All posts by sheikyermami

Holland: Government subsidies for mosques “not unconstitutional’

From the -sinking- land of blue eyed fools:

* Subsidies for mosques “not unconstitutional?’ Of course not.

After all, it’s a Religion of Peace!

0102-02.jpg

* Peaceful Muslims after Friday prayers…

So are they at least trying to determine which mosques are openly preaching jihad and Islamic supremacism and which aren’t? Why, of course not! What are you, some kind of Islamophobe?

“The Lower House was debating with the government on the controversial Westermoskee mosque, for which Amsterdam municipality provided a loan of 2 million euros. Once the construction had started, the mosque withdrew its signature from a covenant pledging it would send out a liberal message.”

“Ministers: Govt Subsidies for Mosques Not Unconstitutional,” from NIS News (thanks to Fjordman via DW):

THE HAGUE, 03/11/07 – The government is inquiring whether Milli Gorus is an extremist organisation but will continue to subsidise it. Milli Gorus is also to remain an official discussion partner for cabinet policy regarding Muslims.
Separation of church and state means that interference by the State in internal religious issues is not accepted, but it does not mean there can be no common ground between political and religious organisations. Government financial support is possible for organisations and activities that are “affiliated to religious organisations” such as mosques, according to Justice Minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin.

The Lower House was debating with the government on the controversial Westermoskee mosque, for which Amsterdam municipality provided a loan of 2 million euros. Once the construction had started, the mosque withdrew its signature from a covenant pledging it would send out a liberal message. Furthermore, 1.2 million euros has disappeared through presumed fraud. The construction has been halted.

* Beautiful. The Euro-dhimmi’s pay for a bunker where the religion of peace plans the destruction of infidels and Jews but the good Muslims steal the money: just give ’em some more!

During the debate, conservative (VVD) MP Henk Kamp wondered why the government indirectly subsidises the construction of mosques but not that of churches or houses of worship of other religions. Integration Minister Ella Vogelaar thereupon replied that subsidies could help create a more positive image of certain groups that need this. “Naturally, these are difficult considerations” and “one must look carefully which organisations the government enters into agreements with”.

Naturally!

Amsterdam entered into an agreement with envoys of the controversial Turkish organisation Milli Gorus. Vogelaar: “The Westermoskee case illustrates how difficult this choice can sometimes prove and that in hindsight, a different choice should possibly have been made”. The actual intention was to promote the integration of Turks by building a mosque, since “mosques can help to reach certain groups”.

* They do. The mosques really do reach ‘certain groups’ – hahahaha!

060517castaway-x.gif
Vogelaar also confirmed there was “a subsidy relationship with Milli Gorus” and her ministry on a national level. She has no wish to end this relationship and would only “consider this if indications should emerge that give cause for suspicion of criminal acts or extremism”. The same applies to the position of Milli Gorus in the Contact Body of Muslims and the Government (CMO), with which the government consults on integration policy.

According to Party For Freedom (PVV) MP Sietse Fritsma, such indications are numerous. He exhibited a file of quotes by international Milli Gorus leaders, “such as ‘Jews are bacteria’, he stated. Vogelaar however remained adamant that there were no indications of extremism, although Fritsma further attempted that “you know how things go at the European headquarters of Milli Gorus in Germany”.

images3.jpg

Vogelaar also refused to confirm that Westermoskee leaders were “untrustworthy”, as Kamp said they were. He too had “indications that Milli Gorus expressly obstructs the integration of Turks in the Netherlands”. With the exception of Christian mini-pary SGP, which also expressed serious concern, the other parties hardly contributed to the debate.

Reluctantly, Vogelaar promised the VVD and PVV an inquiry into Milli Gorus. She did remark that precisely due to the separation of church and state, it is “not for us to judge” the degree of radicalisation of religious organisations.

* Of course not! ‘Not for us to judge’- don’t you just love it?

feministsburka.jpg

* Wanna be ‘liberated’ by Vogelaar?

* If there was a price for ‘dumber than dirt’ it should go to Vogelaar…

*

Italy terrorism raids: 20 arrested

* Caliphate News Network discovers ‘Salafite Jihad cells’,- but not a word about Islam:

ROME, Italy (CNN) — Twenty people suspected of involvement in the recruitment of suicide bombers were arrested in Italy and other European countries Tuesday, an Italian police spokesman told CNN.

Those arrested are suspected of forming Salafite Jihad cells who were recruiting suicide bombers and sending them to Iraq and Afghanistan, said Col. Mario Parente, deputy commander of the Carabinieri special forces unit.

He said a total of 20 Italy were being arrested Tuesday. Police arrested 11 people in Italy and nine others across Europe.

Parente did not specify in which countries the arrests were carried out.

During the arrests, Parente said, police found al Qaeda manuals for the production of explosives, detonation devices, and various poisons. He said the manuals also included details of guerrilla-style war operations.

Those arrested are also accused of producing false documents, facilitating illegal immigration, and covering up other individuals wanted for terrorism-related crimes, Parente said

Kosovo: Islamic Heroin Republic With America’s Blessing?

Debate on U.S. Kosovo Policy Brewing in Washington

* Hello? Anybody home? Anybody realizing what the Clitman administration has done in Kosovo?

One of the supreme ironies of the “Global War on Terror” has been the consistency with which the US has pursued pro-jihadist foreign and military policies since the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. Not even the spectacular carnage of 9/11 has shaken the resolve of the State Department, for example, to back Muslim demands against Christian Serbia in Kosovo. The US of course backed jihadis during the Balkan wars of the 1990s, first the Bosnians — allying ourselves with such Muslim luminaries as Alija Izetbegovic (see his Islamic Declaration if you still aren’t sure of his true sympathies) and Osama bin Laden (that’s “Mr bin Laden” if you ask the New York Times) — and later the KLA in Kosovo.

wahabi_mosque_urosevac.jpg

* Wahabi mosque in Kosovo

*
Slowly — haltingly — it seems that reality is beginning to catch up with US policy. Herewith the latest from the redoubtable Serge Trifkovic in Chronicles Magazine on US policy in Kosovo:

As we near the deadline of December 10 for the Contact Group “Troika’s” report on its attempts to negotiate a solution to the problem of Kosovo, the voices of reason in the United States are finally becoming more influential and more articulate than ever before. Over the past two weeks alone, John Bolton, Christian Science Monitor commentator David Young, and a host of prominent analysts meeting at a conference in Washington D.C. have warned that the U.S. policy in the Balkans is heading for the rocks.
On November 1 the Voice of America interviewed former U.S. Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, about the future status of Kosovo. Mr. Bolton expressed the view that the State Department has conducted a consistently anti-Serbian policy for more than 15 years. Unfortunately, he said, this biased policy has continued even though there is no logical reason for it after the fall of Milosevic:

While Serbia is trying to establish an effective and functional democracy regarding human rights and other issues, the anti-Serbian policy has continued, especially with regard to Kosovo, where a decision in favor of its independence could only create other concerns. Such a decision could impact on the democracy in progress in Serbia, and the possibility that the Security Council would step beyond its authority, which would be very unfortunate. This is one of the numerous examples of behavior by the State Department, which is a problem the next President has to solve.
John Bolton is the most prominent former Administration official so far to be so outspoken about the U.S. policy in the former Yugoslavia. In his VoA interview he was adamant that the United States should not recognize any unilateral declaration of Kosovo independence:

Such a decision, which would be taken under threat of violence, would actually represent a way to reward bad behavior. The issue of Kosovo should be solved by two parties at the negotiation table . . . this is much better than to impose a solution on one side or the other, based on a wrong understanding of the situation.
Bolton added that the last thing we should do is to sow the seeds for future conflicts under the pressure of one side or the other. Of his new book, “Surrender Is Not an Option: Defending America at the United Nations and Abroad,” Bolton said it was focused on how the policy is actually formulated. He quoted a senior State Department official who told him that “if they knew how we formulate our foreign policy, Americans would be very dissatisfied.”

Indeed they would. Read it all.

*

story.jpg

John Bolton gets it:

from B92 News Politics Politics

Ex-U.S. ambassador to UN criticizes U.S. Kosovo policy

* Kosovo Liberation Army

* Heroin Republic Kosovo

* Cooking History a la Islamiyah

“U.S. Kosovo Policy Is Bad for Israel”

From Israel’s prestigious Begin-Sadat Center, Bar Ilan University: The more you pull the thread to appease the jihadists, the more the sweater unravels. Hand them Kosovo today, the more pressure builds to chop up Israel too.

“Strong American support for the independence of Kosovo is detrimental to Israeli interests. Washington futilely hopes to curry favor with the Islamic world through appeasement; effectively gives a fresh impetus to the ongoing growth of Islamic influence in Europe; and denies the fact that the putative state’s leaders are tainted by terrorism, criminality, and well-documented links with global jihad. Most importantly, it betrays a cynically postmodern contempt for all claims based on the historical rights and spiritual significance of a land to a nation” — claims at the heart of modern Israel.

Authored by Jim Jatras (a member of Jihad Watch advisory board) and Serge Trifkovic (author of the superb Sword of the Prophet). Read more here.

*

* We need a steady focus on Islam, sez Hugh

*

* Islam and the nation-state

Writing in the Jerusalem Post, one of Israel’s most influential commentators, Caroline Glick, puts two and two together and, unlike our State Department, gets four:

…The Saudi-financed Kosovo Muslims have destroyed more than 150 churches over the past several years, and have terrorized Kosovar Christians and so led to their mass exodus from the province.

*

This is an important article. The comments, especially from Stendec, are equally important.

Read it all

Jihad in Bosnia 

Sydney: 1,000 protest against Islamic school

* From the ABC with thanks to Savitch:

* From the ‘come and smell the coffee’ department:

Around 1,000 people rallied against plans to build a large Islamic school in south-west Sydney last night.

The Quranic society has lodged a development application for a 1,200-place school with Camden Council but Mayor Chris Paterson says there have already been 284 submissions against the proposal.

