Ayatollah Mayzek loves Jochen Hartloff  for being a useful idiot:

The justice minister in the state of Rhineland-Palatinate has sparked outrage after proposing that Germany could permit Sharia courts, which operate according to Islamic law, to preside over some civil cases in the country.

A commenter nails it:

At some point, cultural understanding and cultural treason intersect. Jochen Hartloff is standing in the middle of this intersection and if he doesn’t get run over by freedom loving people, he will ultimately get run over my some Imam on the way to his Sharia court… which will then charge Hartloff for being a heathen who deserved to be run over for standing in the road in the first place.

In other news:

Parallel Museljustice , Sharia Courts in Germany

Muslim arbitration in Germany

Mediating disputes is an age-old tradition in the Arab world, which is also practiced in Germany. But experts warn of the danger of a parallel, Muslim judiciary.

Deutsche Welle

They do not wear black robes and most have not studied law at a university. Muslim arbitrators, also called justices of the peace, do not work in courts or law firms. Some are imams, who adhere to Sharia tradition. They act as a mediator in marriage and other family disputes. In an ideal world, they manage to de-escalate the situation and prevent further disputes.

Joachim Wagner, who has written a book on the topic called “Judges acting outside the law,” can see the positive aspect of that tradition, but his research has also yielded many negative examples.

Manipulating witnesses

Wagner sees the danger of a parallel judiciary

In an interview with DW, Wagner describes one of 16 cases he analyzes in his book. In that case, a man shoots another in the foot. Later, the victim’s brother takes revenge and shoots the perpertrator in the leg. Both cases go to court.

According to Wagner, Muslim mediators from Sweden and Germany are consulted, resulting in a watering-down of the original statements in the course of the lawsuit. The shooting in the foot is now seen more as accidental.

Wagner claims the case is a typical example of how statements change and lead to a wrong and unfair ruling. In the end, the German court handed down a sentence of nine months on probation – too lenient in Wagner’s opinion. If both the victims and the perpetrators had stuck to their original statements, the sentence would have most likely been harsher.

Question witnesses early

Wagner, who has a Ph.D. in law, came across many such cases while analyzing files and talking to police and defense attorneys. He noticed how readily the courts accept changes to original statements. The judiciary should therefore be stricter with witnesses, according to Wagner.

The German Bar Association is not worried about the issue

They should “give up their sluggish routine with regards to these mediation processes happening alongside criminal trials,” meaning that witnesses should be questioned by the judge much earlier, so that there is less time for manipulation of victims or perpetrators.

While Wagner is adamant about the dangers of what he calls a parallel Muslim judiciary, the German Bar Association is more relaxed about the issue.

“It’s not really something we get asked about a lot,” Spokesman Swen Walentowski said. “So, we suspect that people are making a mountain out of a molehill here.”

And, indeed, Wagner cannot back up his claims with reliable data. He did stress, however, that many witnesses, prosecutors, police and defense attorneys told him that what he described happened all the time. In fact one attorney told him that there was not a single trial that did not involve arbitration.

 Helicopter Crash

31 American Troops Killed In NATO Helicopter Crash In Afghanistan

Update:

• HuffPo Readers React to SEAL Massacre: If you thought your opinion of the denizens of Huffington Post — the largest liberal blog— could not get any lower, check out their reaction to the killing of 25 Seal Team 6 members by Islamic savages: (Moonbattery)

Abdallah won’t move

Hate-spewing 24/7 hot-dog vendor fighting with neighbors

Sounding like he knows a thing or two about bigotry, Abdalla, 60, ranted that his cart is opposed by “homosexuals,” “Jewish people,” ignorant bureaucrats, “rich people” and freebie-seeking doormen.

Somalia

Famine Victims Killed After Government Troops Open Fire

 MOGADISHU, Somalia — A World Food Program handout of corn rations to Somalis trying to survive a famine turned deadly Friday after government troops opened fire, killing at least seven, witnesses said.

No Arab Spring in Bahrain

• Shouting In The Dark: The Bloody Legacy Of Bahrain’s ‘Facebook Revolution’

 The wankers of Strathclyde

•  Just amazing how many Muzz-loving Jew-haters infest our universities. If it wasn’t for the crap they produce you’d never notice their existence….

