Marie Harf Uses Joseph Kony as Example of Christian Terrorist …But He’s Funded By Islamic Regime
Alarm over Abbott’s view on Islam
Many Australians feel the prime minister is putting down a “with us or against us” line. The prime minister was being criticised by Muslim leaders for being divisive.
Abbott’s broader rhetoric – has alarmed many who feel the prime minister is putting down a “with us or against us” line; alienating the very people he most needs help from in his country’s fight against terrorism.
Leftoids & Muselmaniacs nervous about PM’s new national security measures
Mr Abbott said the government would take action against hate preachers through law enforcement and new programs to challenge terrorist propaganda.
He listed a raft of measures the government will implement to reduce the threat, including prosecution of returning foreign fighters, suspension of citizenship and cancellation of welfare payments.
In other news:
Swedish Television’s expert on Islamophobia joins ISIL
The Muslim convert Michael Skråmo, in 2009 was invited to SVT, where he told Swedish viewers how Muslim phobia (Islamophobia) and hatred was spread around Europe. Now he has traveled to Syria with his wife and children to wage war for the brutal terrorist organization Islamic state.
The 29-year-old Swede, who today calls himself “Abdul Samad al Swedi”, grew up in Gothenburg. He converted to Islam during a field trip to Egypt about ten years ago and has since been engaged in a series of tax-funded Muslim organizations.
Maoris Convert to Islam?
If you’d told the teenaged Aeliya Hayat that by the time she was in her 30s she’d be a full-time mum and devout Muslim, she would never have believed it.
Originally from Kazakhstan, she was known as Yuliya when she was sent by her employer to Dubai. Then 20, religion was the last thing on her mind as she found her way in a culture of shopping and flash cars, working in sales for a computer firm.
More than 5000 Pakeha and Maori in New Zealand identify as Muslim and the number of people converting to the faith is growing. Susan Edmunds talks to a few of those who have chosen life behind the veil.
Anti-terrorism chief quits over failure to expel suspects
Senior official quits over fears scheme to deport terrorists isn’t working, the Telegraph can disclose.
Just 12 foreign terrorists have been expelled in the past decade under the Deportation with Assurances scheme. Not a single terrorist suspect has been sent home in the past year, it is understood.
Muslim immigration is suicide for the West
Riots, restrictions on speech and religion, and the takeover of politics and law enforcement are just a few of the unwelcome changes that can be expected in non-Muslim societies as Muslim immigrants increase in number, according to Dr. Peter Hammond. A Christian missionary based in South Africa and author of 40 books, Hammond delineates how Muslims change societies in his book, Slavery, Terrorism and Islam. Citing examples of countries worldwide, Hammond outlines typical activities that occur as the Muslim percentage of the total population increases. It is a warning bell about the gradual, step-by-step changes that can be expected in other countries still undergoing significant Muslim immigration.–By Janet Levy, AMERICAN THINKER
Historically, when the soldiers of allah surrounded a synagogue or a Jewish village, they slaughtered the men and burned everything to the ground. Surviving women and children would be sold into sex slavery. Any Mohammedan protection racket must be seen for what it is: worthless Islamo-prop, a kumbaya exercise for clueless kafirs. No Islamic protection racket ever protected the Jews.
Here are Aussie Dave’s Thoughts On The “Muslim Protective Ring” In Oslo
Thanks to Breitbart, on a tip from the Tundra Tabloids:
The weekend’s feel-good story about a Muslim “ring of peace” formed to “protect” Jews at an Oslo synagogue turned out to be a complete fabrication by the mainstream media, according to an eyewitness report, local officials, and attendees’ photos.
According to a local eyewitness, only about 20 or so Muslims formed the “ring of peace” around the Oslo synagogue. In fact, pictures from multiple angles show that there wasn’t enough people to form a ring, so the locals instead formed a horizontal line in front of the synagogue.
A local news outlet explained how the media got to its “1,300 Muslims” number. “According to police, there were 1300 persons present in the event. Very many of them ethnic Norwegians,” read a translated report from Osloby.no.
Demonstrators also reportedly chanted, “No to anti-Semitism, no to Islamophobia,” conflating criticism of Islam and hatred of Jews.
Photos pulled off of social media appear to corroborate the narrative that only twenty or so people formed the “peace ring.”
Continued below the fold. In other news:
Ezra Levant also squeezes in a shot at Bill Nye, The Science Guy:
Another one of those recurring “my people” moments:
U.S. ADVISERS CHASING ‘HEALTH CARE FOR ALL’ … IN KENYA
A new round of advisers is being sent to Kenya on behalf of the Obama administration, which plans to deploy individual private contractors to assist in the simultaneous expansion of health-care services and the ongoing decentralization of the national government.
Indeed, one of Obama’s long-term goals “is to establish a social health insurance system to enable equitable provision of health care to all Kenyan citizens,” one of the adviser-recruitment documents explicitly declares.
Almost all of Australia’s Islamic State Mo muppets were previously members of the bludjahideen:
A federal investigation into the welfare status of Australian foreign fighters, prompted last year by revelations in The Telegraph, shows 96 per cent had been on welfare benefits when they fled to the Middle East.
Most had continued to collect payments from Australian taxpayers while training with Islamic State to become terrorists intent on wanting to kill Australians.
One of those idiots, who is now attempting to return home after six months in Syria, recently described his pathetic cause:
After more than seven months gaining his trust, CBS News correspondent Clarissa Ward convinced Ibrahim, believed to be in his early 30s, to sit down for an interview and provide a window into the workings of the murderous group …
“Some of the policies, like I said, with the beheadings of non-combatants. Some of those things I don’t agree with.”
What he did agree with though was the barbaric killings that took place in the name of Sharia law.
Ibrahim said he had witnessed a number of executions while in Syria, including a crucifixion and the stoning of a couple who were accused by local officials of adultery.
“It’s harsh. It’s real. But it’s Sharia,” he said.
“It was done publicly, there were many hundreds of people there. Seeing someone die is not something anyone probably would want to see, but having the actual Sharia established is what many Muslims look forward to.”
Not that this is anything to do with Islam, of course.
A warning from Andrew Bolt:
I have learned of attacks on free speech – regretfully successful in part – that have truly shocked me.
I cannot yet reveal them, given the extreme sensitivity involved. But if the public knew the full extent of the danger, there’d be a lot more than the 39 per cent in this poll:
FREEDOM of speech is the human right that Australians feel is most under threat, according to a new poll released today by Ipsos MORI.
The next most frequent response was ‘basic human rights’, which came in at 32 per cent.
According to Julian Burnside AO QC, “the real threat” to Australia’s way of life comes from the Prime Minister and a News Corp columnist:
Muslim Spokesturd: “But Let’s Not Jump To Conclusions”
Unlike, say, the case in Chapel Hill, where jumping to conclusions, as long as those conclusions are that an “anti-Muslim hate crime” was committed, was not only fine, but required.
The FBI is probing a frightening Valentine’s Day attack near Detroit, where a suspect stabbed two men after they told him they were not Muslim, to determine if the attack was a hate crime or even the work of a home-grown radical, a former Motor City FBI chief said Tuesday.
….an argument started over “bad breath and bad teeth” before it “deescalated to a physical altercation.”
Sure. A parking dispute shooting is a hate crime despite a complete lack of evidence. But stabbing someone after they said they were non-Muslims isn’t.
Is Criticism of Islam a Hate Crime?
After every terrorist attack, the news goes through the usual checklist of excuses. Muslims aren’t responsible. It had nothing to do with Islam. Asking Muslims to condemn or disassociate themselves from the attack is racist and you should be ashamed of yourself for even asking them to do it.
In todays sick western nations; speaking the truth is called “hate speech”, being patriot is called “bigotry”, being proud of your heritage is called “racism”, denouncing evil is called “hate mongering”, sounding any alarm of danger is instantly crashed by the tyrannical machine of political correctness . There is no consolation for this dying western civilisation. And that what happened to Brigitte Bardot
The socialist rabble that runs France can’t argue with her, since she is obviously right, so they arrest her. (Moonbattery)
Repeat after me: It’s got nothing to do with Islam
Obama was at it again last week, telling a summit on violent extremism that Islamic terrorists who kill in the name of Islam have nothing at all to do with Islam.
Lots of nothing to do with islam (and the associated allah ackbars) at The Daily Telegraph thanks to Mullah, pbuh
Curry Princess Watch
UK ‘losing radicalisation war’- ‘radicalisation happens in bedrooms’
Baroness Warsi, who resigned last summer over the Government’s “morally indefensible” policy on Gaza, warned it is becoming more apparent that people are being radicalised in their bedrooms rather than in places of worship. …
More on the former minister with her Gaza and other muslim baggage at The Herald thanks to Mullah, pbuh
UK: Muslim former Cabinet member gave official posts to Islamic supremacists
Britain can’t seem to kill itself fast enough to suit British authorities. “Islamic ‘radicals’ at the heart of Whitehall,” by Andrew Gilligan, the Telegraph, February 22, 2015: Entryism, the favourite tactic of the 1980s’ Militant Tendency, is when a political party or institution is infiltrated by groups with a radically different agenda. (JW)
Mohamed El Mouelhy says he is not like most other Muslims.
“Muslims are … 90 per cent are meek and mild. I am neither meek nor am I mild. And anybody who touches me with the finger, I touch them with the full hands. Those who touch me with the full hand, I touch them in the face. And I’m not a person who is backwards in coming forwards.” – end quote.
What say you ?
Grand Mufti Dr Mustafa Ceric: To Conquer the World through Halal Movement
China has in recent years launched a series of “strike hard” campaigns in Xinjiang in the name of the fight against separatism, religious extremism and terrorism. The targets of these campaigns, the minority Turkic-speaking, Muslim Uyghurs, complain of pervasive ethnic discrimination, religious repression, and cultural suppression by China’s communist government.
As our most glorious wannabe caliph Dear Leader has said, Islam is woven into the fabric of USSA’s history. So, comrades, can you tell us stories about the USSA’s great historical figures such as George “Muhammid” al Washington, Ben Al Fraquin (not to be confused with the modern comrade Al Franken of the collective of Minnesota), Ibraham bin Linqin, Touma al Yefferson, Ya’qub bin Madison and others? Imagery welcome and encouraged. Thanks in advance, Comrades!
Please note that by posting such stories, you hereby give the right to include them in new, revised history lessons for schools using Common Core. – See more at the Peoples Cube
Barack Hussein Obama is not a moron. He is not stupid. He is a stealth jihadist, who entertains our enemies in our White House. He funds them. He trains them. He gives your money to them. Then, he has the audacity to identify Christians as the problem and create a ficticious history of America by claiming, “Here in America, Islam has been woven into the fabric of our country since its founding.” Well, yeah, and the way Islam has been woven into our fabric is through terrorism, and I’m not talking about 9/11. I’m talking about the Barbary Wars.
I wonder how many people have ever even heard of America’s dealings with Islam following her founding. I wonder if they have even considered the words and actions of the third President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, especially his sense of reading their own texts from the Qur’an and knowing just what his enemies thought. Let’s take a stroll down memory lane and expose Obama’s lies on Islam, shall we?
First, keep in mind that Islam and terrorism have gone hand in hand since its inception at the beginning of the 7th century. In fact, it’s founder Muhammad was a terrorist and used “religion” to band his merry men together to conquer, rape and pillage.
For nearly fifteen centuries the world has faced the disease of Islam, but our nation faced it head on when Thomas Jefferson, serving as the ambassador to France, and John Adams, serving as the ambassador to Britain, went to London to meet with Ambassador Abdrahaman, the Dey of Tripoli’s ambassador to Britain. Of course they met with Abdrahaman to negotiate a peace treaty, but keep in mind that in Islam, the only peace is submission to Islam.
Islam requires jizya under Sharia law, you know that alleged “harmless law” they want to impose here in the West. Jizya is a per capita tax levied on a section of an Islamic state’s non-Muslim citizens, who meet certain criteria. The tax is and was to be levied on able-bodied adult males of military age and affording power. So as Adams and Jefferson met, they found out the price of peace was quite expensive.
Gary DeMar writes,
If America wanted “temporary peace,” a one-year guarantee, it would cost $66,000 plus a 10% commission. “Everlasting peace” was a bargain at $160,000 plus the obligatory commission. This only applied to Tripoli. Other Muslim nations would also have to be paid. The amount came to $1.3 million. But there was no assurance that the treaties would be honored. In vain, Jefferson and Adams tried to argue that America was not at war with Tripoli. In what way had the U.S provoked the Muslims, they asked? Ambassador Abdrahaman went on to explain “the finer points of Islamic jihad” to the Koranically challenged Jefferson and Adams.
Jefferson then wrote a letter to John Jay that read:
“The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman [Muslim] who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
This is loosely based upon the Qur’an’s teaching from Surah 47:4 which reads,
“Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks; At length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them): thereafter (is the time for) either generosity or ransom: Until the war lays down its burdens. Thus (are ye commanded): but if it had been Allah’s Will, He could certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets you fight) in order to test you, some with others. But those who are slain in the Way of Allah,- He will never let their deeds be lost.”
So what happened? Though the US, along with Great Britain and France had paid a “tribute” for protection against piracy, once Tripoli increased the tribute following Jefferson becoming President, he refused to pay them the increase, though he did continue to pay until the end of his presidency. Tripoli then declared war on the United States on May 10, 1801. This was the beginning of the First Barbary War.
Interestingly enough, before becoming President, Jefferson had opposed funds be used for a Navy except to provide coastal defense. Gerard W. Gawalt writes concerning Jefferson and the tribute payment:
The IFGST (Islamic Food, Goods and Services Tax) seems to have recently ambushed the wider general public, although it’s been around a while. Its origins were benign enough but over time halal certification has morphed into a malignant cancer pervading our entire economy.
Mad-as-hell consumers are furious that they have been unwillingly entrapped in a dodgy money scheme of which they want no part. They vent their objections everywhere – on social media, radio, blogs and news sites, which are met by return online fire with abusive name calling by at least one litigation happy Egyptian halal moneyman.
Our politicians are trying to come to terms with consumer outrage while remaining hoodwinked by the self-serving moneymen saying it’s all about exports. But that’s not at all the true picture.
The swelling tide of anger is about the redistribution of big bucks from domestic consumers’ wallets into the pockets of the halal certifiers, who laugh all the way to the bank.