Are People Waking Up?

The worst hatemongers from the ‘RoP’ are usually the first to call others ‘bigots, hypocrites, Islamophobes and haters’-, something which, coming from those who suck the hatred in with the mothers milk, is called projection. Accusing the accuser, deliberately confusing and deflecting away from the issues, lying and obscuring, this is all part and parcel of the strategy to spread the ‘RoP’ in the lands of the infidels. This is a strategy called ‘kitman & taqiyya’. Unfortunately the unholy alliance of the left-wing moonbats with the great unwashed masses from the Middle East protects the rights of those who came to conquer, to spread their poisonous ideology in the lands of the infidels. ‘All religions are the same,’ we are told, but are they really?

Some people seem to be waking up:


Critics interrupt speaker’s talk on Islam
One woman was ejected, another nearly arrested

By Jeff Hood
Lodi Bureau Chief
January 21, 2007 6:00 AM
STOCKTON – A talk on the basic tenets of Islam was repeatedly interrupted Saturday by a few anti-Muslim members of a crowd at the Cesar Chavez Central Library.

One woman was forced to leave early in the two-hour program after she accused guest speaker Tarek Mourad of lying, yelling that Islam’s holy book teaches Muslims to kill Jews and Christians and that Muslims are trying to take over the Western world.


Read it all…

Kurnatz & the ‘Human Rights’ Circus (Continued)

Background on this story here:



Pressure Mounts on German Foreign Minister in Guantanamo Hearings

By Ralf Beste, Petra Bornhöft, Horand Knaup and Holger Stark

German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier has come under fire following testimony by a Bremen resident who says he was tortured at Guantanamo Bay. The charges could deeply damage the reputation of a senior official in a government that prided itself on promoting human rights.

(The torture claims are straight from the Al Qaeda playbook, but I wonder whether the Dhimmie judges or prosecutors even bother to read up on it)

Here’s the link:

Former Guantanamo inmate Murat Kurnaz testified before a parliamentary committee last week.

Last week Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Germany’s foreign minister and acting president of the European Union Council, considered himself to be once again at the heart of world affairs. On Wednesday evening he hosted a private dinner for United States Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in a suite at the Ritz-Carlton in Berlin. The two discussed, as Steinmeier proudly reported, “not just the small steps, but also the political horizon” for the peace process in the Middle East. On Thursday he then met with newly sworn-in Austrian Chancellor Alfred Gusenbauer for a tête-à-tête aimed at getting the stalled European constitution back on track.
However, just as Steinmeier was trying play a part in shaping the future of the world, the past abruptly caught up with him — in particular, the question of whether as head of the chancellery under the former government of Gerhard Schröder, he bears responsibility for the fact that Murat Kurnaz — a Turkish citizen born and raised in Germany — sat for years in Guantanamo, when he could have returned home to his family in Bremen.


Read it all…

Religion of Peace Member Threatens to Blow Up Paper

Al-Qa’ida in ‘threat’ to blow up paper

Rebecca Weisser/ with thanks to The Australian

January 24, 2007

A MAN claiming to represent al-Qa’ida in Australia has left a telephone message at an Arabic Australian newspaper threatening to kill its editor-in-chief and destroy its offices in Sydney and Melbourne.
Apparently reading from a script, the Arabic-speaking caller threatened to butcher every Iraqi Kurd and Shi’ite in Australia.
ASIO and NSW police are investigating the message, left for al-Furat editor-in-chief Hussein Khoshnow 10 days ago.

The caller claims his “well-structured organisation” will track down the names and addresses of the newspaper’s reporters.

“We will destroy the newspaper’s headquarters in Sydney very soon, God willing,” the caller says. “We will destroy the newspaper’s headquarters in Melbourne. You will be butchered. Every Iraqi Kurd and Shi’ite in Australia will be butchered.”

Do you feel the love already? Read on….

End of Multiculturalism

Amanda Vanstone Sacked

Long overdue, but it seems the government has got the message:

Thanks to John Howard we might see a bit of a shake-up in the immigration ministries. Is it true that many immigration offices in Australia are infiltrated by Muslims who actively work against the interests of the country by rubber stamping and fast-tracking immigrants from Islamic countries?

If so, will they be sacked and replaced? How far does the shake-up go?


With thanks to the Daily Telegraph


End of multiculturalism
January 23, 2007

PRIME Minister John Howard officially scrapped multiculturalism today as he sacked Immigration Minister Amanda Vanstone and renamed her old department.

The trouble-plagued Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (DIMA) will now be known as the Department of Immigration and Citizenship, with former Workplace Relations Minister Kevin Andrews the new minister.

Mr Howard defended the change, saying Australians believed that immigration should lead to citizenship.

“I think the title of the new department expresses the desire and the aspiration, and that is that people who come to this country, who emigrate, immigrants, become Australians,” Mr Howard told reporters.

“That’s what the Australian people want.”


Yes, Sir: That’s what we want. It shouldn’t end there!

Read it all:

Facing the Islamist Menace

Christopher Hitchens sez Mark Steyn’s new book is a welcome wake-up call

Christopher Hitchens

Mark Steyn


Mark Steyn’s new book is a welcome wake-up call.

In the prologue to his new book, America Alone: The End of the World As We Know It, Mark Steyn sarcastically alludes to two people whom, in different ways, I know well. The first is novelist Martin Amis, ridiculed by Steyn for worrying about environmental apocalypse when the threat to civilization is obviously Islamism; the second is Jack Straw, formerly Tony Blair’s foreign secretary, mocked for the soft and conciliatory line he took over the affair of the Danish cartoons. The dazzling fiction writer and the pedestrian social-democratic politician are for Steyn dual exemplars of his book’s main concern: the general apathy and surrender of the West in the face of a determined assault from a religious ideology, or an ideological religion, afflicted by no sickly doubt about what it wants or by any scruples about how to get it.

I might quibble about Steyn’s assessment—Amis has written brilliantly about Mohammed Atta’s death cult, for example, while Jack Straw made one of the best presentations to the UN of the case for liberating Iraq. But it’s more useful to point out two things that have happened between the writing of this admirably tough-minded book and its publication. Jack Straw, now the leader of the House of Commons, made a speech in his northern English constituency in October, in which he said that he could no longer tolerate Muslim women who came to his office wearing veils. The speech catalyzed a long-postponed debate not just on the veil but on the refusal of assimilation that it symbolizes. It seems to have swung the Labour Party into a much firmer position against what I call one-way multiculturalism. Prime Minister Tony Blair confirmed the shift with a December speech emphasizing the “duty” of immigrants to assimilate to British values.

* Read it all, its well worth it! 

Questions for Moderate Muslims

While I am personally in favor of reversing Muhammedan immigration, there is no doubt that there are many Muslims for identification purposes only, some who call themselves Muslims out of filial piety or others who are secular and truly integrate and assimilate in a multicultural society.

To separate friend from foe, perhaps our immigration officials should start asking the right questions.


Here is a test-list from Daniel Pipes, which many Muslims ‘proudly’ proclaimed they ‘failed’ on his blog.

Useful questions might include:


Violence: Do you condone or condemn the Palestinians, Chechens, and Kashmiris who give up their lives to kill enemy civilians? Will you condemn by name as terrorist groups such organizations as Abu Sayyaf, Al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya, Groupe Islamique Armée, Hamas, Harakat ul-Mujahidin, Hizbullah, Islamic Jihad, Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Tayyiba, and al-Qaida?

Modernity: Should Muslim women have equal rights with men (for example, in inheritance shares or court testimony)? Is jihad, meaning a form of warfare, acceptable in today’s world? Do you accept the validity of other religions? Do Muslims have anything to learn from the West?