Amid WikiLeaks storm, gov’t promotes Ellsberg film

By MATTHEW LEE
Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) – Even as prosecutors build a case against the Army private suspected of passing hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables to WikiLeaks, the State Department is promoting a documentary film that celebrates Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg.

Amid its struggle to contain damage from the WikiLeaks revelations, the State Department announced Saturday that “The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers” has been selected as one of 18 films that will tour the world this year as part of its “American Documentary Showcase” program.

Continued below the fold

“Dangerous” is now a synonym for being opposed to Stalin & Mao:

• Mao and Stalin Lovers: Lib Talker: It’s Irresponsible for Beck & Palin Not to Realize How Dumb & Dangerous Their Audience Is

“Civility” for the left means muzzling  YOU!

Today’s culprit is freedom of speech, or at least the speech of the American right and its broadcast cheerleaders. Shock-jock radio presenters feed on biased television news to present a view of the world divided between goodies and baddies. The baddies are always on the brink of victory and must be confronted with virile aggression. Language that might not disturb a balanced mind can clearly stimulate and legitimise an unbalanced one… Free speech cannot exist without chains. (Andrew Bolt)

Ellsberg, whom the film portrays as a whistleblower of conscience, has been a champion of Pfc. Bradley E. Manning, the alleged leaker of the documents who is currently jailed. He has also spoken in defense of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who may also face charges for publishing classified information.

Ellsberg spent months copying the top secret Pentagon Papers on a Xerox machine and when the documentary was released in 2009 before WikiLeaks’ earned notoriety, he recalled that it took The New York Times three months to review the study and decide to publish it.

“If that had happened today,” he told The Associated Press, “I would have posted it directly on the Internet.”

While Manning remains in prison awaiting trial, the Obama administration has loudly denounced Assange for releasing the documents that detail the inner workings of American foreign policy and contain blunt assessments of foreign leaders and governments. The administration says the documents were stolen and demanded that WikiLeaks return them.

But the administration has not gone to court, as the Nixon White House did in the Pentagon Papers case in 1971, to try to stop their publication.

The “American Documentary Showcase” series is funded and organized by the State Department’s Bureau of Education and Cultural Affairs. It brings “award-winning contemporary American documentaries to audiences around the world to offer a view of American society and culture as seen by independent documentary filmmakers,” according to its website.

The films are intended to foster “understanding and cooperation, dialogue and debate,” it says.

The department said that this year’s selections, chosen by the University Film and Video Association and independent international group of filmmakers, educators and students, explore topics ranging from civil rights and the treatment of military veterans to environmentalism and freedom of the press.

Among the other documentaries chosen for this year’s showcase are “If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front,” which deals with the radical environmental group that some regard as a terrorist organization; “Freedom Riders,” which traces the experiences of civil rights advocates in 1961; and “No Crossover: The Trial of Allen Iverson,” which examines the youthful legal troubles of the basketball star.

Infiltration, Subversion, Obfuscation, Treason, Terror & Deceit:

The Ikhwan must understand that all their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” their miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all religions. It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny ……..

Excellent observations by Raymond Ibrahim/Pajamas Media

Islamist enmity for infidels, regularly manifested in the jihad, is by now moderately well known. Lesser known, however, but of equal concern, is the mandate for Muslims to be loyal to fellow Muslims and Islam — a loyalty that all too often translates into disloyalty to all things non-Muslim, including the American people and their government.

This dichotomy of loyalty to Muslims and enmity for infidels — which, incidentally, corresponds well with Islamic law’s division of the world into the abode of war (deserving of enmity) and the abode of Islam (deserving of loyalty) — is founded on a Muslim doctrine called wala’ wa bara’ (best translated as “loyalty and enmity”). I first encountered this doctrine while translating various Arabic documents for The Al Qaeda Reader. In fact, the longest and arguably most revealing document I included in that volume is titled “Loyalty and Enmity” (pgs.63-115), compiled by Aymen Zawahiri, al-Qaeda’s number two.

I say “compiled” because most of the words are direct quotes from the Koran, the Muslim prophet Muhammad, and Islam’s jurists (i.e., this doctrine is not an “al-Qaeda” phenomenon but rather permeates the Islamicate worldview). Those interested are urged to read the whole treatise. For our purposes, however, a few key scriptures must suffice:

Koran 5:51 warns Muslims against “taking the Jews and Christians as friends and allies … whoever among you takes them for friends and allies, he is surely one of them,” i.e., he becomes a non-believing “infidel,” the worst thing in Islam. According to authoritative Muslim exegete, al-Tabari, Koran 5:51 means that the Muslim who “allies with them [non-Muslims] and enables them against the believers, that same one is a member of their faith and community.” Similar scriptures include Koran 3:28, 4:89, 4:144, 5:54, 6:40, 9:23, and 58:22; the latter simply states that true Muslims do not befriend non-Muslims — “even if they be their fathers, sons, brothers, or kin.” Conversely, according to Muhammad, “A Muslim is the brother of a Muslim. He neither oppresses him nor humiliates him nor looks down upon him…. All things of a Muslim are inviolable for his brother in faith: his blood, his wealth, and his honor” — precisely those three things Islamic law singles out asnot being vouchsafed to free infidels.

The problem here is that these scriptures are not mere words; American Muslims act on them. Consider the ongoing case of Nasser Abdo, an infantryman assigned to the 101st Airborne Division, who refuses to deploy to Afghanistan: “I don’t believe I can involve myself in an army that wages war against Muslims. I don’t believe I could sleep at night if I take part, in any way, in the killing of a Muslim…. I can’t deploy with my unit to Afghanistan and participate in the war — I can’t both deploy and be a Muslim.” And why is that? “Abdo cited Islamic scholars and verses from the Quran [no doubt such as the above] as reasons for his decision to ask for separation from the Army.” Indeed, his loyalty to foreign Afghani Muslims is such that, if he does not get discharged, “he will, apparently, be facing a prison sentence.”

Rather than going quietly to prison, major Nidal Hasan went on the infamous Fort Hood killing spree, slaying thirteen Americans. Maintaining that “Muslims shouldn’t kill Muslims,” he was, like Abdo, adamant about not being deployed to a Muslim nation, his “worst nightmare.” He was also “very upfront about being a Muslim first and an American second,” thereby showing where his true loyalty lay. Tabari’s words come to mind: the Muslim who “allies with them [e.g., Americans] and enables them against the believers, that same one is a member of their faith and community,” i.e., he too becomes an infidel.

And of course there was sergeant Hasan Akbar, who was convicted of murder for killing two American soldiers and wounding fourteen in a grenade attack in Kuwait: “He launched the attack because he was concerned U.S. troops would kill fellow Muslims in Iraq.” Previous to the attack, he confessed to his diary: “I may not have killed any Muslims, but being in the army is the same thing. I may have to make a choice very soon on who to kill.”

Nor is Muslim loyalty simply limited to the fear of killing fellow Muslims; rather, it is loyalty in the tribal sense (not surprising, since Islam transferred the tenacity of Arab tribal loyalty onto the umma, whereby Islam became a “super tribe,” transcending race and language). Thus, for helping convict five Muslims who were plotting to kill American soldiers in the Fort Dix terrorism trial, Mahmoud Omar has been ostracized by the Muslim community. Why? Because “in a twisted way…their [the terrorists'] actions are understandable in the Muslim community.” Omar adds, “For Muslims, we are all brothers, and I betrayed a brother”— echoing Muhammad’s injunction: “A Muslim is the brother of a Muslim.”

Prominent American Muslim jurists have further proclaimed that “It is forbidden to work for the FBI or for U.S. security services because these harm Muslims.” Another Muslim jurist said it is permissible for Muslims to serve in the U.S. military — provided they are not “involved in fighting, harming, or even bothering Muslims at all.” Similarly, the authoritative Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America issued a fatwa stating that it is “not permissible” for American Muslims to send aid, even food, to American troops serving in Muslim countries.

At this point, one may justly ask: if Muslim disloyalty to non-Muslims is a ubiquitous phenomenon, why are most examples limited to the military? Simple: Islam is primarily concerned with actual deeds; and the military is one of those rare institutions that requires people to demonstrate their loyalty through action, such as, by going to the frontlines and, if need be, combating America’s enemies — even if they be one’s coreligionists. It is therefore only natural that Muslim loyalty/disloyalty is primarily revealed in military related scenarios, including instrumental support via food or other aid. Concerning this latter, Muhammad said, “One [Muslim] who equips a person on his way to raid [the enemy's camps] in Allah’s path [jihad] is considered to have the same status as the raider [jihadist].” The willing Muslim financial enabler of the infidel American soldier thus acquires the same infidel status.

As for all other instances that require Muslims to indicate their loyalty, the doctrine of taqiyya, which revolves around deceiving non-Muslims, offers relief, and is in fact essential for Muslim minorities living in America who want to uphold the doctrine of loyalty and enmity. Indeed, the Koran’s primary justification for deception is in the context of loyalty: “Let believers not take for friends and allies infidels [non-Muslims] instead of believers. Whoever does this shall have no relationship left with Allah — unless you but guard yourselves against them, taking precautions” (Koran 3:28). Tabari explains this verse: “Only when you are in their [non-Muslims'] power, fearing for yourselves, are you to demonstrate friendship for them with your tongues, while harboring hostility toward them. But do not join them in the particulars of their infidelities, and do not aid them through any action against a Muslim.”

In other words, when necessary, Muslims are permitted to feign friendship and loyalty to non-Muslims, or, in the words of Abu Darda, a pious companion of Muhammad, “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.” Nearly fourteen-hundred years after these faithless words were uttered, American MuslimTarik Shah, who was arrested for terrorist-related charges, echoed them in boast: “I could be joking and smiling [with infidels] and then cutting their throats in the next second.”

At any rate, such is the symbiotic relationship that Islam’s doctrines share: when the deceit, the charade is to no avail and the lives of fellow Muslims, whom are deserving of loyalty, become endangered, Muslims must then stand their ground, come what may. Thus an Akbar, Hasan, or Abdo may appear as perfectly loyal American citizens, until being required to prove their loyalty against Muslims. As Zawahiri puts it in his treatise, the Muslim may pretend, so long as he does “not undertake any initiative to support them [non-Muslims], commit sin, or enable [them] through any deed or killing or fighting against Muslims” (The Al Qaeda Reader, p.75).

The ramifications of this doctrine are clearly troubling, especially since far less than .1% of America’s Muslims will ever be required to enlist in the U.S. military and deploy to Muslim nations. Yet this is the only scenario that determines whether Muslim loyalties lie with fellow Muslims or with fellow, albeit infidel, citizens. Moreover, it is one thing if the average American Muslim harbors loyalty to fellow Muslims, including terrorists such as al-Qaeda, Hamas, and Hezbollah. It is quite another if that Muslim happens to be in a position of authority in the United States. This observation naturally leads to a president who up to 24% of Americans andmany Muslims believe is a clandestine Muslim and who at least appears to have been raised a Muslim: Barrack Hussein Obama.

While there is no proof that he is a Muslim — indeed, no less an authority than Jeremiah Wright, the fellow who used to bellow “God damn America!” recently vouched for Obama’s Christianity — the point here is simple: ifan American president was a secret Muslim, and if he was lying about it, and even if he was secretly working to subvert the U.S. to Islam’s advantage — not only would such an approach comport with Islam’s doctrines on loyalty and deception, but it would have ample precedents, stretching back to the dawn of Islam. Such as when Muhammad commanded one Na’im bin Mas’ud, a convert from an adversarial tribe that refused to submit to Islam, to conceal his new Muslim identity, go back to his tribe — which he cajoled with a perfidious “You are my stock and my family, the dearest of men to me” — only to betray them to Islam.

———————————————————-

Here’s a second article on this subject, thanks to Mullah

Islam’s Invasion Ideology

by Martel Sobiesky

In the same way that a fake $100 bill is not legitimate currency, Islam is a counterfeit religionand therefore does not qualify for first amendment status. It is extremely incorrect to categorize Islam as a religion when its core literature and bloody track record prove a thousand times over that it is an – Invasion ideology, a shrewd and cunning predator — disguising itself as a religion.

Irrefutable evidence proves Islam to be a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” and a “Trojan horse” hell bent upon destroying all religions and nations worldwide. This irrefutable evidence is a book called the Koran where Allah commands that all Muslims must wage Jihad until the entire world and every single person is either converted to Islam, enslaved, murdered, tortured or abused.

“Fight them until all opposition ends, and all submit to Allah” (Koran: 8:39)

The Koran is a Manual of War

It is an error for anyone to call Islam a religion, but for those who insist, it’s best referred to as a “Religion of War” that has arrived on our shore as an enemy invader for the sole purpose of conquering our nation. This point cannot be overemphasized.

The Koran vows to vanquish all religions and nations worldwide.  Allah himself is the protagonist who relishes the role of a “hit man” vowing to knock off every person who rejects Islam — sending them to burn in everlasting hell.  For Allah, there is nothing more heinous and loathsome than those infidels (non-believers) who refuse to convert, and there is nothing he will not do to eradicate them.

“I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore, smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off their fingers and toes.” (Koran 8:12)

“Allah wished to confirm the truth by his words: Wipe the infidels out to the last.” (Koran: 8:7)

Read the Koran for Yourself

Don’t take my word on it.  Read the Koran.  By so doing you will be outraged and ask, “Why in heavens name would any person with integrity and intellectual objectivity call such a blood thirsty and homicidally bigoted “tirade” — a sacred and holy book?”

Below are two sources for authentic passages from the Koran. The first is entitled   “Islamic Quotes” taken from prophetofdoom.net .  It provides a few hundred quotes organized into 30 different categories and is very “digestible” giving immediate insight into the malevolence of the Koran and related Islamic texts. The second is an article by Citizen Warrior encouraging everyone to read the Koran, especially “An Abridged Koran” by CSPI. The advantage of the abridged version is that it eliminates monotonous repetition and provides commentary giving a comprehensive perspective and meaning to the text.

Neutralizing Islam

One does not need a crystal ball to foretell that Islam will turn America into a living hell if left unchecked.  9/11 was America’s initiation into the so called “religious rites” of Islam. Millions of Americans are outraged that the real culprit in this attack has been given a “free pass” to continue its rampage.

Since 9/11, the  religion of peace website has documented 16,124 deadly attacks committed by Islam as mandated by the Koran. These prove that Islam does not deserve the status of a religion and that America has been hoodwinked by so doing. We need to face reality, and implement effective methods if we wish to protect our nation from this religious imposter.

One writer bringing clarity to the situation is Daniel Greenfield. In his article: “Can We Ban Islam? Legal Guidelines for the Criminalization of Islam in the United States” he states in the affirmative that America can legally ban Islam because:

“Organizations aimed at the overthrow of the United States can be banned and membership in them can even be criminalized.”

They key word here is “overthrow”.  Any group that wishes to overthrow the United States can be banned. It is well past time for open debate and discussion upon this issue in regards to Islam.

To reiterate, Islam does not qualify for religion status in the USA because it an Invasion Ideology which absolutely mandates the conquest of the United States.  Please see my related article entitled“Demoting Islam’s Religion Status” it provides the basic elements for discussion and reflection.  Also, a must see “you tube” video named “3 Things about Islam” provides a concise summary of the challenge we face.  It is imperative for all Americans to learn the truth about Islam or it will eventually destroy us.

Martel Sobieskey has 36 years research experience in the field of religious conditioning and its relationship to warfare.  He is greatly alarmed that American politicians, military commanders, educators, journalists, intelligence analysts, and security and police personnel have failed to comprehend the deeply entrenched jihadist conditioning inherent in all of Islam – moderates included

Newsflash:

Update: Unreal. State-Run Media Suppresses Fact That Wikileaks Traitor Is Radical Gay Activist (The Washington Examiner reported, via Ace of Spades) via Gateway

WikiLeaks Won’t WikiLeak on Themselves (Greg Gutfeld)

How the sickly looking transgender creep Julian Assange got his info:

Military Homosexual Scandal Tied to WikiLeaks Treason

In the Scandal involving the theft and release of classified Military information that could cost the lives of U.S. Military personnel, the British Telegraph newspaper is reporting that the American soldier at the center of the Scandal was “openly Homosexual” and apparently held a grudge against the U.S. because of the Military’s Anti-gay policy. In another bizarre twist, reliable reports suggest that Private First Class Bradley Manning, the U.S. Army Intelligence Analyst accused of leaking..

Execute Him

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, told WHMI, a Michigan radio station, that Pfc. Bradley Manning should be executed if he did, in fact, leak classified documents and video to WikiLeaks.  (NPR)

“If they won’t charge him with treason, they ought to charge him with murder,” Rogers said yesterday.

• Al_Qassam_Brigades_mourns_leader_Essa_Al_Batran
• Dogs Thwart Suicide Bomber, Save American Lives…
• al-Qaeda Murder Iraqis, Burn Bodies…

WikiLeaks founder vows more leaks

New whistleblowers said to provide ‘significant’ documents on BP spill, military abuses

by Michael Isikoff/msnbc

Story: Pentagon: Leak probe may go beyond military

Blood on Julian Assange’s Hands: Taliban Hunting Down Leaked Informants

Assange’s vow to publicize more internal government documents comes in the wake of furious criticism of WikiLeaks from the Obama administration and members of Congress over its publication of 91,000 classified U.S. documents on the war in Afghanistan — at least some of which appear to identify the names of U.S. and Afghan government informants and cooperative parties in the war against the Taliban.

Julian Assange, accomplice to murder:

In an interview with Channel 4 News, Zabihullah Mujahid, a Taliban spokesman, said they were studying and investigating the report, adding “If they are US spies, then we know how to punish them.”

If the immoral fools on the Left want to see what war crimes really look like, they need look no further then the way the Taliban handles “murtad” “spies” and “traitors”.

This is what a real war crime looks like. And Julian Assange is guilty of facilitating them for his own anti-American paranoid fantasies. Jawa Report

Churchill on Traitors:

“It is the primary right of men to die and kill for the land they live in,  and to punish with exceptional severity all members of their own race who have warmed their hands at the invader’s hearth.”

Desperate measures by a very desperate government:

UK to raid dormant bank accounts to “fund charity”

(Reuters) – Money from dormant British bank accounts will be used to help fund community work by charities and voluntary groups which would otherwise struggle to secure funding, Prime Minister David Cameron will say Monday. (Reuters)

Yvonne Ridley promotes “interfaith, tolerance & reason” on Iran’s propaganda channel Iran Press TV, whines about “Islamophobia & racism” with like-minded  traitors

Foreign Agents: What CAIR, Anna Chapman, and Rep. Mark Siljander Have in Common

Posted by Adam Savit Jul 18th 2010 at 3:19 am in Espionage, Featured Story, Foreign Policy, Islamic extremism, Justice/Legal, News, Strategy | Comments (21)

Late last month provocative pictures of alleged Russian spy Anna Chapman graced newspapers and blogs worldwide.  The stories alongside the mandatory eye-candy featured scandalous accounts of “spying” and “espionage.” But despite the insinuations, the Russian “spies” in question were never charged with spying or espionage.  Fox News reported that……Read more…

Elena Kagan and Iftikhar Chaudhry: Another bad call by Kagan

It seemed, no doubt, the fashionable thing to do at the time, and as in all Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan’s close relationships with Islamic law and Shariah jurists, she may have just wanted to please her Saudi donors supporting Harvard’s Islamic Legal Studies Program when she was Harvard’s law school dean.

Top Ten Most Left-Biased American Journalists – #5: Cynthia Tucker, Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Unlike the other left-wingers that merely hate conservative Americans, Cynthia Tucker seems to hate all of us. That seems true at least if her latest outrageous comment on MSNBC can be taken for granted.  In recent remarks made on Chris “Leg Thrill” Matthews’ MSNBC show, Tucker said that, unlike the Cold War days, today’s American enemy is “us.” Naturally Matthews chipped in with a hearty “exactly.”

Obama 16 Months into Job: Bush’s Mess Forced Me to Bankrupt the Country (So Don’t Blame Me)

Obama Says Republicans Cannot Have the Keys Back to the Car: “No! You Can’t Drive”

“After they drove the car into the ditch, made it as difficult as possible for us to pull it back, now they want to keys back. No!  You can’t drive. We don’t want to have to go back into the ditch. We just got the car out.”

Appearing before about 185 people at a fundraiser hauling in $1.3 million at the St. Regis hotel in New York City, the president painted the Republican party in unflattering light, as the party standing in the way of reform. ABC has more>>

Stunner. After Demonizing Wall Street Fat Cats Obama Takes Their Cash At Glitzy NY Fundraiser

The New York Daily News reported:

President Obama has been happy to beat up on Wall Street “fat cats,” but tonight he’ll be even happier to take their money. Gateway

Obama threatens to ‘impose’ Palestinian state

Warns White House can force solution ‘Israelis won’t appreciate’/World Net Daily

Obama Calls Finger Pointing by Oil Companies a ‘Ridiculous Spectacle’

Hanging his enablers by the ropes they supplied him with…..

Eric Holder: Jihad? What jihad?

Maybe Hussein Obama will present Holder with a medal for courageous restraint

Holder ‘doesn’t deserve to be attorney general’

Of course not. Neither does the O-bastard deserve to be POTUS or any of the Marxist subversives he surrounds himself with….

Obama’s Peace Partners Deny Israel’s Right to Exist (Video)

Breitbart:

The MSM: Miserable Misunderstanding Misunderstanders of Islam

Money for nothing and the terror for free:

The IMF has released a loan of 1.13 billion dollars to Pakistan

No, Obambi doesn’t like information technology:

Censorship in the age of the Obama bastard

“You’re coming of age in a 24/7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments, some of which don’t always rank all that high on the truth meter,” Obama said at Hampton University, Virginia.

“With iPods and iPads and Xboxes and PlayStations, — none of which I know how to work — information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment, rather than the means of emancipation,” Obama said.  FOX Nation

Times Online/thanks to Tundra Tabloids

Update from Atlas:

• English Defense League (EDL) London Rally in Defense of Geert Wilders, Friday 2pm GO!

“Blond bombshell Geert Wilders returns to Britain, looking for a fight”

Yet another scribbling cocksucker by the name of Ben Macintyre from the extreme left, multiculturalist persuasion spews venom & bile and hopes to smear Geert Wilders, but few are buying:

Boyish, topped with a bouffant mane of bleached blond hair, cheerful and cherubic, Geert Wilders is the unlikely new face of the far Right in Europe. But appearances are deceptive. The leader of the Dutch anti-immigration Freedom Party has emerged as one of the most divisive politicians in Europe, the purveyor of a virulent brand of anti-Islamic rhetoric that calls for a tax on Islamic headscarves and a ban on the Koran, which he likens to Mein Kampf.

Mr Wilders is facing trial in a Dutch court for “inciting hatred”. Last year he was banned from Britain and turned away at Heathrow when he arrived here planning to show his short film, an incendiary anti-Islamic diatribe that the Dutch Prime Minister described as serving “no purpose other than to offend”.

On Friday, after successfully appealing against the Home Office ban, Mr Wilders will return to Britain at the invitation of the UK Independence Party (UKIP) to show his controversial film to an invited audience at the House of Lords. The English Defence League is expected to demonstrate in his support and Muslim groups are all but certain to mount protests.

Related Links:

• Al Guardian:  All eyes on far-right Geert Wilders as Dutch go to the polls
• CBN: Riot Watch: Wilders to Show Fitna in London Friday: If police lose control of the situation, you will be amazed at the street fighting and mayhem you’ll see on your TV screen. (ya think? And who will cause these riots?)
• Al Reuters shills for Balkenende: Balkenende’s public support has lingered below 20 percent for months, whereas the anti-Islamist Wilders had surged to near the top of most polls. Balkenende top Dutch PM choice, Wilders 5th – poll

To his enemies, the 46-year-old Dutchman is an old-fashioned racist demagogue in a new suit; a bottle-blond bigot. To his growing ranks of supporters he is a champion of free speech, a bulwark against what he calls “the Islamic invasion of Holland”. He may be dismissed by some as a crank but he is an increasingly powerful and popular one. On February 20 the Dutch centrist coalition Government collapsed, deeply divided over keeping troops in Afghanistan, paving the way for a general election in June in which the Freedom Party is expected to do extremely well. Polls suggest that the party will triple its tally of seats, becoming at least the second-biggest parliamentary party and quite possibly the overall winner. Mr Wilders is likely to be a key player in any coalition, with a profound impact on the political agenda.

Other news, thanks to Weasel Zippers:

CAIR knows all about terrorism:

A leading Muslim advocacy group CAIR, a front for the Muslim Brotherhood in America, is pushing government officials to call the suicide plane crash in Texas “an act of terror,” saying that if a Muslim had been flying the plane there would be no hesitancy to call it terrorism.

ZIP is fed up: Red meat, here. Where was CAIR when Obama refused to call the Ft. Hood massacre an act of terror? Oh wait, the killer was a Muslim. Fucking hypocrites make me sick….

Aiding & abetting the enemy during time of war:

Attorney General Eric Holder Says Nine Justice Department Appointees Worked For Terrorist Detainees…

Aren’t there still laws on the books for high treason?  I think capital punishment still applies…

Bottom line: Holder revealed no names beyond the two already publicly known. He revealed no cases from which Justice political appointees recused themselves. The letter, which will likely be interpreted on Capitol Hill as a thumb-your-nose statement, is sure to anger Republican senators more than satisfy them. More>>

Rusty from Jawa has this:

Holder: Yeah Obama Appointed a Bunch of Terrorists’ Lawyers So What?

Dude, this is unfreakingbelievable.

No, actually, it’s quite believable. This is the Obama Administration. Which ran on a platform of: let’s shut down Guantanamo within year and give all of these guys lawyers, rights, and civilian trials.

How’s that working out for ya Sparky?

It’s not just that these are lawyers who worked to free terrorists — even terrorists need lawyers — but that some of them filed amicus curiae briefs on behalf of Guantanamo detainees. That means that they weren’t the lawyers for the terrorists, but were so outraged (outgrage!) by what Bush-Hitler was doing that they felt compelled (compelled!) to try and intervene in the cases even though they had no direct relationship with them.

I can’t believe you morons voted for this guy. He’s giving you exactly what he promised.

Code Pink To Muslims: ‘Help Us Cleanse Our Country’

by Nancy Morgan/Newsreal

As Americans keep a wary eye on Muslim radicals in Yemen, little attention is being given to a far more dangerous enemy right in our own backyard. Under the banner of ‘anti-war’ activism, the radical group Code Pink is running banner advertisements on the English language version of the official Web site of a terrorist sympathizing group, the Muslim Brotherhood, one of which invites the Muslim Brotherhood to “join us in cleansing our country.”

The ad is entitled ‘Arrest The War Criminals.’ Only problem is, Code Pink believes the war criminals are none other than George W. Bush and Co. And they’re actively recruiting radical Muslim terrorists to help them in their cause.

A  link on the ad goes to a web site that actually calls for the kidnapping of former President George W. Bush, his wife Laura, his family, and various former administration officials. To date, not a peep has been heard from the Secret Service.

Maybe that’s because Jodie Evans, the co-founder of Code Pink was a top fundraiser for Barack Obama. Or maybe not.

This isn’t the first time the rabid feminist anti-war group has had amicable ties with terrorists. As Andrew Breitbart’s  Big Government reports:

“The Muslim Brotherhood published a statement by Code Pink issued in May to promote Code Pink’s trip to Gaza that month. In December, the Muslim Brotherhood published an open letter to Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak by Code Pink and the Gaza Freedom March decrying the Egyptian government’s refusal to allow the group passage into Gaza.”

If you’re under the mistaken impression that the Muslim Brotherhood is a benign member of the ‘religion of peace,’ you might want to get the straight poop from David Horowitz’s Discover the Networks. Here.

Once again,  yet another radical group is discovered to have close ties to President Obama. Yawn.

We also have a group of American citizens actively rallying jihadists and encouraging them to commit war crimes.  Hey, I can hardly keep my eyes open.

Most alarming however is the absolute media silence.Well, they’re not actually silent. They are otherwise engaged in the life and death debate over how many times Harry Reid should apologize for his sin of  speaking the truth about race.

The media ‘watchdogs’ are asleep and the ones we trust to protect us are instead offering aid and comfort to our enemies when they’re not  prosecuting Navy Seals, CIA officials and anyone else whose job is to keep America safe. What’s wrong with this picture?

Kudo’s to The Jawa Report for being the first to report on this situation. Hopefully they won’t be the last