A far-right Dutch politician, known for his anti-Islam antics, has aired a new movie based on Prophet Mohammed’s controversial cartoons on a national television in the Netherlands that is expected to add more fuel to the global Islamophobic fire.
There is no “global Islamophobic fire” because there is no such thing as “Islamophobia”. To resist the spread of Islam is the sacred duty of every free Western cititzen that still has his head screwed on.
Muhammad Cartoons Shown on Dutch TV
Here’s the story from the Gates of Vienna:
As we reported last weekend, Geert Wilders’ video of the Garland Mohammed cartoons was scheduled to be broadcast on Dutch state TV last Saturday, but an alleged mistake caused the tapes to be switched and prevented the Motoons from being aired.
The second broadcast of them was scheduled for today, and went off as planned. The PVV just sent out the following notice:
Today, a selection of Muhammad cartoons were shown on Dutch public television.
The cartoons were originally shown at an exhibition of Muhammad cartoons in Garland, Texas, last May, where PVV leader Geert Wilders gave a speech, and which was attacked by terrorists.
Geert Wilders: “The only way to show terrorists that they are not going to win is to do exactly what they do not want us to do. I do not broadcast the cartoons to provoke; I do it because we have to show that we stand for freedom of speech and that we will never surrender to violence. Freedom of speech must always prevail over violence and terror.”
So is it time for mobs representing the Tiny Minority of Extremists to start torching embassies in Amman and Jakarta? Stay tuned.
Once again, here is the video that was broadcast on Dutch TV:
The Wall Street Journal has posted an article (requires subscription) about the broadcast of the Motoons.
Meat Cleaver Protest
A young bearded man drove through a police checkpoint outside the courthouse in Boston where Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was being sentenced. When stopped by police, a meat cleaver was found in the car. The man said he was protesting the death penalty. His name was not released, so we don’t know the Mohammed Coefficient of the case. However, we can be certain that the incident had nothing to do with Islam.
A little more frankness from the lawyer might help: Barrister Charles Waterstreet represents Karen Nettleton, the mother of [Khaled] Sharrouf’s wife Tara. He’s trying to get the family back to Australia….– Andrew Bolt
At least five senior producers of embattled ABC program Q&A had contact with former suspected terrorist Zaky Mallah prior to his appearance on Monday night’s show …TEAM ZAKY by Tim Blair
Two More Bite the Dust: 2 Aussie-Passport-Holding Jihadis, Sharrouf and Elomar, Die Fighting For Islamic State
News that I sincerely hope is true. If true, then ASIO and the AFP can scratch two more names off the long, long list of “Manifestly-Dangerous Mohammedans With Aussie Passports”. But there are plenty more, at the moment, that fit that description.
As reported by the ABC’s Dylan Welch, just this morning.
‘The Federal Government is working to confirm reports that Australia’s most infamous terrorists (sic: jihadis – CM) Khaled Sharrouf and Mohamed Elomar have been killed while fighting with Islamic State (IS) in Iraq.
In other news:
Andrew Bolt: Could we really reform such children? And who would pay the price for failure?
SYDNEY’S Islamic State butchers Khaled Sharrouf and Mohamed Elomar have been accused of buying, raping and torturing Yazidi slave girls in Syria and teaching their young children how to torture the girls.
One woman has described how Sharrouf’s children threatened to behead them and film their deaths.
“(They) said that they would make a video while cutting off our heads,” the woman, who says she was bought as a slave by Sharrouf told the ABC’s 7.30 Report last night…
“The children were holding knives and told us that they were going to kills us. They were calling us infidels ‘all Yazidis are infidels’, they said, the whole world must convert to Islam.”
Walked in on an incurable Moonbat today who is totally befuddled with Mooch and and the Obamessiah. So there I was, trying to keep calm after having this shoved in my face:
So I whipped out my new iPhone and showed him this:
He didn’t like that at all. He came back with “but the difference is education”- suggesting that Mooch is far better educated than Jacqueline Kennedy ever was.
So I sent him this:
Here’s an excerpt including the views of the late Christopher Hitchens, whom you hold in such high esteem:
In the case of Michelle Obama, affirmative action did all three. The partners at Sidley Austin learned this the hard way. In 1988, they hired her out of Harvard Law under the impression that the degree meant something. It did not. By 1991, Michelle was working in the public sector as an assistant to the mayor. By 1993, she had given up her law license.
Had the partners investigated Michelle’s background, they would have foreseen the disaster to come. Sympathetic biographer Liza Mundy writes, “Michelle frequently deplores the modern reliance on test scores, describing herself as a person who did not test well.”
She did not write well, either. Mundy charitably describes her senior thesis at Princeton as “dense and turgid.” The less charitable Christopher Hitchens observes, “To describe [the thesis] as hard to read would be a mistake; the thesis cannot be ‘read’ at all, in the strict sense of the verb. This is because it wasn’t written in any known language.” (Read more: American Thinker)
Perhaps he needs some help: “many people personally don’t know someone who is Muslim” – could it be that many people have not personally been smiled at by Muslims who curse them in their hearts?
President Obama used the Charleston shootings at what he called the “Mother Emanuel church” to press his point of religious tolerance for Islam, suggesting in a nationally publicized speech Americans too often…