George “gorgeous” Galloway

News reaches us of a “Peace conference” in Malaysia. The Peace campaigner George Galloway, here praising some “peace campaigners” in Iraq, will be in attendence.  More from “Harry’s”

“Flying Imam’s” Provocation & grievance theater pays:

US airline to pay out in flying imams case

WASHINGTON — US Airways has agreed to pay “undisclosed damages” to six imams it kicked off a flight in 2006 because of alleged suspicious activity, a prominent rights group said Tuesday.

Click here to enlarge

Was the Flying Imams caper an orchestrated stunt designed to intimidate airport security personnel?

The Flying Imams settled their case against US Airways yesterday. But questions linger. Here are more revelations from the blockbuster Muslim Mafia. “‘Flying imams’ rewarded for ominous airline ‘stunt’? Police detective: ‘Acts of staged controversy could be used to desensitize security personnel,’” by David Kupelian for WorldNetDaily,  thanks to JW:

Spying on Muslims causes terrorism:

Excessive surveillance of Muslims undermines a central component of counter-terrorism work, argues Arun Kundnani, author of the IRR study Spooked! How not to prevent violent extremism.

Only from the Guardian (for Muslims) , 19 October 2009

“Linking Islam and terrorism is wrong“

The government must stop seeing all Muslims as innately prone to violence if it wants to rebuild trust in the community, argues Rizwaan Sabir.

Comment is Free

“Since Muslims make up 20% of the world’s population, their involvement in over 50% of the world’s terrorist groups is telling and troubling”

But it is “Islamophobic” to notice, doncha know.

“An(other) Inconvenient Truth–about Terrorism,” by Timothy Rhea Furnish for theHistory News Network, October 19 (thanks to the astounding Kathy Shaidle):

So, just over half the world’s terrorist organizations are Muslim in origin and function. No other religious ideology is close–not even, most notably, Christianity (with its 2 billion+ membership, you’d think more would be involved in violence, wouldn’t you?). Since Muslims make up 20% of the world’s population, their involvement in over 50% of the world’s terrrorist [sic] groups is telling and troubling–and something the NIS is loathe to admit, thus tainting its claim to “know…the nature of the threats.”

Read it all.

As usual, CAIR,  the unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case is behind this:

Probing infidel resistance per Litigation Jihad:

* doesn’t work for Jedi’s: Jedi Forced Out in Wales

A Web site, called “Flying While Muslim,” has been launched to seek support for the six American imams (Islamic religious leaders) who say their rights were violated in 2006 when they were removed from a US Airways flight in Minnesota and arrested.

The “Flying While Muslim” site offers background information and updates about the six imams case and about racial and religious profiling of airline travelers. It also seeks donations to support the legal challenge to the airline. (shamelessly lifted from the Bunglawussi site)

CAIR press release, 18 September 2009

A popular national chain of clothing stores is being sued by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for allegedly not hiring a Muslim Tulsa teenager because she wears a hijab, a religiously mandated head scarf.

The EEOC filed the lawsuit Wednesday against Abercrombie & Fitch in U.S. District Court in Tulsa, citing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, modified in 1991, as the basis for the action.

The suit says that Samantha Elauf, 17, applied in June 2008 for a sales job at the Abercrombie Kids store in Woodland Hills Mall. A district manager allegedly told her that the hijab, which Elauf wears in observance of her religious beliefs, did not fit the store’s image.

“Defendant refused to hire Ms. Elauf because she wears a hijab, claiming that the wearing of headgear was prohibited by its Look Policy, and, further, failed to accommodate her religious beliefs by making an exception to the Look Policy,” the lawsuit states.

Elauf went to the Council on American-Islamic Relations-Oklahoma, which helped her file a complaint with the EEOC in Oklahoma City.

Tulsa World, 18 September 2009

See also the Guardian, 18 September 2009

Australia: Former Gitmo ape Mamduh Habib does Litigation Jihad also:

Mamduh Habib

	Australia: Lawyer Tells Court Habib Case Outside Its Jurisdiction
	Australia: Habib Case Raises Complex Issues
	Australia: Keep Courts Out of Habib Case: Government Lawyersjoel Gibson

Germany:

• Khaled El-Masri has a long history of violent crime and Jihadist associations but always escapes doing jail time. He is also an expert in Litigation Jihad and a former Gitmo inmate….

Islamic Supremacism: Muslim Teen Sues Abercrombie and Fitch

Atlas Shrugs:

Why would a Muslim teen in Islamic dress want to work at Abercrombie and Fitch? Think about it. It’s all about imposing Islam.

This should be good. Anyone with teenagers is quite familiar with the practically pornographic catalogs of Abercrombie and Fitch. Those soft porn fashion books are not allowed in my house. Left meets Islam. They will totally cave.

US teen alleges bias by Abercrombie & Fitch (hat tip Stan)

(OKLAHOMA CITY) A Muslim teenager claims in a federal lawsuit that she was denied a job at an Abercrombie & Fitch clothing store at a Tulsa mall because she wore a head scarf.

In the lawsuit filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Tulsa by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 17-year-old Samantha Elauf said she applied for a sales position at the Abercrombie Kids store in the Woodland Hills Mall in June 2008. The teen, who wears a hijab in accordance with her religious beliefs, claims the manager told her the head scarf violates the store’s “Look Policy.”

“These actions constitute discrimination against Ms. Elauf on the basis of religion,” the lawsuit states.

A spokeswoman for the New Albany, Ohio-based retailer declined to comment on the lawsuit but said the company has “a strong equal employment opportunity policy, and we accommodate religious beliefs and practices when possible.”

An attorney for the EEOC claims the company violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which protects workers from discrimination based upon religion in hiring. The EEOC said the lawsuit was filed after the agency attempted to reach a voluntary settlement.

“It is unlawful for employers to treat applicants or workers differently based on their religious beliefs or practices in any aspect of employment, including recruitment, hiring and job assignments,” EEOC senior trial attorney Michelle Robertson said.

The suit seeks back pay for the teen and a permanent injunction against the retailer from participating in what it describes as discriminatory employment practices. It seeks undisclosed monetary and non-monetary losses resulting from “emotional pain, suffering, anxiety, loss of enjoyment of life, humiliation and inconvenience.”

UPDATE: CAIR Behind Abercrombie & Fitch Hijab Lawsuit

Click on this link to get the full picture>>>