Comments on: The Global Warming Racket

By: sheikyermami

sheikyermami — Thu, 27 Dec 2012 00:09:52 +0000

The evidence? There is plenty of evidence for the monumental fraud called 'climate change'. All the so-called evidence (including Al Goracle's trashy scifi flick) has been debunked, there wasn't much to begin with, and yet the GW gravy train riders keep telling us 'the science is settled', or else! Like this MUSICOLOGIST OF DEATH Kill the sceptics

By: Kasia

Kasia — Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:12:15 +0000

Global Warming was renamed Global Climate Change because “warming” did not reflect that some places would become wetter, while others became dryer, and still others would disappear altogether. It’s a more accurate label. It was first called Global Warming by the media several decades ago.

That said, between 230 and 65 million years ago, there were no polar caps, the Earth was considerably warmer than it is today. It’s not bad for the Earth to be warmer, it’s just bad if becomes that much warmer in a couple hundred years rather than a couple thousand because animal populations cannot adapt/evolve that fast, or at least we don’t think they can.

By: harold

harold — Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:09:19 +0000

First, the United States is rapidly becoming a Fascist nation, this has nothing at all to do with Marxism. Take some university courses in sociology and you’ll soon understand this.

Second, the evidence supporting global warming is rather intimidating to say the least, that is, there is a lot of it, and its shown in a lot of different ways.

Third, reject all faith and embrace science. Truth is amazing once you start living by it.

By: illawarrior

illawarrior — Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:31:09 +0000

As soon as it was realised that many places were not warming … “global warming” was quickly re-labelled as “climate change”. Why are people fighting it? Many climate changes are VERY beneficial. Australia is so proud of its Great Barrier Reef – the only reason it exists is because of a prior “climate change”. Likewise, Australia would not have opals, had there not been a prior climate change. Many parts of Alaska are now able to mine valuable minerals for the first time. As with any change, there will be winners & losers … who is to say whether the overall benefit will be better or worse. Stop fighting … nature will always win.

By: illawarrior

illawarrior — Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:23:21 +0000

Climates have changed ever since time began, and will continue to do so, with, or without, any help / hindrance from humanity. Everyone agrees that carbon emissions harm the climate, however, climate change happened eons before humans came on the scene, and will continue long after we are gone. Carbon taxes / emissions trading schemes are simply a political hoax to grab money. All it takes to reduce carbon emissions is simple legislation. Yes there will be costs involved … but they will involve commercial transactions, NOT govt taxes.

By: jENNIFER

jENNIFER — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:45:25 +0000

Just saw the Conspiracy Theory by Jesse Ventura (History Channel). Shows the reality of the scam in one hour! I urge all to check it out.

By: patricia jones

patricia jones — Fri, 26 Aug 2011 04:40:18 +0000

Anyone hanging any credence on what KRudd or Gillard spout should know by now – they are lying hounds. We have video speak to support their chicanery.