Somalia: Islamic pirates rape, and impregnate, Canadian captive

by sheikyer mami on April 9, 2009

Don’t these kidnappers know that taking captives for ransom is totally unislamic? Why don’t we sent Sherifa Zuhur to straighten these misguided Muslims out and put them on the right track?

Somali pirates currently hold 700 hostages… (seems to be the only industry there is..)

 CBS-tart Katie Couric just disabused her listeners that Somali pirates only resort to piracy for “lack of other economic opportunities”- how can we get her to go to Somalia to give us a first hand report and a piece of the action?

0823Somalia_Missing_400big.jpg
Desperately missing home

She was trying to find refuge in a mosque?  She must be a red hot moonbat.   Next thing you know she marries her rapist and keeps the ransom…

Her kidnappers demand 2.5 million as ransom. Lets make a deal: Instead of returning the Somali-Canadian terrorist just arrested back to Canada, Somalia can keep him and return in his stead these captive Canadians to Canada. Something of an even swap.

Canada returns the “Hawiye kidnap Canadian journalist is pregnant,” from TFSF, April 8 (thanks to JW):

Related: * British moonbat journalism student gang-raped by Muslim ‘refugees’ in Calais

MOGADISHU –Amanda Lindhout, a Canadian journalist who was abducted by habar-gidir .. hawiye al-shabaab wing gunmen in the Somali capital Mogadishu about eight months ago is reportedly pregnant after she was apparently raped by her abductors

Sources say the Canadian journalist Amanda and an Australian photojournalist are being held by the militia in the northeastern neighbourhood of Suqa Holaha habar-girir hawye Terrorist neighborhood in Mogadishu. The abductors have demanded $2.5 million of ransom from the two journalists to release.

Amanda and the Australian photojournalist once escaped from a house in Suqa Holaha neighnourhood and entered a mosque near by, but they were recaptured again. militia who kidnapped the journalists claims they are al-shabab Terrorist Hawiye wing . Some reports suggest that one the abductors made Amanda as his wife

 

From popular Islamic websites today

“Islam ensured that the slave girl’s duties were not restricted merely to domestic chores but also gave her master permission to copulate with her. This concession created an atmosphere of love and harmony between the slave girl and her master. Islam thereby raised the status of the war captive-maidens close to that of wives. It was a psychological cure to her grief-stricken heart, being deprived of her family and thrown into the hands of a strange society.” (1) 
http://www.islam.tc/ask-imam/view.php?q=5482 

A similar popular website, Islam Q & A, reviews several Islamic scholarly opinions and concludes: 

“The Book of Allaah indicates that the sexual relationships that are permitted are only of two types, either marriage or those (women slaves) whom one’s right hand possesses. 
Al-Umm, 5/43. 

“The wife has no right to object to her husband owning female slaves or to his having intercourse with them. 
And Allaah knows best.” 
http://63.175.194.25/index.php?ln=eng&QR=1038…

(Sahih Muslim) “Chapter 29: IT IS PERMISSIBLE TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH A CAPTIVE WOMAN AFTER SHE IS PURIFIED (OF MENSES OR DELIVERY) IN CASE SHE HAS A HUSBAND, HER MARRIAGE IS ABROGATED AFTER SHE BECOMES CAPTIVE” 

Sahih Muslim, Book 8, Number 3432 (also 3433, 3434): 
Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (Allah her pleased with him) reported that at the Battle of Hanain Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that: “And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (iv. 24)” (i. e. they were lawful for them when their ‘Idda period came to an end). 

Sunan Abu Dawud, Volume 2, Number 2150: 
“Abu Said al-Khudri said: “The apostle of Allah sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Quranic verse, “And all married women (are forbidden) unto your save those (captives) whom your right hand possesses”. That is to say, they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period.”” 

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 34, Number 432: 
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: 
that while he was sitting with Allah’s Apostle he said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence. 

Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3371 (3371-3388): 
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. 

Malik’s Muwatta, Book 29, Number 29.32.95: 
Yahya related to me from Malik from Rabia ibn Abi Abd ar-Rahman from Muhammad ibn Yahya ibn Habban that Ibn Muhayriz said, “I went into the mosque and saw Abu Said al-Khudri and so I sat by him and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Said al-Khudri said, ‘We went out with the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, on the expedition to the Banu al-Mustaliq. We took some Arabs prisoner, and we desired the women as celibacy was hard for us. We wanted the ransom, so we wanted to practise coitus interruptus. We said, ‘Shall we practise coitus interruptus while the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, is among us before we ask him?’ We asked him about that and he said, ‘You don’t have to not do it. There is no self which is to come into existence up to the Day of Rising but that it will come into existence.’ ” 

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 637: 
Narrated Buraida: “The Prophet sent ‘Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and I hated Ali, and ‘Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, “Don’t you see this (i.e. Ali)?” When we reached the Prophet I mentioned that to him. He said, “O Buraida! Do you hate Ali?” I said, “Yes.” He said, “Do you hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumus.””

Canadians who are reading this story should send this headline and link around widely to news media outlets, politicians, etc. Rape of non-Muslim female captives should be shown as yet another one of those atrocious policies of Islamic law that has outraged even the media and politicians in Canada over the past week. 

Islam permits rape and forced impregnation of non-Muslim female captives. According to the sahih Hadith of Bukhari and Muslim, when Muslims were raping female captives, they asked Muhammad whether or not they should also perform coitus interruptus, and he is reported to have said either that it doesn’t matter or that he preferred they didn’t do coitus interruptus. That is, he preferred that they not do it, because it is Allah’s will whether or not a baby would be born, and that they “could not turn it away.” (Muhammad’s preferred option of not using coitus interruptus would obviously lead to forced impregnation, or as Muhammad claimed, impregnation by Allah’s will. The Quran states that Allah controls birth rates, women’s wombs, and whether or not a baby will be conceived and born). Some of the Muslims wanted to practice coitus interruptus because they wanted to sell the women they had captured, and pregnant women captives (as per Islamic law) could not be sold until after the baby had been born. 

The basis for rape of non-Muslim female captives comes from the Quran (23:5-6, 33:50-52, 4:24, 70:29-30; also see mainstream commentaries by Ibn Kathir, Al-Jalalayn, Ibn Abbas, et al.), the Hadith, the Sira, Muhammad’s example conduct (see Quran 33:21) and the conduct of the male Companions (e.g., Khalid bin Walid, Ali, et al.), and mainstream Islamic law. Muslim males have been raping non-Muslim female captives with the approval of Islamic doctrine for the past approximately 1400 years, and this practice continues throughout the world today, wherever Muslim populations come into contact with non-Muslim populations. 

From Tabari, and example of rape and forced impregnation: 

(Tabari IX:25): “By Allah, I did not come to Fight for nothing. I wanted a victory over Ta’if so that I might obtain a slave girl from them and make her pregnant.”

Join the discussion...

Too small? Click here This is a satirical website. None of what you read here has anything to do with Islam, because Islam is a Religion of Peace. Everybody knows that good Muslims never do the things they do, (because Allah does it for them, Quran 8:12) and we know that only our misperceptions, ignorance and stereotyping of Islam makes Muslims chop off heads, kill and rape women and children, bomb subways, buses, nightclubs and fly jets into buildings. If it wasn't for the media and da Jooozzz, we wouldn't even know its happening. We welcome open, honest, thoughtful, and vigorous discussion in the comments threads, so do yourself a favour and don't accuse us of being 'haters' because we are loving, tolerant people. Don't curse us, don't threaten us with death or hellfire, and don't accuse us of being "just like the terrorists" because we don't do to Muslims what they do to us or to themselves. Yes, we know that only idiots oppose Islam and sensible people submit, but  you should know that we are ignorant bigots, hypocrites and Islamophobes, and we prefer to remain that way... But since you are forcing yourselves (and your abhorrent belief-system on us) we will defend ourselves, because we must. Avoid tu quoque and ad hominem attacks. Don't bother with circular reasoning either, we been there, done it.  If you annoy us, you will be banned and your posts summarily deleted. Try to add to the discussion, don't try to sell snake oil, don't try to cover us with Islamic shrouds of kitman and taqiyya, don't bother with da'awa, (we've heard it before) don't spam us with long pieces of cut & paste, write in English, try to tell the truth, (we know that's hard for you because you are all pathological liars) but the truth will set you free, try it! One more thing: don't think you can post here under multiple monikers. You will quickly be disappeared! The same goes for trufers and conspiracy kooks: you get one chance, one time. Blow it out of your ass if you must; put your stupidity on display. But you won't be back, trust me on that. Take a deep breath before you post, try to make some sense, do not just vent, do not make a fool of yourself and if you prove us wrong you can earn 10 Islamic dollars for your piggy bank. Deal?

{ 25 comments }

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: