THIS is NOT a “HATESITE”
Winds of Jihad is dedicated to the defense of human rights for all people against those who would impose Islamic law, with its institutionalized discrimination against women and religious minorities, over both Muslim and non-Muslim societies. There is no “hatred” in this, except when we report the words of hatred and supremacism of the Islamic jihadists. We are trying to raise awareness of the nature, extent, and goals of the global jihad, which threatens everyone who loves and cherishes freedom and the equality of rights of all people before the law.
The only hatred you’ll find on this site is the hatred we expose.
The hatred that is deeply rooted in the belief system of Islam. An ideology that divides the world into believers and unbelievers, an ideology that indoctrinates Muslim children with the belief that Infidels and Jews are descendent’s of apes and swine and that they must be annihilated until the religion of Allah rules the globe.
We all know the definition of “hate speech” is:
1) Anything said by a conservative. No matter how well-researched, reasoned, or correct. Double the hate if that conservative happens to be a woman, or African-American, Asian, a Jew, etc.
2) Anything liberals disagree with.
Ask yourself a this question:
Does your religion teach you to kill and die for Allah? No?
It is not US hating Muslims, it is the mental baggage that Muslims bring with them. All we do is point the finger at it.
What is Jihad?
Well, it most certainly isn’t ‘inner struggle’
Noble Qur’an 2:190 Footnote:
“Jihad is holy fighting in Allah’s Cause with full force of numbers and weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars. By Jihad Islam is established, Allah’s Word is made superior (which means only Allah has the right to be worshiped), and Islam is propagated. By abandoning Jihad Islam is destroyed and Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, or does not fulfill this duty, dies as a hypocrite.”
The passage itself can be found in two places. In the the Noble Qur’an translation by Muhammad Khan and distributed by “King Fahd Complex for the Printing of the Holy Qur’an—The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques. It is a footnote to Qur’an 2.190 and is designed to explain Jihad according to Allah as this is the first time the word is used.
And it can be found on page 580 of the Islamic University of Medina’s translation of Sahih al-Bukhari’s Hadith. There it opens Bukhari’s Book of Jihad.
In both cases, the Islamic scholars are condensing Allah’s and Muhammad’s teachings on Jihad to a single paragraph.
I recommend downloading The Tafsir of Ibn Kathir as it is essential to understanding mainstream traditional islamic thought
Our enemies will do anything to discredit us. Blackmail, intimidation, physical attacks and murder is common, to scare those who oppose the spread of Islam. People have been murdered in the streets (Theo Van Gogh) others are under police protection 24 hours a day, like Geert Wilders and Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
Remember Salman Rushdie?
So do I.
I knew his translator, who was murdered in Japan.
NOBODY hates like Muhammedans do. Check out our video section. See for yourself how Muslims indoctrinate their children from day one with hatred.
In fact, most Muslims suck the hatred in with the mothers milk. Killing unbelievers (thats you and me) gives them a free ticket to an imaginary bordello in the sky, where they can screw 72 virgins and 24 boyz (like pearls) in eternity.
Don’t believe me. Don’t take my word for it. Educate yourself. Read the Koran, read the Sira and the hadith, the sayings and the traditions of the pedophile arsonist, serial rapist and genocidal mass-murderer, the 7th century bandit-warlord named Muhammad who invented ‘Allah’ and became Allah’s alter ego. The cult of Muhammad brought more pain and suffering throughout the 1400 years of its existence than all the world-wars and massacres combined.
Jihad from the camels mouth:
“Islam is a revolutionary faith that comes to destroy any government made by man. Islam does not look for a nation to be in better condition than another nation. Islam does not care about the land or or who owns the land. The goal of Islam is to rule the entire world and submit all of mankind to the faith of Islam. Any nation or power that gets in the way of that goal, islam will fight and destroy. In order to fulfill that goal , Islam can use every power available every way it can be used to bring worldwide revolution. This is jihad.”
Sayyed Abdul A’la Maududi in “Jihad in Islam.”
Non-Muslims have been granted the freedom to stay outside the Islamic fold and to cling to their false, man-made ways if they so wish. They have, however, absolutely no right to seize the reins of power in any part of God’s earth nor to direct the collective affairs of human beings according to their own misconceived doctrines. (Maudidi’s commentary on Sura 9:29, in Towards understanding the Qur’an.)
