All posts by sheikyermami

Ayaan Hirsi Ali Threatened in US:

Because its a ‘Religion of Peace’ she has to live in hiding and under 24 hour protection. And the MSM bullshits us with the same drivel as usual:

‘Hirsi Ali is also coming up against opposition because of her uncompromising criticism of Islam.’

Right. Perhaps we should all   be more ‘compromising’ -  and everything will be just fine, right?

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who left the Netherlands to escape the threats from Islamic misogynists that forced her into isolation, is now being threatened by representatives of the Religion of Peaceâ„¢ in the United States as well: Hirsi Ali under threat in US.

AMSTERDAM – Former MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali is now in danger in the US as well. Her security has been stepped up for the past three weeks. Because of concrete threats, she is now receiving the same level of protection as she previously needed in the Netherlands, the Volkskrant reports. …

Hirsi Ali’s protection is carried out by American security personnel commissioned by the Dutch Justice department. Hirsi Ali works at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington DC, a think-tank that has close ties with the Republican party.

As in the Netherlands, the threats against her come from Muslim extremists. They are in connection with the lectures and media appearances Hirsi Ali has been making since the publication of the American version of her autobiography, “The Infidel,” in January.

Hicks pleads guilty, Shysters walk out

Australian Guantanamo Bay detainee David Hicks has pleaded guilty to providing material support for terrorism before a US military tribunal today.

Hicks announced his plea during the rapidly reconvened hearing, by answering ‘yes sir,’ when the judge, Marine Colonel Ralph Kohlmann, asked if that was in fact his plea.

The judge ordered the prosecutors and defence lawyers to draw up a plea agreement by 6am AEST tomorrow, which was expected to indicate what sentence he would serve.

Foreign Minister Alexander Downer says, with the possibility of a prisoner exchange agreement with the US, Hicks could be home before long.

The 31-year-old, originally from Adelaide, was captured while allegedly fighting for the Taliban in Afghanistan in late 2001.

* Note: SKY NEWS claims he ‘allegedly’ fought for the Taliban. Hicks, aka Mohammed Dawoud, a Muslim, has fought in 5 or 6 theaters of the global jihad, from Bosnia to Kashmir and from there on to Afghanistan. The MSM truly sux…

Shiva has the whole kaboodle with pic’s documented here…



Hicks’ lawyers walk out of Guantanamo courtroom


Geoff Elliott/The Australian
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

TWO of David Hicks lawyers left the military court today in sensational circumstances after the tribunal’s judge said they had not complied with procedural rules.
Judge Colonel Ralph Kohlmann cited a number of compliance issues relating the court process but offered Hicks the chance for both his lead civilian lawyer Joshua Dratel and his assistant Rebecca Snyder to stay on the bench with Hicks to offer advice.

Read it all…


Update: Bobby Brown, leader of the watermelon commie-greens, lets it fly:

Hicks was ‘tortured’-, imprisoned for five years (imagine!) and never had a chance of a ‘fair trail’-


Just wait till he gets his hands on you and he will show you which way the wind blows! Do you know what the penalty is for Homosexuals under the sharia???

Last Update:

Gun-toting jihadi was not an angel

Janet Albrechtsen / The Australian

FINALLY David Hicks, also known as Abu Muslim al Australia, aka Abu Muslim Philippine, aka Muhammad Dawood, has pleaded guilty to the charge of providing material support for terrorism. And now watch as the real PR campaign goes into angelic overdrive. His vociferous cheer squad will proclaim his innocence, declaring the plea was the only way for Hicks to get out of Guantanamo Bay.

* His father did just that. Just heard it on the radio… 

Read it all…


Those misguided fools who claim that Hicks was ‘tortured’ should take a look at the Al Quaeda playbook here: Scroll down to lesson no 18

Moderates in Hiding, Catmeat Sheik Hilali stays put


Impact of Al Hilali decision extremely negative: PM

Prime Minister John Howard says Islamic leaders are doing damage to their community by not taking decisive action against Sydney’s Sheikh Taj el-Din Al Hilali.
Meanwhile, the so-called moderate Muslim, Lebanese Muslim Association President Tom Zreika, had to go into hiding because of death-threats by Muslims after he called for reforms. Mr Zreika said he was threatened recently after saying, “I can’t tolerate this freak show”, following recent remarks by Sheikh Hilali.

The despicable catmeat mufti has been reinstated.

Anybody surprised?
Only three months, you say? Well, we can always give him an extension, right?
Andrew Bolt has a take on the cat-meat mufti Al-Hilali:

Despite everything, the Mufti clings on – at least for the next three months:

CONTROVERSIAL Islamic cleric Taj Din al-Hilali is likely to stand aside as the nation’s mufti within three months after being awarded a short “grace period” by Australia’s most powerful Muslim spiritual leaders.

A meeting of 50 clerics yesterday set up an executive committee of the Australian National Imams Council that will subsequently appoint a “fatwa group” to determine who will be the next mufti of Australia…

The Australian understands that the majority of the imams at yesterday’s meeting opposed Sheik Hilali continuing to speak on behalf of Muslim Australia, but were willing to keep him on until they had found a successor.

“The majority don’t want him there, but we basically kept him on to save him face without causing problems in the community,” a senior Muslim spiritual leader told The Australian yesterday.

Problems like this, perhaps?

Strange that such a bigot and hate-preacher, who has done so much damage to the Muslim community for so long, still isn’t out on his ear.


Which proves once again that the ‘moderates’ haven’t got a leg to stand on: The radicals have the scriptures on their side, and they use them to spread the real Islam.

Just listen to this:

Leading Islamic Scholar: Osama Bin Laden is “A Man After My Own Heart”

In an interview broadcast on Al Jazeera March 16, 2007, top Lebanese Islamic cleric Fathi Yakan, described by IslamOnline as a prominent scholar with a Ph.D. in Arabic and Islamic Studies, says Osama bin Laden is a man after his own heart. (Courtesy of MEMRI TV.)

‘King Wanker Strikes Back’: A Tribute to a Traitor, by Shiva


You need to click here

Gavin King, the Cairns Post’s very own ‘Expert on Islam‘ – doesn’t like the nasty feedback from the blogosphere. Click here and here…

History has not been kind to traitors, and Australians will not be kind to Gavin King, who’s despicable behavior is simply inexcusable and offensive to all Australians.

King Quisling projects his own ideological hatred on the bloggers:

‘These Anglo-warriors whip each other up into a frenzy of fear and hysteria, not realizing they are engaging in the same kind of narrow-minded extremist discourse they accuse their Islamic enemies of. The reality is very different, of course’...

For Moonbats like him 1400 years of jihad warfare is ‘not reality’- all we need is love, right?

How can anyone not love a creed that brings us the gouging off of hands, feet and heads, torture, slavery, humiliation, subjugation and a love of death? A doctrine that allows us to attain Paradise by murdering innocent people and to then enjoy sex with 72 virgin women and 24 young boys…..bashir%20ap.jpg


Abu Bakar Bashir

Here is one extremely lovable representative of the ‘RoP’-


Now tell us Mr King: Does he read a different Koran?
Reality is right here, click:


Jihad in Thailand

moonbats_poster.jpg The London Times prefers to remain blissfully ignorant about the global jihad. Everyday we see more deliberate stupidity on display, like here:‘The reasons behind the jihad in Thailand are shadowy and mysterious: Thousands die in Thai shadow war.

* Aha! Now we know! It’s a ‘shadow war’- my goodness! What to do, what to do?

* Charles from LGF sez: “Insurgency” is the new media surrogate word for “Islamic terrorism,” of course. In this case, the Times has no idea why the violence in Thailand is happening—but they still use the word “insurgency.” Insurgency against what? Who knows?

* Next you will hear about ‘sectarian violence between Buddhists and Muslims’- because all religions are equally bad, right?

Pamela from Atlas Shrugs:

The Jihad in Thailand: SILENT DEATH

More of the most under reported news, you won’t get it. From The Strategy Page;

THAILAND: Silent Death

* Somebody must be watching too many Hollywood flicks… 

March 24, 2007: The army and police admit they are facing a new enemy in the south. In the past, there were sometimes Moslem separatists groups in the south that got violent. But these outfits, which still exist, wanted to negotiate. So there was someone to talk to. The current group of terrorists take their cues from al Qaeda. They only communicate with the local Moslems, telling them that non-Moslems will be killed and driven out, and a religious dictatorship will be established. Any Moslems that disagree will be killed. The Islamic terrorists don’t take credit for their attacks, and don’t want to negotiate. The police have discovered that some of the several hundred religious schools are bases for the terrorists (raids have yielded weapons and documents.) The schools were founded over the last few decades with money and missionaries from Islamic charities based in the Persian Gulf. These charities espouse a very conservative, militant version of Islam.

March 19, 2007: Islamic terrorists attacked a group of Buddhist widows (their husbands had earlier been killed by Islamic terrorists) and killed three of them.

March 17, 2007: Ten Islamic terrorists, riding motorcycles, drove by a ranger base in the south, firing their weapons. Some rangers were able to fire back before the attackers rode off into the night. One ranger was wounded. Meanwhile, an Islamic school was attacked, three students were killed and seven wounded. The army said the Islamic terrorists did it, in order to blame the army and get Moslem civilians angrier. The Islamic militants, of course, said the army did it.


* What annoys here is the willful, deliberate stupidity, the deception by the MSM who steadfastly refuses to accept that this is the jihad against all of us.

The Times: The insurgency is now the bloodiest conflict in southeast Asia. Yet it is a war of shadows. The militants issue no communi-qués. They have no known leaders. They have made no precise demands. If they are connected to the worldwide network of Al-Qaeda and its affiliates there there is no proof.


* The mind boggles. How much BS does it take to drown the Times Online? If they listened to Lukman Lima (why don’t they) he would tell them. Lukman has been around for a long time. You can read what he sez right here:


And here’s more…

The Vilification of Ayaan Hirsi Ali and the Traitors Among Us


The unholy alliance of the political left and the Islamo-fascists is self evident


Ayaan Hirsi Ali is not only a survivor, but an apostate, an insider who spills the beans, a strong willed, intelligent and confident black women who fits in no box. The ‘racism’ smear doesn’t work with her and with every ad hominem attack she emerges stronger. The ‘defenders of Islam’ are seething: They simply want her dead.

‘Emancipated’ western females, like her former Dutch colleagues Rita Verdonk, couldn’t bear having her around. Ayaan put them all to shame. By forcing them to take a look in the mirror, to face their failed policies, the idiocy of political correctness with the resulting mess caused by an invading, hostile and alien creed, was too much for the meek.
Rita Verdonk, when asked if she had read the Koran, snapped back with “I don’t want to lose all hope“- hoping against hope that remaining ignorant, that by appeasing the restive infiltrators, somehow the status quo could be upheld, for just a little while longer.

A poster on Jihad Watch nails it:
Western women who staunchly defend Islam should be clinically examined for mental illness or psychosis. They are Islam’s first and foremost victims as it has been throughout history. Symptomatic of such gender-treason is avowed feminist Germaine Greer’s attempted defense of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) as “an attack on cultural identity”. (Cite from the Journal of Medical Ethics.)

Female Genital Mutilation

Feminist writer Germaine Greer’s comments that attempts to outlaw the practice were “an attack on cultural identity” have been strongly criticised as ignoring the purposes of mutilation and the lack of choice for those upon whom it is inflicted.

This is just one manifestation of how the liberal left has come full circle to defend the rights of those who would kill them first of all. The hypocrisy and self-hatred embodied by such nihilistic thinking would be hilarious if it did not pose such a egregious threat to America’s security and Constitutional liberties.

This ‘tolerance’ for the intolerable, does it stop at cannibalism or with human sacrifices?

