Robert Spencer

The learned European essayist Fjordman here reviews Ali Sina’s Understanding Muhammad. Since Fjordman has been accused of being a white supremacist and a neofascist, some people have also accused me of being a white supremacist and neofascist, because I publish his fine essays on jihad and the Islamization of Europe. So I thought I would take this opportunity to say that while white supremacism and neofascism are wrong and should everywhere be opposed, I do not believe Fjordman is a white supremacist or a neofascist. What many have taken as “white supremacism” is his interest in trying to stem the tide of immigration into Europe, which threatens to make Europeans into minorities in their own countries, and — because the immigrants are overwhelmingly Muslim — to create a series of Sharia states across Europe. In 2006, well before he began to be accused of race supremacism, Fjordman wrote this:

We shouldn’t idealize mass-immigration too much. When one group of people move into a territory where another group of people already live, this has usually throughout human history ended in war. Either the newcomers will be expelled, or they will subdue or wipe out the previous inhabitants, or the groups will divide the country between them.I see little reason to expect any different result where the indigenous population happens to be white. [...]

I do not see why I should have to choose between White Supremacy and White Worthlessness. It is one thing to reject the idea that your culture should be forced onto others, it is quite another thing to say that you shouldn’t be allowed to retain your culture even in your own country. The latter is simply a matter of self-preservation, the most basic instinct of all living things down to bacteria level.

I have a right to preserve my culture, too, even though I have blue eyes, and cannot see anything “racist” in not wanting my children to become a persecuted minority in their own country through mass immigration. That you are denounced as a White Supremacist for just stating the obvious shows how deeply entrenched and internalized this anti-white bias has become.

(more…)

*  As if there’s not enough dimwits and infil-traitors at state already…

* Only white people are racists.  Like Mugabe is just another victim of colonialism… but if you don’t vote for da Bommah you are racist!

*  Here we go: the result of affirmative action and the empowerment of the perpetually clueless:

From Michelle Malkin:

Rice and racial beans at the State Department

Lawyer Shyster wins record £600,000 race claim payout from CPS

An Asian lawyer who was suspended after telling a court security guard she was a “friend of Bin Laden’s” has received a record £600,000 payout from the Crown Prosecution Service after seven years of legal battle over a race claim.

Halima Aziz, 43, made the remark a fortnight after the September 11 attacks, and was suspended by the CPS following a complaint from the court. She was accused of inciting a riot, expressing anti-American sentiments and associating herself with Bin Laden.

She won a race and sex discrimination case against them in 2004 on grounds that if she had been a white man she would not have been treated that way.

(more…)

*  There is no end to left-wing stupidity. Once again, the Guardian provides the soapbox for it:

From Andrew Bolt:

The Guardian’s Martin Kettle says making Obama president would be America’s way of saying sorry for its racism:

The election of Obama would be, beyond question, one of the noblest gestures of historical redemption that Americans have ever been called upon to make. But that is precisely why it may not happen.

So a black man must be voted in so America can prove it is color blind. An argument as self-contradictory as it is racist. Talk about Kettle and pots.

 Now guilty until proven innocent

*  from Andrew Bolt:

*  The race industry says you are racist unless you can prove you aren’t:

A gift to witchhunters everywhere. Claims Chief Witchhunter Calma:

“You don’t get vexatious complaints for the sake of complaints.”

You know Calma’s real problem? He can’t actually prove there’s much of that racial discrimination around to justify keeping him his astonishingly well-paid job:

The friendly uncle Tom Calma said “Australia’s laws made it difficult to prove there had been discrimination.”

Spoken like someone who indeed isn’t much fussed with evidence - like the evidence of the operation of the Victorian Government’s obscene religious and racial vilification laws: 

Race Discrimination Commissioner Tom Calma wants the burden of proof in cases of racial discrimination to fall on the alleged offender, instead of the person making the complaint.

*  In other words, once an accusation of racial discrimination has been made, it won’t be the responsibility of the accuser to bring evidence to support their allegation, but the accused must then prove that he or she is not really a racist.

* That’s really what Australia needs: a racist Gestapo, witch-hunts  and Kafkaesque trials that go after perceived ‘Islamophobes’ and ‘racists’. Keep in mind that this kind of racism only applies to whites, because blacks can do no wrong.

Good night, Australia!

*  Source: Andrew Bolt

*  The Age

*  Thanx to Mullah

And then this: 

Race Discrimination Commissioner, Tom Calma, said yesterday that the 19 new projects under its Community Policing Partnerships Programme (CPPP) is a national initiative by HREOC, and aims at building relationships and improving trust between Muslim communities and the police.

“The race and religious hatred that continues to be directed towards Muslim communities in Australia, said Calma, is a breach of human rights and is absolutely unacceptable.”

* Source

* Calma whining: Australia’s human rights record slammed

Calma has been trying to screw upright Australians for a long time now. Its enough! Be gone….

The Apparatchiks who govern us: Jawohl Herr Kommissar!

* Here is how far off the rails this whole human rights circus is:

Sucking up to those above and kicking those below:

 The absolute classic case of this approach was the China Central TV interview with John von Doussa, a warmonista president of Australia’s Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission, in Beijing a fortnight ago… (H)e implied that those demonstrating against the manner in which China rules Tibet were somehow infringing international human rights law, that the ruling Communist Party is a net contributor to human rights, that poor people in China and elsewhere should not expect access to the rule of law, that Westerners have yet again got China wrong.

I’ve been just as astonished by von Doussa’s extraordinary answers. Adds Callick:

In these emotional days here in China, it is especially important for visitors to consider carefully how to engage on such issues in a polite manner while remaining true to themselves and their values.

* With thanks to Andrew Bolt

*

Special treat:  ‘Islam is incompatible with democracy’- watch the debate with Dr Daniel Pipes
*

A message from Pat Condell to all the Calma’s in this world: