Tag Archives: Litigation Jihad

Diversity Watch: Litigation Jihad & the Muslim “Right to Spy”

 Litigation Jihad 

MOBILE, Ala — The owner of a large southwest Alabama car dealership derided as “Taliban Toyota” by a competitor has been awarded $7.5 million in damages after a jury trial for his slander claim.

Iranian-born Shawn Esfahani, owner of Eastern Shore Toyota in Daphne, Alabama, sought $28 million in compensatory and punitive damages from Bob Tyler Toyota, claiming employees at that Pensacola, Florida-based dealership falsely portrayed him as an Islamist militant to customers.

“The feeling I received in the courtroom for the truth to come out was worth a lot more than any money anybody can give me,” Esfahani told Reuters on Tuesday.

Esfahani’s lawsuit said that Bob Tyler sales manager Fred Kenner told at least one couple considering buying from Eastern Shore Toyota in 2009 that Esfahani was of Middle Eastern descent and was “helping fund the insurgents there and is also laundering money for them.”

Sweden rewards praying Muslim for creating nuisance on train:

(Sweden) A Muslim, who refused to show his ticket to a ticket inspector as he was in the middle of his prayers, was kicked off the train by the ticket inspector. He in turn complained and won a $152 payout.

Muslim believes he has a right to spy
A Northern Virginia (Musel-)man is suing one of the nation’s most secretive intelligence agencies, claiming it revoked his security clearance because his wife attended an Islamic school and works for a Muslim nonprofit. (Mahmoud M. Hegab, 30)
Mohamed Elibiary 

Litigation Jihad Against Former Czech PM

Former Czech PM  tells truth about Islam!

War on free speech follows instantly…..

Retired politician Milos Zeman, Czech prime minister in 1998-2002, said Islam is far more aggressive and intolerant than present Christianity, Buddhism, Confucianism and other world religions.   He added that the Koran includes passages calling for the subjugation, enslavement and even elimination of non-believers.

Islamic ummah instantly cranks up the litigation machine:

“Zeman has been known for his strong statements.”

Retired politician Milos Zeman, Czech prime minister in 1998-2002, faces a criminal complaint over the statements on Islam he made in June at an international conference on Europe.

“The enemy is the anti-civilisation spreading from North Africa to Indonesia. Two billion people live in it and it is financed partly from oil sales and partly from drug sales,” Czech news servers quoted Zeman as saying about Islam at the recent conference.

Zeman said Thursday Muslims believe in the Koran like Nazis believed in racial supremacy and anti-semitism and communists in class struggle and dictatorship of the proletariat.

He said Islam is far more aggressive and intolerant than present Christianity, Buddhism, Confucianism and other world religions.

He added that the Koran includes passages calling for the subjugation, enslavement and even elimination of non-believers.

Zeman has been known for his strong statements.


“Activist Groups” whack skating rink into submission; freedom sack beats safety

‘Revert’ Marisol Rodriguez-Colon

And when she has an accident, she can sue the skating rink for breach of safety regulations. Either which way we lose…. An update from this:    Hijab Jihad, Grievance Jihad, Litigation Jihad

Muslim woman says roller rink discriminated against her by not making exception to its no-headgear safety policy so she could wear hijab

Update: Litigation Jihad

Thuggery & Buggery from the Hamas Front CAIR:

This is a safety issue, but for Marisol Rodriguez-Colon and Hamas-linked CAIR, it’s another opportunity to reinforce the idea that Americans must change their behavior to accommodate Sharia norms. “Muslim woman says roller-skating rink discriminated against her,” by Jeane MacIntosh for AP, November 25 (thanks to Pamela Geller via JW):

A Muslim woman claims that a Connecticut roller-skating rink discriminated against her because it wouldn’t allow her to skate in her headscarf.Marisol Rodriguez-Colon, 40, said she was “mortified” when she and another female relative showed up for a niece’s birthday party at the Ron-A-Roll rink in Vernon and were barred at the door.

The venue’s rules, posted at the entrance, read: “No Hats. No Headwear. No Exceptions.”

Continue reading

Hijab Jihad, Grievance Jihad, Litigation Jihad

Associated Press

“Revert” was asked to remove hijab at skating rink, sez she was “shocked”- so the Islamic grievance machine goes in top gear. Of course, if she had caused an accident (like here) she and her backers would have sued as well. Either which way we lose. Wanna bet that the skating ring backs off once the “racist-bigot-Islamophobic” accusations fly?

Woman Says Vernon Skating Rink’s Policy Discriminates Against Muslims

VERNON, Conn. (AP) — A Connecticut woman says a roller rink’s request that she either remove or cover her traditional Muslim head scarf was discriminatory.

“We couldn’t enter the facility because we had our scarves on,” said Rodriguez-Colon, who has worn the scarf, or hijab, for 16 years.

(Nothing “traditional” to see here. Just in-your-face Islamic supremacy. Islam tops your kafir laws, back off, infidel!)

 

Continue reading

UK: Torture Racket Creates Terrorist Millionaires

British Pay Jihadists to Tell Tall Tales of Torture

“Never surrender”— unless you are sued by jihadists.

Massive Taxpayer Payoff to Gitmo Terrorists (Moonbattery)

Binyam Mohamed: among the terrorists who hit the taxpayer jackpot.

Only the most bloodthirsty Islamic maniacs earn the honor of a stay at Guantanamo Bay. Unfortunately for the terrorists, even the most well-earned vacation can’t last forever. Fattened up on gourmet halal meals, some have had to return to the daily grind of murdering the innocent. But at least the British government is mitigating the disappointment with massive handouts of taxpayer money:

Around a dozen men who accused British security forces of colluding in their transfer overseas are to get millions in compensation from the UK government.

Some of the men, who are all British citizens or residents, were detained at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp in Cuba.

At least six of them alleged UK forces were complicit in their torture before they arrived at Guantanamo.

Only six of them? The rest must not have read the al Qaeda manual that instructs all captured terrorists to pretend they’ve been tortured. As the enemy well knows, our own sanctimonious liberal idiocy is their most effective weapon against us.

Odds that the terrorists really were tortured in any genuine sense are remote. However…

In May, the Court of Appeal ruled that the government could not rely on secret evidence to defend itself against the six cases, saying allegations of wrongdoing had to be heard in public.

Therefore the government has to pay off the terrorists to avoid assisting their cause by releasing secret information to the public.

Once again we see that Islam is only an opportunistic infection. The underlying disease that makes us vulnerable to it is moonbattery.

Weekly Standard

The UK government has decided to award seven former Guantanamo detainees millions of dollars in an out-of-court settlement, according to multiple press accounts. Why? The ex-Gitmo detainees claim that British authorities knew they were being tortured during their detention by the U.S. and other countries. And the Brits reportedly do not want their intelligence officials to become embroiled in costly and time-consuming litigation.

When the proposed settlement was first announced earlier this year, UK prime minister David Cameron explained his government’s rationale. “Our [intelligence] services are paralysed by paperwork as they try to defend themselves in lengthy court cases with uncertain rules,” Cameron said. “We cannot have their work impeded by these allegations.”

Cameron’s reasoning makes sense from a certain point of view. But he is still wrong.

Related: Litigation Jihad

Great piece over at Human Events by Robert Spencer,The Law as Weapon. Indeed. Lawfare is a major front in the stealth jihad war on the West. It is wildly expensive, laborious, and time-consuming to fend off these cases of harassment designed to shut down the truth. Read it.

The Law as Weapon Robert Spencer, Human Events

Continue reading

Litigation Jihad: Lawfare Against Truth

What we need to learn from from our enemies

A message from Pamela Geller: Truth is the new hate-speech

The Silence of the Lambs

There are lessons that we can learn from the enemy. There is little admirable in the evil machinations of the left’s tactics, but their defense of their own people is one of them. When one of their own is under attack, they circle the wagons, hunker down, dig in their heels and defend to the death, no matter how egregious the act (think John Edwards, Barney Frank, Charles Rangel, et al — a veritable rogues’ gallery).

The right lacks this quality. We tend to eat our own, and then wonder why we have no real leaders. The right allowed the jackals, the vultures to destroy Sarah Palin; even now we hear that she is unelectable (for 2012). Why? She’s perfect. Palin is the most glaring example, but she is but one in a long line. It has to stop. Would Tom DeLay have resigned if he had been a Democrat? Would Jack Ryan have pulled out of the US Senate race (against Obama, no less) if he had been a Democrat? The list is too long. The right has to man up.

