Tag Archives: media distortions

Media Watch

CNN Continues One-side ‘Islamophobia’ Reporting

Network to nation: You’re a bunch of of bigots, America

Feyerick began by citing unnamed “experts will tell you that there’s a great deal of misunderstanding when it comes to what Islam is all about. Add on politicians spreading rumors that Sharia law- Islamic law- is coming to the United States simply because a group of Americans wants to build a mosque. It’s time to ask, what’s really going on?” She then noted that the “Islamic center and mosque to be built near Ground Zero is not the only mosque drawing fire. About a dozen others across the country are also under attack, from angry protests and suspected arson in Murfreesboro, Tennessee to Temecula, California. American mosques, in some cases, [are] being portrayed as monuments to terror or terror training centers.” (You can always rely on the leftarded media  to remain clueless till after the fact)

BBC Chief Admits ‘Massive’ Left-wing Bias, Vows to Remedy Imbalance

BBC Director General Mark Thompson admitted to the UK Daily Mail in an article today that Britain’s state-run news outlet has had a “massive” left-wing bias. He insisted, though, that the network is taking steps to remedy the ideological slant.

BBC has a history of promoting the ultra-leftist agenda on most issues. But to see the channel’s top dog admit it in an interview with the Daily Mail was quite a sight.

Now if only some television outlets on this side of the pond would do the same.

While Thompson pleaded guilty to a liberal slant, he insisted that a new crop of journalists is changing the political face of the BBC.

The Daily Mail’s Paul Revoir reported/ The Sun has more

Newsweep’s resident interfaith monkey Fareed Zakaria tells you to go back to sleep:

It’s clear we overreacted to 9/11.

Zakaria, Newsweek, and the rest of the Muslim–moonbat alliance are going to be in a world of hurt if we ever stop under-reacting.

Thank heavens we have the MSM totally infiltrated by Mohammedan agit props like Fareed who distributes free valium…! (a while ago he suggested we ‘learn to live with radical Islam’…)

The New York Slimes

Nicholas Kristof doesn’t think that those who are determined to resist the jihad and Islamic supremacism are bigots. Thank heaven for small favors. He just thinks we’re idiots. “America’s History of Fear,” by Nicholas D. Kristof for the New York Times, h/t JW

But there’s more, there’s always more:

Puff Ho, always good for a laugh, employs a Mohammedan shill to tell us once again  a Rumpelstiltskin story:

(Park 51: The Ground Zero Mosque Is Not a Mosque,” by Anushay Hossain at the Huffington Post

A Muslim with a higher education is simply a better liar for the cause…..

When is a Muslim not a Muslim? read it here from Robert Spencer, in context.

Sample: …We need to stipulate that those men who brought down the Twin Towers were not Muslims. People who park their cars packed with explosives and abandon them in Times Square in the name of Islam are not Muslim.

Who do you believe? Me or your lying eyes?

The New York Slimes Grand Deception

NYT: Honor Killings…? Lets pretend its not happening here….

Disinformation vs Reality:

Honor Killings? What’s that? Ah, you mean its only happening in India?  Hindus who burn widows?

Muslim Honor Killing Elephants in the Room at the New York Times

by Phyllis Chesler/ Pajamas Media

Yesterday I posted a piece at FOX about the mainstream media’s extensive coverage of honor killings—but only if they are committed by Hindus and in faraway India. These media outlets will not use the word “honor killing” and “Muslim” or “honor killing” and “Islam” in the same sentence. For example, over this past weekend, the New York Times, no longer the Paper of Record, ran a front page article about a Hindu caste-related honor killing in Koderma, India.

Read the complete original version of this item…

Amina and Sarah Said ran away from their brutal home life and their “devout father,” only to be lured back by their mother on Christmas day and then brutally tortured and murdered not 24 hours later, in an honor killing on New Years day. Autopsy here. Full Atlas coverage here.

Noor Almalaki was run over in an honor killing last November in Arizona by her father for being “too Americnaized” and not Muslim enough. She hung on to dear life for three days before succumbing to her wounds.

Gülsüm Semin was severely beaten (repeatedly), scared to death of her family (and rightly so), and ultimately brutally beaten beyond recognition and “honor” murdered because she refused forced Islamic marriage in Turkey.

Banaz Mahmood was killed in her apartment in London by her father, Mahmood, and his brother Ali Mahmood and 4 others because they didn’t approve of her boyfriend. She had dishonored her Muslim  family by falling in love with the “wrong” man. So they stomped on her, then strangled her to death. Her body was then moved 100 miles to Birmingham, where she was buried in a suitcase in a garden behind a house. They had tried to kill her before. Watch this video of Banaz days before her death, telling of the attempts to kill her.

SIOA Honor Killing Awareness Campaign: Freedom Taxis Hit the Streets of Chicago

Atlas has the whole gallery of murders!

WTF is wrong with our media?

Christian Science Monitor goes to bat for islam

Sample: “Why are many Americans distrustful of a religion and people they know very little about?”

Islam deserves a media makeover. At a time when the United States is mired in two wars in locations where the majority of the people practice Islam, the future of American-Islamic relations is at stake.

Sheik sez:

Why does Islam “deserve a media makeover?” What makes Islam deserve anything at all?

The future of  “American-Islamic relations” ended with 9/11.

And long before that. Aiding & abetting the enemy in a time of war is treason. What are these wankers on about?

If you can be bothered to take a closer look  you’ll quickly discover that the CSM offered a soapbox to Amjad Mahmood Khan, a Mohammedan agit prop who promptly used the opportunity to do his Islamic duty to promote Islam, to engage in the usual lies and dissimulation, otherwise known as taqiyya.

Worthless, useless, infuriating to some, but our media seems to believe it is easier to pull the Islamic wool over our eyes and ears than to tell the ugly truth about the marauding serial killer Muhammad.

Here’s another article from the NYT,  again putting lipstick on a pig and pitting hope against the ugly reality:

In Germany, Xenophobia Diverted by Open Doors

Then, there is Wikipedias definition of “Islamophobia”, conflated with “racism”, which it is not:

It is viewed as a new form of racism whereby Muslims, an ethno-religious group, not a race, are nevertheless constructed as a race.

Right. So Islam is not a race, but should be viewed as a “form of racism”. Strange that Wiki doesn’t tell us why it should be viewed as “a form of racism”. Interesting also, that Wiki states correctly that “the belief that all or most Muslims are religious fanatics, have violent tendencies towards non-Muslims, and reject as directly opposed to Islam such concepts as equality, tolerance, and democracy” and does not  even deny it.   I think these good people have their knickers in a twist.

Bunglawussi has a new definition of “Islamophobia” on his website.

Whereas before these creeps claimed that “Islamophobia is anti-Islam bigotry” they now  have a time wasting page that  offers you different kinds of poison, but at least you can chose.

—————————————————————————————————————–

Meanwhile, the UK produces hit records every week day:

Fighting for the right to wear her cross: Mrs Chaplin is being supported by the Church of England community including Reverend John Eustice, left, and barrister Paul Diamond

Christian nurse ‘ordered to remove crucifix… at hospital where Muslims are  allowed to wear headscarves’      Read more:

Litigation Jihad

British hotel owners had their business and livelihoods ruined after a run in with a rabid ‘revert’

Look at what the Australian media is doing:

Sydney’s Daily Telegraph attacks Christians with the scathing headline:

Is this the most useless man in Australia?”

(smearing a decent bloke)

Indonesia offers to solve  another problem KRudd created

Say what you want about any previous ALP Prime Ministers but at least they had some substance, some backbone. This train-wreck of a leader that we have now has displayed once again just how distant he really is from the true Australian ethos.

Not only is he not demanding that the Indonesians should sign the UN Refugee Convention of 1951 — thus actually dealing with these country shoppers before they sail (or fly) off to the great southern land of liberal softies and no border security — but now he is doing a deal by asking the Indonesians to do the right thing in controlling the disgusting trade of people-smuggling before it becomes our issue. He is even asking if we catch them first, can we can send them back to Indonesia and the Australian taxpayer will foot the bill for the costs incurred by the Indonesian Government?!? How can this be true?

Media comment here

"Tiny Minority of Extremists"

The Myth of “The small fringe” and the “tiny minority of excremists”

In reality,  49.9% of Muslims support Bin-Laden and share both his goals – and his tactics to achieve these goals. In the elections of 1932, Hitler received the support of only 33% of Germans.

Right Side News

Ever since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the media has consistently reassured us that only a tiny minority of Muslims actually support the use of violence against Israel and the West. It’s just a small fringe, 1% or 3% percent at best, they tell us, so don´t worry about it all too much. Needless to say that the Muslims are doing all they can to make sure we go on believing in this “small fringe.”

But a look at the numbers tells a very different story. The extent of support for global jihad against non-Muslims is frightening, and the numbers are anything but “a small fringe.”

“What part of ‘kill the unbelievers’ is it you don’t understand?”

Just look at the efforts of the supporters of the so-called “Palestinians” explaining to us that “the majority of Arabs/Muslims (including those of Gaza) do not support extremists and radicals.” But in December, 2007, Hamas celebrated its 20th anniversary. The main slogan of this celebration was “Jews, we have already dug up the graves for you.” And “peaceful” Muslims, who “in their majority do not support extremists and radicals,” greeted this slogan with such enthusiasm that it seems the only thing that stopped them from immediately running out and digging more graves for the Jews was the lack of spades (well, maybe Israeli Army had some role, too). According to the AP, almost 500,000 adult inhabitants of Gaza took part in this rally.

Do you know the total number of adult (males and females) inhabitants of Gaza?

It´s 500,000.

Related Links:

Continue reading "Tiny Minority of Extremists"