Hit the road, Mohammed… and don’t you come back no more….

Ray Charles for Schabbos:

Why it’s OK to strip foreign fighters of citizenship
Despite the philosophical and legal tensions, if a dual national goes to fight for Islamic State then surely it’s reasonable to strip them of their Australian citizenship.–ABC.NET.AU
Iranian Leader Khamenei: A Society Steeped In The Spirit Of Martyrdom Is Unstoppable; 
In statements on February 26, 2015, both Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and Ali Shirazi, his representative in Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) elite Qods Force, stressed the need to instill the values of…
“…  there is only one Islam, and one type of Muslim. This is the Muslim that follows the Quran and the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)    –Islam revisited in the Straight Path Convention

There Will Never Be An Islamic “Reformation”


For Once I Disagree With Ayaan Hirsi Ali

She believes Islam is capable of a “Reformation” (it’s the subject of her new book). I think that, so far, Islam has shown itself capable of but one kind of “reformation”–the kind that looks backwards to an earlier and purportedly “purer” time (i.e. the time of Islam’s founder and his first few successors, the “rightly-guided caliphs”). Here’s what I wrote in a letter to Commentary on more or less the same subject (only it was Daniel Pipes who was pushing the idea at the time):

Daniel Pipes employs a quasi-highfalutin concept—”essentialism”—and argues that it (along with history) points to Muslims’ ability to reform and modernize Islam in a way that the West can live with. If anything, though, history has shown again and again that whenever Islam “reforms,” it does so by looking backward, not forward. That’s because, in keeping with its essential nature, it is a religion that claims its doctrines and its founder are perfect. It divides the planet into two worlds, the world of Islam and the world not yet conquered for Islam. At the same time, the religion accepts no division between mosque and state. This is not Islamism. It is Islam, pure and simple.


On the subject of Islam and its supposedly rogue aberration, Islamism, Turkey’s strongman, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, is a more reliable authority than is Mr. Pipes. Vis-a-vis Islam’s essence, Erdogan has remarked: “Islam is Islam and that is all.” Which is why, pace Mr. Pipes, the future will likely give rise to more reformist movements in keeping with Wahhabism, Khomeinism, and the religious thinking of the Muslim Brotherhood. It is also why the possibility that an Islamic equivalent to, say, Judaism’s reform and reconstructionist movements will gain traction in the Muslim world is so remote as to be nearly ridiculous.

The good teachings of Muhammad are reserved for fellow Muslims

Obama And Islam’s Non-Existent Golden Rule

The problem with the good teachings of Muhammad is that they are reserved for fellow Muslims. When the hadith says “None of you [truly] believes until he wishes for his brother what he wishes for himself,.” it is talking about the fellow Muslims. The brotherhood in Islam does not extend to everyone.

obama1 (1)NER, by Hugh Fitzgerald, Feb. 6, 2015:

Barack Obama ended his talk at the National Prayer Breakfast with a quote from the Hadtih (Sahih Muslim):

“And, finally, let’s remember that if there is one law that we can all be most certain of that seems to bind people of all faiths, and people who are still finding their way towards faith but have a sense of ethics and morality in them — that one law, that Golden Rule that we should treat one another as we wish to be treated. The Torah says “Love thy neighbor as yourself.” In Islam, there is a Hadith that states: “None of you truly believes until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself.” The Holy Bible tells us to “put on love, which binds everything together in perfect harmony.” Put on love….”

Quoting this Hadtih — incidentally, this is the first time that Obama has publicly used that word — from the Sahih Muslim is like quoting Quran 5.32 without its modifier 5.33, that vitiates the original verse lifted from the Mishnah, or 2.256 (“There is no compulsion in religion”) without understanding what that verse means, for clearly the three possibilities open to non-Muslims under Muslim rule — death, conversion, or life as a dhimmi, with a host of economic, political, and social disabilities that for many proved unendurable.


Ali Sina, the celebrated apostate who was born and raised in Islam, has written extensively, in a debate with Yamin Zakaria, about the non-eexistence of the Golden Rule in Islam. It can be found at his website, http://www.faithfreedom.org. He also wrote, a few years after the original article, a rebuttal to the objections raised by a Muslim defending the faith:

Continue reading The good teachings of Muhammad are reserved for fellow Muslims

Swedish Foreign Minister: Sharia – Islamic law has nothing to do with Islam

With leaders like Margot, we no longer have to wonder  why the birthright of our children is being sold for a song.

From Speisa

The Swedish Foreign Minister, Margot Wallström, is deeply concerned that her statements about the judiciary in Saudi Arabia will be perceived as criticism of Islam. At the business meeting she repeated that she feared that such an interpretation will spread in the Muslim religious world.

According to those who attended the meeting, Wallström was shaken by the Arab world’s reactions to her statements about the state of human rights in Saudi Arabia, Sveriges Television reports.

Wallström has, among other things, said that it is medieval methods to sentence their citizens to flogging as was the case with the imprisoned blogger Raif Badawi. At the meeting with business leaders, she on several occasions expressed her fear that what she said would spread in the Muslim world.

– What has been unfortunate is that it has been linked to Islam, or it has been suggested that it would be statements against Islam. But it is wrong and very unfortunate. It is important to mention that this is not some statements made against a religion, says Margot Wallström, in an interview with TT after the meeting ended.

Saudi Arabia is governed according to Sharia, Islamic law, but according to Wallström, it has nothing to do with Islam. It shows why the Swedes and Sweden has a problem with its politicians. They are dumb as a wet brick.

This confirms the findings of another great Islamic scholar, Hussein Obama, who discovered that ISIS, the Islamic State, has nothing to with Islam.


In other news:

 Thanks to Sweden’s lethal Muslim immigration policies, artist Lars Vilks must remain in ‘indefinite hiding’” 

vilks_rondellhund-300x222Swedish artist Lars Vilks, who is believed to have been the intended target of one of the Copenhagen shootings in February, says police have told him he can never return to his home in southern Sweden.

The Local Swedish artist Lars Vilks, who gained international notoriety for a cartoon portraying the Prophet Muhammad as a dog, emerged unscathed from a deadly attack in a Copenhagen last month, the latest in a string of death threats against him. (Barenaked)

Shocked Shiite

Savages. Hardcore Jihadists, All Of Them:

Father who blamed police for not stopping his daughter joining ISIS, attended 2012 rally led by hate preacher Anjem Choudary and attended by Lee Rigby killer

Daily Mail

  • Father of one of three schoolgirl ‘jihadi brides’ captured on camera at rally
  • Abase Hussen has blamed police for placing a ‘heavy burden’ on his daughter. The police later apologised
  • In the video, he can be seen chanting at the rally led by notorious preacher
  • Footage shows him at the head of demonstration as US flag is burned
  • His daughter, Amira Abase, fled the UK last month to join Islamic State
  • He addressed Home Affairs Select Committee in wake of her disappearance

Sensational footage has emerged showing the father of one of the three schoolgirl ‘jihadi brides’ at the head of an Islamist rally led by hate preacher Anjem Choudary and attended by Michael Adebowale, the killer of soldier Lee Rigby.

The video shows Abase Hussen marching at the front of the demonstrators, behind a banner reading: ‘The followers of Mohammed will conquer America.’

He was filmed chanting ‘Allahu Akbar’ amid dozens of protesters and standing just yards away as the American flag is burned.

Scroll down for video 

Vicious: In 2012, Abase Hussen (left) marched at the head of a violent rally held by Muslim extremists in London, taking part in the burning of an American flag

Vicious: In 2012, Abase Hussen (left) marched at the head of a violent rally held by Muslim extremists in London, taking part in the burning of an American flag

Cuddly: Hussen appealing for the return of his 'jihadi daughter' a few weeks ago after she ran off

Cuddly: Hussen appealing for the return of his ‘jihadi daughter’ a few weeks ago after she ran off

Continue reading Shocked Shiite

Bleeding Hearts For the “Rongingya”

Another hired scribbler from al Jizz keeps pushing for the Islamisation of Burma:

Outcast: Adrift with Burma’s Rohingya

Persecuted Rohingya Muslims fleeing Myanmar face a dangerous journey on their way to freedom in Thailand and Malaysia.

The “Rohingya” are an invented people, just like the “Palestinians”. They are Bengali and Bangladeshi Muslim invaders, seeking land rights in Burma. If Burma caves in, they will wage jihad to have their own state. Once they have that, they will import another 50 to 100 million Muslims to wipe out the Buddhists.

Peter Greste, Always the al Jizz Propagandist

Journalist Peter Greste delivers blunt message to politicians on detention centre secrecy

The Sydney Moonbat Herald

If the Islamisation of Australia and the flooding of the country with Mohammedan welfare seekers is Peter Greste’s agenda, the Australian government would have done well to let him rot in jail in Egypt. (SY)

Freed Australian journalist Peter Greste has criticised the Abbott government for denying journalists access to asylum seekers held in immigration detention centres.

Greste condemned the secrecy surrounding conditions inside detention centres and demanded the media be allowed to report from inside.

“The public has a right to know, it’s as simple as that,” Greste said.

Foreign Affairs Minister Julie Bishop greets journalist Peter Greste ahead of his address at the National Press Club of Australia in Canberra on Thursday.Foreign Affairs Minister Julie Bishop greets journalist Peter Greste ahead of his address at the National Press Club of Australia in Canberra on Thursday. Photo: Alex Ellinghausen

Peter Greste should be asked why he doesn’t  focus on the genocide of indigenous West Papuans by Indonesian Muslims. Curiously, that’s not on his agenda.(SY)

Continue reading Peter Greste, Always the al Jizz Propagandist

SBS Sharia Promo

Thanks to Judy Kennedy

What comes to mind when you hear the words ‘Sharia law’? Terrorism? Extremism? Perhaps if you’re Palmer United Party’s Jacqui Lambie, who recently backed a campaign to ban burqas, linking Sharia law with terrorism and calling those who adhere to the Islamic code to “get out”.

“If you are not going to show your allegiance to our law, then get out,” Ms Lambie told ABC’s Insiders.

But the Tasmanian senator was tongue-tied when asked what she understood sharia to mean.

“Well I think, um, when it comes to, um, sharia law, um, you know to me it’s um … it obviously involves terrorism. It involves a power that is not a healthy power,” she said. “It is one law for all – that is the Australian law, full stop.”

‘A complete way of life’

So what exactly is Sharia law? Dr Jamila Hussain, a research associate at the University of Technology Sydney told SBS, Sharia encompasses all aspects of a Muslim’s life.

“The overriding principle of Sharia is justice. It’s very broad and includes ordinary ways of life, for example how you behave towards other people. Religious duties like prayer and fasting and giving to charity – which is very important,” she said.

“It also includes how you behave towards other people. And it includes things like commercial law, inheritance law, family law.”

Sharia is the moral, legal and religious code followed by all Muslims, but made notorious by extremist groups like Islamic State wanting to implement hardline aspects of Islamic law.
“What might surprise most Australians is that most Muslims live according to Sharia everyday of their lives. They live harmoniously. They’re not living in defiance of the Australian law. They’re not seeking to set up a parallel legal system.”

In Arabic, Sharia means “the clear, well-trodden path to water” and is based on the teachings of the Koran, the life of Prophet Mohammed, and the expertise of Islamic scholars.

Islamic scholars form this code through ‘fiqh’ or Islamic jurisprudence, which is used when interpreting Sharia. While Sharia is enshrined in the Koran and unchanging, fiqh can vary according to the situation at hand, meaning Islamic law can adapt and remain applicable to modern life.

According to Massey University’s Christopher van der Krogt, Islamic law is elaborated by scholars, often as a critique of what the rulers are doing.

“Scholars (the ulama) claim to know best what God requires because they have studied the Qur’an and the sunna, as well as the works of their predecessors. Naturally, they often disagree with each other on matters of detail, and there are five distinct schools of jurisprudence in the Islamic world today. Four of them are Sunni and one is Shii (Shiite).”

2.2% of the Australian population practice Islam

Laying down the law

Sharia criminal law is divided into three broad categories: hadd, qisas, and tazir offences.

Hadd, the most serious offences, have set punishments. According to the Oxford Islamic Studies, these Hadd offences include:

Theft (amputation of the hand)

Adultery or illicit sex (death by stoning or one hundred lashes)
Making unproven accusations of illicit sex (eighty lashes)
Drinking intoxicants (eighty lashes) Apostasy (death or banishment)
Highway robbery (death).
Qisas involve retribution crimes against a person who has inflicted physical harm (murder, manslaughter or physical injury). The family can waive corporal punishment in exchange for financial compensation.

Tazir are severe crimes that do not measure up to the strict requirements of Hadd offences. Punishment can range from the death penalty, fines, imprisonment and caning. The decision depends on the discretion of the judge at hand.

“Punishments are not enforced anywhere except in a handful of very conservative Muslim countries. The majority of Muslim countries do not enforce that kind of criminal law at all. And nobody is calling for it in Australia.”
Dr Hussain explained that while punishments do happen, they are only carried out in conservative Muslim countries, and are not representative of what Sharia law is about.

“The criminal offences mentioned in the Koran which to our way of thinking today are very cruel and outlandish,” she said. “Those punishments are not enforced anywhere except in a handful of very conservative Muslim countries… Saudi Arabia is a very good example.

“The majority of Muslim countries do not enforce that kind of criminal law at all. And nobody is calling for it in Australia.”

Why is Sharia law often linked with cruelty, terrorism and oppression?

Western media coverage of Sharia law has generally been associated with cruelty or oppression, including a report that Indonesia’s staunchly conservative Aceh province was proposing to punish gay sex with 100 lashes. Earlier this year, the arrest of a Sudanese Christian woman sentenced to death for apostasy made international headlines, sparking mass outrage.

“It’s what people see on the TV, it’s what people hear on the news. It’s what people read in the papers,” said University of Sydney legal academic, Dr Ghena Krayem. “If your main source of knowledge or information about Islam or about Islamic legal principles is from the media, then of course you’re not going to know how it really operates.”

The lame stream media is the last place where you can learn about shari’a, because our journo’s  wear kneepads and  brown lipstick when dealing with Muslims. (SY)

Coupled with recent Islamic State terror threats and Senator Lambie’s comments, it’s easy to see why Sharia law is often linked with terrorism.

“It has nothing to do with terrorism,” Dr Hussain said. “Some terrorists have hijacked Islam in order to explain their actions or to get more popularity among Muslim populations. But they’re not acting according to Sharia or according to Islam.”

Islam is the religion of hijackers. Islam is shari’a. Dr Hussain should wash her dirty mouth to wash out the lies.

‘As Muslims, we abide by the law of the land’


Do Australian Muslims want Sharia law to be implemented into the Australian legal system? According to Dr Krayem, that answer is a resounding no.

Muslims are obligated to lie until they have the numbers to tip the system in their favour. Dr Krayem is lying. (SY)

“The current assumption that Muslims want a separate legal system that is called ‘Sharia’ – that’s simply not true,” she told SBS.

They will kill and die for it. (SY)

“What might surprise most Australians is that most Muslims live according to Sharia everyday of their lives. They live harmoniously. They’re not living in defiance of the Australian law. They’re not seeking to set up a parallel legal system.”

They are already a state inside the state. That’s how they operate.

Dr Khrayem said the idea behind the desire to accommodate Islamic principles in the Australian legal system is so the system can be culturally appropriate for people with an Islamic faith.
“In 2012, there was a Family Law Council report about: how does the Australian family law system respond to the needs of a culturally and linguistically diverse communities. That’s what it’s about.

“How does the Australian legal system best serve the needs of its citizens? And I think that’s a fair enough question to ask.

“I don’t think anyone is standing there saying we want some special preferential treatment of setting up our own legal system or accommodating our own set of laws. No, the reality is that: we’re part and parcel with a multicultural society that is Australia. And it’s necessary for the legal system to think about how it responds to the people within it.

“….we want some special preferential treatment of setting up our own legal system”- her denial means yes, that and nothing less is what we want.

“It’s not imposing anything external; it’s not sacrificing Australian values. Not at all.”

Death by a thousand paper cuts. Muslims will never stop until the shari’a is the law of the land.

Dr Khrayem added that under Islam, Muslims are obligated to “abide by the law of the land.”

“One of the first obligations that Muslims feel they have upon them as Australian citizens is to abide by the law of the land,” she said.

Lies and more lies. Go back to sleep, kafir. Don’t resist Islam or we’ll kill you!

“And in the research that I’ve completed – in speaking to many of our Imams in Australia – when asking their views about the applications of Sharia in Australia, the first thing they often tell me is that as Muslims, we abide by the law of the land.”