Robert Spencer published this piece at Front Page magazine. He has been a staunch defender of me and my work, a rare and wondeful quality. Thanks, Robert.

The Demonization of Pamela Geller (read it all)

Richard Warman Sues Blazingcatfur For Linking To “Far Right” Mark Steyn

Warman is suing me for $500,000.00 Dollars. A ridiculous amount for an equally ridiculous lawsuit. Nonetheless even nuisance suits such as this must be defended against. To date legal fees have run me about 10K. I’ve covered that from my own pocket. I am now asking for your help. I know times are hard for many of us but if every reader who visited daily were to contribute 5 or 10 dollars then that would go a long way to helping all of us out.

This is your fight too, well except for the lawyer stuff anyway;)   (read more, here)

Elisabeth’s Voice: Fighting for Free Speech in Austria (Thanks to Vlad Tepes)

Amsterdam Demo 30th October – Free Speech – No Sharia

Kitman TV

Is CNN starting to ask the right questions….?

When the story broke we pointed out instantly that this hijabbed nutcase waited 2 years (until she had citizenship)  before she insisted to wear her scarf in order to sue Disney.

However,  it seems that too many people are getting fed up with these dirty little Islamic games as the word spreads and the message gets out.

CNN’s Don Lemon speaks to the Muslim litigation jihadist who is suing Disneyland because she says the company dress code is discriminatory:

Meet the victims of infidel terror

Pretzel Logic:

Reporting Islamic terrorism makes Muslims furious,  which causes ….. Islamic terrorism!

ADELE HORIN from the Sydney Moonbat Herald offers up another gushing piece of  Islamic victimhood and helps Muslims blame “the media” for  Islamic terrorism, which makes Muslims “furious”.  Now, we all know who controls the media and if we could only catch some of them Jooozzzz…..

Aussie News & Views has some interesting comments

On the other side of the world the Muslim litigation jihad is in full swing:

Nadia Saleh with her children, Mohsen, 20, Kamal, 19, Rana, 17, and Hady, 16.

AUSTRALIAN-MUSLIM families have good relations with other Australians, and feel safe and happy here. But they are furious with the media for depicting Muslims as terrorists and criminals, a report for the Department of Immigration and Citizenship reveals.

”The families felt strongly the media was gunning for Muslims; it was a huge concern for them,” said Ilan Katz, the director of the Social Policy Research Centre at UNSW, and a co-author of the study. The research is part of a wider project commissioned by the department to understand the concerns and needs of Muslim Australians.

Based on in-depth interviews with 72 family members, it found people traced a change in the media’s depiction of Muslims from the September 11 attacks in New York and Washington.

”They felt community attitudes had hardened towards them since then because of the media,” said Dr Katz.

So if we stop reporting acts of Islam terror it will go away?

An Iraqi father said: ”The media portrays us as terrorists; the media is against us.” A man from Sudan said, ”Australians listen to the media, that is what they believe.”

Yet the Australian-Muslims were mainly positive about their daily interactions with ordinary Australians, friends, workmates, and passers-by. On the whole they felt accepted and appreciated what Australia could offer. Another father said:‘Australian government high schools even have a mosque [prayer room] … and the students perform midday and Friday prayers there.”

However, a major concern was low income, with some blaming workplace discrimination. Some parents were troubled their children had become more religious than they were. ”The daughters were wearing the hijab but the mothers weren’t,” Dr Katz said. Others were anxious about their children’s involvement with drugs, sex or alcohol.

Nadia Saleh, 42, of Punchbowl, calls Australia ”this remarkable country” that she came to from Lebanon 21 years ago. With her husband Karl, 52, she has raised four children.

”We have got some people who do the wrong thing but it is unfair to criticise the entire Islamic community,” said Mrs Saleh, a manager at the Riverwood Community Centre.

The study highlights the diversity of Australian-Muslims, who come from countries as disparate as Albania and Nigeria.

Dr Katz found Imams were a main source of guidance for parents with family problems and needed more help and resources from government and non-government agencies to do a better job of pastoral care.

The imams are “a source of guidance” alright. Does Dr Katz have any idea what kind of “guidance” they offer?