Not Buying the NIE

Israeli ambassador Dan Gillerman on the NIE

Simple question: Why would Iran, which floats on an ocean of oil, choose to invest in a nuclear energy program instead of upgrading its refining capacity so that it doesn’t have to import gasoline? He fears there’s only one answer. So does Israeli intelligence: “If one looks at the investment, if one looks at the nature of the project, if you look at the cost to the Iranian economy, there is no logical explanation other than that the Iranian program is not benign.” Even the Times acknowledges that mastering enrichment, which will Iran will now certainly be allowed to do, is the hard part of building a weapon; ElBaradei himself estimated just a few weeks ago that if they’ve worked out the kinks in their 3,000-centrifuge cascade, they could have a bomb in a year. The cause for celebration, especially on the left, isn’t that Iran is no longer a threat, it’s that it’s a threat that Bush has no grounds for confronting militarily and is unlikely to be able to pressure diplomatically. It’s the next president’s problem now.

Ethnic Cleansing Threat To Serbs in Kosovo

By Gethin Chamberlain in Mitrovica, Kosovo, and Bojan PancevskiTelegraph UK

Kosovo mon amour:

The legacy of Clitman’s support for the jihad against the Christian Serbs:


Tens of thousands of Serbs are preparing to flee the troubled Balkan province of Kosovo because of fears that the region is on the brink of a devastating war.

Talks to find a political solution to the future of the region collapsed last week, eight years after Nato intervened to end violence that left more than 2,000 dead.

With Kosovo’s new Albanian-led administration poised to declare independence from Serbia, the old hatreds are resurfacing. Many Serbs – who account for less than 10 per cent of the population – are packing their bags, fearing a new wave of “ethnic cleansing” at the hands of the Albanian majority.

Read it all…


Fjordman: Why We Should Oppose an Independent Kosovo

I have said repeatedly that I believe the Balkan wars were far more complex than we are led to believe by the political establishment, and I fear that we out of ideological blindness have come to support some pretty dangerous Muslim forces. I respect Mr. Rustad for exposing the bias against Israelis in the mainstream media, and I am sad to see that he accepts uncritically a similar bias against the Serbs. My point is that you cannot understand recent history in the Balkans without taking the previous seven centuries of Islamic oppression into account.

Sir Jadunath Sarkar, the pre-eminent historian of Mughal India, wrote this about dhimmitude, the humiliating apartheid system imposed upon non-Muslims under Islamic rule: “The conversion of the entire population to Islam and the extinction of every form of dissent is the ideal of the Muslim State. If any infidel is suffered to exist in the community, it is as a necessary evil, and for a transitional period only. (…) A non-Muslim therefore cannot be a citizen of the State; he is a member of a depressed class; his status is a modified form of slavery. He lives under a contract (dhimma) with the State. (…) In short, his continued existence in the State after the conquest of his country by the Muslims is conditional upon his person and property made subservient to the cause of Islam.”


Because they hate

F*kcwits in Parliament:

Democratic presidential candidates explain why Muslims hate us

* The result of shallowness and ignorance. The result of not learning, and not teaching history. The result of indulgence, complacency and the age of stupid.

From “Why do Muslims Hate us?” by Bonney Kapp at Fox (thanks to Hot Air, where there is audio of the complete exchange):

“Because we are trusted so little” – Joe Biden

Because of “the bullying, selfish, abusive behavior” of President Bush and his administration. – John Edwards

“John’s point is right, but I want to broaden it a little.” If you were a Muslim overseas listening to Rudy Giuliani saying they want to come over here and kill you, you would get the impression that we don’t want to talk. – Barack Obama

“This has been a vacuum for a long time.” We don’t know their culture. – Chris Dodd

Why are they ethnocentrists? Because no one said anything like, “They hate us because of Islam. They hate us for reasons arising from their core values. They hate us because they suck the hatred in with the mothers milk.”

No, instead they assume that their hatred for us is entirely our fault and our responsibility. It never enters their mind that Muslims might be free agents who act on their own initiative, and not just as passive reactors to American actions.


Hugh Fitzgerald has answers and questions:

Questions to be raised every time this “they hate us because we do this or we do that” business rears its idiotic head:

1) Why have Muslims been beating to death Hindus walking by mosques after Friday Prayers in Bangladesh? Why has the Hindu population, relative and absolute, gone from 15% to 1.5% in Pakistan, and from 34% to 7% in Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan)? Why, in that same period since Partition, has the Muslim percentage of the population in India gone, on the other hand, steadily up?


2) Why are Christian Assyrians and Chaldeans massacred in Iraq? Why were 100,000 Assyrians killed in 1933, six months after the British left, taking with them a guarantee from the local Arabs that no harm would befall the Assyrians?

3) Why did Muslim Turks (and Kurds) kill hundreds of thousands of Christian Armenians, not during the “wartime conditions” that the apologists for Turkey like to invoke, but twenty years before, in 1894-96?


4) Why did the Muslim Turks mass-murder Christian Armenians and Christian Greeks in the period 1915-1920?

5) Why did the Muslim Turks commit the Bulgarian Atrocities that so inflamed Gladstone and others in the advanced Western world, in 1876?

6) Why did Muslims massacre Maronites in Damascus in 1860?

7) Why did Muslims massacre every last Jew in Grenada in 1066, during that supposed “convivencia” in Islamic-ruled Spain that we hear so much about? Why did Muslims continue to massacre Jews, in Spain and then in Fez and Marrakech? What led Maimonides to write his “Epistle to the Yemen” in which he described the murderous hatred of Muslims for Jews as worse than anything else they had ever endured?

8) Why have Copts enjoyed the only relative freedom, and semi-equality, in modern Egypt during the period of Lord Cromer’s adminstration, and then during a few decades after, when the European, and especially English influence and power, were at their height, and ever since Nasser and the other colonels overturned Farouk it has been steadily downhill, as first pan-Arabism (a subset of Islam) and then Islam itself, without the intermediate step of pan-Arabism, has taken over — so that the meretricious and corrupt regime of Mubarak, with his Family-and-Friends Plan, is almost certain now to be replaced by the forces supporting the Ikhwan, the Muslim Brotherhood. Why, when Copts enjoy the freedom of living in the advanced West, do they often throw off the islmochristian mentality and start telling the truth about Islam, and about Egypt — that they find so difficult and dangerous a thing to do in Egypt itself?

9) Why did Pakistani and Saudi engineers help the Taliban blow up the Bamiyan Buddhas?


10) Why before the blowing up of the Bamiywan Buddhas had there been the wholesale destruction of Buddhist statues, and of stupas, all over Central Asia and India, at Muslim hands?

11) Why did Muslim conquerors kill between 60 and 80 million Hindus, even after they had conquered India and there was no danger of a revolt? Why did Muslims destroy Jain and Buddhist and Hindu temples and temple complexex, by the thousands, and often build mosques right on top of the ruins?

12) Why did the first Umayyad caliph deliberately choose Jerusalem as the site of the “furthest mosquye” (al-masjid al-aksa) mentioned, without more, in the Qur’an, from which Muhammad is said to have travelled to, and back from, seventh heaven on his magic steed al-Buraq?


13) Why did the Caliph Al-Hakim in 1009 order that the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem was to be razed? Why did Muslims attack Christian sites and Christian pilgrims with increasing boldness throughout the eleventh century, culminating in the ferocious attacks by the Seljuk Turks, a century of attacks that led, in the end, to the calling of the Crusades to recover the Holy Land, and not any other part of the vast lands that had been conquered by the Muslims over the previous four hundred years?

14) Why did Muslim Turks destroy so many of the churches in conquered Constaninople? Why did they leave Hagia Sophia, but vandalize all of its Christian pictures inside, and turn it into a mosque? Why has it not, even to this day, been turned back into a church?

15) Why was the population of Turkey 20% non-Muslim in 1900, and today is far less than 1% non-Muslim?

16) Why did people in Western Europe, over the past thousand years, build watchtowers on their coasts? Who was Thomas Pellow, and why does it matter? What was the extent of Muslim raiding up and down the coasts of Christian Europe, and how many Christians were taken in slavery back to Muslim domains? (Note: an estimate will do). How many slaves were seized by Muslims on raids in the Slavic lands, and in the Caucasus and Georgia, for women to be taken back to harems?


17) When did the Arab slave trade in Africa begin, and when did it end? How many victims did it claim, and what was the relative size of the Arab slave trade as compared to the Atlantic Slave Trade? Why was it mostly young black males who were seized, and what made their rate of survival so small?

18) In what respect have the canonical texts of Islam, the Qur’an, and the Hadith, and the Sira, been changed, or re-interpreted, so as to conform more with the moral sense of the modern world, and with the need to live in peace with the 85% of the world that is non-Muslim? List specific verses in the Qur’an, or stories in the Hadith, that have either been eliminated altogether, or been made subject to radical re-interpretation, or downgraded, in the case of certain Hadith, to a much lower level of “authenticity” based on a revisiting of the relevant isnad-chain?


* Islamic Jihad members

19) What is the status, at present, of the concepts of Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb? What is the duty of Jihad? What is the goal of Jihad? What are the permissible instruments of Jihad, in the state of permanent war that Muslims are taught exist between Believers and Infidels?


20) What, in all that has been written in the previous 19 questions, has to do, has anything at all to do, would not exist but for, the admittedly wasteful, naive and sentimental, administration of George Bush, and its dreamy belief that the problem with the Islamic states and peoples has absolutely nothing to do with Islam, a perfectly peaceful and splendid “religion” (and all “religions” are to be respected, are they not?) that has been so badly misrepresented by a handful, or possibly just more than a handful, of “extremists” who have “hijacked a great religion” for their own nefarious purposes?

I could list another 80 questions, but I think this is quite enough for today. After all, the presidential candidates have so much campaigning to do. And during the past six years and three months, since 9/11/2001, they just haven’t had a minute to spare to begin to study, really study and thing about, either the texts and tenets and attitudes of Islam, or to find out very much, anything in fact, about the 1350-year history of Muslim conquest of non-Muslim lands, and about the subsequent subjugation of so many different non-Muslim peoples — Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians, Buddhists, Hindus, Jains, and others from smaller and less well-known communities — who are in the end treated, at best, in remarkably similar, and often unendurable ways.

Is it really too much to expect that the candidates would have done this studying, and done it a bit more seriously than buying some work by a known, and venal, apologist for Islam, such as the ridiculous Karen Armstrong, or the sinister John Esposito?

If candidates are unwilling to do the absolute minimum amount of study necessary to understand the contents, and menace, of Islam, when they have had more than six years to prepare, then how can they ask to be supported, how can they presume to be capable of instructing, and protecting us?

What nerve. What self-satisfied ignorance. What intolerable nonchalance.

Posted by: Hugh


No Mo Clitman’s!

From the Byzantine Sacred Art Blog


What Hashim—The Snake—Thaci Buys With Millions of Heroin/Human Trafficking Dollars: Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton

Billary’s Statement on future status of southern Serbian province of Kosovo-Metohija

“On December 10, the US-EU-Russian troika seeking a mutually acceptable settlement of the future status of Kosovo will make its report to the United Nations and to the world.

“Given the current position of the Russian government, it is unlikely that any agreement will be reached. If this is the case, I believe that further delay would be highly inadvisable. This process, which started far too late thanks to the neglect of the Bush Administration in its first term, has run its course. With Russia threatening to veto any arrangement submitted to the U.N. Security Council, we must be prepared to strongly support the will of the majority of the people of Kosovo. If the government in Pristina decides for independence, I would strongly support prompt U.S. recognition, and I would urge the European Union to do the same. I also congratulate the people of Kosovo on the orderly, peaceful election they have just completed.

“In supporting the independence of Kosovo, I want to stress the high importance that I attach to full protection of the rights of all minorities in Kosovo, especially the Serbs. This is an absolute necessity as Kosovo goes forward.

“I am also concerned about the deterioration of the situation in Bosnia. Twelve years after the Dayton Agreement ended that war, a combination of American neglect, European Union weakness, and Russian and Serbian obstructionism threatens the stability and future of Bosnia. I urge the Administration to pay more attention to this issue, so that it does not once again become a major threat to European stability, especially at the same time as the Kosovo situation approaches a historic juncture.”

Read the whole shameful thing

‘Lord’ Ahmed, Baron Ahmed, of Rotherham


From ‘the slime from the video’ department

* Another perceived ‘moderate’ who is, when we take a closer look, not moderate at all, but much more so a ‘good Muslim’- which comes, of course, with all the mental baggage including the inbred Jew hatred.

In 2005 Lord Ahmed hosted a book launch in the House of Lords for anti-Zionist author Israel Shamir. On the 22nd March, Stephen Pollard, in a guest editorial appearing in the Times, lambasted the event. In his piece entitled ‘Lord Ahmed’s Unwelcome Guest’, Pollard opines that Shamir “is, in fact, a Swedish-domiciled anti-Semite also known as Jöran Jermas.” Pollard goes on to characterize the speech entitled ‘Jews and Empire’ as containing anti-Semitic references such as “Jews control … a big share of mass media”; ‘the Jewish supremacy drive’ as the one reason for wars in the Middle East, and that ‘Jews love Empire’. Shamir also suggested that the large Muslim population in Britain was important to turn the tide of ‘Judaic Values’ in Britain. Lord Ahmed refused to comment on the remarks of Shamir.

* “Israel Shamir” is in reality a Muhammedan parvenu and asylum parasite who sucks off the Swedish welfare department while writing anti-semitic s#*t under false flag.

In August 2006 he was a signatory to an open letter to Tony Blair, the Prime Minster, criticising the UK’s foreign policy. In 2007 he responded to the award of a knighthood to Salman Rushdie by claiming he was appalled, stating that Rushdie had ‘blood on his hands’.

Lord Ahmed reportedly said: “What would one say if the Saudi or Afghan governments honoured the martyrs of the September 11 attacks on the United States?” . He was criticized by some for apparently besmirching free speech and for showing an a lack of tolerance for criticism of Islam, something that called into question his appropriateness for the privilege of sitting in the House of Lords.

Lord Ahmed pumps out the usual drivel like “there is “a constant theme of demonisation of the Muslim community”, he told the BBC’s Sunday programme, the politicians and some people in the media have used this (presumably terrorism) for demonisation of the entire communities…’ and Lord Ahmed called on ministers to address deprivation in Muslim communities, which simply means ” you pay the jiziyah and we Muslims take care of the rest”…


* Now, Lord Ahmed is again in the news, the last time we saw him on ‘Undercover Mosques’ when he frequented the same radical mosques where channel 4 took some footage of the hate spewing clerics. This time the good lord presents himself as a good Samaritan, because he went to Sudan along with Baroness Warsi, another beknighted Muhammedan at Lord Ahmed’s behest, and singlehandedly had British school teacher Gillian Gibbons pardoned and released from gaol, because she she committed the uspeakable offence to allowe her pupils to name a teddy bear ‘Mohammed’- punishable by at least 40 lashes. But the Muhammedan mob in the Sudan screamed for her blood.

Lord Ahmed, from Britain’s ruling Labour Party, and Baroness Warsi, an opposition Conservative, visted Khartoum and had a meeting with the President of Sudan. Following this the President pardoned Ms Gibbons and she was allowed to return to the UK.

* That’s all we get in the news. Lord Ahmed the savior. See, these Muhammedans are not all bad, can’t paint them all with one brush, you know: Islam is not a monolith, you know, and if we just help them along maybe one day, one day, they might just become like us, don’tcha think?


“She was pardoned thanks to the mediation of Lord Ahmed and Baroness Warsi. She will be released in about an hour,” Mahjoub Fadl Badri told AFP.

* Always eager to help when it comes to screwing their host country out of funds to help the ummah along, those ‘British Muslims’…

Good cop, bad cop routine. Are we all suckers?

How much did Britain pay to have Gillian Gibbons ‘pardoned?’

Why does this charade remind me of catmeat sheik Hilali?



Update: Gillian Gibbons Not Safe In Britain

FREED teddy bear row teacher Gillian Gibbons jetted out of Sudan last night, but may fly into a new danger.

The British mum-of-two received a presidential pardon for allowing a stuffed bear to be called Mohammed.

She was yesterday believed to be returning home via Dubai. But senior Government sources last night warned that her ordeal may not be over.

One said: “Gillian may be coming home, but there are still fears that someone here may want to attack her.

“The threatening protests over the Danish cartoons in Britain in 2006 highlighted how many extremists are still in our midst.”



Gillian Gibbons returns to Britain


Fitzgerald: The freeing of Gillian Gibbons 

We, as Infidels, know that Lord Ahmed, unlike those Sudanese calling for the death of Mrs. Gibbons, has a much greater knowledge of the outside world, of how Infidels think, and of how Infidels can get angry, and how there are certain danger signs that possibly the Infidels are getting just a little too fast, too large a dose of the real Islam — and not what the smylers with the knyfs under their clokes present as the real Islam. He was protecting his own position, and the position of Islam, in Great Britain. Don’t let him or the well-heeled Muslimah who went with him get away with this. They are, in their own way, furthering the Jihad, indeed furthering it far better than are those who wanted Gibbons punished, or even killed, for her act of sweet innocent all-too-understandable non-Muslim ignorance of the nature, and scope, of the menace of Islam. 


“Not to worry”, sez the Bungla-wussie of the ‘ancient rulings’


Inayat Bunglawala, spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain, agreed that the pardon was “wonderful news”.

He said: “Gillian should never have been arrested in the first place, let alone held in jail. She had done nothing wrong.

* The truth will set you free, Bungla!

“I am sure she will be welcomed by Muslims and non-Muslims after her terrible ordeal at the hands of the Sudanese authorities.”

* Not so sure about that. I wouldn’t trust you with a ten foot pole…

Bunglawussie Watch

Skid Marx of Melbourne sez:

We had Inayat Bunglawala laying into the man from the Sudanese Embassy on Newsnight.
We had Anjem Choudhary (the man who called 9/11 ‘magnificent’ and wants to see the UK under the heel of a Caliphate) insisting that there is nothing offensive about giving that name to an ‘item of endearment’.
We’ve had statements in support of Gillian Gibbons from the Muslim Council of Britain, the Ramadhan Foundation and the Islamic Society of Britain.

And we had a demo at the Sudanese Embassy on Saturday by Muslims carrying ‘NOT IN MY NAME’ placards and attempting to hand in a ‘goodwill teddy’ to Embassy staff, who refused to accept it.

These Muslims living in Great Britain have not for one minute ended their attempt to defend Islam from critical scrutiny, and to continue to fool and confuse Infidels. It is just that when something like this happens, and cannot be explained away, and has to be dealt with, then they go into full “war is deception” mode and act outraged, and indignant. It is nonsense. If they thought such behavior by the Sudanese government could be gotten away with, they would have done nothing. They object not morally but only in terms of public relations—the damage to the “image” of Islam in Great Britain, and possibly elsewhere in the West. Otherwise, they do not give a damn.


No one should allow himself to be fooled.

A delegation of British Muslims—having met with the Sudanese—apparently expected her to be pardoned. Muhammad Abdul Bari of the Muslim Council of Britain said: “There was clearly no intention on the part of the teacher to deliberately insult the Islamic faith.” But what if there had been? If Gibbons had named the teddy bear Muhammad in order to mock the Muslim prophet, would Muhammad Abdul Bari have approved of her being arrested, imprisoned, lashed or even executed?

This business of Muslims in this or that Infidel land taking it upon themselves to go and attempt to free non-Muslim citizens taken by Muslims elsewhere will merely give Muslims, and some Kaffirs, the idea that “our” Muslims are “our secret weapon” for they, you see, can always be sent out to prevent the worst from happening. And it will give them a quasi-official role, and instead of being regarded as part of the problem of Islam, they will be regarded as part of the solution. Lord Ahmad and Tory Baroness Sayeeda Warsi are nothing of the sort. They were merely, by attempting to free the Gibbons lady, to promote Islam, to burnish the image of Islam, in Great Britain.
We, as Infidels, know that Lord Ahmed, unlike those Sudanese calling for the death of Mrs. Gibbons, has a much greater knowledge of how Infidels think, and of how Infidels can get angry, and how there are certain danger signs that possibly the Infidels are getting just a little too fast, too large a dose of the real Islam – and not what the ‘smylers with the knyfs under their clokes’ present as the real Islam. He was protecting his own position, and the position of Islam, in Great Britain. Don’t let him or the well-heeled bint who went with him, get away with this. They are, in their own way, furthering the Jihad, indeed furthering it far better than are those who wanted Gibbons punished.

Meanwhile, a clueless, non Qur’an/hadith/sira studying Gibbons said she was sorry if she caused any “distress.”

“I have a great respect for the Islamic religion and would not knowingly offend anyone,” Gibbons said.

In other news:

UK: Nurses ordered to drop everything and turn Muslims’ beds toward Mecca five times daily

Quality health care. “Nurses Told To Turn Muslims’ Beds To Mecca, by Paul Jeeves in the Daily Express thanks to DW

OVERWORKED nurses have been ordered to stop all medical work five times every day to move Muslim patients’ beds so they face towards Mecca.
The lengthy procedure, which also includes providing fresh bathing water, is creating turmoil among overstretched staff on bustling NHS wards.

But despite the havoc, Mid- Yorkshire NHS Trust says the rule must be instigated whenever possible to ensure Muslim patients have “a more comfortable stay in hospital”.

More ? Read it and weep…

Perhaps Gillian Gibbons could appease our muslim friends by doing voluntary work in the Dewsbury hospitals moving the beds round.

The holiest of holies

Ever wondered what Muslims worship?

* Inspired by Shiva


The Black Stone (Kaaba)
Doesn’t take much imagination to figure out what it resembles



Well, first of all Muslims worship Muhammad, who was the perfect man, (uswa hasana, al insan al kamil) a model of conduct for all mankind, for all time. Without Muhammad no Muhammadanism, and his alter ego, ‘Allah’- or Al-Ilha, as the moon-god of the pagan Arabs was called, would probably still be one of the statues among many others in the kaaba in Mecca.


Muslims will vehemently deny that they worship Muhammad, but at the same time they will tell you ‘we love our prophet more than our own children,- we will kill and die to defend the honor of our profit’– etc. You saw the obsessed, fanatical f*kcwits in Sudan ready to clobber a British teacher to mince-meat because she allowed her pupils to name a teddy bear Muhammad. You remember the reaction about these ridiculous Muhammad cartoons in Denmark? You will see the same obsession about the Koran, when they go ape-shit over stories that a Koran was kicked or thrown in a toilet or somehow mishandled by a kufar.

So what you have essentially is a trinity: Muhammad is the role model to be emulated in every possible way by every muslim, the Koran, which is the ‘Mein Kampf’ of Islam, and last not least the imaginary ‘Allah’- which is an abstract concept. In the Koran Allah threatens the believers with hellfire and grievous punishments if they don’t follow Muhammad, and Allah grants Muhammad every wish (how convenient) and sends down the heavenly sura’s just at the right time for Mo to justify raiding caravans, stealing, looting, wiping out other tribes, killing their men, raping their women and selling their children into slavery.

More here…

Islam is a monumental black hole… 

Iran Police Brutality Watch

Iran Focus

London, Dec. 03 – The following photos of police brutality in Iran were sent to Iran Focus by Iranian opposition activists.

The State Security Forces (SSF) are presently carrying out a nationwide crackdown primarily targeting youths and women under the guise of combating “trouble-makers” and “mal-veilers”.

The nationwide clampdown began in April. Some images of the crackdown have been aired daily on state television in what numerous Iran analysts believe is to spread fear in society. So far, both the European Union and the United States have been by-and-large silent toward the government-orchestrated crackdown.




More here


Expect more crack-downs from the ‘Islamic Police of Morality’

* This is been going on for a long time. The lunatic Shiite clerics are terrorizing their people with ‘dress-codes’ – among other things.

Iran: “Considering the start of the cold season and its special way of dressing, police will start early next week a drive against women who wear improper dress.”

Grab your coat, grab your hat, your chador, and your running shoes, and then leave your worries on the doorstep (maybe). It’s not just summertime that presents the possibility of running afoul of the Iranian police. “Tight trousers targeted in Iran clothing crackdown,” from Al Reuters via DW

TEHRAN (Reuters) – Iranian police will crack down on women in Tehran flouting Islamic dress codes with winter fashions deemed immodest, such as tight trousers tucked into long boots, an officer was quoted as saying on Saturday.
“Considering the start of the cold season and its special way of dressing, police will start early next week a drive against women who wear improper dress,” Tehran police chief Ahmad Reza Radan was quoted as saying by state news agency IRNA.

“Tight trousers tucked inside long boots while wearing short overcoats are against Islamic codes,” the police chief said.

“Wearing a hat or cap instead of scarves is also against Islamic dress codes.”



Thailand Religion of Peace Watch:

Bomb kills 6, wounds 25 in Thai Muslim south

PATTANI, Thailand, Dec 4 (Reuters) – A motorcycle bomb exploded outside a busy restaurant in Thailand’s rebellious Muslim south on Tuesday, killing six people, including two boys, government officials said. Two Muslim men died instantly when the bomb, left in a motorcycle parked in front of the restaurant, exploded in Pattani, one of four southern provinces where more than 2,600 have been killed in nearly four years of insurgency, an army spokesman said.

“We suspect the two dead men might have been the bombers who failed to escape before the bomb exploded,” Acra Tiproch said by telephone from the Muslim south.
Two women and two boys died at the hospital where 25 wounded people were being treated, Pattani’s deputy governor Vinai Kruvanapat told reporters at the hospital.
The southern violence is centred in the region bordering Malaysia, a Malay-speaking former sultanate annexed by Thailand about a century ago.

* Note how Al Reuters snuggles this ‘former sultanate annexed by Thailand about a century ago’- into each and everyone of their reports lately? Preparing the ground for the ‘liberation’ by the Islamofascists, are we? Malay-speaking” is absolute bullshit, they speak Thai and not Malay in Sauthern Thailand.

Since July, security forces have launched almost daily raids on suspected insurgent hideouts in villages and towns and have detained dozens of people without charge.

Human rights groups say detainees are exposed to potential abuses by the army, which is operating under martial law that grants soldiers immunity from prosecution. (Reporting by Khemin Guagoon; Writing by Nopporn Wong-Anan; Editing by Martin Petty and Alex Richardson)

* Unbelievable how these far left wacko-journo’s side with the Islamic enemy of Thailand to smear the police and the army.


A member of the bomb disposal squad inspects the bodies of Buddhist state officials in Pattani province November 21, 2007. Suspected Islamic rebels killed four Buddhist state officials on Wednesday in a roadside gun attack in Thailand’s rebellious Muslim south, police said. REUTERS/Stringer

Another Mohammed gets off. Because ‘War is Deceit’

Mistrial in Muslim Air Force Guard Case


* They’re playing us like Liberace played the grand piano, and they’re laughing at our stupidity; the judge in this case was of course a complete moonbat:

GREENBELT, Md. (AP) — A federal judge declared a mistrial Monday in the case of a former Andrews Air Force Base security guard accused of failing to include his Muslim name on a background check to hide his ties to an outspoken Washington imam and mosque.
U.S. District Judge Deborah Chasanow made the ruling after jurors failed to reach a verdict for Darrick Michael Jackson, who did not put on a defense, after two days of deliberations. Jurors sent a note to the judge Monday afternoon, saying they could “see no light at the end of the tunnel.”

Jackson, 37, of Washington, was charged with making a false statement for not listing “Abdul-Jalil Mohammed” as an alias on the federal form he was required to fill out in 2005. He could have been sentenced to five years in prison if convicted.

Jackson’s defense was that he did not know he had to include his religious name for the background check he needed to work at the suburban Washington base, which is home to Air Force One. His attorney accused the government of going after the security guard for religious and political reasons.

Prosecutors have argued that Jackson left off the Mohammed name because he feared it would arouse suspicion and scuttle his chances of keeping his job at the base. They highlighted his ties to the Masjid Al-Islam mosque in southeast Washington, as well as some of the inflammatory statements made by Imam Abdul Alim Musa, including Musa’s praise for suicide bombers.


Imam Abdul Alim Musa,

Jackson reacted to the judge’s decision by thanking God. “I didn’t do anything on purpose,” he said. “I don’t think I should be here.”
Marcia Murphy, a spokeswoman for the U.S. attorney’s office, said a decision would be made later on whether to retry Jackson.
Juror Eric Smith, 37, said prosecutors failed to prove that Jackson’s omission was willful. A majority of jurors wanted to find him not guilty, he said. And despite government claims that religion was not a part of the case, Smith said he wasn’t convinced.


“They wanted not to make it about religion, but they ended up making it about religion,” he said.


* Indeed. The ‘Religion of Peace’ – which is raging world wide, is  in reality a horrific ideology. An ideology that teaches that ‘war is deceit’ Hadith 4:269 and ‘kill the unbelievers wherever you find them’
Qur’an 9:005: and ‘fight the unbelievers, wipe them out to the last until the whole world is Islamic’ Qur’an 8:7:


Selected offerings from the Religion of Peace

France stunned by rioters’ savagery

Matthew Campbell, Villiers-le-Bel

IN retrospect, it was not a good idea to have left his pistol at home. Called to the scene of a traffic accident in the Paris suburbs last Sunday, Jean-François Illy, a regional police chief, came face to face with a mob of immigrant youths armed with baseball bats, iron bars and shotguns.

What happened next has sickened the nation. As Illy tried to reassure the gang that there would be an investigation into the deaths of two teenagers whose motorbike had just collided with a police car, he heard a voice shouting: “Somebody must pay for this. Some pigs must die tonight!”


The 43-year-old commissaire realised it was time to leave, but that was not possible: they set his car ablaze. He stood as the mob closed in on him, parrying the first few baseball bat blows with his arms. An iron bar in the face knocked him down.

“I tried to roll myself into a ball on the ground,” said Illy from his hospital bed. He was breathing with difficulty because several of his ribs had been broken and one had punctured his lung.

His bruised and bloodied face signalled a worrying new level of barbarity in the mainly Muslim banlieues, where organised gangs of rioters used guns against police in a two-day rampage of looting and burning last week.

Not far from where Illy was lying was a policeman who lost his right eye after being hit by pellets from a shotgun. Another policeman displayed a hole the size of a 10p coin in his shoulder where a bullet had passed through his body armour.

Altogether 130 policemen were injured, dozens by shotgun pellets and shells packed with nails that were fired from a homemade bazooka. It prompted talk of urban “guerrilla warfare” being waged on French streets against the forces of law and order.

By the end of the week an extraordinarily heavy police presence in Villiers-le-Bel, where most of the rioting took place, appeared to have halted the violence: on top of public transport strikes and student protests against his reform plans, Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, could not afford a repeat of 2005, when a similar incident involving the deaths of two youths provoked the worst French urban unrest in four decades.



Moderate, modern Malaysia:

Malaysia Degenerates into ‘Hotbed of Islamic Intolerance’…


When Hindus gathered courage and protested in an unprecedented solidarity on November 26 in Kuala Lumpur, they were crushed brutally by the Malay police using chemicals in the water cannons. None of those who had put up a united front against a cartoon created in Denmark felt anything bad or condemnable in the injustices meted out to the Hindus in an Islamic country. When it’s a question of Hindus getting unfair treatment in a Muslim majority region, the ‘civil, sophisticated and articulate’ Muslim intellectuals take refuge in the statement that it’s a matter concerning a foreign country. But when it’s a question regarding a cartoon or a fatwa for beheading a writer, they say -we are a global Ummah, anything happening anywhere to Muslims is our common concern! All big lies and a bigger hypocrisy traded in the name of a religion.

This year Diwali was not celebrated openly by Malaysian Hindus in protest against the demolition of one of their most revered shrines, the hundred-year-old Maha Mariamman temple in Padang Jawa. In the last fifteen years, hundreds of Hindu temples have been demolished and the number of forcible conversions and unfair treatment on religious grounds has been constantly increasing. The tragic case of Revathi was just a recent one.


Moorthy Maniam was a Malaysian Hindu hero. After he died, a group of Muslims claimed he’d made a deathbed conversion. Despite his widow’s protests, the Sharia courts declared that he should be buried as a Muslim. “They used Moorthy to show that in this country, Islam is supreme”, complained his lawyer.

In the 1980s, Malaysia’s Sharia courts were given equal power to the civil courts, creating two parallel legal systems. But while the Sharia courts are constantly trying to extend their authority, secular courts are reluctant to challenge them.

Malaysia which tries to woo Indian tourists with an aggressive media campaign claiming-it’s a ‘truly Asian’ destination, has become a hotbed of Islamic intolerance and barbarities on non-Muslims. It has sixty per cent Malay Muslim population with Chinese, mostly Buddhists, comprising twenty-five per cent. Malays of Indian origin constitute about eight per cent and Tamil Hindus are ninety per cent amongst the Indian origin population. There is a fair number of Indian Muslims too.

Indian Malays were taken there by the British as plantation workers in the late nineteenth century and have now become an inseparable part of Malay life. In fact, from the second century to the 14th century, Malay Peninsula has seen Hindu kingdoms and a way of life beautifully expressed in arts, culture, language and Shaivite values. Sanskrit’s influence over their language is visible all over, yet the Malay Muslims choose to express their affinity with the Arabs and deny their ancestral heritage.

Dhimmi’s must remain dhimmi’s: read it all…


Two Palestinian policemen among three arrested in settler’s shooting death


Pali terrorist scum in police uniform remain murderous scum:

JERUSALEM: Two Palestinian policemen are among three people arrested in the shooting death of a Jewish West Bank settler last month, the Israeli military disclosed Monday.

Israeli security forces arrested two men who opened fire on a passing Israeli vehicle on a West Bank road on Nov. 19, killing settler Ido Zoldan, the military said in a statement. It identified the suspects as Dafar Baram of the Palestinian national security forces, and his brother, Abdullah, both 22.

According to the military, the two men told investigators they had waited at the side of the road for a passing Israeli vehicle, overtook Zoldan’s after they saw it pass, and opened fire. The two admitted carrying out the attack and turned over the weapons they used, the military said.

Separately, Palestinian security forces arrested Fadi Jama, who also belongs to the Palestinian national security forces, the military said.

The shooting took place in an area seen as a test case for the Palestinians’ ability to impose law and order in the West Bank.

More here

* From the ‘dumber than bricks’ department: 

* Why do these pop-tarts get air-time on national TV? They are so thick it is embarrassing, if they would do it in their own homes it would be bad enough, but anyhow: have a look… 

 *  Whoopi, Sherri wonder — why didn’t the teddy-bear teacher respect Islamic customs?

I have no respect or tolerance for Sharia

* Islamaniacs and Koranimals: If you want to live in a 7th century nightmare piss off to where floggings, stonings and honor killings are believed to be ‘justice’- and if you insist that women be ‘liberated’ under a black tent, which they call ‘portable seclusion’- then you have come to the wrong place,

sez Ian O’Doherty

As regards the spurious accusation of racism which is bandied about against anyone who criticises Islam, let me make this clear — you cannot change the colour of your skin. Pigmentation is irrelevant. But you can dislike someone’s superstition and in Islam’s case, even among other superstitions, they are particularly horrible.

No, my Muslim friend, it’s your religion and your Sharia law I am criticising. It has nothing to do with the colour of your skin. And you know what? In a free democracy we still have the right to say things like that.



Wafa Sultan: “Islam is the problem”

Voluntary submission in the Netherlands, update:

Hague museum pulls offensive Muslim art

* Yeah. You can have any art you like, as long as it doesn’t offend these sensitive Muslim feelings…

The city museum of The Hague has decided not to include in an exhibition a work of art that may offend Muslims, it was reported on Monday.

The picture, made by Iranian artist Sooreh Hera, is entitled Adam and Ewald and shows two gay men wearing masks of the Muslim prophet Mohammed and his son-in-law Ali.

It is part of a photoseries the Gemeentemuseum has included in the 7up exhibition due to open on December 15.

The Gemeentemuseum’s director Wim van Krimpen told reporters the museum is interested in purchasing Hera’s complete series, which he called “high quality works of art”.

However, he added he will not exhibit Adam and Ewald in the next few years because “certain people in our society might perceive it as offensive”.

The terrorists have won again.



Bomb making madrassah blows up

* Western governments including Australia are financing Islamic schools from Indonesia to Pakistan. The skills the kidz learn in these institutions are absolutely essential for good muslims in order to fight the global jihad: making bombs is a delicate matter, but unfortunately sometimes there are work accidents:

Bomb kills 6 in Pakistani school on Afghan border


Indonesia: Mass murdering Jihadi’s get mere jail terms

With thanks to weasel zippers

They deserve death and they would have received it if they had killed fellow Muslims, not infidel Christians….

Six Indonesian Islamic militants were jailed for up to 19 years over a string of deadly attacks against Christians in a religiously divided region of Sulawesi island.

Their crimes included the assassination of a Protestant minister, the beheading of three Christian schoolgirls and a bomb attack on a market that killed 22 people.

* They’ll be out in no time. Watch this space…


The Bungla-wussie has trouble telling left and right-wing ‘Islamophobes’ apart


* Now here we have the ultimate hypocrite and bigot calling Spencer and other critics of his terrorist blood cult “narrow-minded bigots” who think alike…


Right on, Bungla: all we need is ‘diversity & tolerance” of the Islamofascist variety and everything will be just swell….


Pat Condells latest: Laugh at Sudan

Criminalizing Free Speech


Nowadays, within the European Union, it’s no stretch to criminalize free speech. Under the draconian new legal guidelines issued by Brussels, virtually any Counterjihad writings can be cast as “inciting religious hatred” or “promoting racism”, or some other Orwellian classification. Speech is cast in these terms to render it doubleplus ungood, and therefore unutterable.

More from the Gates of Vienna

How much did Britain pay to have Gillian Gibbons ‘pardoned?’

* The criminal Islamaniac scum of Sudan ‘issues a pardon’ to have a British teacher released for allowing her pupils to name a teddy bear ‘Mohammed’.

Sudanese President Omar al-Beshir on Monday pardoned a British woman teacher jailed for 15 days for insulting religion and she will be released in an hour, a presidential advisor told AFP.

“She was pardoned thanks to the mediation of Lord Ahmed and Baroness Warsi. She will be released in about an hour,” Mahjoub Fadl Badri told AFP.

* Always eager to help when it comes to screwing their host country out of funds to help the ummah along, those ‘British Muslims’…

A Sudanese court on Thursday jailed Gillian Gibbons to 15 days in prison for insulting religion by naming a teddy bear after the Prophet Mohammed at the exclusive English school where she taught in Khartoum.

Two British Muslim peers, Lord Nazir Ahmed and Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, from the upper house of parliament, were on Monday meeting Beshir at the Republican Palace after flying to Khartoum in order to secure a pardon.

The arrest and jail sentence of the 54-year-old mother of two sparked outrage in Britain and a diplomatic crisis between London and Khartoum, further straining relations already frayed over nearly five years of war in Darfur.

Hugh Fitzgerald deplores the cowardice of our Western ‘leaders’ 

Not a single Presidential candidate, not a single official in the American government, has uttered a single word about the telling sentence handed down to the now-pardoned — for “image” reasons –by that Muslim despot and fanatic Bashir, who thinks nothing of mass-murdering the blacks in Darfur, and the Christians in the south of the Sudan)– hapless Mrs. Gibbons.

Not a word. Not a syllable.

Why not?

Can’t think quite what to say, quite how to put it?

I’ll write it for you, just ask!


* Send in the troops and turn these Islamic extortion-bandits out!

* Robert Spencer comments on the Muhammad Teddy Bear teacher

* How to pay the jiziyah with willing submission:

“The dhimmi stands with his head bowed and his back bent. The jizya is placed in the balance and the taker seizes his beard and hits his chin.”

While Islamic law does stipulate that the jizya is not to be collected from women and children, reality in many cases has been different. According to the pioneering historian of dhimmitude, Bat Ye’or:

The poll tax was extorted by torture. The tax inspectors demanded gifts for themselves; widows and orphans were pillaged and despoiled. In theory, women, paupers, the sick, and the infirm were exempt from the poll tax; nevertheless, Armenian, Syriac, and Jewish sources provide abundant proof that the jizya was exacted from children, widows, orphans, and even the dead. A considerable number of extant documents, preserved over the centuries, testify to the persistence and endurance of these measures. In Aleppo in 1683, French Consul Chevalier Laurent d’Arvieux noted that ten-year-old Christian children paid the jizya. Here again, one finds the disparity and contradiction between the ideal in the theory and the reality of the facts. (The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam, pp. 78-9).

Read it all


Clitorectomy is all good’ sez African ‘Anthropologist’

* Hold on to your vaginas, ladies, this is the future:

On the surface, female circumcision sounds like sexual abuse: it is the removal of a young woman’s clitoris practiced by some African cultures as an initiation ritual. While FGC (female genital cutting) has been roundly condemned by many Western women, several African scholars will be arguing in favor of the ritual at the American Anthropological Association’s annual meeting. Dr. Fuambai Ahmadu of Sierra Leone, a post doctoral fellow at the University of Chicago, is one of the scholars who is pro-FGC, and even had her own clitoris cut with fellow members of the Kono ethnic group as an adult. Ahmadu says that her Western “feminist sisters insist on denying us this critical aspect of becoming a woman in accordance with our unique and powerful cultural heritage.”

* Yes doctor. We deny you this ‘critical aspect of becoming a woman’ – and if you insist on your ‘powerful cultural heritage’ piss off to Africa and get some more until it comes out from the other end.

Another proponent of FGC, Dr. Richard Shweder, says that Westerners conveniently ignore the fact that they produce their own kinds of genital mutilation in the form of the vaginal rejuvenation of women and circumcision for boys. Shweder says that, “‘First World’ feminist issues and political correctness and activism have triumphed over the critical assessment of evidence.” Ahmadu also has an essay called “Ain’t I a woman too?: challenging myths of sexual dysfunction in circumcised women”, where she insists that women who have undergone FGC still experience orgasm and a great deal of sexual pleasure.

I asked a friend who has lived in Liberia and works for a post-conflict justice association what she thinks about FGC, and she points out that “There are lots of versions of the procedure. The most severe being cut off the clit, the inner labia, and SEW CLOSED the vaginal hole.” That sounds like straight abuse to me. But according to my friend, some modified versions only involve pricking the clitoris. “It’s about degrees and when the practice, in its entirety is accepted, there are no ways to moderate the procedure.”

What do you think? Is the pro-FGC argument just cultural relativism? Or is the issue more nuanced than Westerners have realized?


* Nothing to think about. No debate. No bullshit. No cultural relativism. No fake equivalence: clitcutting is a crime against humanity. Those who engage in it must know they will rot in prison and will be stripped of citizenship and deported to some cultural desert in Africa where they can engage in it. We have laws and if you want to live here you abide by the law. Our law.

No can do.

What say you?

* Hundred comments here..