Germany in the shadow of Islamic ‘rocket launchers’

Merkel Doesn’t Want Mosque Minarets Higher than Church Steeples….

mosque_church_3.jpg

German Muslim Group Slam Merkel Over Mosque Remark `We must be on guard against sparking artificial discussions for political purposes which have little connection with reality,` Alboga said.

*

* Sure, Alboga, sure. The reality is that mosques are bastions of Islamic conquest, symbols of Arab Imperialism and dominance, but you want us to look away, because ‘other issues’ are more important. But what could be more important for the adherents of your cult to have gigantic rocket launchers?

A German Muslim group criticised Chancellor Angela Merkel on Thursday for suggesting that mosque minarets should not be higher than church steeples, saying it hoped this topic would not be used as a campaign issue.
Merkel, a Lutheran pastor’s daughter who grew up in communist East Germany, told a congress of her conservative Christian Democrats that “we must take care that mosque cupolas are not built demonstratively higher than church steeples”.

Mosque-building is a sensitive subject in Germany. Merkel’s fellow conservatives in Bavaria have been saying for months that minarets should not dwarf steeples. Local residents are up in arms about plans to build mosques in Berlin, Munich and Cologne.

Bekir Alboga, spokesman for the Coordination Council of Muslims, an umbrella organisation for Muslims in Germany, said he was worried that mosques could become a campaign issue in state elections coming up in some parts of Germany.

“We must be on guard against sparking artificial discussions for political purposes which have little connection with reality,” Alboga said in a statement.

“Comments like Chancellor Merkel’s (about Mosques) … take a back seat to the expert opinions of building authorities, who base their decisions on local conditions and consensus between the citizens and mosque communities,” he said.

* The ‘experts’, of course, are the Muhammedan’s, who would know better?


Merkel has organised several conferences to try to improve relations between Germany’s largely Christian population and its roughly 3.2 million Muslims. One of the subjects under discussion is mosque building.

Christians in Cologne do not want the city’s skyline — now dominated by one of the world’s largest cathedrals — to be altered by two tall minarets.

Alboga said Muslims and Christians have more important issues to deal with than arguing about the height of minarets and steeples.

“Parts of the world are on fire,” he said. “Instead of putting those out we’re fighting over secondary issues.”

*

* True, Alboga, true. Parts of the world are indeed on fire. Some 30+ theaters of war where the global jihad rages. Because the soldiers of Allah have to kill and die to make your cult the dominant ‘religion’ in the world. What could be more important than that?

The Global Jihad

* Soon coming to a theater near you!

* India and the Sudan and Algeria and Afghanistan and New York and Pakistan and Israel and Russia and Chechnya and the Philippines and Indonesia and Nigeria and England and Thailand and Spain and Egypt and Bangladesh and Saudi Arabia and Ingushetia and Dagestan and Turkey and Kabardino-Balkaria and Morocco and Yemen and Lebanon and France and Uzbekistan and Gaza and Tunisia and Kosovo and Bosnia and Mauritania and Kenya and Eritrea and Syria and Somalia and California and Argentina and Kuwait and Virginia and Ethiopia and Iran and Jordan and United Arab Emirates and Louisiana and Texas and Tanzania and Germany and Australia and Pennsylvania and Belgium and Denmark and East Timor and Qatar and Maryland and Tajikistan and the Netherlands and Scotland and Chad and Canada and China and Nepal

and the Maldives and…
…and pretty much wherever Muslims believe their religion tells them to:
“Fight those who do not believe in Allah, … nor follow
the religion of truth… until they pay the tax in acknowledg-ment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.”
Qur’an, Sura 9:29

199924306_83753cb271_o.jpg

“A good wife must live in fear”

arabia_saudita_-_it_0504_-_saudi.jpg

Saudi Arabia:

Women are forbidden to drive, to show their head and to speak in public, and to shake a man’s hand. On television, preachers incite husbands to beat their wives “for their own good”. Saudi journalists describe the countless prohibitions facing Muslim women in their country and appeal for a distinction between religious truths and social customs.

Riyadh (AsiaNews/Agencies) – Without permission, women cannot even drive a car or change the colour of their clothes, and television preachers warn that women who shake a man’s hand are committing “adultery of the hand”. Citing such examples, Saudi journalists have criticized the social mentality that rules the relationship between wife and husband.


In the Saudi daily Al-Watan, Fatima Al-Faqih described the many bans imposed on Saudi women: “[They] are forbidden to drive, forbidden to travel without permission [of their husband or father or whoever has authority over them] , forbidden to stay alone at a hotel without permission, forbidden to name their own children without [a man’s] consent… forbidden to leave their homes or to take a job without permission… forbidden to change the color of their abayas [traditional, long tunic], forbidden to go to school or to the university without permission.”

In some Saudi cities, a woman cannot even “show her face”, she cannot get married without permission nor can she “remain married if one of her male relatives decides that her husband’s lineage is inferior to hers… nor can she sue for divorce without apologizing and paying a fine.” Without permission, she “cannot keep her children after the divorce… hold a senior position in the private or public sectors… annoy her husband, and finally, a woman’s voice is considered [a form of] defilement, and she is forbidden to speak in public.”

Many men, writes Hasna Al-Quna’ir on the Al-Riyadh daily, justify the inferiority of women by resorting to a “distorted reading of the sayings of the Prophet”, a tactic often used by television preachers. For example, there is a verse that says: “A tribe that nominates a woman [as leader] will not succeed”. The journalist explained that on the strength of this saying, an expert said on television that wives should not be asked for their views as they were completely emotional. Another television expert, to “defend the virtue of women”, “incites fathers, brothers and husbands”, telling them that “a girl who is not beaten from an early age grows up to be a rebellious woman, difficult to control” and that “a woman who leaves her home without a veil is like a woman who goes out naked”. The same preacher warned Muslim women that not covering their heads was “the main reason that women are seduced and fall [into sin].” Another preacher said the woman “who shakes the hand of a man that is not her husband is guilty of… ‘adultery of the hand’”. The journalist said that the sayings of the Prophet needed to be considered in the “historical circumstances and particular context” in which they were pronounced and that “religious duties” had to be distinguished from norms of social conduct that were controversial and not subject to dogmas of faith, “like the custom of covering the face”.

Due to this culture, writes Maha Al-Hujailan on the Al-Watan, “women live in constant fear… that the husband may take another wife.” “Only women living in this fear properly fulfill the role of the wife, while a woman who feels assured that her husband will not take another wife comes to disdain her husband and her family life…This culture causes a women to feel mentally and psychologically inferior, like a quarrelsome child who must be constantly supervised, intimidated and punished into performing her duties.”

The journalist said that women who felt this way may even believe that “a good man who respects them is nothing but a weak and unstable man… In their opinion, an ideal man is a violent one who humiliates his wife.”

Hasna Al-Quna’ir added: “The woman is the victim of this insular culture, and her only salvation would be a reorganization of the cultural structure of [our] entire society.”

* The silence of Western feminists on this insanity amounts to complicity and quiet consent.

Link

*

Video: Max Boot on Saudi Arabia, NIE

*

The ACLU, a demented, nihilistic commie mob, hellbent on destroying the US, has long been attacking Christianity. The ACLU managed to get Christian symbols removed from public buildings and supports groups that want to ban Christmas trees and ‘In God We Trust’ from dollar bills.

CONTACT: media@aclu.org; (212) 549-2666

The same ACLU supports Muhammedanism, on the double:

Muslim Woman Sues San Bernardino County Over Religious Freedom in Jail

LOS ANGELES— A 29-year-old Muslim woman who was forced by deputies to remove her religious head covering while she was in custody in San Bernardino County’s West Valley Detention Center, filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court Wednesday asserting that her religious freedom rights were violated under the First Amendment by San Bernardino county sheriff’s deputies.

Jameelah Medina, of Rialto, was arrested at the Pomona station of Metrolink’s commuter rail system on Dec. 7, 2005, for having an invalid train pass. She was taken to the West Valley Detention Center in Rancho Cucamonga for processing.

Medina, who was born in the United States and raised in a Muslim family, wears a headscarf known as a hijab to cover her hair, ears, neck and part of her chest. Many Muslim women, like Medina, believe that they should be covered at all times in the presence of men who are not members of their immediate family.

Despite her repeated requests to keep her head covered during her day-long incarceration, she was forced to remove her hijab in the presence of men she did not know and to remain uncovered for much of the day.

“I tried to tell the officer not to make me remove it because it is part of my religion,” said Medina. “Even after the officer had searched me and found nothing, she would not give me back my scarf. I felt humiliated, exposed.”

Medina was never prosecuted in connection with this arrest.

The lawsuit is being filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Southern California.

Egypt: Al-Qaeda urged to attack Knights of Malta in Cairo

Via Weasel Zippers:

* Paranoia, conspiracy theories and old fashioned Islamo hatred combined with stupidity against the Knights of Malta, who are now a charitable group helping out their fellow Muslims. This is how they (try to) repay the Knights for their generosity….

250px-malta_knights.jpg

Rome, 6 Dec. (AKI) – A message posted on Islamist websites close to al-Qaeda is urging jihadists to carry out a terrorist attack on the embassy of the Roman Catholic Order of Malta in the Egyptian capital, Cairo.

“Do not stint on your attacks, Egyptians, either with car or truck bombs,” reads the message posted on Thursday. It is accompanied by photos of the embassy building (photo) and entrance.

cav_malta_cairo-200×150.jpg

“These are photos of the Order of Malta embassy in Cairo. I ask Allah to have it closed down or blown up, along with those inside it, who hate Islam and Muslims,” the Internet message continued.

The message urging the jihadi attack on the Order of Malta – nowadays a charitable organisation – follows the publication of an editorial in the United Arab Emirates daily al-Bayan, by Jordanian MP Jamal Muhammad Abidat entitled ‘The Knights of Malta – more than a conspiracy’.

* The Rome-based Order of Malta, also known as The Knights of Malta began as an organisation founded in Jerusalem in 1080, to care for poor and sick pilgrims to the Holy Land.
The Order of Malta retains its claim of sovereignty under international law and has been granted permanent observer status at the United Nations. It issues its own passports, stamps and coins and has formal diplomatic relations with 99 states.

In the article, Abidat gives a Muslim interpretation of the Order’s history, describing the role played by the Knights of Malta during the Crusades. Abidat says the Order is playing the same role in the Middle East today, citing the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“The painful saga of modern Arab-Muslim history evokes the battles fought in Crusades of the 11th centry – when the Knights of Malta began their operations as a Christian militia whose mission it was to defend the land conquered by the Crusaders.”

* Poor Muslims. All 1.3 gazillion of them are sooooooooooooooo oppressed by a small, “secret” organization.

*  My guess is there are more literates in the “Knights of Malta” than in the entire population of 1.3 billion meteorite lovers. 

More

*

Fitzgerald: The freeing of Gillian Gibbons

The “freeing” of Gibbons, after what has already been an ordeal, may lead to a further unseemly spectacle. For it is not unlikely, it is likely, that she will return to England, and safely home, instead of discussing her amazement at the crazed behavior of so many Sudanese, and the Sudanese government, and the supposedly “advanced” parents — it’s the Sudanese elite that sends its children to the school at which Gibbons taught — she will tell us all, possibly selling her story to the tabloids, just how well-treated she was by her Sudanese captors, how wonderful those children and the Sudanese “in general” had been. She will even add, no doubt, that if things die down a bit, she wouldn’t hesitate to return to the Sudan and take up teaching again if she were asked to do so.

.…she might even declare how grateful she was to Lord Ahmed and Lady whatshername, the two Muslims who had come to Khartoum in a noisy effort to obtain her release, hoping thereby to win points for themselves, and for Islam. If anyone thanks them for their effort — which did not succeed in its goal because the cruel and murderous Bashir, the man behind the Janjaweed, had decided, for good and sufficient reasons of his own, it will be outrageous. He freed her to insure no interruption in the extensive British and other Western aid, and to make sure that there is no Western reaction on the ground, that the Western Infidels don’t decide to seize the southern Sudan and Darfur and hold them, as I have suggested dozens of times here, until a referendum on independence can he held.

Read it all

*

Muslim cult(-ure) tests recommended

ap_sudan_techer_071130_ms_2.jpg

* Well, if they don’t accept any of our culture then perhaps we have to become more like them, isn’t it? Moonbat logic and multiculti- stupidity are taking their toll…

*

Westerners going to live and work in Sudan should pass an exam on the local culture, a Sudanese official has said.
Khalid al Mubarak, media counsellor at London’s Sudan embassy, said the orientation courses that were mandatory in the colonial era “worked very well”.

He said a two-week course could help people avoid accidental insults.

Teacher Gillian Gibbons has returned to the UK following eight days in custody in Sudan, convicted of insulting Islam after pupils named a toy bear Muhammad.

from al bebeeceera

*

Indonesia: Muslims imprisoned for 14-19 years for beheading Christian schoolgirls;

Muslims angered by severity of penalty

beheading.jpg

Via JW

After all, it wasn’t as if the victims were Muslims. 14-19 years in prison for murdering Christians? It’s an outrage!

“...[I]f a Muslim deliberately murders another Muslim he falls under the law of retaliation and must by law be put to death by the next of kin. But if a non-Muslim who dies at the hand of a Muslim has by lifelong habit been a non-Muslim, the penalty of death is not valid. Instead the Muslim murderer must pay a fine and be punished with the lash….Since Islam regards non-Muslims as on a lower level of belief and conviction, if a Muslim kills a non-Muslim…then his punishment must not be the retaliatory death, since the faith and conviction he possesses is loftier than that of the man slain…Islam and its peoples must be above the infidels, and never permit non-Muslims to acquire lordship over them.” — Sultanhussein Tabandeh, A Muslim Commentary on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1970.

“Muslims given prison for beheading schoolgirls,” from WorldNetDaily.com

Three Muslim extremists have been sentenced to prison for their roles in the ambush of four Indonesian schoolgirls, three of whom were decapitated – with their heads wrapped in plastic and delivered to nearby villages.
While the sentences of 14-19 years may seem light considering the horrific crime, the minister at large for Open Doors USA, a Christian ministry that has worked in the area of Indonesia where the attack happened, said it not only is a relatively severe penalty, it also is raising fears of violence as the Christmas season approaches.

Paul Estabrooks, of Open Doors USA told WND the sentences may appear light from a Western perspective. But he said in a culture dominated by Islam, it is a serious statement, and also will bring “some closure” for Christians in the region.

“The interesting thing is the timing,” he said. “The last few Christmases have been pretty violent (in the region). … There is some concern this would inflame the sectarian violence of the area again.”

* History of the Jihad against Indonesia (1441 – Ongoing)

* Today, Americans, Christians, Jews and other non-Muslims throughout the world are being besieged and under relentless, murderous attacks from militant Islam. People, who just want to their lives in peace, are confronted on a daily basis by the dangers of Islamic Fascism. It seems as though not a single day can pass any longer without a report on the TV news of a Mohammedan homocide bomber killing scores of innocent men, women and children — or some other form of Muslim Terrorism from the “Religion of Peace.” In face of the violence and threats we endure unceasingly from International Muslim Terrorists – we are presently duplicating the complacent pacifism of the Western Democracies to the Nazis in the 1930’s. How tragic that in response to militant Islam — we are again making the mistake made in Pre-WW II Europe of liberal appeasement to Adolph Hitler. There will be at the very least, the same horrific consequences for the West’s complacency and appeasement to Islamic Fascism now, as there was to Nazism then. We are potentially, at this moment in history, on the verge and brink of an International Holocaust that will make the death, destruction and carnage of World War II pale in comparison!

“Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Philosopher George Santayana (1863-1952)

* Here’s the message from the camels mouth

“Islam is a revolutionary faith that comes to destroy any government made by man. Islam does not look for a nation to be in better condition than another nation. Islam does not care about the land or or who owns the land. The goal of Islam is to rule the entire world and submit all of mankind to the faith of Islam. Any nation or power that gets in the way of that goal, islam will fight and destroy. In order to fulfill that goal , Islam can use every power available every way it can be used to bring worldwide revolution. This is jihad.”

Sayyed Abdul A’la Maududi in “Jihad in Islam.”

Bunglawussie Watch: The Silly Season

Muslims ‘criminalised for silly thoughts’*

* No wonder, it is the silly season!

images2.jpeg

Young Muslims are being convicted of thought crimes and branded as terrorists for life, the country’s most prominent Islamic leader has told The Times. Muhammad Abdul Bari said police and prosecutors were criminalising youths for harbouring “silly thoughts” and were undermining Gordon Brown’s £400 million drive to win Muslim hearts and minds. Dr Bari, Secretary-General of the Muslim Council of Britain, was commenting ahead of the sentencing today of Samina Malik, a shop assistant who styled herself as “the lyrical terrorist”, wrote poetry in praise of beheadings and joined extremist internet forums.

Dr Bari told The Times: “Many young people download objectionable material from the internet, but it seems that if you are a Muslim then this could lead to terrorist charges, even if you have absolutely no intention to do harm to anyone else. Samina’s so-called poetry was certainly very offensive but I don’t believe that this case should really have been a criminal matter. Young people may well have some silly thoughts. That should not be criminalised. It is their actions that we should be concerned about.” He said that if police were concerned about Malik they should have placed her under surveillance and detained her if she was involved in “actual terror-related activity”.

Dr Bari added: “Instead, she was prosecuted for what can only be termed really as a thought crime. This should not be of concern just to Muslims, but to all in our society who care about natural justice. Her conviction raises a lot of deeply worrying questions about Section 58 of the Terrorism Act and just how incredibly broad its scope is.”

* Indeed. The scope is broader than your horizon, Dr. Bari. Muslims are by nature ‘innocent’ are they not? Because the Koran commands them to engage in terrorism and to strike terror in the hearts of the infidels they are only following their ‘religion’- and what could be wrong with following the religion of the pedophile, mass murdering warlord Muhammad?

He contrasted the stance taken by the police in cases like Malik’s with Gordon Brown’s antiradicalisation initiatives in schools, mosques and youth groups. The Prime Minister spoke in his security statement last month about mentoring programmes, roadshows and other methods to “isolate extremists”.

Dr Bari said that Malik’s conviction and other cases could prove counter-productive. He added: “It is certainly sensible for the Government to work with Muslim groups to counter extremist propaganda. This is, we have been told often, part of a ‘hearts and minds’ campaign directed at young British Muslims, but it is difficult to see how Samina’s conviction can do anything other than impair this effort.”

*

* Don’t miss Shiva’s excellent expose’ on ‘doctor’ Abdul Bari here:

*

Al Bebeeceera Watch 

The BBC is a pigsty. The BBC has to be cleaned out, totally. Read this: 

BBC Knew of Terrorist Activity, Didn’t Tell Cops

Yes, the BBC can still cause our jaws to drop; the Times reports that the Beeb paid for a paintballing excursion as part of a program to make Muslims look cuddly and friendly called “Don’t Panic, I’m Islamic.”

Small problem. Three of the friendly Muslims who went on this trip turned out to be terrorists, involved in the failed bombings of July 21, 2005. Oops.

And when the BBC learned about this connection, they did not report it to the police: BBC ‘took terrorist trainers paintballing’.

The BBC funded a paintballing trip for men later accused of Islamic terrorism and failed to pass on information about the 21/7 bombers to police, a court was told yesterday.

Mohammed Hamid, who is charged with overseeing a two-year radicalisation programme to prepare London-based Muslim youths for jihad, was described as a “cockney comic” by a BBC producer.

The BBC paid for Mr Hamid and fellow defendants Muhammad al-Figari and Mousa Brown to go on a paintballing trip at the Delta Force centre in Tonbridge, Kent, in February 2005. The men, accused of terrorism training, were filmed for a BBC programme called Don’t Panic, I’m Islamic, screened in June 2005. The BBC paid Mr Hamid, an Islamic preacher who denies recruiting and grooming the men behind the failed July 2005 attack, a £300 fee to take part in the programme, Woolwich Crown Court was told.

* More 

*

Fitzgerald: Clean out the BBC 

The BBC needs to be cleaned out, top to bottom, and this requires a Parliamentary investigation. It needs to have John Simpson (see here for more) discharged as head of the World Service. It needs to be asked why it is refusing to reveal the contents of an investigation into bias in its coverage of the “Middle East conflict” (which means the Lesser Jihad against Israel).

In a few — just a few — cases, the outcry was too strong, and the outrageousness of the coverage too egregious, to be ignored, so a few transfers were made. For example, there was Orla Guerin, married to a “Palestinian” and a determined propagandist herself for The Cause. The steady drip-drip-drip in her outrageous coverage did so much to poison the minds of so many listeners, steadily over so many years, about Israel. She’s now been sent to South Africa, where she will continue to do what she can — for example, she’ll never cover the growing Muslim threat in Capetown, because for her, with her view, there is no Muslim threat.

There is Barbara Plett, who on air wept after Arafat — that great man — died, and who, only because of that on-air sobbing, revealing her bias, had to be transferred. In other words, her years of viciously one-sided reporting from Israel (along with Orla Guerin) could have continued forever, had she not wept for Arafat those real, not crocodile, tears. She’s now in Afghanistan — or is it Pakistan?

And then there is Lys Doucet, of the unusually hard and nasty voice, who was a cross between Guerin and Plett. Quite a trio. She’s been transferred, for her outrages, to Pakistan — or is it Afghanistan?

The BBC is the source from which many obtain their news and therefore their worldview. Like the U.N., it has been infiltrated and captured by Muslims ably abetted by non-Muslims who are — not all, but many — subject to those two mental pathologies that has done such damage in Western Europe, anti-Americanism and antisemitism. There have been recently cases of people quitting the BBC, people who did not share either the anti-Americanism or the antisemitism, and who are disgusted by what may be called the “culture” (as that word is now used) of the BBC. They too should testify. The few decent papers should make a stink, raise holy hell. And in this country, people should raise holy hell about the BBC being transmitted by NPR — and supported, therefore, by American taxpayers, either as donors, or as those who subsidize NPR because it has charitable status. 

more 

How Muhammedan Agit Prop Works

With thanks to Mullah

‘Sheik Haron’- Who the hell is this creep? Heaven knows when and how he got into Australia, but he is here, and ‘here to stay’- and he’s got himself a website.

* But not only that: Besides writing hurtful and disgusting s*it to families of fallen Aussie diggers who died fighting Muhammedan headbangers in Afghanistan, his sheikness writes a lot of equally revolting crap to Australia’s politicians.

Take a look:

30 July 2007
Report of terrorist acts to DPP

Letter of Sheikh Haron to Mr. Damian Bugg

6.2 KB
6 August 2007
It is not my business. Report it to AFP

Facsimile to DPP, Mr. Damian Bugg

10 KB
7 August 2007
I haven’t heard from you, did you get my report about terrorism?

Facsimile to ASIO, Mr. Paul Osullivan

4.5 KB
7 August 2007
Have you received the report of terrorist acts?

Facsimile to Attorney-General, Mr. Philip Ruddock

4.5 KB
9 August 2007
Why are not Non Muslim terrorist victims taken seriously?

Facsimile to Director of Public Prosecutions, DPP

10 KB
10 August 2007
We give your terrorism report to AFP, only if you give permission!

Letter of Director of Public Prosecutions, DPP, to Sheikh Haron

4.3 KB
15 August 2007
Go ahead with DPP, if unsatisfied then go to ACMA

Letter of Senator Joe Ludwig, Shadow Attorney-General to Sheikh

3.6 KB
16 August 2007
A message for Prime Minister

Letter of Sheikh Haron to Mr. John Howard

Dear Prime Ministerif the war against terrorism is not a war against Islam, you and your
government should prove it by your behaviour not by words. If your war is not a war against
Islam, but it is only against terrorism, why Non Muslims are free to commit terrorist offence
in Australia but Muslims are not allowed? If your war is not a war against Islam, so please
tell me why only and only Muslims victims are targeted and beeninterrogated? Why Non
Muslims who were instructing terrorism on 4thJuly 2007 in Sydney Australia have not been
interrogated yet. We do not expect them to be in custody, we at least expected your Attorney-
General to interrogate or investigate about the case. If Australian Government condemns
discrimination, as Mr. Philip Ruddock has mentioned in his letter, it must be proved by action
not just by words.

* Our Muhammedan overlords call the shots?

9.1 KB
17 August 2007
Has ‘Sunrise’ damaged the Australian society?

Letter of Sheikh Haron to ACMA, Mr. Chris Chapman

4.4 KB
24 August 2007
ACMA is appropriate authority for your terrorism report, not ASIO!

Letter of ASIO to Sheikh Haron

5.4 KB
30 August 2007
Paul ! Please do your duty. It’s your job

Letter of Sheikh Haron to ASIO, Mr. Paul Osullivan

* Besides, sheik Haron issues fatwas, and councels the believers:

Q: A Christian girl loves to marry my Muslim friend. She is like most of Christians who believe Jesus is the son of God. My friend wants to know whether or not he can marry this Christian girl?

A: The marriage with Mushrik is religiously false and can’t be in order. It is Haram to sexually touch the Mushrik partner even after marriage.

Check it out

*

‘There Are No Moderates”

Of course not. The assassins, the suicide bombers are the Muhammedan stormtroopers. They are the ‘tiny, tiny minority of extremists’ and ‘we cannot tar them all with the same brush’ – right? Because Islam is a ‘Religion of Peace’- but when you draw a silly cartoon about the pedophile ‘profit’ Muhammad every Muslim will tell you that you have just insulted 5 gazillion Muslims and that they all have a duty to kill you, you filthy kuffar, how dare you!

abu_hamza_islamist_cleric.jpg

Abu Hamza and footsoldiers

Don’t call me radical. Don’t call me moderate. Call me Muslim.


Let me make something clear for you:

We do not have “radical” and “moderate” in Islam. Muslims are Muslims. Muslims are not divided to two kinds of “radical” and “Moderate”. These names and divisions are made by man, not by God or religion. Radical Muslim and moderate Muslim do not exist. Muslims are Muslims even if they have different interpretation of the religious texts. In Islam there is another division. 1. The Muslims who follow the Quran and practice the religion. 2. The Muslims that believe in God and the messenger of God, Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him), but they do not follow the Quran and do not practise the religion. They just carry the name of Islam. So this division is not only in Islam, we can see it in all other religions. There are practising Christians and non practising Christians. They are not called radical Christians or moderate Christians.

Radical Muslims do not exist. Moderate Muslims do not exist. Extremist Muslims do not exist. According the order of Allah in the Quran we are not allowed to call any name on our religion but Islam, and any name on ourselves but Muslim (I refer you to Chapter 30, Verse 32 of the holy Quran). If a Muslim doesn’t follow the Quran, do not call him/her moderate, but call him a Muslim who is not following the rules of his/her religion. Islam is not divided to two types of hard and soft, radical and moderate. Also the Quran is one unique holy book. There are not few versions of the Quran. I understand that there is variety of different interpretations of verses which are not clear enough and need to be explained by an expert, but that is completely different subject and will not result in division of radical and moderate, and secondly those verses are the minority. The majority of the verses are very clear and without any interpretation and explanation they give one particular guideline to the Muslims and no need that any cleric explain about them. The guidelines of the Quran are very clear. Unfortunately those who follow the Quran and practise their religion are called radical Muslims or extremist or Islamist or fundamentalist. And those who only carry the name of Muslim and Islam without following the orders of Allah in the Holy Quran are called moderate Muslims or understanding Muslims or open minded Muslims! “A part of the letter of Sheikh Haron to the Prime Minister John Howard 14 November 2007”

* Glad we cleared that up, your sheikness. Now, Mr. Rudd, what are we going to do about this?

Sudden Jihad Syndrome? 9 DEAD, 5 WOUNDED IN OMAHA MALL SHOOTING

* We hate to suspect any ‘innocent Muslims’- we never tar all Muslims with the same brush because ‘Islam is not a monolith’ and we can’t condemn 5 gazillion Muslims for the actions of the tiny, tiny minority of extremists that is so small that the combined ummah of 5 gazillion Muslims does just about anything to cover up that they exist at all, you Islamophobe, you!

Anyhow:

All that is known at this point is that the shooter was a black white male, possibly wearing a black ski mask, approximately 6 feet tall and that he is also among the dead. There may have been multiple shooters. At least 8 people are dead victims. The total number of dead is 9 including the dead gunmen.

Obviously we will be following this story closely.

OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — A man with a rifle opened fire at a busy shopping mall Wednesday, killing eight people before taking his own life, police said. Five more people were wounded, two critically.
Shoppers and employees ran screaming through the mall and barricaded themselves in dressing rooms after hearing gunfire. The gunman was found dead on the third floor of the Von Maur department store.
THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP’s earlier story is below.
OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — A gunman opened fire Wednesday at a busy Omaha shopping mall, killing nine people before taking his own life, police said. Five more people were wounded, two critically.

*

* Update: Turns out that this was, for once, not jihad related, but rather a f*kced up- disturbed kid. Since we don’t hear much in the media perhaps we shouldn’t jump to conclusions.  Now the Muslims will tell us that ‘everyone can be a terrorist’ and indeed, there are a lot of ratbags out there with evil intentions. But they don’t have a ‘holy book’ that tells them to kill unbelievers and to ‘strike terror in the hearts of the enemy’- so no need for apologies. It would have been better for all of us if it had been a Muslim, because it forces lazy, complacent kuffars to learn something about the threat that we’re facing.

*

Annapolis Breakthrough Revisited

breakthrough.jpg

British imam’s daughter under police protection after converting to Christianity

Ruth Gledhill, Religion Correspondent of The Times

Hat tip Weasel

jesusslaveallah1.jpg
A British imam’s daughter is living in fear of her life under police protection after she received death threats from her family for converting to Christianity.

*  ‘Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.'” Muhammad

The young woman, aged 32, whose father is a Muslim imam in the north of England, has moved house 45 times to escape detection by her family since she became a Christian 15 years ago.

Hannah, who uses a pseudonym to hide her identity, told The Times how she became a Christian after she ran away from home at 16 to escape an arranged marriage.

The threats against her became more serious a month ago, prompting police to offer her protection in case of an attempt on her life.

* Obviously none of the British dhimmi’s in government or immigration have considered internment and deportation for her clan.
She was speaking on the eve of the launch of a new charity in London today to promote greater religious awareness. Muslims in Britain who wish to convert to Christianity are living in fear of their lives because of Islamic apostasy laws, a senior Church of England bishop will warn at the invitaton-only launch in west London.

The Bishop of Rochester, Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, will claim “freedom to believe” is under threat in Britain because of Islamic hostility to conversion.

Hannah, now employed in multi-faith youth work and who gives talks to churches on Islam, is the daughter of a Lancashire imam whose seven other children are demanding she return to Islam. She has been in hiding,

since her home was attacked by a group of men armed with knives, axes and hammers, in 1994. She will describe today how she is in fear of her life after the death threats against her were recently renewed.

She said: “I left home and I had nowhere to go. My religious education teacher gave me somewhere to live. Even though she tried to make me stay at home on Sundays, I am quite rebellious by nature and I started to go to church with her out of curiosity.”

She said she had been in hiding, on and off, ever since, and has now been given a telephone number she can call for an instant response by police should she need help. The latest threat was a text message from one of her brothers, warning he could not be responsible for his actions if she did not return to Islam.

veil.jpg

Hannah said she was looking forward to getting married so she could change her name and escape detection by her family. Not all Muslims in Britain are this extreme, she believes.

“It is representative of some Muslims. I know the Koran says that anyone who goes away from Islam should be killed as an apostate so in some ways my family are following the Koran. They are following Islam to the word. But I do not think every Muslim would actually act on that.”

Earlier this year, a Policy Exchange study found that 36 per cent of British Muslims aged between 16 and 24 believed those who converted to another religion should be punished by death.

Dr Nazir-Ali will speak out on behalf of Hannah and others suffering persecution for their beliefs in the UK at today’s launch of Lapido Media, a new charity which is seeking to promote “religious literacy” in world affairs.

The Bishop is expected to describe how sharia law in many countries, including parts of Britain, punishes apostasy with death and is viewed as treason by theocratic governments. Dr Nazir-Ali will call on society to offer greater protection, by increasing understanding of what makes people vulnerable.

Pakistan-born Dr Nazir-Ali, who has a Christian and Muslim background, is patron of Lapido Media, funded by donations and trusts including the Jerusalem Trust. The word ‘lapido’ means ‘to speak up for’ in the Acholi language of Northern Uganda. The charity has been named in honour of the courage of Acholi church leaders who campaigned for an end to a little-reported 20-year war there, involving the abduction of 25,000 children

*

The Odyssey of Ayaan Hirsi Ali

* A Rice surprise: who would have guessed?

Ayaan claims Rice helped her get a green card.

The US Secretary of State, she says, expressed her admiration for everything Hirsi Ali “has done for women and freedom.” Rice even helped her obtain a green card, she says proudly. It is quite possible that money to pay for her bodyguards over the past few weeks has been paid by associates of the Bush administration.

01020103850900.jpg
Former Dutch politician Ayaan Hirsi Ali is worshipped by foreign intellectuals, but not always welcome at home. Her opinions provoke Muslims as well as the European left, and she’s been living in very public exile from the Netherlands for over a year.

Even her clothing is provocative, though not at first glance. Ayaan Hirsi Ali wears a soft brown designer jacket with an embroidered floral pattern. When she takes off the jacket, though, there’s a black T-shirt. A black T-shirt underneath reads, in several languages (including Arabic): “Neither Whore Nor Submissive.”
She smoothes the T-shirt, stretches and says: “It’s a fantastic slogan, isn’t it?”

Who can be surprised that this woman polarizes people? That some consider her a kind of Joan of Arc, while others see her as an incorrigible radical? As someone who says that she wants to help oppressed Muslim women, and yet may do more them more damage than good? The daughter of a Somali opposition politician who fled to the Netherlands to escape an arranged marriage, Hirsi Ali is an expert at offending others. A rebellious spirit lurks beneath her graceful exterior and designer clothing.

Since the murder of Theo van Gogh, with whom she produced a film critical of male dominance in Muslim families three years ago, the 38-year-old Hirsi Ali has been traveling the world without a place to call home. She now lives in the United States, but recently came to Europe to promote her autobiography, which has just come out in paperback in Germany.

One of the reasons Hirsi Ali travels so much is a dispute over her personal protection that has been raging for weeks. After calling the Prophet Muhammad a pedophile and a tyrant, Hirsi Ali has become the target of Muslim fanatics.
And the threats are serious. Mohammed Bouyeri, a Dutch citizen of Moroccan descent, shot van Gogh as he was riding a bike down an Amsterdam street in November 2004. In a note he pinned to his victim’s chest with a knife, Bouyeri also threatened to kill Hirsi Ali. By then she already had bodyguards, paid for by the Dutch government. After Van Gogh’s murder the protection was heightened, and three years later Dutch intelligence still considers the risk to her life to be very high.

But she moved to the United States in September 2006, and after a year abroad, was told by the Netherlands that government money for her protection would be canceled — she would have to pay for it herself. The bodyguards who protected Hirsi Ali’s life 24 hours a day, seven days a week, had already cost The Hague €2 million ($2.93 million).

Read it all

Australia: Muhammedan Infil-traitors Engage in Propaganda Warfare & Psycho-terror

‘Sheikh’ tells dead Digger’s dad the loss was for nothing

By Mark Schliebs

* Dead soldier’s father told his son “died for nothing”

* “Hurt” John Worsley says “we were proud of our boy”

* Private Luke Worsely “saved lives of others”

A MAN purporting to be a Muslim cleric wrote to the father of slain Australian soldier Luke Worsley telling him he “can’t be proud” of his son who “died for nothing” – then posted the letter online.

John Worsley, father of 26-year-old commando Private Luke Worsley who was killed by the Taliban in Afghanistan last month, received the letter from “Sheikh Haron” just days after news broke of his son’s death.

“We were hurt (by the letter),” Mr Worsley told NEWS.com.au.

“We’re very proud of our boy.”

Former adviser on to John Howard on Islam, Dr Ameer Ali, said that the letter was ridiculous.

“(Pte Worsley) did his duty, like any other public servant would,” Dr Ali said.

This man (who wrote the letter)… does not respect the lives of other human beings.”

The letter – topped with Mr Worsley’s home address – has been posted on the internet by the mystery “Sheikh”.

“Dear Mr Worsley,” the letter reads. “It is painful but we should be proud when we loose (sic) our dear kids for defending our country while we are unjustly attacked by another country.

“But it is more painful and we can’t be proud when we loose (sic) our kids for nothing!

“We loose (sic) our dear kids for nothing if we unjustly attack to (sic) another country and our kids are killed while the other country is defending itself.”

NEWS.com.au emailed the author through the website where the letter was published but did not receive a response.

0578458100.jpg
Pte Worsley was farewelled at a funeral in Sydney yesterday.

The letter said “it would be nice” if Mr Worsley asked the Department of Defence to organise a ceremony “for the respect of innocent civilians, whether they have been killed by Australians or not”.

“It was nice of Chief of (the) Defence Force Air Chief Angus Houston that (sic) has extended his sympathies to your family… but I don’t know why he has not had any comment for the family of three innocents who were killed in that operation.”

Pte Worsley was killed during a fire-fight against the Taliban on November 23. He was part of an operation against insurgent bomb-makers in the dangerous Oruzgan Province.

At his funeral yesterday, Pte Worsley was described as a “hero” who saved many lives and was an inspiration to his comrades.

“Luke was the first man of the team through the door and was met by enemy forces who opened fire at close range, resulting in Luke being killed almost instantly,” Lieutenant Colonel Mark Smethurst said.

“Luke’s actions upon entering the room, warning of the enemy threat, almost certainly saved the lives of other members of his team.”
Dead soldier’s father told his son “died for nothing”
“Hurt” John Worsley says “we were proud of our boy”
Private Luke Worsely “saved lives of others”
A MAN purporting to be a Muslim cleric wrote to the father of slain Australian soldier Luke Worsley telling him he “can’t be proud” of his son who “died for nothing” – then posted the letter online.

John Worsley, father of 26-year-old commando Private Luke Worsley who was killed by the Taliban in Afghanistan last month, received the letter from “Sheikh Haron” just days after news broke of his son’s death.

“We were hurt (by the letter),” Mr Worsley told NEWS.com.au.

“We’re very proud of our boy.”

Former adviser on to John Howard on Islam, Dr Ameer Ali, said that the letter was ridiculous.

“(Pte Worsley) did his duty, like any other public servant would,” Dr Ali said.

“This man (who wrote the letter)… does not respect the lives of other human beings.”

The letter – topped with Mr Worsley’s home address – has been posted on the internet by the mystery “Sheikh”.

Do you know more about Sheikh Haron? Email us at news@news.com.au or SMS / MMS 0429 300 245

“Dear Mr Worsley,” the letter reads. “It is painful but we should be proud when we loose (sic) our dear kids for defending our country while we are unjustly attacked by another country.

“But it is more painful and we can’t be proud when we loose (sic) our kids for nothing!

“We loose (sic) our dear kids for nothing if we unjustly attack to (sic) another country and our kids are killed while the other country is defending itself.”

NEWS.com.au emailed the author through the website where the letter was published but did not receive a response.

Pte Worsley was farewelled at a funeral in Sydney yesterday.

The letter said “it would be nice” if Mr Worsley asked the Department of Defence to organise a ceremony “for the respect of innocent civilians, whether they have been killed by Australians or not”.

590413335_e577923913_m.jpg

“It was nice of Chief of (the) Defence Force Air Chief Angus Houston that (sic) has extended his sympathies to your family… but I don’t know why he has not had any comment for the family of three innocents who were killed in that operation.”

Pte Worsley was killed during a fire-fight against the Taliban on November 23. He was part of an operation against insurgent bomb-makers in the dangerous Oruzgan Province.

At his funeral yesterday, Pte Worsley was described as a “hero” who saved many lives and was an inspiration to his comrades.

“Luke was the first man of the team through the door and was met by enemy forces who opened fire at close range, resulting in Luke being killed almost instantly,” Lieutenant Colonel Mark Smethurst said.

“Luke’s actions upon entering the room, warning of the enemy threat, almost certainly saved the lives of other members of his team.”

Pte Worsley was the third member of the Australian Defence Forces killed in Afghanistan in the past two months, following the deaths of SAS Trooper David Pearce and Sergeant Matthew Locke in October.

In 2003, SAS trooper Sergeant Andrew Russell died when his vehicle hit a landmine.

*

“Islamophobia” Wankfest in Istanbul

* The usual suspects will whine at each other how misunderstood their Islam is, and if it weren’t for the ignorance of the kuffar everything would be just swell….

Hugh Fitzgerald has more:

There is “Lord” Ahmed, fresh from Khartoum, no doubt expecting to be basking in gratitude from the non-Muslims of Great Britain, for though Al-Bashir had decided to free Gibbons before Ahmed and his traveling companion (a Muslim woman, not married to Lord Ahmed, whom some fellow Believer should not forget to punish for her crime) arrived.

There is the hysterical, ex-nun Karen Armstrong, who needs no introduction, and who believes that Muhammad’s essential function was that of Peacemaker. She apparently still has not figured out that she really must reread the Qur’an, and then find out all about the Hadith (and how their “authenticity” has been ranked to Muslim satisfaction) and the Sira — for Aisha, the Khaybar Oasis, the decapitation of the Banu Qurayza, the murders of Abu Afak and Asma bint Marwan are just of the few of the things that Armstrong forgot to mention, much less to comprehend, in her guide to nothing and nowhere, Islam: A Short History.

There is the crazed antisemite Norman Finkelstein, for whose parents — Holocaust survivors — we must feel sorry. About him nothing more need be said except that at such gatherings one completely lunatic Jewish person is de rigueur, and apparently Israel Shamir was otherwise occupied.

israel_shamir.jpg

* Islamio- agit prop and parvenu Israel Shamir on Swedish welfare sails under false flag as a pretend Jew.

There is Tariq Ramadan, about whom see Frere Tariq, a book-length study of his soft-voice taqiyya (but listen for the hiss underneath at all). He is determined to make sure that the confusion and fog of war continue while Muslims make themselves as comfortable as possible in the Lands of the Infidels, settling in for the long haul and the demographic conquest that, if nothing is done, is assured. It is Tariq Ramadan who promises a new Islam, a “European Islam” that he carefully never defines. He never explains what that “European Islam’s” canonical texts will look like, or how they will differ, those texts and then those tenets of Islam, from the Islam we have all seen, and grown correctly to fear, in Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Iran, Pakistan, indeed everywhere in the Muslim lands, among all those Muslims who take their Islam seriously — which is to say, almost all of them, though they are very good at finding westernized, plausible, smooth-talking representatives to fan out to the capitals of the West to deny, obfuscate, and sometimes, in their own persons, to offer a false view of Islam.

More

Coup Against The White House

* Pamela Geller from Atlas has a take on the intelligence debakel designed to discredit Bush and to stop an attack on the mad Mullah’s of Iran, who can now peacefully assemble their nuclear bombs…

Who is in charge? The NIE report on Iran’s cessation of their nuclear program is a thinly veiled attempt to change the direction (if there is one) on how we handle Iran’s nukes. And that has clearly succeeded.

The permanent bureaucrats in these intelligence agencies are notoriously partisan and their intel is poor at best. These guys are running the country now? Yes, that’s a 21st century coup. Bush will not be able to get anything nothing done on Iran.

This, IMAO is sabotage, sedition. And it’s a very scary turn of the knife.

More here:

John Bolton on the O’Reilly Factor last night

Iran Declares Victory, IAEA Agrees

By Reza Derakhshi

TEHRAN (Reuters) Iran’s president declared victory over the United States on Wednesday and the head of a U.N. watchdog said Iran had been “somewhat vindicated” by a U.S. report that it halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003.

President George W. Bush called for Tehran to “come clean” on its nuclear activities and stop its enrichment of uranium which can potentially be used to make atomic bombs.

ahmadinejad.jpg

But Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Iran would press ahead with its nuclear program which the Islamic Republic says has only peaceful civilian aims.

“Today, the Iranian nation is victorious but you (the United States) are empty-handed,” Ahmadinejad said in a televised speech to a rally in the western Iranian city of Ilam.

Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said the report gave Iran a chance to resolve the crisis and former chief UN arms inspector Hans Blix said it meant there would be no military action against Iran “in the intermediate future”

The UN’s blind nuclear watchdog, sounding as usual like a sleazy apologist for Iran, agrees:

Mohamed El-Baradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the report gave Iran a chance to resolve the crisis.

“It opens a window of opportunity for Iran now because Iran obviously has been somewhat vindicated in saying they have not been working on a weapons program at least for the last few years,” El-Baradei told a news conference in Brazil’s capital.

* Hans Blix, as we all know is a completely deluded jackass. Anyone who reads this blog knows that Muhammad Al Babbledai supports the global jihad. This guy is in the opposite camp and we pay him to deceive us. The world is on skid row…

More

*

Israel Not Buying the NIE

Israeli ambassador Dan Gillerman on the NIE

Simple question: Why would Iran, which floats on an ocean of oil, choose to invest in a nuclear energy program instead of upgrading its refining capacity so that it doesn’t have to import gasoline? He fears there’s only one answer. So does Israeli intelligence: “If one looks at the investment, if one looks at the nature of the project, if you look at the cost to the Iranian economy, there is no logical explanation other than that the Iranian program is not benign.” Even the Times acknowledges that mastering enrichment, which will Iran will now certainly be allowed to do, is the hard part of building a weapon; ElBaradei himself estimated just a few weeks ago that if they’ve worked out the kinks in their 3,000-centrifuge cascade, they could have a bomb in a year. The cause for celebration, especially on the left, isn’t that Iran is no longer a threat, it’s that it’s a threat that Bush has no grounds for confronting militarily and is unlikely to be able to pressure diplomatically. It’s the next president’s problem now.

Ethnic Cleansing Threat To Serbs in Kosovo

By Gethin Chamberlain in Mitrovica, Kosovo, and Bojan PancevskiTelegraph UK

Kosovo mon amour:

The legacy of Clitman’s support for the jihad against the Christian Serbs:

adiclinto-1.jpg

Tens of thousands of Serbs are preparing to flee the troubled Balkan province of Kosovo because of fears that the region is on the brink of a devastating war.

Talks to find a political solution to the future of the region collapsed last week, eight years after Nato intervened to end violence that left more than 2,000 dead.

With Kosovo’s new Albanian-led administration poised to declare independence from Serbia, the old hatreds are resurfacing. Many Serbs – who account for less than 10 per cent of the population – are packing their bags, fearing a new wave of “ethnic cleansing” at the hands of the Albanian majority.

Read it all…

*

Fjordman: Why We Should Oppose an Independent Kosovo

I have said repeatedly that I believe the Balkan wars were far more complex than we are led to believe by the political establishment, and I fear that we out of ideological blindness have come to support some pretty dangerous Muslim forces. I respect Mr. Rustad for exposing the bias against Israelis in the mainstream media, and I am sad to see that he accepts uncritically a similar bias against the Serbs. My point is that you cannot understand recent history in the Balkans without taking the previous seven centuries of Islamic oppression into account.

Sir Jadunath Sarkar, the pre-eminent historian of Mughal India, wrote this about dhimmitude, the humiliating apartheid system imposed upon non-Muslims under Islamic rule: “The conversion of the entire population to Islam and the extinction of every form of dissent is the ideal of the Muslim State. If any infidel is suffered to exist in the community, it is as a necessary evil, and for a transitional period only. (…) A non-Muslim therefore cannot be a citizen of the State; he is a member of a depressed class; his status is a modified form of slavery. He lives under a contract (dhimma) with the State. (…) In short, his continued existence in the State after the conquest of his country by the Muslims is conditional upon his person and property made subservient to the cause of Islam.”

More