Explainer: What is Sharia law?
“Dr Hussain explained that while punishments do happen, they are only carried out in conservative Muslim countries, and are not representative of what Sharia law is about.”
The hudud punishments are exactly what the shari’a is about.
Here again, when a Muslim opens his mouth, he lies. Islamisation begins with the first mosque that is built in a country, not when the shari’a is already the law of the land.
Therefore: stop, for god’s sake stop, importing trouble—and Muslim immigrants, as a whole, necessarily mean trouble, in all lands where the political and legal institutions, and social arrangements, are flatly contradicted by the Shari’a. Muslims are obligated to change or tear down those institutions, in order to remove all “obstacles to Islam.” It is not special or individual malice that prompts that attitude. That is their duty, a central duty. Why not come to fully and soberly understand that duty, and out of a minimal sense of self-preservation, cease to import those into our lands (America, Canada, Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Australia, and every other place that has so generously admitted, under a twisted definition of “refugees,” people who do not, and can not, wish our ways or institutions or constitutions well.

Hugh Fitzgerald

Treason on an unimaginable scale

Where Are They Now? The Fate of Bowe Bergdahl’s Taliban Five

Psaki: Bergdahl Swap ‘Absolutely’ ‘Worth It’

Shameless. These Obamabots are fearless. They believe they are untouchable.

Everything The White House Told You About Bowe Bergdahl Was Wrong
His release was supposed to be the political masterstroke in the last days of the war. But the war is still going, and Bergdahl is going to court.–THEDAILYBEAST.COM
DEARBORNISTAN: Michigan Judge orders Muslim cleric who supports ISIS and advocates violent jihad to disclose the sources of his income

Ahmad Musa Jibril Muslim Fraud ArtistA controversial Dearborn Muslim hate preacher, on probation for fraud, and on the U.S. government’s radar for his Islamic extremist views, must tell the feds where and from whom his income is coming. He owes $250,000 in restitution charges and they believe he is hiding assets and information.

WXYZ  Ahmad Jebril has failed to pay the majority of the nearly $250,000 in restitution he owes after facing 42 charges of financial fraud, they say.


Jebril’s probation is set to come to an end in mere days. He has refused to answer the U.S. Attorney’s questions, they claim. His attorney was fighting the call that he be forced to testify to his financials. Its believed he may have lied to his probation officer, and testifying could lead to new charges.

Judge Rosen said today—too bad. He wants Jebril to testify, but with some protections. That’s to be discussed tomorrow in further detail. Jebril, who was reading what appeared to be a copy of the Quran in court, refused to comment, and walked away from 7 Action News cameras after court.

Watch Bergdahl Platoon Member’s Takedown of Obama Admin. Actions After Controversial Swap
Reacting to the U.S. Army’s decision to charge Bowe Bergdahl with desertion, one of the controversial figure’s former platoon members issued a blistering critique of…  THEBLAZE.COM

A ‘significant discovery’ @ Andreas Günter Lubitz’s Home

Earlier today, the chilling final moments of Flight FU 9525 were revealed by French prosecutors who said Lubitz’s sole aim was to ‘destroy the plane’.

It was said that Lubitz had a Muslim girlfriend. It is unclear if she was still dating Lubitz at the time of the crash. It is unclear if he met the woman through his Muslims friends.

One said that Lubitz had broken off the relationship after he pledged to commit Jihad for Allah. (This cannot be verified at this moment.)


Audio files extracted from the plane’s cockpit voice recorder – discovered yesterday at the remote crash site – revealed Lubitz locked his captain out of the flight deck minutes before the crash.
The captain was heard growing increasingly distressed as he tried to force his way back into the cockpit and passengers’ screams were heard in the final moments before impact.

Mass-killer co-pilot who deliberately crashed Germanwings plane had to STOP training because he was suffering depression and ‘burn-out’. German police make ‘significant discovery’ at his flat

  • Black box voice recorder reveals chilling final moments of Airbus A320
  • Passengers heard ‘screaming’ in final moments before crash that killed 150
  • Prosecutor: ‘The intention was to destroy the plane. Death was instant’
  • Co-pilot was named today as 28-year-old German Andreas Günter Lubitz
  • Police today made ‘significant discovery’ at his home outside Dusseldorf 
  • Raises serious questions about why he was allowed to fly commercial jet
  • Airline boss insists Lubitz was ‘100% fit to fly’ after passing medical tests 

Police investigating the Germanwings crash said tonight they had made a ‘significant discovery’ at the home of pilot Andreas Lubitz, who deliberately ploughed the Airbus A320 into the French Alps.

Officers refused to reveal details of the potential breakthrough but said it was not a suicide note.

And then this: