Who is Sheik yer’mami?

Shem, Winds of Jihad Vice President and resident cartoonist, is presently in charge of editing and moderating this blog. Thank you all for news-feeds and contributions and your support. Sheik yer’mami will be saddling the camels and head off on a short expedition to the Middle East. I will keep you posted…


Salaam! I’m back:

Yes: We know this page is outdated and needs to be reconstructed! Bear with us: in the meantime please go to our educational site:

* Robert Spencer:

If you speak honestly and accurately about the Islamic jihad doctrine and the Islamic supremacist agenda, and even confine your case entirely to quotes from authoritative Islamic sources and spokesmen, you will still be accused of “hating Muslims.” This is the constant refrain of apologists for jihad and their useful idiots in the West — and they constantly have recourse to it because they know that it is effective: it turns the Left and much of the squishy Right away from the message of the “hater,” regardless of how outlandish and unjust the charge is.

Myself, I don’t hate Muslims. I love Muslims. Telling the truth is not an act of hate. I am not “Islamophobic,” I am Islamorealistic. I tell the truth about Islam and work to defend Western civilization and society from the encroachments of a legal and societal system that oppresses Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

Or visit our Islam site: here

For the Nutroots:

Multicultural Europe and its suicide


ukinfidels2Finsbury Park Mosque, London 2002

Are you willing to defend your freedom?

*  Fight against sharia: “Sharia is Hate”

Unlike refugees from Nazism, or Communism, who hated Nazis and hated Communists, and wanted only to escape from them and, in many cases, to actively work against them, the so-called “refugees” or simply immigrants from Muslim lands bring with them, in their mental baggage, Islam itself. They do not realize that it is Islam, with its inshallah-fatalism and natural support for depotism as opposed to advanced Western democracy (for the belief-system locates legitimacy not in the expressed will of the people, but in the will expressed by Allah in the Qur’an, as glossed by Hadith and Sira). They carry the belief-system with them, and what is more, attempt – not without success — to spread it about, to make sure that the numbers of adherents of Islam grow and grow and grow. It is this Da’wa, and demographic conquest that is the result of fantastic, utterly unchecked Muslim migration, and the great disparity in birth-rates between Muslims (who often smuggle in plural wives, supported by Infidel taxpayers in their generous welfare payments), and the indigenous non-Muslims, that has, for example, caused the 15,000 Muslims in Holland in 1970 to become 1 million, or 5-7 million Muslims now to burden the educational and justice systems, and the welfare benefits, and the laic state, and social peace, in France, and England, and Germany, and everywhere that Muslims in large numbers have been permitted to settle — which has led, no clear-sighted Infidel can deny, to a situation far more unpleasant, expensive, and physically dangerous — and becoming more unpleasant, more expensive, more physically dangerous every day — for the indigenous Infidels.
This must stop. This suicidal policy cannot continue.

Guessing the religion of those who plant bombs, hi-jack planes, fire into crowds of civilians, take hostages and murder hostages is the world’s ultimate no-brainer. And yet our leaders, the media and many of us pretend there’s no connection between psychopathic killers and the religion which exalts the slaughter of unbelievers. Islam remains what it was at its beginning, a violent, expansionist faith that will tolerate no competitors. What other religion has the concept of jihad, the notion that if you die fighting for allah you get 72 virgins in paradise? Mohammed started by eliminating the competition, annihilating Jewish tribes in the Arabian Peninsula. More than a 1000 yrs later, it’s still business as usual for his successors. Is islam a religion of peace? Is there an Easter bunny? Can pigs fly? Calling for a war on terror is like trying to stop the bullets instead of stopping the people who are doing the shooting, decades of terror and they still dont get it. Any religious creed that promotes terrorism as a method for the conversion of infidels deserves only contempt and needs to be mocked, crushed, and expelled from the lands it has silently infiltrated. The war is, and needs to be identified without question, against islam and their numbers and attitude warrant exceptional attention…

Hugh Fitzgerald

So-called dialogue with the Islamic world and relativism regarding marriage, the dignity of women, and sexual equality in the name of multiculturalism is destroying European identity and doing away with womens rights.

Thursday, March 08, 2007
By Samir Khalil Samir

The ideology of multiculturalism, i.e. blind tolerance toward any culture and tradition, is destroying European identity and is above all doing away with human rights and, more specifically, women’s rights. A prime example is the increasing tolerance in European countries toward polygamy.

In theory, polygamy is prohibited in Italy and in Europe. But it increasingly happens, in the name of multiculturalism, that Muslim immigrants are registered as polygamists in the European continent: if a man is Muslim and married in his country of origin with 4 wives, we cannot but accept this as a given. All this goes against European laws and constitutions – which affirm monogamous families – but, in the name of a misplaced respect for cultures, any solution is deemed acceptable.

Tolerance for polygamy?

In Italy, some constitutionalists are suggesting, for the sake of letting people have it both ways, that only one wife be recognized as such, while the others are considered concubines: this would settle the situation of various Muslims who already have a wife in their country of origin and take another in Italy. Others think that a distinction could be made between civil marriage (at City Hall, with just one wife) and religious marriage in a mosque, where polygamous marriages could be celebrated. Naturally, to do this, they are proposing that the articles of Italian civil law, which affirm monogamy and the equality of men and women, not be read. A similar trend is spreading in Greece. In certain areas where Muslims are the majority, the government has accepted the principle that they manage themselves with their own norms. And so, in Athens, polygamy is prohibited, but in Muslim-majority areas, it is allowed, again in the name of cultural respect.

Multiculturalism is doing a lot of damage. Firstly to common sense: if a man is married in Senegal with a woman and in Italy with another, this cannot be defined as monogamy. A crime remains such whether it is committed in Italy or abroad. Such tricks are actually a way to suggest loopholes for polygamy. Thus, if an Italian wants to have more than just one wife, all he needs to do is to convert to Islam!

But multiculturalism is above all damaging to the dignity of women. Polygamy in Italy is prohibited in that it is contrary to the principle of equality between men and women. It would be useful to Islam too to affirm this principle. In Islamic society, in fact, women cannot be polygamous (only men have that “right”). The same is true for repudiation, which is permitted to a man, but not to a woman who, however, can ask her husband the favour of repudiating her. Affirming monogamy is thus the way forward on the path for an overall effort in favour of women’s rights.

The Imam of Vénissieux and women

To understand the humiliation in which women live in the Islamic world, I would like to recall a fact that sparked much debate in France. Last February 20th, the courts definitively rejected an appeal made by Imam Abdelkader Bouziane. An Algerian-national, Sheikh Abdelkader, imam of the mosque of Vénissieux, near Lyon, a polygamist and father of 16 (sixteen) children (14 of which French citizens) had been living in France since 1980.

He had been ordered on February 26, 2004, to leave the country by Interior Minister Sarkozy, for his inflammatory speeches and for incitement to hatred, but the ordinance was not enforced. On April 20, following an interview in the “Lyon Mag” newspaper, he was again served an expulsion order for his statements against women, in particular for having said that “the Koran authorizes a Muslim, in certain cases, to beat his wife,” that women must subjugated themselves to their husband and were not equal to men.

On April 23rd, the administrative tribunal of Lyon suspended the expulsion ordinance and rejected the Interior Ministry’s request. The imam went back to France in May 22. On October 5, 2004, the State Council cancelled the expulsion suspension, and the next day the iman was again expelled to Orano in Algeria. On June 21, 2005, the Lyon court declared him once again free, but on October 14, he was convicted in absentia. The imam filed an appeal, but on February 6, 2007, the courts definitively rejected his case.

The “Régards de femmes” Association of Lyon, which had sued the imam, declared: “The right to dignity, to respect, to the integrity of her body belongs to every woman in France. It will not be possible from now on to legitimize violence against women on the pretence of religion.”

The Imam’s interview

here are a few extracts of the (famous) interview with Sheikh Abdelkader on the male-female relationship.

In your opinion, are women equal to men?

No. For example, women do not have the right to work alongside men, as they [women] could be tempted by adultery.

Must women necessarily be subjugated to men?

Yes, because the head of the family is always a man. But he must be fair to his wife: he must not beat her for no reason, nor consider her a slave.

Is this why you are favourable to polygamy?

Yes, a Muslim can have more than one wife. But not more than four! Plus, there are conditions.

But why can women not have more than one husband?

Because no one would know who fathered the children!

Are you in favour of the stoning [1] of women?

Yes, because beating one’s wife is allowed by the Koran, but under certain conditions, in particular if she betrays her husband. Please note however: the man does not have the right to beat her everywhere: not on the face, but in the lower parts, her legs, her stomach, her bottom. He can beat her vigorously so as to induce fear, so that she does not start again!

The Koran: wife beating is allowed

Various readers were up in arms, but in the end the imam defended himself saying that this is the Koran. And he’s right. If we open the Koran at Sura 4, verse 34, we can read:

“Men have authority over women due to the preference that Allah concedes to them over the other and because they spend their property [for women]; Good women are therefore obedient, guarding under secrecy that which Allah has preserved [sex]. [2] ; As for those on whose part you fear insubordination, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do nothing further against them; Allah is high and great.”

Last week on Al Jazeera, I heard another imam explain the four conditions for beating a wife: not on her face; without drawing blood; without breaking bones; not in the presence of children. If all this is insufficient, one must resort to extreme punishment, i.e. the man deprives his wife of sexual relations.

The Koran is also explicit on the question of the superiority of men to women; according to the Koran, Charter 2 (The Cow), Verse 228:

“Divorced women should keep themselves in waiting for three periods; and it is not lawful for them to conceal what Allah has created in their wombs, if they believe in Allah and the Last Day. And their husbands have priority to take them back during this time if they wish for reconciliation; and they [women] have rights equivalent to their duties, on the basis of good custom, but the men are superior. Allah is Mighty, Wise.”

The Italian edition published by the Union of Islamic Communities and Organizations in Italy (UCOII) includes a long footnote (absent on the on-line version) on the phrase “but men are superior”:

“In a pitiful effort to standardize Islam to Western culture, certain modernist commentators have written that superiority has only to do with the right of men to repudiate their wife, a faculty which is not reciprocal. In reality, it is a much more important and fundamental matter for the maintaining of balance at the individual, family and social levels.

“Man and Woman are two complementary realities that exist unto each other. If this were not so, Allah (glory be to Him the Most High) would not have formed Eve from Adam’s rib, he would have furnished each gender with complete reproductive organs, etc., etc.

“The physical structure of men is capable of great exertion and significant exploits, that of women, of steady labour and great endurance of pain.

“Male sensitivity is entirely exterior, projected outside the realm of family and tends to become public and political. That of women is interior, careful of oneself, aimed at the protection of that which has been acquired and to the acquisition of simple means of sustenance and security.

“Male psychology is imaginative, creative, experimental, risk-loving, desirous of novelty, of affirming the Self, usually ample and superficial. That of women is concrete, traditional, risk-hating, desirous of certainty, of conserving what is “mine”, usually profound and limited.

“In the realm of family, the respect of the Laws of Allah and of the Sunna of the Messenger can create situations that require an affirmation of power that mortifies the complementarity of spouses. But apart from complementarity, there is the problem of leadership, in the family and in society, which does not mean predomination, oppression or the lack of recognition of female predominance in a number of sectors and circumstances. Allah (Glory be to Him, the Most High) assigns this management role to the male. It is an onerous and difficult task that men would often willingly do without, and for which he must respond before Allah.”

This apologetic comment, written by an Italian converted to Islam, mirrors the opinion of traditionalistic ulemas, avoiding their excesses. It assigns specific tasks to men and to women, tasks which are unchangeable because determined by God, which claim to correspond to the nature of one and the other. It is obvious that such a distribution of roles, established by God for eternity and valid for all times and cultures, is hardly compatible with Western mentality and is often incompatible with the laws and constitutions of Europe.


Is it possible to accept this teaching in the name of the respect for cultures and religious tolerance? This is the serious question faced by all Western countries.

I don’t know if the flag-wavers of multiculturalism realize how much human damage they cause. Actually, it is increasingly clear that so-called multicultural tolerance is only acquiescence to a subtle form of racism. In the name of cultural difference, in fact, everything is left to proceed on parallel tracks, without envisaging any progress, integration or betterment in the name of human dignity.

It is time for Europe to understand that religious law cannot prevail over civil law and that, above every form of tolerance, there is a country’s constitution. If this does not happen, Islam will be given carte blanche to colonize our customs.


1) The imam, who had lived in France for 24 years, did not understand the word “stoning”, which he understood to mean “beating”. Hence, his reply.

2) In UCOII’s translation, generally attributed to Hamza Piccardo (Imperia, 1994), the following note can be read “This is the ideal of the believing woman: ‘patient and modest.’ Says the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him): “The best of women is she who rejoices at your gaze, obeys you, guards her person and the property of the husband in his absence.”

Was Muhammad a Sex Maniac?

From the Hadith:

Muslim (8:3309) – Muhammad married Aisha at the age of nine.

Bukhari (62:18) – Aisha’s father, Abu Bakr, wasn’t on board at first, but Muhammad explained how the rules of their religion made it possible. This is similar to the way that present-day cult leaders manipulate their followers into similar concessions.

Muslim (8:3311) – The girl took her dolls with her to Muhammad’s house (something to play with when the “prophet” was not having sex with her).

Bukhari (6:298) – Muhammad would take a bath with the little girl and fondle her.

Muslim (8:3460) – “Why didn’t you marry a young girl so that you could sport with her and she could sport with you, or you could amuse with her and she could amuse with you?” Muhammad posed this question to one of his followers who had married an “older woman” instead.

Bukhari (4:232) – Muhammad’s wives would wash semen stains out of his clothes, which were still wet from the spot-cleaning even when he went to the mosque for prayers. Between copulation and prayer, it’s a wonder he found the time to slay pagans.

Bukhari (6:300) – Muhammad’s wives had to be available for the prophet’s fondling even when they were having their menstrual period.

Bukhari (62:6) – “The Prophet used to go round (have sexual relations with) all his wives in one night, and he had nine wives.” Muhammad also said that it was impossible to treat all wives equally – and it isn’t hard to guess why.

Bukhari (5:268) – “The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number.” I asked Anas, ‘Had the Prophet the strength for it?’ Anas replied, ‘We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty men.’ ”

So let me summarize:

Even if we accept a 54 year old man marrying a child, raping captured (non-believing) woman what does that make him?

Even we accept the unacceptable, what do you call a guy who rapes captured women and sells them into slavery?

Even if we accapt all that, what do you call a guy who has sex with 14 women in one night?

Did Muhammad, profit of Islam, drink wine? Yes he did!

Here’s more:

The Sex Life of the Prophet


Some of many jihad verses:

Qur’an:2:216 “Jihad (holy fighting in Allah’s Cause) is ordained for you , though you dislike it. But it is possible that you dislike a thing which is good for you, and like a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knows, and you know not.” [Another translation reads:] “Warfare is ordained for you.”

Qur’an:8:12 “I shall terrorize the infidels. So wound their bodies and incapacitate them because they oppose Allah and His Apostle.”

Qur’an:8:57 “If you gain mastery over them in battle, inflict such a defeat as would terrorize them, so that they would learn a lesson and be warned.”

Bukhari:V4B52N44 “A man came to Allah’s Apostle and said, ‘Instruct me as to such a deed as equals Jihad in reward.’ He replied, ‘I do not find such a deed.'”

Bukhari:V1B2N25 “Allah’s Apostle was asked, ‘What is the best deed?’ He replied, ‘To believe in Allah and His Apostle Muhammad.’ The questioner then asked, ‘What is the next best in goodness?’ He replied, ‘To participate in Jihad, religious fighting in Allah’s Cause.'”

Arguing, debating with Muslims:

They will say:

1. He’s taking verses out of context
2. He’s an Islamophobe/racist/bigot
3. He doesn’t know Arabic, and you can’t understand the Qur’an unless it’s in Arabic
4. He’s not an expert on Islam/he has no credentials
5. The Qur’an, the mind of Muhammad, and Islam in general are too complex and mysterious for infidels to understand
6. What about the Crusades (and other violent Christian actions of the past)?
7. What about the violent verses in the Bible?
8. Those Muslims are not “real” Muslims
9. Only Muslims can address the tough topics
10. He’s lying
11. If you prove him wrong from Qur’an and Hadith, you just get ridiculed
12. He has been refuted hundreds of times, and thoroughly discredited

Muslims are hopeless. They can’t debate because Islam doesn’t make sense. They are victims of a senseless indoctrination program that devours them and their perceived enemies. More

Is Islam a Religion of Peace? Not!

The day after 9/11, President George W. Bush made the absurd statement that Islam is a religion of peace.  Ponder the findings of a monumental study of the Islamic Trilogy, the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sira published in 2007.  The study was made by Bill Warner, director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam:

  1. Of more than 153,000 words in the Koran, only 4,018 or 2.6 percent seem to express goodness to humanity, qualified, however, by obedience to Muhammad.
  2. The words of Allah are only about 17 percent of the Islamic Trilogy, but the words and actions of Muhammad comprise 83 percent of the Trilogy.
  3. About 20 percent of the most authoritative school of the Hadith is about jihad.
  4. At least 75 percent of the Sira is about jihad.
  5. There are 146 references to hell in the Quran, only 6 percent of which concern moral failings such as murder and theft.  The other 94 percent of the reasons for being in Hell are for the intellectual sin of disagreeing with Muhammad, a political crime.

Warner concludes:  there is no benevolence toward good nonbelievers in Islam. Moreover, and, contrary to what Obama said in Cairo, there is no golden rule in Islam that restricts what Muslims may do to non-Muslims. This places a big question on Islamic monotheism

Open Season on British Women (The Opinionator)
Now that Europe has imported a 7th century values system and given it top priority, the continent’s women will need to remember to cover up.

Debating Islam (Answering Muslims)
A four-part video series of a debate between David Wood and Sami Zaatari. The subject is “Is Islam a Religion of Peace?” (As usual, Sami’s job is to pretend that Islam has nothing to do with what is done in the name of Islam each and everyday).

Poll: Muslim Support for Terrorism Declines (Pew Research)
Muslims are less likely to support terrorism when THEY are the targets of such attacks. Thanks to recent al-Qaeda sprees in Islamic countries, bin Laden is barely pulling 50% approval ratings. Religion of Peace, indeed!

Child Rape and the Religion of Peace (CNN)
(Video) Parents express shock that their child is raped afterbeing “married off,” but then tell the girl that she belongs to her husband.

Sex in the Islamic City (FrontPage Magazine)
An ex-Muslim explains why Muhammad’s religion has been so successful in motivating young Muslim men to become “martyrs.”

We are Losing Europe to Islam (TownHall.com)
As a side note – If Europe goes Muslim, then where will the Muslims who have “fled” there have to flee next?

Our “Ally” Islamabad (The Australian)
One of America’s best buddies is in the process of becoming the world’s first nuclear-armed Sharia state.

Jihad for Love (FrontPage Magazine)
A new film exposes the very real persecution of homosexuals under Islam that goes far beyond mere disapproval.

‘She Doesn’t Want to be Called an Uncircumcised Girl’ (LiveLeak)
Video of female genital mutilation. Seriously, does this look natural?

Britain Adopts Sharia (Chronicles Magazine)
A must-read piece from Srdja Trifkovic.

When Someone Says You Shouldn’t Watch Something. . . (JSOnline)
. . . react accordingly. In this case, the film in question is the excellent documentary, Obsession: Radical Islam’s War against the West.

The al-Aqsa Myth (Europe News)
Just one more example of Islam’s attempt to borrow legitimacy from someone else’s religion.

(Joke) India vs. Pakistan at the UN (The Kashmir)
A bit of inside humor regarding the “disputed” region to which Pakistan lays claim.

Female Genital Mutilation in Eritrea (BBC)
Muslims in some parts of the world are beginning to realize that Allah wouldn’t have made the clitoris in the first place if he meant for it to be cut off. Women elsewhere. . . not so lucky.

Jordan’s Outreach to Hamas (JCPA)
The bonds of Islam are simply too strong to let a little thing like terrorism spoil relationships.

Gave Peace a Chance (Jerusalem Post)
A Peace Now activist in Israel reluctantly admits that his country has no peace partner in the Middle East.

No Longer One Law for All (Spectator)
“Sharia law is not compatible with English law or the principles of equality and human rights that it embodies.”

Fear and Fiction (FrontPage Magazine)
The story behind the story that was deemed too hot to handle.

Losing My Religion – Continued (Islam Watch)
The second piece to the story of a Muslim who decided that believing for the sake of believing wasn’t making much sense anymore.

From Magna Carta to Sharia: Britain’s Decline (Brussels Journal)
Labour has worked hard to give the cancer a foothold.

Islam and the Barbary Pirates (Islam in Action)
How did the Tripoli ambassador justifiy the plundering of ships and the enslaving of innocent people to Thomas Jefferson? Let’s just say the man knew his Qur’an.

Fleeing Malaysia (Islamist Monitor)
Only a few short years ago, the young country of Malaysia was held up as proof that a Muslim majority didn’t necessarily mean discrimination against other religions. Wonder what it means now?

Street Warfare in Denmark (The Opinionator)
More Islam – less peace.

Wildcatting for Allah (Max Flack)
Somalis in Colorado demand special privileges for themselves, but how do they treat other religions back home?

Islam at Face Value (Europe News)
A lot of insight into Islam can be gained from the first few verses of the Qur’an. Unfortunately, little of it is good.

The Hatred within Britain (The Telegraph)
These investigators were shocked to find that hatred exists within British mosques. Other than that, there’s nothing humorous in this article.

Honor Killings in Islam (FSM)
“What kind of an ideology causes a man to show no remorse for murdering his own daughter, but then rant and rave at being served ham sandwiches while in prison?”

Fighting for the Right to Incite Murder (Pajamas Media)
The Muslim Student Union is fighting hard to keep hate alive.

The Islamic Suicide Bomber

Dead Mumbai Headbanger
“Sharia Is Hate”

By Supna Zaidi
FrontPageMagazine.com | Monday, October 06, 2008

Imagine Dodger Stadium full of loud and whooping fans cheering on, not baseball, but your weekly stoning and flogging of adulterers, thieves and other errant citizens of southern California.

This is America under Islamic law, or Shari’a, a system that everyone should fear. Or so, Alan Kornman, director of the United American Committee (UAC) thinks. He continues to fundraise for a freeway billboard in Florida stating, “Shari’a Is Hate,” to educate America before it’s too late.

As Kornman argues, “under Shari’a law if you are accused of stealing, a hand and foot from opposite sides are amputated. If you are caught having an affair, the woman is stoned to death and the man is given 80 lashes. If you change religions, you can be charged under apostasy laws and given the death sentence by a legal Sharia court.”

The implementation of Shari’a is much more subtle than the quotation from Kornman suggests, however.

Through Shari’a, Islamists govern the private lives of individuals as well as regulate the social, political, and economic aspects of society. Islamism crosses national borders, with the final goal of asserting the Muslim ummah globally, with all non-Muslims as second class citizens. It is a totalitarian ideology, and Islamists do want to make Europe and the US Islamist states.

Don’t wait for floggings in your local neighborhood. Consider the following incidences:

1. Muslim cab drivers in Minneapolis refusing fares where would-be passengers are carrying alcohol because it is a sin to drink in Islam:

This first example exemplifies the lack of tolerance Islamists have for non-Muslims. It is one thing to believe drinking is a sin; it’s quite another to enforce your opinion on others. Muslims aren’t alone in this belief. Consider Mormons, who don’t drink coffee because of the caffeine. The problem is the belief that you have the right to impose your opinion on people of a different faith, or no faith at all.

The Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC), possibly fearing charges of discrimination, tried to compromise and approached Kahlid Elmasry of the Muslim American Society, who sided with the cabbies: “it is expressly stated transportation of alcohol for Muslims is against the Islamic faith, and therefore forbidden.”

But this is not an Islamic country. The Constitution governs us, not Shari’a. Therefore, Elmasry’s defense of the cabbies’ position reinforced their notion that Islamic law trumps American secular law.  In a later lawsuit, the cabbies lost and intend to appeal.

2. Niqabi fails to reveal face for ID purposes.

The second example concerns Muslim women and modesty. While there is no specific definition of what modesty entails in the Quran, Islamists increasingly demand the niqab, which covers a woman’s body, hair, and her face. Islamists refuse to concede that the niqab is not a requirement of Islam, but greatly debated among Muslims. Yet, when Americans raise security concerns, Islamists call them racist.

Consider, Sultana Freeman, a niqabi in Florida. She refused to remove her veil for picture identification purposes at the DMV (Department of Motor Vehicles) citing modesty. In reality, she mocks any reasonable person’s definition of modesty since ID pictures have nothing to do with attraction and sexuality, completely ignoring Florida’s right to identify its citizenry for the sake of public safety.  Such blind adherence to Shari’a rather than the laws of the state exemplifies the disdain Islamists have for non-Muslims wherever they may live as well as common sense.

3. Polygamy in America

United States are obligated to perform their duties within the limits of American secular law. Yet, some Imams, like Siraj Wahhaj, prefer to ignore American law where it conflicts with Islamic law. Wahhaj stated in Paul Barrett’s 2007 book American Islam* that, “If a man can have a hundred girlfriends, and it’s legal, I don’t say you can’t have more than one wife.”

Rather than explain what is wrong with men having multiple relationships, Wahhaj greenlights it under the guise of polygamy despite American law against it. This is because he only sees relationships from a usurious male perspective when he should be teaching men to see women as equals and partners. Moreover, he ignores a woman’s perspective entirely. Subsequent wives have no legal rights. Family problems, domestic abuse, combined with economic dependency, forces women to remain silent when issues arise.

Wahhaj also ignores the criminal fraud behind polygamy as well. The UKCanada, like theUS, face welfare fraud every time polygamous marriages are made. Subsequent wives live in a marital household, yet can file for welfare as single women because they failure to register the marriage. The failure to register is not an accident. Polygamous couples know that if they file they will be arrested for violating local bigamy laws. Second, these couples realize the financial advantages given current welfare policy. Such fraud is occurring in the thousands and is a burden to all taxpayers.

It is time for policymakers to realize that Sharia is a system of hate and must not gain any influence in American society. It denigrates women, non-Muslims and the US Constitution. Policymakers must define the limits of religious accommodation in light of the Islamist agenda. Otherwise, democracy and true tolerance will be mere words with no meaning as Islamism spreads in the West.  The UAC billboard is a good start in bringing the danger of Sharia to the nation’s attention.


Greetings from sheik yer’mami!

638 thoughts on “Who is Sheik yer’mami?”

  1. What a pathetic & HATE FILLED article! You should have a better understanding of Shariah. Democracy has led to a great deal of destruction all over the Muslim world with MILLIONS being killed.
    It is democracy that is snatching away our rights! WE DO NOT WANT YOUR PATHETIC “WAY OF LIFE”.
    The highest suicide rates ARE infact in the scandinavian countries even though they follow democaracy!!!

  2. “It is democracy that is snatching away our rights! WE DO NOT WANT YOUR PATHETIC “WAY OF LIFE”.

    We know that. You believe you have a right to rule over us.

    That’s why “Winds of Jihad”.

    The highest suicide rates ARE infact in the scandinavian countries even though they follow democaracy!!!

    Who knows how high they are in countries where Mohammedands rule?

    You don’t even keep records.

    You lot are pathetic losers!

  3. Much as I am pro-multiculturalism and do not believe in “creeping sharia” at least for the Americas yet, I also think that if Muslims want to be part of America and Europe, they should expect no special coddling treatment, and be prepared to act like citizens of whatever country they move to. If they don’t want to do that, then why leave their homelands at all? Oh, right, some of them want to rule the world. There is such thing as Islamaphobia, but it only exists in bad NBC TV shows and far-right chain letters. Liberals want to look the other way and deny there is anything to be concerned about where islam goes, yet many would crucify Christians or at least blame them for every single thing to go wrong in the world, particularly where there were human victims. But where is the outrage when islamist extremists kill? Oh, but that’s a religion, and some anti-theists simply take the opportunity to make ridiculous hateful statements against all religions, simply doing their best to toss all for-real Christians in the same kettle as the fake Christians who did everything wrong in the past, and with the Muslim extremists. I used to believe Muslims mostly left their countries for the same reasons 19th and early 20th century Europeans left theirs for America – to get away from religious oppression and dictatorship. But that picture has gotten considerably fuzzy when there are so many acts of terror coming from Muslim extremists, and I’ve read things, not from either far-right or conservative sources about Islam that painted a pretty horrendous picture. Islam doesn’t seem to have changed much if at all since it’s beginning, so how it has managed to hang on for as long as it has is a bit of a mystery. Every other well-known religion has changed for the better since their beginnings, though there are still infuriatingly backward, narrow-minded throwback sects/groups and frauds too. They are not the norm, however.

  4. “Islam doesn’t seem to have changed much if at all since it’s beginning,”- really?

    Well, that’s because Islam is perfect.The Koran is the word of allah for all time and any place. I must not be doubted. Your call for ‘change’ is redundant. ‘Bida’ (innovation) is absolutely forbidden and those who tried have been killed.

    It might interest you that this also applies to ‘interpretations’- you have to take Islam straight up, undiluted.

  5. Hello there, My name is Yuri, I’m Austrian, and I’m a Muslim, cause I chose to read and understand more about all who claim to know better than me, and know more, and Sir, I’m so ashamed of a closed minded person such as yourself, I read more books about islam only more than you could claim to use here for reference, and I’ve never came cross by any of what you write here. I’ll let myself to express my sorrow for knowing that people do live in darkness of ignorance yet. I wish you the best of luck with whatever you dedicated your life for, and tell you that terror is not just bombers, terror is whatever makes you afraid in your own home, and I think you are terrorized, more than I am by a bomb that may kill me without knowing my religion .

  6. This has to one of the most idiotic websites ever made. I have met 1000s of muslims, but never a single one who believes ‘islam has a right to rule over us’. what are you doing, spencer, cherry picking bits out of the koran that suit your fanatic paranoia? why don’t you go to the bible and read where it says jews should stone and kill all non-jews? [check deuteronomy] Should christians fear jews because this is in the bible?
    It’s a shame that gullible little minds quiver in fear over the tripe spouted by nazis like spencer and geller. now, didnt hitler say the jews were planning to take over the world? same old garbage sold by fanatics and bought by pinheads.

  7. We went to the bible and “read where it says jews should stone and kill all non-jews”, but we never found any Jews who became Deuteromists and stoned non-Jews.

    However, it says in the Koran to ‘kill every Jew that falls into your hand”. And Muslims act on it.

    Christians do not fear Jews “because its in the Bible”.

    Leave it to your mullah to fill you up with garbage.

  8. Hi,
    Today is 20 June 2013. When I log in to Winds of Jihad I get redirected to the page dated 11 August 2011. Is something odd happening here?
    Regards Bill

  9. Me too, from 2 different countries too…..

    Attempts to go to more later content via google get an error message

  10. Hanna,
    islam has utterly failed in every instance where a country has been governed by it: amusing that you think this will change when the rules cannot be changed. You might have found something in islam – but that is a reflection of the fact that you are not terribly bright. The truth is that all thinking people find islam amusing at best, or downright evil at worst. Why is it that you muslims need to kill everyone who tells you the truth about your religion? It seems that you people are not very bright: you cannot argue against the detractors of the code you follow so you try to destroy the messenger, You are afraid, of everything, and your fear is poisoning our world – we do not want you nor do we need you. Allah was an pagan moon god – you cannot even acknowledge that you stole the name!!!

  11. Assalamu Alaikum. I am islamic respectable girl. I have 3 sisters. recently my parents were died. I aske help some persons. help to us no one help to us. please can you help to us any way. recently my parents were died.this matter is true. Wallahi.

  12. Don Laird is a bastard. I really need to see him to give him freedom from speech. Don Laird please share your contact details.

  13. You guys fell for this all. The saudis are bushs’ best friends. You are nothing but drones who pay me your taxes so i can buy guns and you idiots shoot each other. YOU WILL KILL YOURSELF

  14. I guess the word truth does not exist in your dictionary because if it did, you would at least know something. Are you trying to tell me that 9/11 wasn’t an inside job? Bali Bombings? London Bombings? That the “muslim brotherhood” and all other bullshit gangs in the name of Islam arent affiliated with AMERIKA and the CIA? Looks like you need to go back to the history (ones that arent zionist biased) and really figure out why Africa is still in the state it is, why the USA/NATO are funding terrorists (Osama bin Laden – wasnt he trained and funded by the US?), why the middle east is being raped by countries that call themselves “democratic” yet their own people are dying of hunger, lack of cancer treatment because $3bil is going to aid Israel….wtf for? Fear of the Arabs? But isnt US/Israel the ones behind the OCCUPATION of Palestine? Illegal settlers eh lets turn a blind eye, phosphorous attacks on Gaza, eh lets turn a blind eye. But as soon as an Arab does something its Islamic? Let me assure you, most of the rapists in the world are non-Islamic, turn on the ABC news and listen for a day, you will hear of more than 5 at least rape charges committed by NON-MUSLIMS! Yes there are extremists, but just because there is a priest who loves fucking little boys does that mean all Christians are sick and twisted and have a skewed perception towards the rest? That just highlights how much intelligence you lack. The wave is changing, Syria was a catalyst, those so called Islamic Freedom fighters (Al-qaeda – Nusra) or the Free Syrian (Bullshit) Army – the ones being funded by USA openly is losing the fight over the true Islamic/Christian/other religious factions in Syria. Because once the dust settles the truth surfaces :)
    You know, most shieks spread lies, the only ones who believe them are ones who have been promised 72 virgins and $150 US dollars to slit someones throat – really says something about the underground affiliation and funding of these shieks (by the Saudis, Qataris, Turks – all who have strong US relations). That is not Islamic, that is just moral and educational corruption.

  15. Who is shaiyer mamii don’t u know the best justic in the world is in islam I chalange u in tho no any book is pure every book is change by time . Go and chek whol books crischen hindu yahood or evry religion books are change after 100 year . But this is only holy quran is a same like before no body can change hoty quran becous befor 1000s year when wholy quran was compliet god take responsbility. To save holy quran its chalange for all religion fathers can thay prof that I am wrong? Ok know every sensable person is like islaam but some islam enimies are jelas that’s whay they are doing wronge and make joks but no any muslim joke another relegion.one day evry body will know that islam is truo and
    If I see shaik yer mami I will kill him its chalange to whole world bcs he disrespect my wholy profit mohummad. S.a.w. Some muslims is also not on the right way like another religion peoples. Islam is true and best justic best peace than all

  16. this the the most stupid web page i ever seen fuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoonchristJewiSRAELgotoHellSoon

  17. Political Correctness is the death knell of free speech. When free speech dies. Real dying is not far behind.

  18. Regardless of whether what you’re presenting about Islam is or is not the truth (and I think a lot of it is valid), your use of crude cartoons with vicious stereotypes of Arabs and Muslims undercuts your message. It’s exactly equivalent to Nazi cartoons of Jews prior to WWII. It brings your whole enterprise down and drives people away who might otherwise be willing to hear what you have to say.

  19. If pisslam is so good & great as they all claim it to being so (?) then why can’t they live in say, um, ‘HARMONY,THEN ‘ ? It’s a sure sign of being so FULL OF STINKING SHIT ! Or do those that have escaped from there own fore fathers homelands of thy family ( without thy worry of DEATH or RAPE/MURDER or CHILD ABUSE TO 1’s young kids (?) it has to be asked, ” WHY IS THIS SO ? And who’s telling us thy truth in it all ? “

  20. I would think that your site has the capability of “reaching back” and sending out emails to all who have commented on your article. Especially those who appear to “attack” you for what you have written. I would “link” them to jihad watch which has more “current news” articles on ISIL/ISIS than MSM.

    Great article & LOVE your cartoons.

  21. I noticed the recent despicable crimes of most but not all radicals increased my hate for Islam, while still I do not hate Muslims of any confession or extremism.
    Persecution, harassment, ingratitude and lack of reciprocity, martyrdom of hundreds of thousands in the recent years alone, rape, church pyromania, crucifixion, beheading, kidnapping, booty wars, forced conversions, intimidation, demand for Sharia in spite of 5% demographic, bomb attacks… and still no trace of hate but just severe disappointment and “pedagogic determination”… to correct the trend with effective unity and action. Maybe because I worked as a Correctional Officer in a maximum prison and got used to delusional bunches of most successful losers?
    Any idea? All normal?

  22. Why is it that the author of this BS website continues to mix truth with falsehood when they (he or she) misquote the ‘ahadith’, which are academically authenticated and validated narrations of what the Prophet Muhammad, Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Aalehi wa Sallam (May the Peace and Salutations of Allah/”God” be upon him and his followers), said or did or gave consent through his silence on the situation…and no one is calling them out on it? One hadith they misquoted – I think it was from Sahih Muslim – and I am too disgusted to scroll up and find it on this page again, left me flabbergasted. So, if you the author of this website are one person, physically (pychosis is mental), you are probably not followers of Allah’s Word and His Spirit (by ownership), and the Messiah that Allah Sent to Bani-Israel to all the twelve tribes of the children of Israel, ‘Esa’ (Jesus), when they were being persecuted by their rulers, because the Holy Quran tells the Muslims that the ‘Nasara’ (Christians) are the closest to them; full disclosure: and that the polytheists and the Yahood have the worst enmity against you, O Muslims.

    Dear Jews and ‘Christians’, this is a polite message from a Muslim living in the ‘West’ who would like to inform you that the Prophet Muhammad, Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Alehe wa Sallam, has said in Arabic, the meaning and interpretation of which is: any Jew or Christian who hears of me and does not believe in me, will go to Hell. Please get to know this greatest man in history, the last and final Apostle of Allah, the seal of prophethood and the last brick to make the building of the Divine Message complete, Muhammad, Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Alehe wa Sallam.

    So, if you or anyone else looks at even the basic facts about the God’s Prophet Muhammad, Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Alehe wa Sallam, and Islam by reading or listening to the original revelation he was Given by God – the Quran and the explanation of the Quran in the form of the Authentic Ahadith with strong and reasonably strong chains of narration- and come to the conclusion that Muhammad was truly The Truthful and The Trustworthy as the society among whom he lived all his life until he started receiving The Revelation at age 40 and was Ordered by God to Disseminate it openly to everyone, called him … then say ‘I bear witness that there is no god Except The God (Allah) and Muhammad Sallallahu ‘alaihi wa Sallam, is the Messenger of Allah’ and you will enter Islam (which means submission to the Will of Allah) and gain 23% of the world’s population today. Please do it now. Thank you!

    Yours Sincerely,
    A Muslim

  23. The author of this website has little clue about the very basics of Islamic jurisprudence, the Shariah (the other ‘S’ word after ‘Shaitan’/Satan), demonstrated by confusing Hadith with Sira.

  24. Anonymous Four – Your Apologetics sounds very passionate and heartfelt but true Judeo-Chrisyians who are aware of their doctrine and faith find it absolutely weak to reach its objective.
    Islam essentially repeats the doctrines of Arianism. A long-lasting and mostly civilised dispute took place in the last century – and still continues – Vs the “Jehovah Witnesses”. Their theological defeat has been objectively total and reconfirmed the effectiveness of Thomistic apologetics adopted to defeat the scriptural claims against the Sonship of Jesus Christ in its fullness.
    The problem with Islam is that the Judeo-Christian Holy Scriptures are used when convenient and abused when not convenient. We sell noticed this trend in dealing with Mr Deedat – who has been a magnificent advocate in supporting and promoting the weak islamic apologetics in such a strategic and rhetorical way that even Cicero has surely envied him from the underworld.
    Even by common sense Islam doesn’t stand on its feet as it aspect all of us to believe that Allah corrected the TANACH after over 1000 years and after Jesus declared to be in them and extensively quoting all its scriptures as authentic.
    The allegation of falsification doesn’t stand either as Qumran demonstrated with especially Isaiah that the texts have remained the same in centuries.
    The allegation of the NT falsification doesn’t stand either as Nicaea took place centuries before Allah’s speedy intervention. The essential purpose of Nicae was the definitive rejection of the gnostic infiltration in Christianity.
    If it was true that Allah is the YHWH – which is the true name given to Moses – you would pray YHWH and changing his name. You would ask YHWH to keep your faith and worship only in him instead go bowing your knees to another and kiss the black stone.
    Your case for Sharia and Calipha doesn’t stand either as we all are appalled by centuries of violent conquest and false pretext of coexistence. A wide portion of Islamic land has been taken from the Byzantinian Christianity and if Europe did not get organised in time Islam would have conquered all to achieve the almost zero % de;graphic Christianity occurred in Turkey.
    Muslims have been adopted in millions in to the West on the intention and good faith to live together… but the reciprocity has been poor in the West and amongst the Islamic lands, with a massive and increasing number of persecuted Christians and Martyrs.
    Now Islam is calling Europe to Sharia under a serious degree of intimidation and vocal harassment.
    As we speak Choudary advocated in favour of ISIS and Tarik Ramadan is academically spreading the School of Thoughts of the MB.
    The truth speaks clearly even when we see the self-proclaimed “Extremely Mercy of Allah” compared with the meekness and compassion of Jesus Christ and those Christians who – still disarmed – pray for the change of heart of their executors and assassins – who instead keep reassign their right index finger in anger while accusing their poor victims.
    I’ll tell you something clear and short: I am sick of Islam and its crimes and wish Europe to weak up ASAP.

  25. This has been edited to avoid misunderstandings. Please delete the above old version.

    Anonymous Four – Your Apologetics sounds very passionate and heartfelt but true Judeo-Chrisyians who are aware of their doctrine and faith find it absolutely weak to reach its objective.
    Islam essentially repeats the doctrines of Arianism. A long-lasting and mostly civilised dispute took place in the last century – and still continues – Vs the “Jehovah Witnesses”. Their theological defeat has been objectively total and reconfirmed the effectiveness of Thomistic apologetics adopted to defeat the scriptural claims against the Sonship of Jesus Christ in its fullness.
    The problem with Islam is that the Judeo-Christian Holy Scriptures are used when convenient and abused when not convenient. We well noticed this trend in dealing with Mr Deedat – who has been a magnificent advocate in supporting and promoting the weak islamic apologetics in such a strategic and rhetorical way that even Cicero has surely envied him from his grave.
    Even by common sense Islam doesn’t stand on its feet as it aspect all of us to believe that Allah corrected the TANACH after over 1000 years and after Jesus declared to be in them and extensively quoting all its scriptures as authentic.
    The allegation of falsification doesn’t stand either [philologically and archeologically] as Qumran demonstrated with especially Isaiah that the texts have remained the same in centuries.
    The allegation of the NT falsification doesn’t stand either as Nicaea took place centuries before Allah’s speedy intervention and its essential purpose was the definitive rejection of the gnostic infiltration in Christianity.
    If it was true that Allah is YHWH – which is the true name given to Moses – you should worship YHWH and not changing his name.
    You should ask YHWH to keep your faith and pray only in his name instead of bowing your knees to another name and kiss the black stone.

    Your case for Sharia and Calipha doesn’t stand either as we all are appalled by centuries of violent conquest and false pretext of coexistence. A wide portion of Islamic land has been taken from the Byzantinian Christianity and if Europe did not get organised in time Islam would have conquered all to achieve the almost zero % demographic for Christianity as occurred gradually in Turkey.

    Muslims have been adopted by millions in to the West due to the intention and good faith of living together… The reciprocity instead has been poor in the West and amongst the Islamic lands even worse with few exceptions. An increasing number of Christians have been persecuted and Martyrs have been estimated at about 1 Million worldwide – of which a great portion in Islamic lands.
    Now Islam is calling Europe to Sharia under a serious and increasing degree of intimidation and vocal harassment.
    As we speak Choudary advocated in favour of ISIS and Tarik Ramadan is academically and kindly spreading the School of Thoughts of the MB.

    The truth speaks clearly even when we see the self-proclaimed “Extreme Mercy of Allah” compared with the meekness and the compassion of Jesus Christ and those Christians who – still unarmed or disarmed – pray for the change of heart of their persecutors and assassins – who instead keep raising their right index finger in anger while accusing their poor victims.
    I’ll tell you something clear and short: I am sick of Islam and its crimes and wish Europe to wake up ASAP.

  26. Hey, all the Muslims here with your nifty little “theory” of the Qur’an unchanged for a 1000 (quote/unquote) years. Ever heard about the San’a manuscripts dating to before 671 CE? 12,000 Qur’anic parchment fragments? Upper text an ‘Uthmanic “edited” authorized version, the lower text (which has resurfaced because of metals in the ink) peppered with numerous variations. Unaltered word of God. Really?

  27. The Qur’an unchanged for 1000 years? All you Muslims out there ever about the Yemeni Sana’a manuscipts? The 12,000 fragments of the “authorized” ‘Uthmanic version written over the older version with a gazillion variations? You don’t like hearing that, do you?

  28. your weak ,your scum..look @ YOURSELF BEFORE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>