From Obama’s Muslim speech in Cairo:

So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.

As long as the deception continues and the silence on these atrocities goes unchallenged, I will continue to make these videos. Here’s the first in a series: Women in Islam.

Obama’s Islamic fiction vs Islamic fact:

***GRAPHIC VIDEO GRAPHIC VIDEO **** Link to Atlas Shrugs

Dr. Andrew Bostom wrote to me to enlighten us on Obama’s selective Koranic cherry picking:

Immediately following the murderous acts of jihad terrorism committed on September 11, 2001, Ibn Warraq highlighted the tragic irony of many apologists quoting selectively from Qur’an 5:32-“whoso slays a soul . . . shall be as if he had slain mankind altogether; and whoso gives life to a soul, shall be as if he has given life to mankind altogether”- attempting to demonstrate that the Qur’ran disapproved of violence and killing.

____continued…_____________________________________________

* Important point: Jefferson’s ownership of a Koran comes under the heading of “know thy enemy.”

Thomas Jefferson did not own a Koran because he desired to study Islam for its merits. Jefferson bought and read a Koran because our major foreign policy challenge from 1786 to 1812 was our war with Barbary Pirates who used the Koran as justification for attacking American ships and enslaving American citizens.

__________________________________________________________________

 Firstly, these wonderful sounding words come from a preexisting Jewish text (Mishnah, IV Division 5), “Thus was created a single man, to teach us that every person who loses a single soul, it shall be written about him as if he has lost the entire world, and every person who sustains a single soul, it shall be written about him as if he has sustained the entire world.”

And apologists for Islam-just like President Obama-quote the Koranic words out of context. For the very next verse offers quite a different meaning from that of 5:32, which was “laid…down for the Israelites,” as stated in verse, 5:33, continuing:

“…Our apostles brought them [the Jews] veritable proofs: yet it was not long before many of them committed great evils in the land. Those that make war against Allah and His apostle [Muhammad] and spread disorder shall be put to death or crucified or have their hands and feet cut off on alternate sides, or be banished from the country. (Qur’an 5:33)”

•  Did White House order FBI to “back off” anti-terror investigations of radicalized Muslim converts?
• Michelle Malkin: Finally: Obama’s limp statement on the jihadi attack in Arkansas
• Obama condemns Muslim attack on Arkansas Army recruiters…not
• Brit Urges Fellow Muslims to ‘Kill the Unbelievers’…
• Westerner Converts to Islam, Builds ‘Bomb Factory’ in Bedroom
• Islamic Outreach: ‘The Christians of America, My Message Is This: We Worship the Same God’

Why is that the Muslims can expel, kill, behead, subjugate all non-Muslim people who live in their 57 countries, but the Jews cannot live in their tiny homeland? This is a serious question. This is the question.

Why is the most aggressive, relentless, backward, violent people in history given every benefit of the blood and sweat of free peoples? They are indulged in their worst abuses. Why aren’t the Jews given their basic human rights?

Why is it always about the Jews? Obama’s speech was anti-semitic. Obama has to prove his bonafides to the ummah by delivering the Jews? Obama (along with the ummah) treats the Jews as an apartheid people.

There is no such thing as a “settler”. There are only Jews who live in the homeland. Obama has no right, no right, to throw the Jews out. If Muslims won’t live among the Jews, they’ll have to leave. That works for me :)

Jewish expulsions are over. G-d bless this campaign! We stand with you. 

Settlements are merely this year’s model. Oslo, self-determination, Gaza blah blah blah ……. the Muslims never have to meet any condition. 16 years, NOT ONE CONDITION. Push the Jews further into a ghetto and all you’ve done is given the Muslims yet another victory over the Jews. In this Islamic colonialism, the line in the sand is moved yet again, to the Jews’ terrible detriment. No more. Hamas (Iran) is in charge to the West, Hezb’Allah (Iran) to the north is sure to win the Lebanon elections – this is the poisonous fruit of appeasement. No more Jewish land to barbarians.

From Charles Krauthammer: 

Obama the Humble declares there will be no more “dictating” to other countries. We should “forge partnerships as opposed to simply dictating solutions,” he told the G-20 summit. In Middle East negotiations, he told al-Arabiya, America will henceforth “start by listening, because all too often the United States starts by dictating.”

An admirable sentiment. It applies to everyone — Iran, Russia, Cuba, Syria, even Venezuela. Except Israel. Israel is ordered to freeze all settlement activity. As Secretary of State Clinton imperiously explained the diktat: “a stop to settlements — not some settlements, not outposts, not natural-growth exceptions.”

What’s the issue? No “natural growth” means strangling to death the thriving towns close to the 1949 armistice line, many of them suburbs of Jerusalem, that every negotiation over the past decade has envisioned Israel retaining.

It means no increase in population. Which means no babies. Or if you have babies, no housing for them — not even within the existing town boundaries. Which means for every child born, someone has to move out. No community can survive like that.

The obvious objective is to undermine and destroy these towns — even before negotiations.

To what end? Over the last decade, the U.S. government has understood that any final peace treaty would involve Israel retaining some of the close-in settlements — and compensating the Palestinians accordingly with land from within Israel itself.

That was envisioned in the Clinton plan in the Camp David negotiations in 2000, and again at Taba in 2001. After all, why turn towns to rubble when, instead, Arabs and Jews can stay in their homes if the 1949 armistice line is shifted slightly into the Palestinian side to capture the major close-in Jewish settlements, and then shifted into Israeli territory to capture Israeli land to give to the Palestinians?

This idea is not only logical, not only accepted by both Democratic and Republican administrations for the last decade, but was agreed to in writing in the letters of understanding exchanged between Israel and the United States in 2004 — and subsequently overwhelmingly endorsed by a concurrent resolution of Congress.

Yet the Obama State Department has repeatedly refused to endorse these agreements or even say it will honor them. This from a president who piously insists that all parties to the conflict honor previous obligations.

The entire “natural growth” issue is a concoction. It’s farcical to suggest that the peace process is moribund because a teacher in the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem is making an addition to her house to accommodate new grandchildren — when Gaza is run by Hamas terrorists dedicated to permanent war with Israel and when Mahmoud Abbas, having turned down every one of Ehud Olmert’s peace offers, brazenly declares that he is in a waiting mode — waiting for Hamas to become moderate and for Israel to cave — before he’ll do anything to advance peace.

In his much-heralded “Muslim world” address in Cairo on Thursday, Obama declared that the Palestinian people’s “situation” is “intolerable.”

Indeed it is, the result of 60 years of Palestinian leadership that gave its people corruption, tyranny, religious intolerance and forced militarization; leadership that for three generations — Haj Amin al-Husseini in 1947, Yasser Arafat in 2000, Abbas in December 2008 — rejected every offer of independence and dignity, choosing destitution and despair rather than accept any settlement not accompanied by the extinction of Israel.

In the 16 years since the Oslo accords turned the West Bank and Gaza over to the Palestinians, their leaders — Fatah and Hamas alike — built no schools, no roads, no courthouses, no hospitals, no institutions that would relieve their people’s suffering. Instead they poured everything into an infrastructure of war and terror, all the while depositing billions (from gullible Western donors) into their Swiss bank accounts.

Obama says he came to Cairo to tell the truth. But he uttered not a word of that. Instead, among all the bromides and lofty sentiments, he issued but one concrete declaration of new American policy: “The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements,” thus reinforcing the myth that Palestinian misery and statelessness are the fault of Israel and the settlements.

OBAMA’S GREAT PYRAMID SCHEME: THE TWO-STATE SOLUTION AS THE FINAL SOLUTION Rabbi Dov Fisher

(Photo: Palestinian militants from the Popular Resistance Committee wear masks to conceal their identities from the camera as they pose with their weapons while watching the televised speech of US President Barack Obama in front of journalists at a training base in Gaza City, Thursday, June 4, 2009. Quoting from the Quran for emphasis, President Barack Obama called for a “new beginning between the United States and Muslims” Thursday and said together, they could confront violent extremism across the globe and advance the timeless search for peace in the Middle East.

“Palistan & the Palistanian People”

Who are the “Palestinian people?”—a mere hodgepodge of Arab clans and tribes from the Middle East and North Africa, obviously devoid of any Palestinian culture or language.  Professor Efraim Karsh quotes the eminent Arab-American historian Philip Hitti: ”There is no such thing as Palestine in history, absolutely not.” It was never “perceived as a distinct entity deserving national self-determination but as an integral part of a unified regional Arab order …”

*  Quiz: can you name one “Palistanian leader’ before Arafat?

A JAPANESE VIEW OF THE PALESTINIANS

by Yashiko Sagamori