Secularism: Should non-Muslims enjoy completely equal civil rights with Muslims? May Muslims convert to other religions? May Muslim women marry non-Muslim men? Do you accept the laws of a majority non-Muslim government and unreservedly pledge allegiance to that government? Should the state impose religious observance, such as banning food service during Ramadan? When Islamic customs conflict with secular laws (e.g., covering the face for drivers’ license pictures), which should give way?

Islamic pluralism: Are Sufis and Shi’ites fully legitimate Muslims? Do you see Muslims who disagree with you as having fallen into unbelief? Is takfir (condemning fellow Muslims with whom one has disagreements as unbelievers) an acceptable practice?
Self-criticism: Do you accept the legitimacy of scholarly inquiry into the origins of Islam? Who was responsible for the 9/11 suicide hijackings?

Defense against militant Islam: Do you accept enhanced security measures to fight militant Islam, even if this means extra scrutiny of yourself (for example, at airline security)? Do you agree that institutions accused of funding terrorism should be shut down, or do you see this a symptom of bias?

Goals in the West: Do you accept that Western countries are majority-Christian and secular or do you seek to transform them into majority-Muslim countries ruled by Islamic law?

It is ideal if these questions are posed publicly – in the media or in front of an audience – thereby reducing the scope for dissimulation.


More questions:


Justification of any Islamic Terrorism, Palestinian or otherwise

Supporting or refusing to condemn Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda, Hamas, or other terrorists or terrorist organizations by name

Promoting jihad for Muslims to fight against what they determine is “injustice” or “aggression”

Demands for Sharia law in the West, or denying that Sharia forbids equal rights for women and members of religions other than Islam

Demanding that Australians accommodate the public expression of Islamic laws, customs, and practices that conflict with, or are harmful to Australian laws, customs, and practices

Denying that Muslims were involved in the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and other attacks around the world

Refusal to cooperate with or inciting others not to cooperate with authorities or standard security procedures

Branding progressive Muslims or Muslims of different opinions as apostates.

Refusal to interact, converse, or socialize with non-Muslims

Now lets see how many Muslim posters we can attract to participate in this test, which should be compulsory.

Can a Good Muslim Become a Good Australian?

This has previously been posted slightly different,  with ‘American’ instead of Australian. I have changed the text a little bit to make it fit:

Can a good Muslim be a good Australian?

Theologically – no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon god of Arabia.

Religiously – no. Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256)

Scripturally – no. Because his allegiance is to the five pillars of Islam and the Quran (Koran). Don’t forget the ‘pinnacle of islam’- the jihad against unbelievers and Jooozzz…

Geographically – no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

Socially – no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.

Politically – no. Because he must submit to the mullah (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and Destruction of America, the great Satan. Islam is a global movement for world domination.

Domestically – no. Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34).

Intellectually – no. Because he cannot accept the
American Constitution or any other ‘man-made law’- since it is based on Judeo-Christian principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.

Philosophically – no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually – no. There’s no spirituality in Islam. The promise of 72 virgins and 24 boyz in the afterlife focuses on carnal pleasures.

Jews and Christians believe God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred nor is he ever called love in The Quran’s 99 excellent names.

Therefore after much study and deliberation…perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. They obviously cannot be both “good” Muslims and good Australians. Call it what you wish…it’s still the truth. The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future. This war is bigger than most Australians know or understand.

Muhammedan Madness On Display

As a longtime reader and contributor to Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch and Dhimmi Watch I must say that these two websites are amongst the most important in the world today. In order to understand the global jihad the writings of Robert Spencer & Hugh Fitzgerald make these sites the most educational, irrefutable and knowledge-based sites on the web. Credit where credit is due, so of course we have to highly recommend the indefatigable Ali Sina and his FFI (Faith Freedom International) website, and Charles Johnson from Little Green Footballs who exposes the lunacy of the left, their deception, fraud, lies and scandalous corruption on a daily basis.

You can’t reason with unreasonable people, but there are many of us who still don’t understand anything about Islam, who believe its us ‘who are at fault’- who would insist we treat them like misbehaved children rather than assassins and potential terrorists, who wish to force a bizarre and twisted ideology on us.
For these people every little bit helps. The poster here may be just a mental lightweight, a simple idiot. But he is the prototype of the muslim masses who will cut your throat for Allah. If it helps your understanding of what we’re up against then this might be well worth posting:

This is from Jihad Watch today. I thought worthwhile posting it here since it puts Muhammedan insanity on display, from ‘The Problem is not America…or me, an invitation for Dinesh De Souza, here is the post from a soldier of Allah:

As I read some of the comments in this forum, it’s clear that most of you are ignorant to other religions, most notably Islam. So I decided to include some FACTS about Islam.

Islam = Total submission to god
Muslim= One who submits to god
Allah= God (also used by arab speaking christians and jews)
Out of the 25 prohets mentioned in the Quran, the five most important in Islam are: Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad (pbuh).
Muslims, Christians, and Jews pray to the same god.

Islam is not a name, but a description: “Total submission to god”. And if you attack Islam profanely, you are attacking anybody who believes in the one true God, which would also include Christians and Jews.

“Surely, those who believe, those who are Jewish, the Christians, the converts; anyone who
1.)believes in God, and
2.)believes in the Hereafter, and
3.)leads a righteous life, will receive their recompense from their Lord; they have nothing to fear, nor will they grieve.”
Sura [2:62,5:69]

Go out meet a muslims, read the Quran and find out for yourself the truth about real muslims, and not criminals.


Answered here:

Posted by: deathtocrusaders at January 22, 2007 03:31 AM
I think I’ll start with Al-Anfal and Al-Tawba. Can I direct deposit my jizya with you deathtocrusaders? Or would you prefer to ambush me and cut off my head? I’m trying to work with you.

Posted by: Beagle at January 22, 2007 03:47 AM

‘Go out meet a muslims, read the Quran and find out for yourself the truth about real muslims, and not criminals.’

You did not tell us how to differentiate between a Muslim and the criminal.

P.S Love the handle.

Posted by: western infidel at January 22, 2007 04:21 AM

Citizenships revoked to Bosnian Jihadists

Al Qaeda Jihadist protesting possible revoking of his citizenship in Sarajevo, December 11, 2006.

With thanks to Serbianna:

January 15, 2007
Bosnia (FT) — Under pressure from western states over fears it may become a European base for Islamic terror cells, Bosnia is revoking citizenship it granted to hundreds of foreign Muslims who came to the country to fight the Serbs and Croats in the wars of the 1990s. Many of the Jihadists have married local Bosnian Muslim women.

Hard to believe that the bureaucrats in the EU  should have woken up. However, those who know about the ‘strong family ties’ and inner workings of Muhammedan jihad families will point out that they will never get rid of them or that they will never go back to where they came from, unless forcibly evicted. So rest assured that this Bosnian hotbed of jihad insurgency will be with us for a long, long time to come.


The announcement that the first batch of passports had been canceled coincided last week with the decision of a Bosnian court to convict four men of planning a bomb attack on an unspecified European target.

“So far we have revoked 330 citizenships,” said Vjekoslav Vukovic, the head of a commission established to review the granting of about 1,500 passports since 1991.

“The majority of them are from African and Asian countries,” Mr Vukovic said of the people whose citizenship had been revoked, adding that some 500 cases were still pending.

Hundreds of Muslim men arrived in Bosnia to fight as mujahideen, or “holy warriors”, during a 1991-1995 war with Serbs and Croats, and many obtained citizenship afterwards by marrying local women or as a reward for their service to the Bosnian Muslims. The worst atrocities against Christians have been committed by these foreign fighters and not one has been indicted by the Hague court.

Bosnia has come under suspicion in recent years as a potential base for terror cells and organisations that raise and launder money for groups linked to al-Qaeda.

Last week, two Bosnians, a Swede and a Turkish man were convicted of travelling to Bosnia to prepare a terrorist attack against a European target, with the intention of forcing western troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. A fifth man was jailed last May after admitting involvement in the same plot.

Six Algerians were arrested in Bosnia in late 2001, on suspicion of planning attacks on the country’s US and British embassies. They have been held in the US-run Guantanamo Bay prison camp in Cuba since early in 2002.


when the Bosnian jihad was in full swing, Bin Laden brought some 20.000 foreign mujaheddin to this former Yugoslav  province. Amongst them was also Mohammed Dawood, aka David Hicks, now inmate in Gitmo.

Many stayed. To revoke citizenship for 330   does nothing to reduce the threat of jihad warfare against the west.

Love Letter to Australia from a Turkish Migrant

With thanks to Gramfan

I just picked this up from the comments section and I think its worthwhile to reprint the whole text including the link right here:,21985,21091961-5006029,00.htmlI

It sure makes good reading and it will warm many hearts. But I’m afraid something is missing. Guess what?

I will comment later. For now I invite your comments:

I’m so proud to be an Aussie
John Ilhan

January 21, 2007 12:00am
Article from: Sunday Herald Sun

JOHN Ilhan writes: IT’S an important time to consider what it really means to be an Australian.

Australia Day is just around the corner, allowing us to express our patriotic feelings with pride.

Australia has given me everything. It has embraced Crazy John’s and allowed it to become a successful company employing hundreds of people. I met an Australian girl from Hawthorn who became my wife and now we are a loving family of six following the recent proud birth of our son.

Of course, nationalism can also be misdirected, as the events of the first day at the Australian Open showed when the destructive side of patriotic jingoism raised its ugly head. No matter what our background, we are Australians.

The loyalty first and foremost to Australia should also be remembered by some religious leaders, including some radical Muslim leaders in Australia, who pretend to speak for the faith, but instead promote intolerance and hatred. These thankfully are in the minority, but they should respect Australian laws and not preach division and fear. If they cannot respect Australian law then they should have their citizenship revoked or not be allowed back in the country if they are living overseas.

My Muslim faith qualifies me to strongly denounce any racist and inflammatory comments made by any Muslim leaders because they perpetuate a stereotype that is unhelpful and dangerous.

I am the proud son of Turkish parents. I missed out on being born in Australia by a few years, but each day I thank my lucky stars that I came to this country. Most people came to this country to build a better life. They should be thankful and grateful to be here. Therefore immigrants must learn the Australian way of life, culture and learn the English language.

For many Australians, the true awakening of our national identity was at Gallipoli. Each year thousands of young Australians travel to the Turkish coast to discover the sacrifices and courage shown by those young Anzacs in World War I.

In recent years there has been a growing appreciation also of the courage and determination shown by the Turkish troops in that battle.

I had relatives who fought in the First World War against the Anzacs, yet today, if there was another world war, I would fight for Australia without hesitation. I would die for this country.

I love Australia for what it stands for. It embraces opportunity, inclusion and, most important of all, mateship. What Australia has taught me is that if you give something – like the hand of friendship or provide a service that fulfils a need – you will be repaid many times over. They say that America is the “land of opportunity”, but I say Australia is. I’m a good example – a boy from Broadmeadows made good.

That is also why I am giving back to the community in the form of the llhan Food Allergy Foundation to promote research and education into food allergies that affect hundreds of thousands of Australians.

On Australia Day, I am lucky enough to be playing the role of an ambassador and will speak to a gathering of people in Melbourne about my family and what it means to be Australian. It will be a chance to celebrate with others what was the best decision my family ever made — to come to this wonderful country and the great city of Melbourne.

Australia doesn’t owe us anything – we owe Australia.

JOHN ILHAN is founder and chief executive of mobile phone chain Crazy John’s.