Councillor Paterson says most of the opposition is on planning and traffic grounds.

One woman speaking at last night’s meeting said residents were concerned about traffic and they did not want people from Muslim backgrounds like in areas closer to Sydney.

“I believe in everyone having their own religion, whether they’re Catholic, Church of England or Muslims – they’re fine – but I’ve seen what’s happened at Bankstown,” she said.

“Bankstown used to be a really nice town. People are terrified.”

Local federal MP Pat Farmer, who also attended the meeting, says it is not a racist issue.

skipping_narrowweb__300×4260.jpg

* Well brother, you better go check with Charles Johnson and the canniballistic lizards from LGF, they’ll set you straight! You racist Nazi, white power supremacists, you…

2_61_011807_sheik_feiz.jpg

* Lebanese hate preacher calls infidels and Jews ‘sons of apes and swine’

“It’s more an issue of council consulting with the local people in their area to be able to have a say in what goes on in their area,” he said.

Mr Farmer says people are concerned that the historic rural feeling of their town may change.

“Council requires an application if you want to do something as little as setting up a barbecue area out in your backyard to a pergola, let alone fences around your property. Council has a say in all of that,” he said.

bankstown30707_wideweb__470×3110.jpg

* The ‘solution’ these people have in mind is of course, Islam, nothing but Islam, which means death , subjugation or forcible conversion for the kuffar. (kuffar or kafir: that’s you and me, just in case you’re wondering) Yes, Bankstown used to be really nice…

*

“The people are saying, ‘Well, those sorts of things are up for scrutiny by the neighbours. Why shouldn’t any large piece of infrastructure be up for scrutiny by the neighbours?'”

Meeting organiser Emil Frenchevich has told ABC Local Radio people have a right to have a say about their community without being labeled racist.

“Let the people decide,” he said. “Why is it that politicians always make these rules where they say, ‘You must do this and you must do that,’ irrespective of some so-called political correctness?”

Camden Council says it expects the matter to come before council early next year.

* When will the nutroots and the polit-props start taking notice?

*

Risotto Delusions

From the ‘Clueless & Befuddled In Arabia’ series:

RAMALLAH, West Bank (CNN) — A Palestinian state alongside Israel is within reach, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Monday after talks with the Palestinian president and Israeli prime minister.

artricemideastap.jpg

* The result of affirmative action: a clueless fruitcake and the Pali-gravy train engine mama…

* With Secretary Rice next to him, “moderate” “peace partner” Mahmoud Abbas shared with the reporters that “I also reiterated to Dr. Rice the need for
the Israelis to commit to stop the military aggressions against our people

in the West Bank and Gaza, as well as the stopping of incursions and
assassinations and the military checkpoints” =
Israel has to stop defending
itself.

Rice said a proposed summit in Annapolis, Maryland, later this year can be a “launching pad” toward a two-state solution.

* Last week the Pali’s used a schoolyard as a ‘launching pad’ for rockets into Israel…

“We appear to be on course to prepare seriously for continuous ongoing negotiations,” said Rice, who appeared at a press briefing in the West Bank with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. She met Sunday with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who underscored the importance of the Annapolis summit in a speech.

* “continuous ongoing negotiations” = Rice-speak for jihad against Israel

“Annapolis will be the jumping-off point for continued serious and in-depth negotiations which will not avoid any issue or ignore any division which has clouded our relations with the Palestinian people for many years,” Olmert said.

Rice said there are “very clear signs” Arab neighbors want the process to succeed. “I can really say without fear of contradiction that everybody’s goal is the creation” of a Palestinian state, she said.

* Translation: Arab neighbors want the process to succeed= destruction of Israel. Creation of a Palestinian state” simply means replacing Israel with an Arab nightmare called Palistan.

* Rice, that awful Rice, is hellbent on making this her legacy.

1674jpg.jpg

Cartoon In Jordanian Paper: Condoleezza Rice Says “We’re Arranging The New Middle East” 

*

Other News:

Israel’s anti-Zionist leaders

by Caroline Glick JP

From October 26-30, a mob of Druse villagers in Peki’in in the Galilee launched what has all the markings of a pogrom against the four Jewish families in the village. They burned their cars and surrounded and torched their homes.

The police took a full day to come to the Jews’ defense. And when they did, the Druse mob kidnapped a policewoman and only set her free in exchange for their cohorts who had been arrested. The police then set about evacuating the Jews from their encircled homes and did nothing to prevent their homes from being destroyed by the mob.

Now the Knesset’s Interior Committee is demanding that a governmental commission of inquiry be set up to investigate what the Druse claim was police brutality in attempting to disperse the violent mob. For its part the Olmert government is distancing itself from Internal Security Minister Avi Dichter’s decision to suffice with an internal police investigation of the policemen’s behavior at the scene.

More

*

* But its not only that steaming, indigestible Risotto that Condoleeza Rice is cooking.

Look what we have here:

Tony Blair: Israel needs to forget that its enemies want to destroy it utterly, and help put them in a better position to do so

images2.jpg

Yes, says Blair, the “Palestinians” have always been untrustworthy, but trust them anyway.

“BLiar: Israel needs psychological shift,” by David Horovitz for the Jerusalem Post via DW

*

Fitzgerald: That shallow flim-flam man, Tony Blair

tony_blair_is_a_wanker.jpg

Tony Blair, simply assumes that treaty-making is the same everywhere in the world. It has never occurred to him — why should it, given his temperament, given his mental makeup — that possibly in the world of Islam, treaty-making with Infidels is not a matter of Pacta Sunt Servanda, but of doing exactly as Muhammad did, in 628 A.D., when he made the Treaty, or Agreement, with the Meccans, a treaty that was essentially a “truce treaty” or “hudna” that was to last ten years, and that he broke at the first opportunity, just as soon as he felt strong enough to attack the Meccans. It is regarded in Muslim commentaries as the final word on how Muslims should regard any treaties, agreements, hudnas, that they might sign, at a time when such signing is made necessary by events.

Does Tony Blair know that? Does he care to examine all the other treaties and agreements that Israel entered into with the Arab Muslim states, starting with the Armistice Agreements of 1949? Does he?

*

Pali-faux student tries to slip past Israeli authorites into US

* Another example of how bleeding hearts are manipulated by Pali-thugs:

A Palestinian “university student” supposedly trapped in Gaza tried to slip past Israeli authorities and into Texas with a forged document—but was thwarted by the Associated Press.

Kudos to the AP for this one.

A Palestinian included by a human rights group as one of hundreds of university students trapped in Gaza is apparently not a student and used what appeared to be a forged document to make his case to leave for Texas, The Associated Press learned on Thursday.

“Gisha,” a human rights group advocating freedom of movement for Palestinians, is pressing the Israeli Supreme Court to allow university students to leave Gaza to continue their studies abroad. The group included Yaser Betar in its suit, presenting the court with a one-page document from the University of North Texas affirming that he is enrolled in a doctorate program.

But after the AP sent the document to the university, its spokeswoman replied that the document was not authentic, and Betar “is not currently enrolled at the university. He studied Engineering Technology as an undergraduate student from spring 1992 to fall 1998 and did not earn a degree.”

more

MI5 says {Muslim} kids groomed for terror attacks

* Its not as if we didn’t know it, but:

* Please note that in Gordon Brownnoses Britain you can’t call it ‘Islamic terrorism’ any longer, because that might just upset innocent Muslims so much that they might become….Islamic terrorists…

By DAVID STRINGER, Associated Press


‘Extremists’ are grooming children and teenagers to plot terrorist attacks against Britain, the director of the domestic spy agency said Monday.

* The ‘extremists’ must be Buddhists or Hindu’s, no doubt…

But Jonathan Evans, making his first public speech since becoming director-general of Britain’s MI5 agency in April, said vital resources needed to tackle terrorism are being diverted to counter the espionage threat from Russia and China.

“Terrorists are methodically and intentionally targeting young people and children in this country,” Evans said, according to a text of his speech in Manchester, England. “They are radicalizing, indoctrinating and grooming young, vulnerable people to carry out acts of terrorism.”

Testimony from a U.S. terrorist-turned-witness in British court cases has revealed how young Britons are trained for attacks at terrorist camps in tribal areas of Pakistan.

Evans said though Pakistan remains a key training ground for Britons, similar centers are emerging elsewhere. Al-Qaida in Iraq is attempting to stage attacks outside Iraq and parts of East Africa, particularly Somalia, have become a key area for training and planning of attacks on Britain, he said.

Evans said thwarting plots alone is not enough to stop the threat of extremist terrorism, and urged the government and society to counter the message of radical preachers.

“If we only react tactically while our enemies plan strategically, we shall be hard put to win this. A key part of our strategy must be perseverance,” Evans said at a newspaper editors’ conference. “It starts with rejection of the violent extremist ideology across society.”

* Hmm. And where does this ‘violent extremist ideology’ come from if not from the mosques, the madrassah’s, the Koran and the sunnah?

He said al-Qaida “has a clear determination to mount terrorist attacks against the United Kingdom.”

* Really?

But Evans warned that efforts to tackle terrorism are being stalled by work to halt foreign intelligence agents from stealing sensitive information on civilian and military technology. He singled out agents from Russia and China.

* Right. Worry about China and Russia stealing military technology, but sell it to Saudis and other despotic Arab regimes. Makes sense. Does it?

“So, despite the Cold War ending nearly two decades ago, my service is still expending resources to defend the U.K. against unreconstructed attempts by Russia, China and others, to spy on us,” he said.

Officials at the Russian Embassy in London were not immediately available for comment.

*

At least 2,000 jihadists in UK; teens recruited 

Orwells ‘Animal Farm’ revisited

_44218539_evans_203.jpg

* Jonathan Evans took over as director of MI5 in April 

Evans is in trouble for this: “But the Ramadhan Foundation said it was concerned Mr Evans had not stressed the 2,000 people suspected of involvement in extremist activity made up only a small proportion of the 1.6 million Muslim population. Mohammed Shafiq, a spokesman for the Muslim youth organisation, said the language was inflammatory and called for responsible dialogue.”

So pointing out that there are 2,000 jihadists in the UK is “inflammatory” unless one takes pains to point out also that there are 1,598,000 peaceful Muslims in Britain as well? And what assurance do we have that none of those 1,598,000 peaceful Muslims agree with the jihad ideology or Islamic supremacism — particularly when such things can’t even be discussed in the public sphere? And how helpful is it for a Muslim leader to take offense at something as silly as this? Did World War II leaders stop to assure us constantly that the vast majority of Germans weren’t Nazis? Would anyone sane have taken offense if they didn’t do this?

* With thanks to JW

“‘Thousands’ pose UK terror threat,” from the BBC

Suspend Muslim immigration: Hanson

* Here we go again: not one article in the MSM without the ‘right-wing firebrand’ smears:

SENATE hopeful Pauline Hanson has accused the Federal Government of opening up the immigration floodgates to people “who have no intention of being Australian”.

images1.jpg

Ms Hanson, who is running in the federal election under the banner of Pauline’s United Australia Party, was campaigning on similar policies to those that won her international notoriety a decade ago, including calling for a moratorium on Muslim immigration.

Campaigning in NSW, the right-wing firebrand told website www.federalelection.com.au she was worried about the loss of Australian values, particularly as a result of Muslim immigration.

“I’ve seen the destruction of our industry, manufacturing, our farmers, everything that is Aussie and to be proud of … that’s been lost,” she said.

“They’ve just opened up the floodgates to allow people here that have no intention of being Australian or being proud Australians.

“I’ve actually now called for a moratorium on Muslim immigration because I believe it’s not for reasons of religious or any other reason.

“But I think it is a cultural difference to us as Australians and we must protect our own culture.”

Ms Hanson, who co-founded the One Nation party, listed “Australian values” as the nation’s culture, way of life and standard of living.

She said if she held the balance of power in the Senate she would be willing to block legislation she did not agree with.

“If it is not in the best interests of our country and the Australian people, yes I would,” she said.

“I wouldn’t do deals and sell myself out or the people out for that.

“I would fight to make the politicians accountable to us and that’s what they haven’t done and that’s why I’m standing again and that’s why people are getting behind me in the support.

“They don’t believe that there is true representation.”

Ms Hanson’s vote will be bolstered by the fact she has registered a party.

When Ms Hanson ran for the Senate in 2004 she appeared under the line as an individual candidate – a position which historically attracts fewer votes.

* Daily Telegraph/with thanks to Savitch

*

Family First rewarding Hanson: Democrats

* The ‘Australian Democrats’ are without a doubt the most irrelevant bunch of socialist wankers and flakes downunder. All the more telling that they see themselves threatened by Hanson, which they try to portray as a fire-spewing witch:

The Australian Democrats have accused Family First of “rewarding” Pauline Hanson for her “extremist” views by giving her its preferences.

The right-wing firebrand’s chances of being elected to a Queensland senate seat have been boosted by Family First, which has revealed it will give her its preferences after the coalition.

Democrats Senator Andrew Bartlett, who faces a battle to retain his seat, accused Family First of rewarding Ms Hanson for her “extremist and destructive” views.

His comments came after the former One Nation leader on Sunday renewed her calls for a halt to Muslim immigration, saying some migrants had no intention of being Australian.

“The Family First party clearly believes that families don’t come first if they are Muslim, African or Asian families,” Senator Bartlett said in a statement.

“This sort of prejudice and ignorance repeatedly expressed by Pauline Hanson is incredibly damaging to our social fabric, as well as incredibly hurtful to Muslim Australians.

“It should be unequivocally opposed, not rewarded with preferences.”

Senator Bartlett said if there was a large swing away from the coalition, there was a “real chance” that Family First’s senate preferences would flow to Ms Hanson should she outpoll them.

“Combined with favourable preference allocations from a range of smaller groups … there is no doubt Pauline Hanson is now a credible chance if she gains a reasonable primary vote herself,” Senator Bartlett said.

He listed the smaller groups as the Shooters’ Party, two different fishing parties, the non-Custodial Parents’ Party, One Nation, the Liberty and Democracy Party, the Carers’ Party and some independents.

* From SMH thanks to Savitch

Nick Griffin & The Islamization Of Europe

* Here’s a link to Google if you can’t get the above video to work:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8336123906443296275

Now here’s a guy who’s long been vilified and smeared in the worst ways possible. In spite of growing support he is virtually shunned by the MSM. Yet if you listen to what he has to say you’ll find that Griffin has actually educated himself about Islam and knows exactly which way the wind blows.

Could Griffin be the new Churchill?

04.jpg

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.

The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceasedto be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities – but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”

-Sir Winston Churchill (The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages248-50

*

Meanwhile, the lizards on LGF have gone from canniballistic to plain stoopid:

Some random samples:

#490 Sharmuta 11/03/07 6:39:02 pm 0
re: #478 jeppo

The Wehrmacht was the German regular army.

OMG! Hello-oooooooooo! They were NAZIS!

*

#573 spam spam spam spam 11/03/07 7:09:05 pm -2

e: #490 Sharmuta

re: #478 jeppo

The Wehrmacht was the German regular army.
OMG! Hello-oooooooooo! They were NAZIS!
Not only that, but today Germany STILL uses the same song the Nazi’s did for the National Anthem!

Das Lied der Deutschen (“The Song of the Germans”, also known as Das Deutschlandlied, “The Germany song”) has been used wholly or partially as the national anthem of Germany since 1922. Outside Germany, the hymn is sometimes informally known by the opening words and refrain of the first stanza, Deutschland, Deutschland über alles.

If they weren’t Nazi’s, wouldn’t they pick a differen’t tune?

I’d rather live next to a Muslim than stinking German.

*

That’s right folks: in lizard gagaland everybody is a Nazi now:

* Sheik yer’mami: the quote above definitely does it for me. The chief-lemming jumped the cliff and the lizards follow. This is Cheepnis…..

The result of too many Hollywood movies or the kind of education one gets in US schools?

The mind boggles…

sheik-zappa.jpg

No explanations necessary. Right. And this is cheepnis here: One two three four…

I ate a hot dog
It tasted real good
Then I watched a movie
From Hollywood

(repeat)

Little Miss Muffett on a squat by me
Took a turn around, I said: Can y’all see?
The little strings on the Giant Spider?”
The Zipper From The Black Lagoon?
The vents by the tanks where the bubbles go up?
(And the flaps on the side of the moon)

The jelly & paint on the 40 watt bulb
They use when the slime droozle off
The rumples & the wrinkles in the cardboard rock
And the canvas of the cave is too soft

*

Don’t Laugh: That’s How It Used To Be:

THE GATES OF TIVOLI

Thanks to Shiva’s Illustrated Pig

THEN

copenhagen1.jpg

NOW

copenhagen2.jpg

Shiva: Nick Griffen, the BNP and Islamic terrorist supporting wankers

*

Pali-Swine Shoot Rockets From Boys School in Gaza

* The footage, taken by IDF aircraft on Monday, October 29, 2007, shows three -Islamic- terrorists preparing and then launching the shells from the school.

idfmortarsgazaschool268.jpg

* When will the Western propagandists from Al Reuters and Associated Press stop inventing apologies for the bottomless depravity of these murderous zombies?

(Communicated by the IDF Spokesman)

Filmed footage taken on Monday shows a terrorist cell captured on tape while launching mortar bombs from an elementary school for boys in the town of Beit Hanoun in the northern Gaza Strip.

The footage, taken by IDF aircraft on Monday, October 29, 2007 at approximately 9:00 am, shows three terrorists preparing and then launching the mortars from the school, which they used for cover immediately afterwards. The IDF targeted and hit the terrorists as they were fleeing the school premises.

* Islamic terrorists rely on the humanity of the ideological enemy…

The terrorist organizations, headed and controlled by Hamas, constantly and cynically use the uninvolved Palestinian civilians and children as human shields, as seen in the released footage. This puts uninvolved Palestinians in danger. The responsibility lies with the terrorist organizations alone.

Link

*

Must see: Bill Maher’s Burka Fashion Show

* you can have it in any color your want as long as its black on black in black…

*

UK: Hypocritical Mosque Chairman Slams Report

_41351697_mohammed_naseem203.jpg

* More lies and denial from the creeps who deny responsibility: its never about what they say and do, but whining and complaining that they have been found out…

The report published on Monday 28, October by the Policy Exchange think-tank has been condemned by the chairman of Birmingham’s Central Mosque. The Policy Exchange sent researchers to almost 100 mosques, and found extremist literature in a quarter of the mosques visited. Much of this material was of Saudi Arabian origin.

The chairman of Birmingham Central Mosque is 84-year old Mohammad Naseem (pictured above left), who claims to be a “moderate”. He is a bizarre character, whose hypocrisies I will describe below. In an article from the Birmingham Post, Naseem called the Policy Exchange study “irresponsible”.

He said: “A mosque is an open, public place and anyone can distribute literature or leave literature in a mosque. The real question is who is publishing these leaflets? These are people that spread hatred and the people who do publish this literature generally don’t put their name on it. If such literature comes to our notice we will confiscate it and we will report it to the police.”

He added: “My presumption is that these leaflets have nothing to do with the mosques – it’s irresponsible to suggest that a quarter of mosques are involved with this.”

* Except that these leaflets are based on the Koran and the sunnah. So how can it be wrong? When will these pesky kuffars stop sniffing around and just submit..?

More

The chairman of the East London Mosque is Muhammad Abdul Bari, the current secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB). This Bangladeshi-born individual had invited Sheikh Abdur-Rahman al-Sudais (Sudeis, pictured), imam at the Grand Mosque in Mecca, to the inauguration of the East London Mosque in June 2004.

sudais.jpg

Sudais has said: “Read history and you will understand that the Jews of yesterday are the evil fathers of the Jews of today, who are evil offspring, infidels, distorters of words, calf-worshippers, prophet-murderers, prophecy-deniers… the scum of the human race ‘whom Allah cursed and turned into apes and pigs…’ These are the Jews, an ongoing continuum of deceit, obstinacy, licentiousness, evil, and corruption.” In another sermon, Sudais has called Jews “the scum of the human race, the rats of the world, the violators of pacts and agreements, the murderers of the prophets, and the offspring of apes and pigs.” Abdul Bari was questioned about why he had invited Sudais to his mosque, but denied that the imam was anti-Semitic.

More from Western Resistance

Nothing revealed in this report has come as a great surprise to Western Resistance. We have been documenting the hypocrisy of the MCB and its luminaries, and the bigoted attitudes expressed by Saudi Wahhabists , since we started in August 2005. In June 2005 Iqbal Sacranie was knighted by Tony Blair, and at that time the MCB had a position of influence with the government. The group still claims to represent most Muslims and maintains that it is “moderate”.

If it does represent most Muslims then I am reminded of the words of the late Oriana Fallaci, when discussing the difference between moderate and extreme Islam: “There is only one Islam.”

*

Other News: 

Pipe Bomb Discovered at Palo Verde Nuclear Plant

A contract worker for a company hired to do work at the plant was arrested after a routine search of his vehicle at the employee entrance to the plant uncovered a suspicious device that turned out to be a pipe bomb.

This isn’t the first time that security has been an issue at Palo Verde.

The name of the contract worker has not been released.

* Hmm. Could it be that his name was Muhammad or Abdullah…? 

Norway’s Very Own Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Racist. Xenophobe. These are just a couple of the epithets Europe’s cultural elite like to hurl at critics of Islamic fundamentalism. Bruce Bawer reports on the character assassination of Hege Storhaug, author of the new book Covered. Uncovered. and a courageous advocate of freedom.

storhaug_featuredimage.jpg

Storhaug: victim of a full-scale media assault

By Bruce Bawer, author of ‘While Europe slept’

* Via Pajamas Media
As Europe’s Islamization proceeds apace, the gap widens between ordinary folks’ growing recognition of the outrages that are going on all around them and the movers and shakers’ cynical insistence on pretending that everything’s just hunky-dory.
Case in point: the responses to Covered. Uncovered., a new book on hijab. Its author, Hege Storhaug of Norway’s Human Rights Service, is this country’s answer to Ayaan Hirsi Ali – a gutsy advocate of freedom who doesn’t mince words about the illiberal conditions (especially for women and girls) in Europe’s Muslim communities. In Covered. Uncovered. she explains why the increasing visibility in these parts of hijab – a potent symbol of totalitarianism and sexual oppression – should not be taken lightly.
The result? A full-scale media assault – marked not by honest engagement with Storhaug’s arguments but by lies, more lies, and sheer personal abuse. Norway’s Dagbladet alone has published pieces by Amin Asskali of the Arabic Student Association, who accused the “woman-hating” Storhaug of “creating intolerance”; by Iffit Qureshi, who labeled her a “totalitarian…out to crush religious freedom”; and by Dagbladet opinion editor (and, ahem, former head of the Communist group Red Youth) Marte Michelet, whose litany of charges against Storhaug included “burkaphobia,” an “irrational fear of Islam,” “paranoid delusions,” and “hateful contempt” for Muslim girls.
“It is absolutely crucial,” said Michelet in a radio interview, “that Hege Storhaug’s campaign to undermine the Muslim religious minority’s rights in Norway be stopped.”

Yes: “Storhaug’s campaign…must be stopped.”

As some readers will recall, it was just this sort of rhetoric that led to the 2002 murder of Pim Fortuyn. Fortuyn, like Storhaug, believed passionately in individual rights – but because he dared to point out that many Dutch Muslims despised those rights, his country’s pols, profs, and pundits labeled him a racist and xenophobe (precisely the words, by the way, that Magnus E. Marsdal, a veteran of the Communist organizations Attac and Red Youth and of the Communist newspaper Klassekampen, hurled at Storhaug the other day on taxpayer-supported Norwegian public radio). In short, Fortuyn was demonized as a threat to the very liberty he was fighting to preserve. Among those who heard that this fascist must be stopped was a man named Volkert van der Graaf.

The rest is history.

Fortuyn’s murder should have put an end to the character assassinations of the advocates of freedom. Nope. Instead they’ve only grown more sophisticated. Nowadays when someone like Ayaan Hirsi Ali assails Islamic fundamentalism, the clever thing to do is call her a fundamentalist – because she’s so uncompromising in her insistence on liberty, get it? In this spirit, a hijab-clad Dagbladet staffer compared Storhaug’s call for Muslim women to “take the hijab off and embrace freedom” to “the rhetoric of the bearded fundamentalists” – thus equating an advocate for the victims of forced marriage and honor killing with the perpetrators of these barbarities.
Such, in 2007, is the cultural elite’s line on Islam. But who’s buying it? To scroll down on newspaper websites from the anti-Storhaug screeds by reporters, bureaucrats, professors, etc., to readers’ comments – which number in the thousands – is to turn from multicultural mendacity and vile ad hominem invective to commonsensical comebacks by sane citizens who prize liberty.
Responding, for example, to Qureshi’s insistence that we shouldn’t allow “the fear of the unknown [i.e., Islam] to control us,” one reader noted dryly that at this point Islam is hardly an “unknown.” Another answered Asskali’s description of Islam as woman-friendly: “Yes, we can see this…in practice in Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.” Yet another directly addressed Michelet and social geographer Kirsten Øvregaard (who, in assaulting Storhaug, had compared hijab favorably to Western girls’ “sexualized attire”): “What will you do on the day your daughters are forced to wear hijab? Why do you hate your own culture and embrace one that degrades and oppresses women? I just don’t get it.”
“Do you think we’re entirely brainwashed?” one indignant reader asked Asskali. But that’s precisely the goal of Asskali and his bien pensant accomplices: to convince the public that the problem here isn’t him, or his religion, but people like Hege Storhaug. As Dagbladet reader Hans-Christian Holm cogently put it, Norway’s media are engaged in “a sick tolerance competition, in which whoever tolerates the most intolerance wins, and the one who suggests that we perhaps should not tolerate so much intolerance is automatically branded as the most intolerant of all.” Storhaug’s own concern, as expressed in an email the other day, is that the relentless demonizing of persons like herself by those who are determined to suppress open liberal debate about these vital issues can only strengthen the hands of both right-wing nativists and Islamists.


And it’s not just happening in Norway, of course. The question is: how much longer can the tension continue to intensify between the plain, unvarnished truth and the outrageous flimflam churned out by a cowardly and conscienceless elite?

*

* More on Bruce Bawer, Charles Johnson & Paul Belien from the Brussels Journal

Is This What It Is All About?

060315_dutch_testing_hlg11ahmedium.jpg

Fjordman and the questions Charles Johnson never answered:

Little Green Footballs and Racism

As most readers know by now, I have been involved in what has unfortunately become a very public brawl — some would probably say witch-hunt — with Charles Johnson of major American blog Little Green Footballs about the supposed “racism” of the Sweden Democrats and the Vlaams Belang. Many of these claims have already been countered, though LGF refuses to link to this.

I have announced my intention to take a break from commenting at LGF, where I have been active for several years, since it has become abundantly clear that neither Charles nor many of his readers have any interest whatsoever in having an actual debate, and certainly not about the real threats to freedom in Europe.

However, I’d like to continue the debate about “racism,” which now frequently means something along the lines of “I’m a Multiculturalist. I’ve just lost the debate because I have poor arguments in favor of my case. I want to shut you up, therefore you are a racist.”

More 

Saudi Marriage ‘Expert’ Advises Men How To Whack Their Wives Properly

 From DW:

* The question of course is not whether or a soldier of Allah should beat his wife(s) at all, for the Muhammedans its simply a matter how its done Islamically correct. Its also funny how the taqiyya-spin doctors in the West always lie and deny these things, when the ‘experts’ back in the kingdom of oil-slicks have no qualms to go on TV and promote their 7th century ideology:

What mainstream media reports such as this one never acknowledge is that this advice comes directly from Qur’an 4:34:

Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them. Lo! Allah is ever High, Exalted, Great.
* Then again, many Muslims, including one “moderate” Muslim student at Dartmouth last week who called the mere notion that the Qur’an endorses wife-beating “incorrect and offensive,” won’t either. And you can’t reform what you won’t admit needs reforming, or what you won’t acknowledge to exist.

Video at MEMRI.
From Fox News:

Move over, Dr. Phil, there’s a new relationship expert in town.

He’s Saudi author and cleric, “Dr.” Muhammad Al-‘Arifi, who in a remarkable segment broadcast on Saudi and Kuwaiti television in September, counseled young Muslim men on how to treat their wives.
“Admonish them – once, twice, three times, four times, ten times,” he advised. “If this doesn’t help, refuse to share their beds.”
And if that doesn’t work?
“Beat them,” one of his three young advisees responded.
“That’s right,” Al-‘Arifi said.
[…]
Even his attempts at counseling restraint are bizarre and disturbing:

He goes on to calmly explain to the young men that hitting their future wives in the face is a no-no.
“Beating in the face is forbidden, even when it comes to animals,” he explained. “Even if you want your camel or donkey to start walking, you are not allowed to beat it in the face. If this is true for animals, it is all the more true when it comes to humans. So beatings should be light and not in the face.”
His final words of wisdom?


“Woman, it has gone too far. I can’t bear it anymore,”
he tells the men to tell their wives. “If he beats her, the beatings must be light and must not make her face ugly.
“He must beat her where it will not leave marks. He should not beat her on the hand… He should beat her in some places where it will not cause any damage. He should not beat her like he would beat an animal or a child — slapping them right and left.
“Unfortunately, many husbands beat their wives only when they get mad, and when they start beating, it as if they are punching a wall – they beat with their hands, right and left, and sometimes use their feet. Brother, it is a human being you are beating. This is forbidden. He must not do this.”

* Unfortunately there are still many women marrying Arab Muslims…

*