Jihad is “Inner struggle?” NOT:
Ishaq:587 “Our onslaught will not be a weak faltering affair. We shall fight as long as we live. We will fight until you turn to Islam, humbly seeking refuge. We will fight not caring whom we meet. We will fight whether we destroy ancient holdings or newly gotten gains. We have mutilated every opponent. We have driven them violently before us at the command of Allah and Islam. We will fight until our religion is established. And we will plunder them, for they must suffer disgrace.
Ishaq:550 “The Muslims (Orcs) met them with their swords. They cut through many arms and skulls. Only confused cries and groans could be heard over our battle roars and snarling.”
Ishaq:204 “‘Men, do you know what you are pledging yourselves to in swearing allegiance to this man?’ ‘Yes. In swearing allegiance to him we are pledging to wage war against all mankind.'”
On the issues of holy war (jihad), apostasy and the treatment of women, the Koran and Sunna are clear. It is the obligation of every Muslim to spread Islam to unbelievers first through dawa, or proselytizing, then through jihad, if the unbelievers refuse to convert. It is the obligation of the unbelievers to accept Islam. Exempted from this edict of conversion are the people of the book: Christians and Jews. Both peoples have a choice. They may adopt Islam and enjoy the same rights as other Muslims, or they may stick to their book and lead the life of a dhimmi (lower citizen). Legally, the rights of the dhimmi are not equal to those of a Muslim. For instance, a Muslim man may take a Jewish or Christian wife, but Jews and Christians are not allowed to marry Muslim women. If a Christian or a Jew kills a Muslim man, they should be killed immediately. In contrast, the blood of a Muslim should never be shed in recompense for the blood of Christians or Jews.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali on Islam
* Memorize it. Print it out, fax or e-mail it to everyone you know. The next time a Muslims tells you a fata morgana about ‘inner struggle’ you can tell him where to shove it!
“Opposing Islam is Racism”
Islam is a violent, totalitarian ideology in the guise of religion. Islam is not a race.
Just like communism, catholicism or capitalism, Islam is not a skin color. Islam has spread around the globe, from Bosnia to Chechnya, from the Philippines to Thailand, from Africa to Kashmir, from Londonistan to Boston and from Arabia to Australia. Islam has not been ‘hijacked by extremists’- it is the religion of hijackers, of terrorists, because Muhammad said ‘Terror made me victorious’- and ‘strike terror in the hearts of the infidels’- and because Muhammad was the perfect man, ‘uswa hasana, al insan al kamil’- he is the perfect example for all mankind for all time to follow. And that is what Muhammedans do:
Kill and conquer in Allahs name until all the world submits.
‘War is deceit’- said Muhammad. We are being deceived. We are deceiving ourselves if we believe what our media and our politicians tell us: That we ‘all just want the same, we all just want to raise our children and pay our mortgage’- etc. etc.
Yes, of course, Muhammadans want to raise their children, just like we do. Some grow up to blow up. ‘Not to worry’- our politicians and the media tells us “its just a tiny minority of extremists”- But WE don’t breed in order to conquer other peoples lands and consider their belongings ‘booty’- which our prophets made ‘lawful’- as a matter of fact, the Judeo-Christian tradition teaches us ‘thou shalt not steal’ so there is a fundamental difference.
Yes, the Islamic invaders breed for the jihad. And the unsuspecting infidels will feed them, generously, give them welfare, housing, medical care, free schooling, until the Muslims have reached critical mass. And eventually the call for jihad comes, as it must.
And when the knives come out these generous infidels will be terribly disappointed, just like the Christians of Lebanon, or the Christians of Iraq, or the Coptic Christians of Egypt, the original inhabitants of Indonesia and other countries, who are now under perpetual siege and fear annihilation. And it doesn’t take much to raise the ire of the Muslims: A false accusation, a torn Koran, a cartoon, a perceived insult: anything to start a riot….
To be continued…
Islamophobe (is-slahm-o-fohb) – A non-Muslim who knows too much about Islam.
Islamophobia is a fear of losing life or liberty to Islamic rule merely because the laws, sacred texts, and modern practices of Islam demand the submission of culture, politics, religion and all social expression. It tends to afflict those most familiar with the religion, while sparing the more gullible.
In Muhammad’s day, Islamophobia was treated with a practice known as beheading. Since this is now impractical outside of the Muslim world, the condition is best addressed by means of prevention. Such preventive measures include willful ignorance with a strong dose of taqiyya.
Islamophobia (fear or hatred of Islam) is a term which has been used since at least 1997, and was apparently coined by liberals in Britain to denote what they perceived as a subcategory of xenophobia (fear or contempt of strangers).
Labelling those who oppose Islamic jihadist political and territorial objectives as phobic (irrational fear or hate) is a device which has been used by Islamists to intimidate opposition from outside Islam and to stifle rational discussion and debate from within.
This strategy is actually quite clever since it treats Western opposition to the intolerance and viciousness of Islam as a form of mental illness. Goebbels would indeed have approved.
Is being anti-Islam racist? No. Islam is NOT a race. It is a totalitarian ideology.
Is being anti Islam bigotry? No. There is nothing more bigotted than Islam. How many examples would you like?
Is being anti-Islam hypocrisy? No. Nothing is more hypocritical than Islam.
This site and music is the property of Sheik Yer’mami.
An updated and remixed album including a booklet on the global jihad and about the life and adventures of Sheik Yer’mami will be available soon. If you like to place an order we please email us your name and address and we will add your our mailing list and reserve a copy for you. The first run will be limited to 10,000 CD’s only.
Sheik Yer’mami composed and arranged all words and songs. He plays the guitar and bass and financed this project entirely out of his own pocket, that includes hiring musicians and studio’s. Credits to the musicians who helped make this possible will be added later.
Financial contributions are very welcome! Help us fight the global jihad!
All funds received will be used to keep this site going and to produce more songs, raising awareness against the global jihad.
Make payments with PayPal – it’s fast, free and secure
Women & Islam
“Men have a status above women. God is mighty and wise.” (Sura 2:228)
“A male shall inherit twice as much as a female.” (Sura 4:11)
“When you contract a debt for fixed period, put it in writing. Call in two male witnesses from among you, but if two men cannot be found, then one man and two women whom you judge fit to act as witnesses; so that if either of the women makes an error, the other will remind her.” (Sura 2:282)
“You are forbidden to take married women in marriage, except those whom you own as slaves. Such is the decree of God.” (Sura 4:24)
“Women are your fields. Enter your fields whenever you please.” (Sura 2:223)
“If, when you have relieved yourself or had intercourse with women, you can find no water, take some clean sand and rub your faces and hands with it”. (Sura 4:43)
“Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and beat them.” (Sura 4:34)
“If any of your women commit a lewd act, and they testify to their guilt, confine them to their houses till death overtakes them.” (Sura 4:15)
“The adulterer and the adulteress shall each be given a hundred lashes”. (Sura 24:2)
“For the man or woman who is guilty of theft, cut off their hands to punish them for their crimes. That is the punishment enjoined by God.” (Sura 5:38)
“When divorcing those of your wives who have ceased menstruating, their waiting term shall be three months. The same shall apply when divorcing wives who have not yet menstruated.” (Sura 65:4)
“For those that fear the majesty of God there are two gardens, planted with shady trees. Therein are bashful virgins whom neither man nor genie will have touched before. Dark-eyed virgins, sheltered in their tents, they shall recline on green cushions and fine carpets.” (Sura 55:46-76)
* Whack your wife(s)?? But of course:
Qur’an 4:34 tells men to beat their disobedient wives after first warning them and then sending them to sleep in separate beds. It is worth noting how several translators render the key part of this verse, waidriboohunna.
Pickthall: “and scourge them”
Yusuf Ali: “(And last) beat them (lightly)”
Al-Hilali/Khan: “(and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful)”
Shakir: “and beat them”
Sher Ali: “and chastise them”
Khalifa: “then you may (as a last alternative) beat them”
Arberry: “and beat them”
Rodwell: “and scourge them”
Sale: “and chastise them”
Daryabadi: “and beat them”
Asad: “then beat them”
Pickthall, Yusuf Ali, Al-Hilali/Khan, Shakir, Sher Ali, Khalifa, Daryabadi and Asad are Muslims. Are their translations all incorrect?
Free Will in Islam
Qur’an 33:36, “It is not fitting for a Muslim man or woman to have any choice in their affairs when a matter has been decided for them by Allah and His Messenger. They have no option.”
Sumayyah Meehan is a “Kuwait-based American writer who embraced Islam.” In this article she transgresses somewhat against her Khaleej Times headline, “Why Islam rejects lying and deception in all forms,” by detailing, quite accurately, the circumstances in which lying is permitted according to Islamic law — including “in times of war.” Which means now.
Some Western analysts claim that taqiyya, which is essentially religious deception, is an exclusively Shi’ite practice that is not condoned by Sunnis — and that only “Islamophobes” believe that any of it is going on today. Meehan here quotes a tradition of Muhammad that also appears in other hadith collections besides Tirmidhi, and is generally considered authentic by Sunni Muslim scholars. Will those analysts brand Meehan an “Islamophobe”?
Lying is permitted, according to Islamic law, “in times of war.”
Given that Muslims are in a permanent state of war with the non-Muslim world, lying to non-Muslims is never wrong. Even truces can be broken when the time is right. We are the region of war (dar-al-harb), aren’t we?
“Why Islam rejects lying and deception in all forms” is the title of the article.
Then Ms. Meehan writes “There are, however, a few choice instances where lying is acceptable in Islam.”
This is a great example of ‘logic’ in islam.
“Islam rejects lying in all forms.”
Declarative statement. BUT, HOWEVER, ALTHOUGH, etc. just contradicted the former. That is islam for you.
Dhimmis, ‘protected people,’ are free to practice their religion in a Sharia regime, but are made subject to a number of humiliating regulations designed to enforce the Qur’an’s command that they ‘feel themselves subdued’ (Sura 9:29). This denial of equality of rights and dignity remains part of the Sharia, and, as such, is part of the law that global jihadists are laboring to impose everywhere, ultimately on the entire human race.
The dhimmi attitude of chastened subservience has entered into Western academic study of Islam, and from there into journalism, textbooks, and the popular discourse. One must not point out the depredations of jihad and dhimmitude; to do so would offend the multiculturalist ethos that prevails everywhere today.
* The honour of Islam lies in insulting kufr and kafirs. One who respects the kafirs dishonours the Muslims… The real purpose of levying jiziya on them is to humiliate them to such an extent that they may not be able to dress well and to live in grandeur. They should constantly remain terrified and trembling. It is intended to hold them under contempt and to uphold the honour and might of Islam.–
Sufi saint Ahmad Sirhindi (1564-1624), letter #163
Mohammed was succeeded by Omar, who produced a charter laying down the conditions under which Jews had to live. The same charter applied to Christians, and it was applied down through the centuries. The non-Muslims had the status of Dhimmi. They were :- 1) forbidden to touch the Qur’an, 2) required to wear distinctive clothing and 3) a yellow badge, 4) not allowed to practice their religion in public, 5) not allowed to own a horse, 6) to bury their dead without public grieving, 7) to pay special taxes, 8) not allowed to defend themselves against a Moslem, or, 9) to testify against a Moslem, 10) forbidden to build new synagogues, 11) not allowed to have houses or tombs higher than those of Moslems, 12) to have their graves level with the ground so that anyone could walk over them.
John Wesley had this to say of Islam:
Ever since the religion of Islam appeared in the world, the espousers of it…have been as wolves and tigers to all other nations, rending and tearing all that fell into their merciless paws, and grinding them with their iron teeth; that numberless cities are raised from the foundation, and only their name remaining; that many countries, which were once as the garden of God, are now a desolate wilderness; and that so many once numerous and powerful nations are vanished from the earth! Such was, and is at this day, the rage, the fury, the revenge, of these destroyers of human kind.
The Doctrine of Original Sin, Works (1841), ix. 205.
from C. Snouck Hurgronje in “Mohammedanism” 1916
“It is a principal duty of the Khalif, or of the chiefs considered as his substitutes in different countries, to avail themselves of every opportunity to extend by force the dominion of Allah and His Messenger. With unsubdued unbelievers PEACE is not ALLOWED; a truce for a period not exceeding ten years may be concluded if the interest of Islam requires it.”
Only Muslims are innocent, unbelievers are guilty of ‘shirk’ and must be killed.
That’s what Muhammedan scriptures teach…
Shirk is worse than Killing
Since Jihad involves killing and shedding the blood of men, Allah indicated that these men are committing disbelief in Allah, associating with Him (in the worship) and hindering from His path, and this is a much greater evil and more disastrous than killing. Abu Malik commented about what Allah said:
﴿وَالْفِتْنَةُ أَشَدُّ مِنَ الْقَتْلِ﴾
(And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing.) Meaning what you (disbelievers) are committing is much worse than killing.” Abu Al-`Aliyah, Mujahid, Sa`id bin Jubayr, `Ikrimah, Al-Hasan, Qatadah, Ad-Dahhak and Ar-Rabi` bin Anas said that what Allah said:
﴿وَالْفِتْنَةُ أَشَدُّ مِنَ الْقَتْلِ﴾
(And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing.) “Shirk (polytheism) is worse than killing.”
“Jihad means the conquest of all non-Muslim territories.
Such a war may well be declared after the formation of an Islamic government worthy of that name, at the direction of the Imam or under his orders. It will then be the duty of every able-bodied adult male to volunteer for this war of conquest, the final aim of which is to put Qur’anic law in power from one end of the earth to the other. But the whole world should understand that the universal supremacy of Islam is considerably different from the hegemony of other conquerors.
It is therefore necessary for the Islamic government first to be created under the authority of the Imam in order that he may undertake this conquest, which will be distinguishable from all other wars of conquest, which are unjust and tyrannical and disregard the moral and civilizing principles of Islam.
Any nonreligious power, whatever form or shape it may take, is necessarily an atheistic power, the tool of Satan; it is part of our duty to stand in its path and to struggle against its effects. Such Satanic power can engender nothing but corruption on earth, the supreme evil which must be pitilessly fought and rooted out. To achieve that end, we have no recourse other than to overthrow all governments that do not rest on pure Islamic principles, and are thus traitorous, rotten, unjust, and tyrannical administrative systems that serve them. ―
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini
Magic Muhammedan medicine:
In Ash Shifa we read the following unbelivable text, about the magical powers on muhammeds body waste products.There was the time when Malik ibn Sinan drank muhammeds blood on the day of Uhud and licked it up.Muhammed allowed him to do that and said ,the fire will not touch you. In another similar case Abdullah ibn az-Zubayr drank his cupped blood. Muhammed told a woman who drank some of his urine, you will never have stomach-ache again. Muhammed did not tell them to wash their mouths out ,or not to do it again.People how much longer are we going to put up with the filty cult of islam? Lets put an end to all muslim immigration, before islam puts an end to us and our way of living.
Another spin on the Islamic 10 commandments:
The ten commandments of Islam:
1. I am Allah, thy God. Thou shalt have no gods before me.
2. Mohammed is my prophet. Honor him and treat him as you would me. Share your booty with him.
3. Remember thou keep holy the hajj.
4. Honor thy koran.
5. Thou shalt not kill. Muslims only – apostates and infidels don’t count.
6. Thou shalt not commit adultery with a Muslim in good standing. Apostates and infidels don’t count.
7. Thou shalt not steal from a Muslim. Apostates and infidels don’t count.
8. Thou shalt not bear false witness against a Muslim in good standing. Lie away about apostates and infidels.
9. Thou shalt not covet a Muslim’s wives nor his goods. Allah gave them to him.
10. Thou shalt covet and lay possession to the goods and lands and women and children of all apostates and infidels. They are there for you to enjoy, courtesy of Allah.
Posted by: PMK at February 21, 2008 10:53 PM
This is not a race issue. Its about ideology:
Stop, for god’s sake stop, importing trouble—and Muslim immigrants, as a whole, necessarily mean trouble, in all lands where the political and legal institutions, and social arrangements, are flatly contradicted by the Shari’a. Muslims are obligated to change or tear down those institutions, in order to remove all “obstacles to Islam.” It is not special or individual malice that prompts that attitude. That is their duty, a central duty. Why not come to fully and soberly understand that duty, and out of a minimal sense of self-preservation, cease to import those into our lands (America, Canada, Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Australia, and every other place that has so generously admitted, under a twisted definitiion of “refugees,” people who do not, and can not, wish our ways or institutions or constitutions well.
Is it progress if a cannibal uses knife and fork?
— Stanislaw Lec
From a poster on Jihad Watch:
Having lived in Muslim countries, I learned that everything in Islam that is good is that which supports Islam and advances it throughout the world. From the viewpoint of Islam, a Muslim is correct when saying Islam is peaceful. Because there is no peace without Islam, therefore Islam is peaceful and everything else is warlike until Islam is present.
That is why Muslims never agree to peace treaties unless Islam is completely victorious. Otherwise only a truce or ceasefire can be agreed upon, to be broken once Islamic forces again are ready to fight. What we call terrorism is not terrorism in Islam because actions of the ones we call terrorists are advancing the cause of Islam. We who are non-Muslims are the terrorists because we are opposing Islam.
The OIC is correctly arguing, from its Islamic viewpoint, that Islam is not connected with terrorism and that Muslims are not terrorists. In the same way, CAIR is Islamically correct when saying JihadWatch.org is an internet hate site because it opposes Islam. Islam is peace, JihadWatch.org is war.
We must be very careful to understand that Islam does not use the same definitions for words like peace as in all other societies. In Islam, “peace” means the “presence of Islam.” For most of the rest of us it means “absence of conflict” or something similar. Another example of the need to understand Islam’s definitions of words is when the Iranian president says the USA is a terrorist nation. He is speaking correctly as a follower of Islam, in a “peaceful” country (i.e., where Islam is present), about America opposing Islam (America is not Islamic and therefore is a warlike country). More scary is that when he says Iran’s nuclear program is peaceful, he is correct because its purpose is to advance Islam. And how might that “peaceful” nuclear program be used? To destroy Israel.
Killing Jews is a tenet of Islam, so using nuclear weapons to eliminate them and wipe Israel off the map would be a “peaceful” solution because it supports peace, i.e., Islam. When the Jews exposed Mohamed as a fraud, he never forgave them, and they are still suffering his vengeance. In signing off, I must say that I can’t understand why the supposedly intelligent people of the news media, who have reported for many years about problems involving Muslims and their actions to advance Islam, still seem to have no clue about what Islam involves and the grave danger Islam poses to civilization, including the free press. I say to them: RTKS! (Read the Koran, stupid!). Islam is not just a religion; it is an ideology that has been waging war against the world since the seventh century.
Posted by: shallen at December 6, 2008 1:31 AM
SATURDAY, JANUARY 24, 2009
Islam: 270 Million Dead Bodies Can’t Be Wrong
Infidel Bloggers Alliance
Warner: The Center for the Study of Political Islam is a group of scholars who are devoted to the scientific study of the foundational texts of Islam—Koran, Sira (life of Mohammed) and Hadith (traditions of Mohammed). There are two areas to study in Islam, its doctrine and history, or as CSPI sees it—the theory and its results. We study the history to see the practical or experimental results of the doctrine.
CSPI seems to be the first group to use statistics to study the doctrine. Previous scientific studies of the Koran are primarily devoted to Arabic language studies.
Our first principle is that Koran, Sira and Hadith must be taken as a whole. We call them the Islamic Trilogy to emphasize the unity of the texts.
Our major intellectual breakthrough is to see that dualism is the foundation and key to understanding Islam. Everything about Islam comes in twos starting with its foundational declaration: (1) there is no god but Allah and (2) Mohammed is His prophet. Therefore, Islam is Allah (Koran) and the Sunna (words and deeds of Mohammed found in the Sira and Hadith).
Endless ink has been wasted on trying to answer the question of what is Islam? Is Islam the religion of peace? Or is the true Islam a radical ideology? Is a moderate Muslim the real Muslim?
This reminds a scientist of the old arguments about light. Is light a particle or is light a wave? The arguments went back and forth. Quantum mechanics gave us the answer. Light is dualistic; it is both a particle and a wave. It depends upon the circumstances as to which quality manifests. Islam functions in the same manner.
Our first clue about the dualism is in the Koran, which is actually two books, the Koran of Mecca (early) and the Koran of Medina (later). The insight into the logic of the Koran comes from the large numbers of contradictions in it. On the surface, Islam resolves these contradictions by resorting to “abrogation”. This means that the verse written later supersedes the earlier verse. But in fact, since the Koran is considered by Muslims to be the perfect word of Allah, both verses are sacred and true. The later verse is “better,” but the earlier verse cannot be wrong since Allah is perfect. This is the foundation of dualism. Both verses are “right.” Both sides of the contradiction are true in dualistic logic. The circumstances govern which verse is used.
(Koran of Mecca) 73:10: Listen to what they [unbelievers] say with patience, and leave them with dignity.
From tolerance we move to the ultimate intolerance, not even the Lord of the Universe can stand the unbelievers:
(Koran of Medina) 8:12: Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, “I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the unbelievers’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!”
All of Western logic is based upon the law of contradiction—if two things contradict, then at least one of them is false. But Islamic logic is dualistic; two things can contradict each other and both are true.
No dualistic system may be measured by one answer. This is the reason that the arguments about what constitutes the “real” Islam go on and on and are never resolved. A single right answer does not exist.
Dualistic systems can only be measured by statistics. It is futile to argue one side of the dualism is true. As an analogy, quantum mechanics always gives a statistical answer to all questions.
For an example of using statistics, look at the question: what is the real jihad, the jihad of inner, spiritual struggle or the jihad of war? Let’s turn to Bukhari (the Hadith) for the answer, as he repeatedly speaks of jihad. In Bukhari 97% of the jihad references are about war and 3% are about the inner struggle. So the statistical answer is that jihad is 97% war and 3% inner struggle. Is jihad war? Yes—97%. Is jihad inner struggle? Yes—3%. So if you are writing an article, you can make a case for either. But in truth, almost every argument about Islam can be answered by: all of the above. Both sides of the duality are right.
FP: Why, in your view, is there so much ignorance about the history and doctrine of political Islam in the West?
Warner: First, let’s see how ignorant we are about the history of political Islam. How many Christians can tell you how Turkey or Egypt became Islamic? What happened to the Seven Churches of Asia mentioned in Paul’s letters? Find a Jew who can tell you the Jewish history of dhimmitude (second class citizens who serve Islam). What European knows that white women were the highest priced slaves in Mecca? Everyone knows how many Jews Hitler killed, but find an unbeliever who can tell you how many died in jihad over the last 1400 years.
FP: You mentioned earlier how logic is another point of profound difference. Can you touch on that?
Warner: To reiterate, all of science is based upon the law of contradiction. If two things contradict each other, then at least one of them has to be false. But inside of Islamic logic, two contradictory statements can both be true. Islam uses dualistic logic and we use unitary scientific logic.
Since Islam has a dualistic logic and dualistic ethics, it is completely foreign to us. Muslims think differently from us and feel differently from us. So our aversion is based upon fear and a rejection of Islamic ethics and logic. This aversion causes us to avoid learning about Islam so we are ignorant and stay ignorant.
Another part of the aversion is the realization that there is no compromise with dualistic ethics. There is no halfway place between unitary ethics and dualistic ethics. If you are in a business deal with someone who is a liar and a cheat, there is no way to avoid getting cheated. No matter how nice you are to a con man, he will take advantage of you. There is no compromise with dualistic ethics. In short, Islamic politics, ethics and logic cannot be part of our civilization. Islam does not assimilate, it dominates. There is never any “getting along” with Islam. Its demands never cease and the demands must be met on Islam’s terms: submission.
The last reason for our aversion to the history of political Islam is our shame. Islam put over a million Europeans into slavery. Since Muslims can’t be enslaved, it was a white Christian who was the Turkish sultan’s sex slave. These are things that we do not want to face.
Jews don’t want to acknowledge the history of political Islam, because they were dhimmis, second class citizens or semi-slaves, just like the Christians. Jews like to recall how they were advisors and physicians to powerful Muslims, but no matter what the Jew did or what position he held, he was still a dhimmi. There is no compromise between being equal and being a dhimmi
Why should a Hindu want to recall the shame of slavery and the destruction of their temples and cities? After Hindu craftsmen built the Taj Mahal, the Muslim ruler had their right hands cut off so that they could not build anything as beautiful for anyone else. The practice of suttee, the widow throwing herself on the husband’s funeral pyre, came about as a response to the rape and brutality of the Islamic jihad as it sweep over ancient Hindustan.
Blacks don’t want to face the fact that it was a Muslim who rounded up their ancestors in Africa to wholesale to the white slave trader. The Arab is the true master of the African. Blacks can’t accept the common bond they share with whites: that both Europeans and Africans were slaves under Islam. Blacks like to imagine Islam is their counterweight to white power, not that Islam has ruled them for 1400 years.
Dualistic logic. Dualistic ethics. Fear. Shame. There is no compromise. These are the reasons we don’t want to know about Islam’s political history, doctrine or ethics.
FP So is there such a thing as non-political Islam?
Warner: Non-political Islam is religious Islam. Religious Islam is what a Muslim does to avoid Hell and go to Paradise. These are the Five Pillars—prayer, charity to Muslims, pilgrimage to Mecca, fasting and declaring Mohammed to be the final prophet.
Political Islam’s most famous duality is the division of the world into believers, dar al Islam, and unbelievers, dar al harb. The largest part of the Trilogy relates to treatment of the unbelievers, kafirs. Even Hell is political. There are 146 references to Hell in the Koran. Only 6% of those in Hell are there for moral failings—murder, theft, etc. The other 94% of the reasons for being in Hell are for the intellectual sin of disagreeing with Mohammed, a political crime. Hence, Islamic Hell is a political prison for those who speak against Islam.
Mohammed preached his religion for 13 years and garnered only 150 followers. But when he turned to politics and war, in 10 years time he became the first ruler of Arabia by averaging an event of violence every 7 weeks for 9 years. His success did not come as a religious leader, but as a political leader.
In short, political Islam defines how the unbelievers are to be dealt with and treated.
FP: Can you touch briefly on the history of political Islam?
Warner: The history of political Islam starts with Mohammed’s immigration to Medina. From that point on, Islam’s appeal to the world has always had the dualistic option of joining a glorious religion or being the subject of political pressure and violence. After the immigration to Medina, Islam became violent when persuasion failed. Jihad entered the world.
After Mohammed’s death, Abu Bakr, the second caliph, settled the theological arguments of those who wished to leave Islam with the political action of death by the sword. The jihad of Umar (the second caliph, a pope-king) exploded into the world of the unbelievers. Jihad destroyed a Christian Middle East and a Christian North Africa. Soon it was the fate of the Persian Zoroastrian and the Hindu to be the victims of jihad. The history of political Islam is the destruction of Christianity in the Middle East, Egypt, Turkey and North Africa. Half of Christianity was lost. Before Islam, North Africa was the southern part of Europe (part of the Roman Empire). Around 60 million Christians were slaughtered during the jihadic conquest.
Half of the glorious Hindu civilization was annihilated and 80 million Hindus killed.
The first Western Buddhists were the Greeks descended from Alexander the Great’s army in what is now Afghanistan. Jihad destroyed all of Buddhism along the silk route. About 10 million Buddhists died. The conquest of Buddhism is the practical result of pacifism.
Zoarasterianism was eliminated from Persia.
The Jews became permanent dhimmis throughout Islam.
In Africa over 120 million Christians and animists have died over the last 1400 years of jihad.
Approximately 270 million nonbelievers died over the last 1400 years for the glory of political Islam. These are the Tears of Jihad which are not taught in any school.
We hate ourselves because we are mentally molested and abused. Our intellectuals and artists have responded to the abuse of jihad just as a sexually abused child or a rape victim would respond. We are quite intellectually ill and are failing at our job of clear thinking. We can’t look at our denial.
Islam declares that we are the enemies of Allah. If we do not learn the political doctrine of Islam we will end up just like the first victims of Islam—the tolerant, polytheist Arabs of Saudi Arabia who became the Wahabbis (a very strict branch of Islam) of today, the most intolerant culture on the face of the earth.
“If politeness and ceremony be observed toward Mohammedans, they imagine they are feared and become arrogant; but in showing severity and rudeness, they are impressed with fear and respect, and they are supple and manageable.”
–North China Herald,1867