Tag Archives: Raymond Ibrahim

Assbomb Fatwa: "Strange and Disgusting but True"

To anyone still wondering whether the sodomy fatwa is a hoax — though I alreadydismantled the charge — here is an interesting comment at Daniel Pipes’ web site, obviously written by an Arabic speaker, which offers more links and proofs that the sodomy fatwa is no hoax:

There is so much in the Arabic language web about information about this strange fatwa 

فتوى جواز توسيع الدبر باللواط اذا كان الغرض منه الجهاد

I really do not believe that it is a hoax and it appears as far back as November and here is a link from facebook

And this is an article from the very respected web site el-hiwar el-mutamadin by Malik Baroudi

There is no reason for him to be a liar at all and here is another copy of the fatwa from the site where it now appears and it is منتديات أسول السنة and here is as how appears in the web site and yes I had to use the link from a Christian web site with a link to the muntadaiat site but there file was the best

I do not have any doubt that there is such fatwa and it is strange and disgusting but true

Now how about the strange name of Hamd Abu al-Dima’ al-Qasab or Hamd the father of blood who cuts (chops) but that does not mean very much as it is not unusual that fatwas can be issued under a nom de plume

And what is most surprising Arab readers on the web who are used to crazy Shiekhs that issue crazy fatwas believe that this fatwa is for real and the question is who is behind it so the Sunnis are blaming the shi3a who are blaming the sunnis and everyone is blaming the usual suspects el-Yahood wa el-CIA [the Jews and the CIA]

I say to Raymond Ibrahim: Those freaks at El [Electronic Intifada]know that he is correct and like typical Muslims lies and intimidations will always be part of how they operate

The Specter of Muslim Disloyalty in America

Infiltration, Subversion, Obfuscation, Treason, Terror & Deceit:

The Ikhwan must understand that all their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” their miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all religions. It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny ……..

Excellent observations by Raymond Ibrahim/Pajamas Media

Islamist enmity for infidels, regularly manifested in the jihad, is by now moderately well known. Lesser known, however, but of equal concern, is the mandate for Muslims to be loyal to fellow Muslims and Islam — a loyalty that all too often translates into disloyalty to all things non-Muslim, including the American people and their government.

This dichotomy of loyalty to Muslims and enmity for infidels — which, incidentally, corresponds well with Islamic law’s division of the world into the abode of war (deserving of enmity) and the abode of Islam (deserving of loyalty) — is founded on a Muslim doctrine called wala’ wa bara’ (best translated as “loyalty and enmity”). I first encountered this doctrine while translating various Arabic documents for The Al Qaeda Reader. In fact, the longest and arguably most revealing document I included in that volume is titled “Loyalty and Enmity” (pgs.63-115), compiled by Aymen Zawahiri, al-Qaeda’s number two.

Continue reading The Specter of Muslim Disloyalty in America

Dick Morris: the enemy is sharia, not Islam

How much longer must we be tortured with this mental diarrhea?

“Islam is peace”- George W. Bush

“We will never be at war with Islam” -Hussein Obama

“The enemy is Al Qaeda, not Islam”

I let you sort it out, Dick.

Raymond Ibrahim: Is Sharia a “hopelessly abstract concept”?

In “Is Newt Gingrich Wrong to Talk About Sharia?” in Pajamas Media (viaRaymondIbrahim.com), August 24, our friend Raymond Ibrahim discusses whether Sharia, as Lee Smith recently characterized it, is a “hopelessly abstract concept”:

In a recent article appearing in Tablet, Lee Smith takes former House speaker Newt Gingrich to task for the latter’s focus on sharia (i.e., Islamic law). The thrust of Smith’s argument is that sharia is a “hopelessly abstract concept” and “a highly idealized version of reality that has little basis in fact”; that sharia is “a catchall phrase for legal principles that have rarely, if ever, existed in actual Muslim societies”; and that “the notion that something called ‘sharia’ was widely imposed throughout the lands of Islam is an Orientalist fantasy.”My first observation is — even if all these charges were perfectly true — so? It hardly matters what sharia really is; all that matters is what today’s Muslims believe it is. And a great many believe sharia is tangible and codified, and that it can, and should, be implemented in society. More to the point, telling the apostate or adulteress — who are regularly executed “according to sharia”– that they are reallybeing murdered by “principles that have rarely, if ever, existed in actual Muslim societies,” is hardly reassuring.

Smith does acknowledge Islam’s famous draconian punishments; he just prefers to call them hudud, and limits them to “Islamist outfits like the Taliban.” Similarly, Smith offers a blitz tour on Islamic jurisprudence — including the Hanbali, Hanafi, Maliki, and Shafi’i madhahib, the differences between usuli and akhbari, fiqh,ijma, ‘aql, qiyas, and ahkam sultaniyya — even as the reader wonders how these concepts are relevant to the discussion at hand: Islam in America, from a national security context….

Read it all.

Why do they call it "Cordoba Mosque?"

Frank Gaffney on the ‘Cordoba House’ mosque at ground zero/Vlad Tepes Blog

Update from TRoP:

A Shrine to Sharia

For Muslims, the Ground Zero mosque is not about freedom of worship. It is about symbolism.

Raymond Ibrahim: The Two Faces of the Ground Zero Mosque

In “The Two Faces of the Ground Zero Mosque” in Pajamas Media (via MEF), June 22, our great friend Raymond Ibrahim exposes yet more duplicity from the Ground Zero Islamic supremacist mega-mosque organizers. Sign the petition here.

Continue reading Why do they call it "Cordoba Mosque?"

Zakarias Botros & the Motoon Racket

What Did You Say About Muhammad?!

by Raymond Ibrahim/ Pajamas Media

Which is more likely to elicit an irate Muslim response: 1) public cartoons of the Muslim prophet Muhammad, or 2) public proclamations that Muhammad was a bisexual, sometime transvestite and necrophile, who enjoyed sucking on the tongues of children, commanded a woman to “breastfeed” an adult man, and advised believers to drink his urine for salutary health?

Based on the recent South Park fiasco—where an animated episode depicting Muhammad in a bear suit sparked outrage among various Muslim groups, culminating with the usual death threats—the answer is clear: cartoons, once again, have proven to be the Muslim world’s premiere provocateur. Indeed, during a university lecture the other day, Swedish artist Lars Vilks, whose life is in jeopardy due to his depiction of Muhammad as a dog, was violently assaulted to ululations of “Allahu Akbar!” (Islam’s primordial war cry).

Yet how can cartoons rouse Muslim ire more than public assertions that Muhammad was a bisexual, a transvestite, a necrofile, et al? First, context:

Continue reading Zakarias Botros & the Motoon Racket