The answer would most likely be ‘who are we to judge…’


Newsweek, a typically far left publication provides a forum for a Fareed Zakaria.

Zakaria is a Mohammed Atta look-alike and openly works as a Muhammedan agit prop in America, right in the Dar-al Harb, behind enemy lines. He uses his powers incessantly to stir up the psychologically challenged peace-freaks.

Newsweek allows him to wage his very own jihad against the war efforts of the Bush administration. Newsweek recently allowed a certain Lorraine Ali to call Ayaan Hirsi Ali a ‘bombthrower’ things could hardly get more absurd.

The ‘Religion of Peace’- the most violent socio-political ideology on the face of the earth, a cult that demands total submission of the individual, makes it incumbent on its adherents to wage violent jihad against Infidels and Jews. Until all the world is Islamic, until the unbelievers are either killed or forcibly converted. This ideology is still, 5 years after 9/11,- considered to be just ‘another religion’.

‘Islam is a peaceful religion’- said GWB, hijacked by ‘extremists’ – but everyday we see the rapidly growing numbers of ‘extremists’ hijacking our freedom, our airplanes, buses and trains. Every day the ‘RoP’ murders, bombs, assassinates thousands, from Darfur to Thailand, from Mindanao to Sulawesi, from Chechnya to India. It is time to take a closer look at what Islam teaches instead of parroting the nonsense of the ignorant and the taqiyya masters.

Something is seriously wrong when a Lorraine Ali, an Islamo-shill, is allowed to smear Ayaan Ali Hirsi in a widely read magazine like Newsweek as a ‘bombthrower’. The irony is bizarre.

Moreover, note the use of the words “right-wing” and “reactionary” to describe Hirsi Ali and her views. To Newsweek’s Lorraine Ali, a woman who is a feminist, atheist, pro-gay and combats the greatest religious extremism of our time is “right-wing” and “reactionary.”

Yes, the bombthrowers are among us.

Ayaan is not one of them, but she shows you where they are.

Pamela at Atlas Shrugs has a take on Ali Hirsi’s Book ‘Infidel’ and knocks the traitors:

The New York Times continues it’s role as the jihad’s ho. Not its bitch, its ho. There are no journalistic standards at the Times. They have set out to destroy the truth tellers. Tools.


A letter to the editor:

She (Ayaan Hirsi Ali) shouted from the rooftops about Muslim women who endure female genital mutilation, forced marriages at young ages, “honor” killings and denial of education to ensure subjugation. And she went up against obscurantist Islamic religious leaders who use democratic freedoms to pursue antidemocratic goals. In doing so, Hirsi Ali ruffled feathers and stepped on toes, especially those of Dutchmen (and other Europeans) whose deafening silence was exposed.

As to Buruma’s claim that Europe must show greater respect for Islam, the reality is that many European nations have done just that, in some cases bending over backward to accommodate religious beliefs and needs. And where there have been lapses, many have rushed to protest. But Hirsi Ali’s key point is that this must be a two-way street. Newcomers must respect and adapt to their host societies’ defining principles. If not, she contends, Europe will wake up one day and no longer recognize itself as a bastion of Enlightenment values.

David A. Harris
New York
The writer is the executive director of the American Jewish Committee.

A Bolt Surprise:

 Andrew Bolt
* Just when his (self imposed) censorship on his blog made him look ridiculous he comes up with some surprising stuff:

A German judge who ruled that the Koran permitted a man to beat his wife – and so turned down a Muslim woman’s request for a divorce – has been told she got the religion all wrong:

Muslim leaders agreed that Muslims living here must be judged by the German legal code. But they were just as offended by what they characterized as the judge’s misinterpretation of a much- debated passage in the Koran governing relations between husbands and wives.

While the verse cited by the judge does say husbands may beat their wives for being disobedient — an interpretation embraced by Wahhabi and some other fundamentalist Islamic groups — mainstream Muslims have long rejected wife-beating as a relic of the medieval era.

I do hope and trust that is true.

The following preachers, though, seem to disagree: