Tag Archives: BLair

Race Replacement Theology

Just wondering: will the Labour stooges who tried to replace the native Brits with a Mohammedan proletariat ever be held accountable? Is there anybody at all in the kingdom  who will prosecute the deceit and the treason committed by the BLiar-Brown-Straw-Milibandits?

I’m not holding my breath. But by chance I happened upon a site that really cracked me up tonight. Laugh if you must, but be careful. You might be chokin’ on something:

RACE-REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY PRAYER

New immigrants who art in Africa,
hallowed be thy name.
Thy kingdom come.
Thy will be done
In Manchester as it is in Monrovia.
Give us this day our anchor baby,
and forgive us not for slavery, nor the holocaust,
as we forgive thee who trample us.
Lead us not towards one iota of resistance.
Nay, deliver us from all kinship ties.
For thine is our kingdom,
and the power, and the glory,
for ever and ever.

Obama’s  spiritual advisor:  lets get rid of all the “rich white people…”

Italy: Adoptive parents ‘can’t specify child’s race’

Rome, 29 April (AKI) – Italian couples, who are seeking to adopt a child, are guilty of racism if they reject black or non-European children, the prosecutor at Italy’s highest court claimed on Wednesday. The prosecutor backed a court petition by Italy’s Friends of Children association of adoptive and foster parents (AIBI).

Funny, that. I was under the impression that adoption agencies tried to match as much as possible the child’s ethno-religious background with that of any prospective parents. We’ve heard Blacks complain of “cultural genocide” when White liberals adopt Blacks.

We’ve heard similar outcries when Christians tried to adopt children from a Mohammedan background.

WTF is going on?

Fjordman warns of Eurospherewide civil war if things keep going the way they’re going (and he does talk of forced race-replacement though not in those words — he uses unmistakable equivalents):

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4425 .

Its no better in France either:

“True integration will be when Catholics name their child Mohammed.”

Spoken by Martin Hirsch,  initially appointed High Commissioner on “active solidarity against poverty, ” a fancy way of saying that he is in charge of what we would call the “war on poverty”.

Nicolas Sarkozy certainly knows how to pick them. When he put together his first cabinet, following the presidential election of 2007, he chose with infallible precision politicians who (he must have known) would be loyal servants to the causes of métissage, multi-culturalism and socialism, and to the overarching duty of sycophancy to their boss….

Read it all, from Gallia Watch

Stop Importing Trouble!

Hugh Fitzgerald’s Prayer:

Stop, for god’s sake stop, importing trouble—and Muslim immigrants, as a whole, necessarily mean trouble, in all lands where the political and legal institutions, and social arrangements, are flatly contradicted by the Shari’a.

Muslims are obligated to change or tear down those institutions, in order to remove all “obstacles to Islam.” It is not special or individual malice that prompts that attitude. That is their duty, a central duty. Why not come to fully and soberly understand that duty, and out of a minimal sense of self-preservation, cease to import those into our lands (America, Canada, Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Australia, and every other place that has so generously admitted, under a twisted definitiion of “refugees,” people who do not, and can not, wish our ways or institutions or constitutions well.

Newslinks:

Continue reading Stop Importing Trouble!

Muslim group Tony BLiar promised to ban calls for 'jihad' at London rally

0208_1                                           Pic from Western Resistance

 A leader of a radical Muslim group which Tony BLiar promised to ban four years ago has called on followers to support “jihad” against Israel at a rally in London.

* Ah yes; Tony BLiar! Wasn’t he the guy who said he would deport 500 Muslim clerics and did none of it?  Isn’t he the guy who reads the Koran every day and thinks we’re all stoopid?

By John Bingham and Tom Whitehead / Telegraph UK

Dr Imran Waheed, told followers of Hizb ut-Tahrir that there could be “no peace” with Israel and urged them to “fight in the way of Allah”.

A leaflet distributed by the international wing of the organisation also called for Muslim countries to “eliminate the state of the Jews”.

Continue reading Muslim group Tony BLiar promised to ban calls for 'jihad' at London rally

Imam BLiar and the battle about Islam

tony_blair_narrowweb__300x4100
“There is essentially one battle going on, and it is a battle about Islam”
So says former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. And he makes it all very simple and Manichaean: there are “two elements in Islam: one wanted to work with the West; the other did not.” We just have to work with the one that wants to work with the West.

Of course! Why didn’t anyone think of that before?

Anything in his talk about why the “extremists” are so popular, or is that assumed to be a simple matter of policy and reaction to Western foreign policy? Did Blair even get close to mentioning the fact that there is a traditional, deeply rooted idea in Islamic texts and teachings, that Muslims must wage war against and subjugate unbelievers — regardless of what those unbelievers have done or not done? I am sure that he didn’t, despite its relevance to his point.

But until analysts grapple with that fact, nothing is more certain than that the global jihad will continue, no matter which smiling moderate is feted in Western capitals today.

“Battle on Islam heart of Mideast crisis—Blair,” by John Nery for the Philippine Daily Inquirer, March 23 (thanks to Wilkie):

MANILA, Philippines – Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, in Manila for a series of leadership conferences, used an open forum at the Ateneo de Manila University to make what he called “a larger point” about the turmoil in the Middle East.
“There is essentially one battle going on, and it is a battle about Islam.”…

He told a sympathetic audience that the “larger point” was the right framework with which to understand the pivotal, conflict-ridden region.

Blair said there were two elements in Islam: one wanted to work with the West; the other did not.

The right approach to peace and development in the Middle East, then, would be to “partner with the modernizing and moderate element,” he said.

He made his remarks in answer to a question about how he made major decisions, such as joining the US-led Coalition of the Willing in invading Iraq.

He answered the Iraq question first, and then broadened his view to include the titanic struggle for the future of Islam.

Referring to the moderates doing battle with extremists, he said: “We gotta make sure those guys win.”
Comment:
Blair is definitely confused. Sure, lots of Muslims would like to “work with” the West. The issue is what they want, and it is clear from polls that most Muslims want the economic and technological advantages that may come from dealing with the West, but most of them don’t want to be influenced by Western values, and most of them want strict sharia.

Note, from the figures cited below, that across those four major Muslim countries, an overall simple average of only 9% of people “disagree strongly” with the goal to require a strict application of sharia law. Some of this 9% is probably composed of non-Muslims (especially in the Indonesian sample; see D4). If we take a moderate Muslim to be someone who disagrees strongly with sharia law, then, overall, less than about 9% of Muslims fit that category. The figures below regarding attitudes toward Western values also put into perspective Blair’s statements about “two elements” in Islam. Obviously, the “element” or subset of Muslims that is positive in its attitudes toward Western values is very small (see section “f” below).

Excerpts from World Public Opinion Poll 2007

Q27-F28: What do you personally feel about these goals? For each goal, please say whether you agree with it strongly, agree somewhat, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly.

a. To require a strict application of Shari’a law in every Islamic country.
………………………………………… Egypt, Indonesia, Morocco, Pakistan
Agree strongly…………………….. 50%, 17%, 35%, 52%
Agree somewhat……………………24, 36, 41, 21
Disagree somewhat………………..11, 25, 10, 6
Disagree strongly………………….. 11, 15, 9, 1
Refused/Don’t Know…………….. 4, 7, 6, 19

f. To keep Western values out of Islamic countries.
………………………………………..Egypt, Indonesia, Morocco, Pakistan
Agree strongly…………………….80%, 40%, 33%, 42%
Agree somewhat………………….11, 38, 31, 23
Disagree somewhat……………… 3, 9, 13, 7
Disagree strongly………………… 1, 4, 8, 2
Refused/Don’t Know……………. 5, 10, 16, 25

D4. What religion do you follow?
………………………………………….Egypt, Indonesia, Morocco, Pakistan
Muslim………………………………….93%, 87%, 100%, 98%
Christian…………………………………7, 7, *, *
Jewish…………………………………..na, 0, *, 0
Other…………………………………….na, 5, na, 2
Refused/Don’t Know………………na, 1, na, *

Source:
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/apr07/…

Hamas: Tony Blair "stupid" for asking it to recognize Israel and renounce violence

* No, he is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, Britain’s careering busybody Tony BLiar. He never got it, although he claims to “read the Koran everyday”–  and history will be unforgiving, just like history will be unforgiving to his American counterpart, the forever deluded, mendacious Peanut Khadr…

Update: BLiaring away wants to bring his sister-in-law‘s Hamas friends into the ‘peace process.’ But Hamas apparently can’t make up its collective mind whether that is good or bad for them.

                                  BlairStupid.jpg
                                  Not schmart

He is stupid to think that Hamas will ever sincerely do this, but his stupidity is shared by most policymakers today, as Hugh explains here. This kind of stupidity stems directly from an ignorance of the Islamic doctrines of jihad and Islamic supremacism. “Hamas: Blair’s statements ‘stupid,'” by Roee Nahmias for Ynet News, January 31 (thanks to JW):

Quartet envoy Tony Blair’s comments about the need to involve Hamas in the Middle Eastern dialogue are “worthless and stupid” but show that the world recognizes Hamas’ strength, sources in the movement said Saturday.

Continue reading Hamas: Tony Blair "stupid" for asking it to recognize Israel and renounce violence

Here's Proof for Global Worming!

From Jordan:

See: the ice is melting! we’re all doomed!

Oh NO! Tony Blair to visit Middle East in attempt to broker peace

Keep him away! Tell him to stay home with his egregious wife and read the Koran!

Tony Blair will visit the Middle East next week as the international community steps up its efforts to broker a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas.

Telegraph/UK

Read more: BLiar: anything to make a deal…

Continue reading Here's Proof for Global Worming!