Iran to Hezbollah: Islamic Law Permits Jew Killing


* Well, if it is the  “LAW”  it must be alright then, no?

“Do we really believe in a culture of death? Absolutely not. We believe in the culture of martyrdom. Martyrdom is valuable, sacred, respectable, and great, not something that can be used as an accusation. It is an honor for us to be accused of believing in the culture of martyrdom.

Deputy Secretary-General of Hizbullah, Sheik Naim Qassem: We Received Jurisprudent Permission to Carry Out “Martyrdom” Operations and to Fire Misilles at Israeli Civilians from Iran MEMRI Transcript here

Naim Qassem: As for the issue of the culture of death, the culture of martyrdom, the culture of life – with all its different names… It is no secret that the materialistic West, and the atheists in general, and all those who see that the power of Islam is on the rise, and that it is gaining influence – and especially with regard to the philosophy of martyrdom-seeking… They all take a negative position and exert pressure, in order to make the believers abandon the culture of martyrdom. What is the reason? They seek (the pleasures of) this world and compete in this world. They know that if we competed with them according to the rules of this world, they would overcome us, because they are more materialistic than us. Therefore, by materialistic criteria, they would be victorious. But if they compete with us on the issue of faith, we will overcome them, because the competitive power of faith is greater, stronger, and more influential.

So they challenger us, or provoke us, by saying that we have a culture of death. They call martyrdom “death,” in order to make us renounce martyrdom. If we renounce martyrdom, we will only have the strength of our weapons and our numbers, and then they will be able to overcome us. The enemies will be able to overcome us.


“Hizbullah, when it comes to matters of jurisprudence pertaining to its general direction, as well as to its jihad direction, based itself on the decisions of the Jurisprudent. It is the Jurisprudent who permits, and it is the Jurisprudent who forbids. When the resistance of Hizbullah was launched in 1982, it was based on the jurisprudent position and decision of Imam Khomeini, who deemed fighting Israel to be an obligation, and therefore we adhered to this opinion. How Israel should be fought, what equipment you should prepare, when you should or shouldn’t attack – these questions are guided by principles in Islamic religious law, and you can act in this direction, according to your abilities. Therefore, we covered our jihad position with regard to fighting Israel with the decision of the Jurisprudent. “With regard to all the other details – whenever we need jurisprudent clarifications regarding what is permitted and what is forbidden on the jihad front, we ask, receive general answers, and implement then. Even with regard to martyrdom operations – a person cannot kill himself unless he has jurisprudent permission.

Alright: ‘Ishmail Ax’ was not a Muslim


…and we are all guilty of accusing innocent Muslims of being mass-murderers, right? Right?

No further comment. 


Killers are everything but original. If the pictures sent by were not reminiscent enough of Islamist vigilantes, his argumentation cannot be more identical – his college classmates and teachers were not moral enough to live and therefore he had a right to kill them:

You had everything you wanted. Your Mercedes wasn’t enough, you brats. Your golden necklaces weren’t enough, you snobs. Your trust fund wasn’t enough. Your vodka and Cognac weren’t enough. All your debaucheries weren’t enough. Those weren’t enough to fulfill your hedonistic needs. You had everything

The Iranian supreme court could not agree more. It has just reaffirmed that according to their interpretation of Muslim law, individuals have the right to decide that their fellow citizens are not moral enough to live and proceed to execute them:

The Iranian Supreme Court has overturned the murder convictions of six members of a prestigious state militia who killed five people they considered “morally corrupt.” . . .

The ruling stems from a case in 2002 in Kerman that began after the accused watched a tape by a senior cleric who ruled that Muslims could kill a morally corrupt person if the law failed to confront that person.

Some 17 people were killed in gruesome ways after that viewing, but only five deaths were linked to this group. The six accused, all in their early 20s, explained to the court that they had taken their victims outside the city after they had identified them. Then they stoned them to death or drowned them in a pond by sitting on their chests.

In other words, Iran would be acting virtuously if it used its nukes to destroy any country (not only Israel) it considers too immoral to survive. Oh, yes, the IAEA just informed us that Iran produces nuclear fuel in underground facility.

Pamela from Atlas Shrugs has more… 

Catmeat Sheik Hilali: “I love Australia more than Howard- Say otherwise and I will sue..!”

Shiek Taj al-Din al-Hilali, the Mufti of Australia who compared unveiled women to “uncovered meat” (therefore deserving of rape), is returning to Australia from the Middle East. He’s taking a page from the Council on American Islamic Relations’ playbook, and threatening to sue anyone who criticized his Dark Ages hate speech and support for terrorists: Sheik Alhilali primed to face accusers.


* He ‘loves’ Australia more than we love him. Why would that be?

Hell hath no fury like a mufti scorned, but at least he doesn’t want to kill us all, not just yet. For the time being he will sue…

Controversial mufti Sheik Taj Aldin Alhilali will return to Australia this week primed to launch legal action against those accusing him of supporting terrorism.

(There it is again, that ‘controversial‘ bullshit word that the MSM uses to circumscribe the most offensive deeds and the creeps who commit them. Who are we to judge, right?)

“I will not hesitate to take legal action against anyone who directed at me accusations during my absence,” he told SBS Radio from Egypt on Tuesday. “Betraying the country or giving donations to Hezbollah or any terrorist organisation in Lebanon, these are dangerous accusations. This is unacceptable, defamation, without proof, based on malice, racism and based on wrong information.”

* Hilali has proven time and time again that he’s a terrorist sympathizer. Pointing it out doesn’t make anyone ‘racist’-

The Australian Federal Police (AFP) are investigating donations allegedly handed out in Lebanon by Sheik Alhilali to Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah. According to media reports, the mufti distributed $10,000 to Sheik Bilal Shaaban, the head of the Islamic Unity Movement in Lebanon, who allegedly has links to the radical Islamist movement Hezbollah. …

On SBS Radio, the mufti said Mr Howard, who called him a “joke”, should be honoured to see a migrant claiming to be more “Aussie” than him.

“I love Australia more than anyone. This is competition and not disrespect to his position,” Sheik Alhilali told SBS Radio. “(Mr Howard) knows I am a moderate in Australia. I am against terrorism and fundamentalism. I mean, safety for Australia. I will defend it with all my might, yet (Mr Howard) tries to deprive the community of someone defending moderation. This is a dictatorship.”

Last week, the mufti was quoted by Iranian media as urging Australian Muslims “to stand in the trenches with the Islamic Republic of Iran which possesses the might and the power”.

* He didn’t ask whether Australia loves him. Perhaps love and rape is the same thing for him…

Here’s the cover from Jihad Watch

Habib rubs it no more

Welfare cheat loses

From the Australian


FORMER Guantanamo Bay inmate Mamdouh Habib has lost his appeal against a jury’s rejection of his defamation claim involving a Sydney newspaper.
The Court of Appeal today dismissed Mr Habib’s appeal, ruling the NSW Supreme Court jury was open to find an article published in The Daily Telegraph was not defamatory.

Mr Habib had sued the newspaper’s publisher Nationwide News (owned by the publisher of , claiming an August 2005 article implied he was a welfare cheat.

The jury last year rejected the claim, finding the page five story headlined “A stretch but Habib wants his pension”, did not carry the imputation Mr Habib was seeking Centrelink disability payments, despite being able to participate in the Sydney City to Surf run.

Mr Habib was captured in Pakistan in late 2001 and detained at the US military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for three years as a suspected terrorist.

more …

Sheik’n it up in Britain: “Polygamous husbands can claim cash for their harems”

From the Evening Standard
* Polygamous husbands settling in Britain with multiple wives can claim extra benefits for their “harems” even though bigamy is a crime in the UK, it has emerged.


Comedy Harem Scene

Opposition MPs are demanding an urgent change in the law, claiming that the Government is recognising and rewarding a custom which has no legal status and which is “alien” to this country’s cultural traditions.
Yes. Exactly.

Officials said yesterday a review was now under way into whether the state should continue to pay out income support, jobseeker’s allowance and housing and council tax benefits to ‘extra’ spouses.
Islamic law allows a man to take up to four wives, providing he can provide for them fairly and equally. But British law only ever recognises one spouse, while bigamy is punishable by up to seven years in jail.
However, if a husband and his wives arrive and settle in Britain having wed in a country where polygamy is legal, then the UK benefits system recognises his extra wives as dependents and pays them accordingly.
The Department of Work and Pensions admitted yesterday it had no figures on how many families are claiming for multiple wives.
Official DWP guidelines on housing and council tax benefit states: “If you were legally married to more than one partner under the laws of a country that permits this, then your relationship is called a polygamous marriage.
“In this case your household consists of you and any partners who live with you and to whom you are married.”
Officials were unable to say when the rules were brought in, claiming they had “evolved over decades”.
Tory MP for Monmouth David Davies condemned the arrangements as “appalling”, and called for an immediate halt to the payments.
He said: “People who come to this country must be prepared to abide by our laws and rules. Polygamy is completely alien to our cultural and legal tradition, and it’s disgraceful that our benefits system is recognising and rewarding it.
“Why are some people in Government falling over themselves to undermine every tradition that has made this country what it is?”

There are thought to be thousands of polygamous marriages in Britain not recognised in law – mostly within the Muslim community.
Muslim couples are only married in the eyes of the state if they undergo a register office wedding as well as a Nikah, or religious ceremony.
A spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain said it was quite common for men here to undergo more than one Nikah with different wives. This does not count as bigamy since only the first marriage is legally recognised.


A DWP official insisted the rules did not “reward” polygamy, as second wives receive less in benefits than single women. A single person can claim just under £60 per week in jobseeker’s allowance, while couples receive up to £92.80, but each ‘additional spouse’ in a polygamous marriage receives an extra £33.65.
* It’s still money they wouldn’t have otherwise, and it’s also still taxpayer money, which those taxpayers could surely put to good use for their own families. And it’s just plain bad policy that undermines British culture and the rule of civil law.

Religion of Peace Strikes Again in Turkey


Murderous Islamic supremacists strike again in Turkey:

3 killed in attack on Christian publishing house in Turkey.

ISTANBUL, Turkey: Assailants killed three people Wednesday at a publishing house that distributed Bibles, in the latest attack apparently targeting Turkey’s tiny Christian minority.

The three victims were found with their throats slit and their hands and legs bound at the Zirve publishing house in Malatya, a city in eastern central Turkey, local Gov. Ibrahim Dasoz said. One was found still alive, and was taken to the hospital but later died, he said.

Two of the victims were Turkish, and one was a German who had lived in Malatya since 2003, Dasoz said. The German ambassador to Turkey said he was shocked by the attack.

Thai Jihad in Full Swing

* Emissaries of the Religion of Peaceâ„¢ are burning, bombing and beheading Buddhists in south Thailand, and the media universally refuse to label them as “terrorists.” The word has been effectively banished from mainstream media; there are only “insurgents” and “militants,” no matter how appalling or repulsive their acts: Suspects Muslim insurgents kill 2 Buddhists, leaving one beheaded, in southern Thailand.

BANGKOK, Thailand: Suspected Muslim insurgents shot and killed two Buddhist laborers and then beheaded one of them as deadly violence and scattered bombings continued Wednesday in restive southern Thailand, police said.

A deputy police chief in Narathiwat, Col. Noppadol Pueksomon, was seriously injured when he stepped on a hidden bomb while inspecting one of several sites in Narathiwat where bombs exploded, said police Col. Paisal Chaibuth.

The injured officer lost his left leg and left hand in the blast, one of at least four that occurred early Wednesday in Narathiwat. He was flown to a hospital by helicopter.

“His condition is still unstable,” said Dr. Sumeth Pirawut, director of the Prince of Songkhla Hospital.

In separate violence, three suspected insurgents stormed a construction site late Tuesday in the Sisakorn district of Narathiwat province and fatally shot two Buddhist workers, said police Lt. Pattarakorn Srisurin, according to a witness.

After shooting their victims, the attackers beheaded one of the corpses before fleeing.

“Germans will always be targets for kidnappings all over the world until the German government pulls its troops out (of Afghanistan)”

BERLIN, April 17, 2007 (UPI) — Concerns are rising about the growing number of terror threats against Germany, formerly a country spared from Islamist violence. Ever since the abduction of two Germans in Baghdad, the Islamists have stepped up the rhetorical warfare against Berlin.
* Obviously, it won’t stop there.

In a video message to the German TV show “Spiegel TV,” the Global Islamic Media Front, or GIMF — a German language Web site that has in the past posted Islamist videos — said that more Germans will be abducted in the future. The GIMF said it was relaying the message in the name of the kidnappers of the two German hostages in Iraq.
The kidnappers wanted to tell Berlin that “even if the two Germans are killed, Germans will always be targets for kidnappings all over the world until the German government pulls its troops out (of Afghanistan),” German news magazine Der Spiegel quoted from the message.
It remains unclear whether the Web site hosts are really in contact with the kidnappers; they have in the past posted and edited the kidnappers’ video messages to the government.
Berlin-born Hannelore Kraus, 61, and her son were snatched in early February by armed men who entered their home in Baghdad, where the woman has lived since she had married an Iraqi professor. A crisis team has been set up in the German Foreign Ministry to get the pair released. Already, two ultimatums threatening their lives have run out.