Who is Sheik yer’mami?

img094.jpg
Shem, Winds of Jihad Vice President and resident cartoonist, is presently in charge of editing and moderating this blog. Thank you all for news-feeds and contributions and your support. Sheik yer’mami will be saddling the camels and head off on a short expedition to the Middle East. I will keep you posted…

******

Salaam! I’m back:

Yes: We know this page is outdated and needs to be reconstructed! Bear with us: in the meantime please go to our educational site:

* Robert Spencer:

If you speak honestly and accurately about the Islamic jihad doctrine and the Islamic supremacist agenda, and even confine your case entirely to quotes from authoritative Islamic sources and spokesmen, you will still be accused of “hating Muslims.” This is the constant refrain of apologists for jihad and their useful idiots in the West — and they constantly have recourse to it because they know that it is effective: it turns the Left and much of the squishy Right away from the message of the “hater,” regardless of how outlandish and unjust the charge is.

Myself, I don’t hate Muslims. I love Muslims. Telling the truth is not an act of hate. I am not “Islamophobic,” I am Islamorealistic. I tell the truth about Islam and work to defend Western civilization and society from the encroachments of a legal and societal system that oppresses Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

Or visit our Islam site: here

For the Nutroots:

Multicultural Europe and its suicide

fallaci_1.gif

ukinfidels2Finsbury Park Mosque, London 2002

Are you willing to defend your freedom?

*  Fight against sharia: “Sharia is Hate”

Unlike refugees from Nazism, or Communism, who hated Nazis and hated Communists, and wanted only to escape from them and, in many cases, to actively work against them, the so-called “refugees” or simply immigrants from Muslim lands bring with them, in their mental baggage, Islam itself. They do not realize that it is Islam, with its inshallah-fatalism and natural support for depotism as opposed to advanced Western democracy (for the belief-system locates legitimacy not in the expressed will of the people, but in the will expressed by Allah in the Qur’an, as glossed by Hadith and Sira). They carry the belief-system with them, and what is more, attempt – not without success — to spread it about, to make sure that the numbers of adherents of Islam grow and grow and grow. It is this Da’wa, and demographic conquest that is the result of fantastic, utterly unchecked Muslim migration, and the great disparity in birth-rates between Muslims (who often smuggle in plural wives, supported by Infidel taxpayers in their generous welfare payments), and the indigenous non-Muslims, that has, for example, caused the 15,000 Muslims in Holland in 1970 to become 1 million, or 5-7 million Muslims now to burden the educational and justice systems, and the welfare benefits, and the laic state, and social peace, in France, and England, and Germany, and everywhere that Muslims in large numbers have been permitted to settle — which has led, no clear-sighted Infidel can deny, to a situation far more unpleasant, expensive, and physically dangerous — and becoming more unpleasant, more expensive, more physically dangerous every day — for the indigenous Infidels.
This must stop. This suicidal policy cannot continue.

Guessing the religion of those who plant bombs, hi-jack planes, fire into crowds of civilians, take hostages and murder hostages is the world’s ultimate no-brainer. And yet our leaders, the media and many of us pretend there’s no connection between psychopathic killers and the religion which exalts the slaughter of unbelievers. Islam remains what it was at its beginning, a violent, expansionist faith that will tolerate no competitors. What other religion has the concept of jihad, the notion that if you die fighting for allah you get 72 virgins in paradise? Mohammed started by eliminating the competition, annihilating Jewish tribes in the Arabian Peninsula. More than a 1000 yrs later, it’s still business as usual for his successors. Is islam a religion of peace? Is there an Easter bunny? Can pigs fly? Calling for a war on terror is like trying to stop the bullets instead of stopping the people who are doing the shooting, decades of terror and they still dont get it. Any religious creed that promotes terrorism as a method for the conversion of infidels deserves only contempt and needs to be mocked, crushed, and expelled from the lands it has silently infiltrated. The war is, and needs to be identified without question, against islam and their numbers and attitude warrant exceptional attention…

Hugh Fitzgerald

*
So-called dialogue with the Islamic world and relativism regarding marriage, the dignity of women, and sexual equality in the name of multiculturalism is destroying European identity and doing away with womens rights.

Thursday, March 08, 2007
By Samir Khalil Samir

The ideology of multiculturalism, i.e. blind tolerance toward any culture and tradition, is destroying European identity and is above all doing away with human rights and, more specifically, women’s rights. A prime example is the increasing tolerance in European countries toward polygamy.

In theory, polygamy is prohibited in Italy and in Europe. But it increasingly happens, in the name of multiculturalism, that Muslim immigrants are registered as polygamists in the European continent: if a man is Muslim and married in his country of origin with 4 wives, we cannot but accept this as a given. All this goes against European laws and constitutions – which affirm monogamous families – but, in the name of a misplaced respect for cultures, any solution is deemed acceptable.

Tolerance for polygamy?

In Italy, some constitutionalists are suggesting, for the sake of letting people have it both ways, that only one wife be recognized as such, while the others are considered concubines: this would settle the situation of various Muslims who already have a wife in their country of origin and take another in Italy. Others think that a distinction could be made between civil marriage (at City Hall, with just one wife) and religious marriage in a mosque, where polygamous marriages could be celebrated. Naturally, to do this, they are proposing that the articles of Italian civil law, which affirm monogamy and the equality of men and women, not be read. A similar trend is spreading in Greece. In certain areas where Muslims are the majority, the government has accepted the principle that they manage themselves with their own norms. And so, in Athens, polygamy is prohibited, but in Muslim-majority areas, it is allowed, again in the name of cultural respect.

Multiculturalism is doing a lot of damage. Firstly to common sense: if a man is married in Senegal with a woman and in Italy with another, this cannot be defined as monogamy. A crime remains such whether it is committed in Italy or abroad. Such tricks are actually a way to suggest loopholes for polygamy. Thus, if an Italian wants to have more than just one wife, all he needs to do is to convert to Islam!

But multiculturalism is above all damaging to the dignity of women. Polygamy in Italy is prohibited in that it is contrary to the principle of equality between men and women. It would be useful to Islam too to affirm this principle. In Islamic society, in fact, women cannot be polygamous (only men have that “right”). The same is true for repudiation, which is permitted to a man, but not to a woman who, however, can ask her husband the favour of repudiating her. Affirming monogamy is thus the way forward on the path for an overall effort in favour of women’s rights.

The Imam of Vénissieux and women

To understand the humiliation in which women live in the Islamic world, I would like to recall a fact that sparked much debate in France. Last February 20th, the courts definitively rejected an appeal made by Imam Abdelkader Bouziane. An Algerian-national, Sheikh Abdelkader, imam of the mosque of Vénissieux, near Lyon, a polygamist and father of 16 (sixteen) children (14 of which French citizens) had been living in France since 1980.

He had been ordered on February 26, 2004, to leave the country by Interior Minister Sarkozy, for his inflammatory speeches and for incitement to hatred, but the ordinance was not enforced. On April 20, following an interview in the “Lyon Mag” newspaper, he was again served an expulsion order for his statements against women, in particular for having said that “the Koran authorizes a Muslim, in certain cases, to beat his wife,” that women must subjugated themselves to their husband and were not equal to men.

On April 23rd, the administrative tribunal of Lyon suspended the expulsion ordinance and rejected the Interior Ministry’s request. The imam went back to France in May 22. On October 5, 2004, the State Council cancelled the expulsion suspension, and the next day the iman was again expelled to Orano in Algeria. On June 21, 2005, the Lyon court declared him once again free, but on October 14, he was convicted in absentia. The imam filed an appeal, but on February 6, 2007, the courts definitively rejected his case.

The “Régards de femmes” Association of Lyon, which had sued the imam, declared: “The right to dignity, to respect, to the integrity of her body belongs to every woman in France. It will not be possible from now on to legitimize violence against women on the pretence of religion.”

The Imam’s interview

here are a few extracts of the (famous) interview with Sheikh Abdelkader on the male-female relationship.

In your opinion, are women equal to men?

No. For example, women do not have the right to work alongside men, as they [women] could be tempted by adultery.

Must women necessarily be subjugated to men?

Yes, because the head of the family is always a man. But he must be fair to his wife: he must not beat her for no reason, nor consider her a slave.

Is this why you are favourable to polygamy?

Yes, a Muslim can have more than one wife. But not more than four! Plus, there are conditions.

But why can women not have more than one husband?

Because no one would know who fathered the children!

Are you in favour of the stoning [1] of women?

Yes, because beating one’s wife is allowed by the Koran, but under certain conditions, in particular if she betrays her husband. Please note however: the man does not have the right to beat her everywhere: not on the face, but in the lower parts, her legs, her stomach, her bottom. He can beat her vigorously so as to induce fear, so that she does not start again!

The Koran: wife beating is allowed

Various readers were up in arms, but in the end the imam defended himself saying that this is the Koran. And he’s right. If we open the Koran at Sura 4, verse 34, we can read:

“Men have authority over women due to the preference that Allah concedes to them over the other and because they spend their property [for women]; Good women are therefore obedient, guarding under secrecy that which Allah has preserved [sex]. [2] ; As for those on whose part you fear insubordination, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do nothing further against them; Allah is high and great.”

Last week on Al Jazeera, I heard another imam explain the four conditions for beating a wife: not on her face; without drawing blood; without breaking bones; not in the presence of children. If all this is insufficient, one must resort to extreme punishment, i.e. the man deprives his wife of sexual relations.

The Koran is also explicit on the question of the superiority of men to women; according to the Koran, Charter 2 (The Cow), Verse 228:

“Divorced women should keep themselves in waiting for three periods; and it is not lawful for them to conceal what Allah has created in their wombs, if they believe in Allah and the Last Day. And their husbands have priority to take them back during this time if they wish for reconciliation; and they [women] have rights equivalent to their duties, on the basis of good custom, but the men are superior. Allah is Mighty, Wise.”

The Italian edition published by the Union of Islamic Communities and Organizations in Italy (UCOII) includes a long footnote (absent on the on-line version) on the phrase “but men are superior”:

“In a pitiful effort to standardize Islam to Western culture, certain modernist commentators have written that superiority has only to do with the right of men to repudiate their wife, a faculty which is not reciprocal. In reality, it is a much more important and fundamental matter for the maintaining of balance at the individual, family and social levels.

“Man and Woman are two complementary realities that exist unto each other. If this were not so, Allah (glory be to Him the Most High) would not have formed Eve from Adam’s rib, he would have furnished each gender with complete reproductive organs, etc., etc.

“The physical structure of men is capable of great exertion and significant exploits, that of women, of steady labour and great endurance of pain.

“Male sensitivity is entirely exterior, projected outside the realm of family and tends to become public and political. That of women is interior, careful of oneself, aimed at the protection of that which has been acquired and to the acquisition of simple means of sustenance and security.

“Male psychology is imaginative, creative, experimental, risk-loving, desirous of novelty, of affirming the Self, usually ample and superficial. That of women is concrete, traditional, risk-hating, desirous of certainty, of conserving what is “mine”, usually profound and limited.

“In the realm of family, the respect of the Laws of Allah and of the Sunna of the Messenger can create situations that require an affirmation of power that mortifies the complementarity of spouses. But apart from complementarity, there is the problem of leadership, in the family and in society, which does not mean predomination, oppression or the lack of recognition of female predominance in a number of sectors and circumstances. Allah (Glory be to Him, the Most High) assigns this management role to the male. It is an onerous and difficult task that men would often willingly do without, and for which he must respond before Allah.”

This apologetic comment, written by an Italian converted to Islam, mirrors the opinion of traditionalistic ulemas, avoiding their excesses. It assigns specific tasks to men and to women, tasks which are unchangeable because determined by God, which claim to correspond to the nature of one and the other. It is obvious that such a distribution of roles, established by God for eternity and valid for all times and cultures, is hardly compatible with Western mentality and is often incompatible with the laws and constitutions of Europe.

Conclusion

Is it possible to accept this teaching in the name of the respect for cultures and religious tolerance? This is the serious question faced by all Western countries.

I don’t know if the flag-wavers of multiculturalism realize how much human damage they cause. Actually, it is increasingly clear that so-called multicultural tolerance is only acquiescence to a subtle form of racism. In the name of cultural difference, in fact, everything is left to proceed on parallel tracks, without envisaging any progress, integration or betterment in the name of human dignity.

It is time for Europe to understand that religious law cannot prevail over civil law and that, above every form of tolerance, there is a country’s constitution. If this does not happen, Islam will be given carte blanche to colonize our customs.

NOTE :

1) The imam, who had lived in France for 24 years, did not understand the word “stoning”, which he understood to mean “beating”. Hence, his reply.

2) In UCOII’s translation, generally attributed to Hamza Piccardo (Imperia, 1994), the following note can be read “This is the ideal of the believing woman: ‘patient and modest.’ Says the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him): “The best of women is she who rejoices at your gaze, obeys you, guards her person and the property of the husband in his absence.”

Was Muhammad a Sex Maniac?

From the Hadith:

Muslim (8:3309) – Muhammad married Aisha at the age of nine.

Bukhari (62:18) – Aisha’s father, Abu Bakr, wasn’t on board at first, but Muhammad explained how the rules of their religion made it possible. This is similar to the way that present-day cult leaders manipulate their followers into similar concessions.

Muslim (8:3311) – The girl took her dolls with her to Muhammad’s house (something to play with when the “prophet” was not having sex with her).

Bukhari (6:298) – Muhammad would take a bath with the little girl and fondle her.

Muslim (8:3460) – “Why didn’t you marry a young girl so that you could sport with her and she could sport with you, or you could amuse with her and she could amuse with you?” Muhammad posed this question to one of his followers who had married an “older woman” instead.

Bukhari (4:232) – Muhammad’s wives would wash semen stains out of his clothes, which were still wet from the spot-cleaning even when he went to the mosque for prayers. Between copulation and prayer, it’s a wonder he found the time to slay pagans.

Bukhari (6:300) – Muhammad’s wives had to be available for the prophet’s fondling even when they were having their menstrual period.

Bukhari (62:6) – “The Prophet used to go round (have sexual relations with) all his wives in one night, and he had nine wives.” Muhammad also said that it was impossible to treat all wives equally – and it isn’t hard to guess why.

Bukhari (5:268) – “The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number.” I asked Anas, ‘Had the Prophet the strength for it?’ Anas replied, ‘We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty men.’ ”

So let me summarize:

Even if we accept a 54 year old man marrying a child, raping captured (non-believing) woman what does that make him?

Even we accept the unacceptable, what do you call a guy who rapes captured women and sells them into slavery?

Even if we accapt all that, what do you call a guy who has sex with 14 women in one night?

Did Muhammad, profit of Islam, drink wine? Yes he did!

Here’s more:

The Sex Life of the Prophet

muhammad_party.jpg

Some of many jihad verses:

Qur’an:2:216 “Jihad (holy fighting in Allah’s Cause) is ordained for you , though you dislike it. But it is possible that you dislike a thing which is good for you, and like a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knows, and you know not.” [Another translation reads:] “Warfare is ordained for you.”

*
Qur’an:8:12 “I shall terrorize the infidels. So wound their bodies and incapacitate them because they oppose Allah and His Apostle.”

*
Qur’an:8:57 “If you gain mastery over them in battle, inflict such a defeat as would terrorize them, so that they would learn a lesson and be warned.”

*
Bukhari:V4B52N44 “A man came to Allah’s Apostle and said, ‘Instruct me as to such a deed as equals Jihad in reward.’ He replied, ‘I do not find such a deed.’”

*
Bukhari:V1B2N25 “Allah’s Apostle was asked, ‘What is the best deed?’ He replied, ‘To believe in Allah and His Apostle Muhammad.’ The questioner then asked, ‘What is the next best in goodness?’ He replied, ‘To participate in Jihad, religious fighting in Allah’s Cause.’”

Arguing, debating with Muslims:

They will say:

1. He’s taking verses out of context
2. He’s an Islamophobe/racist/bigot
3. He doesn’t know Arabic, and you can’t understand the Qur’an unless it’s in Arabic
4. He’s not an expert on Islam/he has no credentials
5. The Qur’an, the mind of Muhammad, and Islam in general are too complex and mysterious for infidels to understand
6. What about the Crusades (and other violent Christian actions of the past)?
7. What about the violent verses in the Bible?
8. Those Muslims are not “real” Muslims
9. Only Muslims can address the tough topics
10. He’s lying
11. If you prove him wrong from Qur’an and Hadith, you just get ridiculed
12. He has been refuted hundreds of times, and thoroughly discredited

Muslims are hopeless. They can’t debate because Islam doesn’t make sense. They are victims of a senseless indoctrination program that devours them and their perceived enemies. More

Is Islam a Religion of Peace? Not!

The day after 9/11, President George W. Bush made the absurd statement that Islam is a religion of peace.  Ponder the findings of a monumental study of the Islamic Trilogy, the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sira published in 2007.  The study was made by Bill Warner, director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam:

  1. Of more than 153,000 words in the Koran, only 4,018 or 2.6 percent seem to express goodness to humanity, qualified, however, by obedience to Muhammad.
  2. The words of Allah are only about 17 percent of the Islamic Trilogy, but the words and actions of Muhammad comprise 83 percent of the Trilogy.
  3. About 20 percent of the most authoritative school of the Hadith is about jihad.
  4. At least 75 percent of the Sira is about jihad.
  5. There are 146 references to hell in the Quran, only 6 percent of which concern moral failings such as murder and theft.  The other 94 percent of the reasons for being in Hell are for the intellectual sin of disagreeing with Muhammad, a political crime.

Warner concludes:  there is no benevolence toward good nonbelievers in Islam. Moreover, and, contrary to what Obama said in Cairo, there is no golden rule in Islam that restricts what Muslims may do to non-Muslims. This places a big question on Islamic monotheism

Open Season on British Women (The Opinionator)
Now that Europe has imported a 7th century values system and given it top priority, the continent’s women will need to remember to cover up.

Debating Islam (Answering Muslims)
A four-part video series of a debate between David Wood and Sami Zaatari. The subject is “Is Islam a Religion of Peace?” (As usual, Sami’s job is to pretend that Islam has nothing to do with what is done in the name of Islam each and everyday).

Poll: Muslim Support for Terrorism Declines (Pew Research)
Muslims are less likely to support terrorism when THEY are the targets of such attacks. Thanks to recent al-Qaeda sprees in Islamic countries, bin Laden is barely pulling 50% approval ratings. Religion of Peace, indeed!

Child Rape and the Religion of Peace (CNN)
(Video) Parents express shock that their child is raped afterbeing “married off,” but then tell the girl that she belongs to her husband.

Sex in the Islamic City (FrontPage Magazine)
An ex-Muslim explains why Muhammad’s religion has been so successful in motivating young Muslim men to become “martyrs.”

We are Losing Europe to Islam (TownHall.com)
As a side note – If Europe goes Muslim, then where will the Muslims who have “fled” there have to flee next?

Our “Ally” Islamabad (The Australian)
One of America’s best buddies is in the process of becoming the world’s first nuclear-armed Sharia state.

Jihad for Love (FrontPage Magazine)
A new film exposes the very real persecution of homosexuals under Islam that goes far beyond mere disapproval.

‘She Doesn’t Want to be Called an Uncircumcised Girl’ (LiveLeak)
Video of female genital mutilation. Seriously, does this look natural?

Britain Adopts Sharia (Chronicles Magazine)
A must-read piece from Srdja Trifkovic.

When Someone Says You Shouldn’t Watch Something. . . (JSOnline)
. . . react accordingly. In this case, the film in question is the excellent documentary, Obsession: Radical Islam’s War against the West.

The al-Aqsa Myth (Europe News)
Just one more example of Islam’s attempt to borrow legitimacy from someone else’s religion.

(Joke) India vs. Pakistan at the UN (The Kashmir)
A bit of inside humor regarding the “disputed” region to which Pakistan lays claim.

Female Genital Mutilation in Eritrea (BBC)
Muslims in some parts of the world are beginning to realize that Allah wouldn’t have made the clitoris in the first place if he meant for it to be cut off. Women elsewhere. . . not so lucky.

Jordan’s Outreach to Hamas (JCPA)
The bonds of Islam are simply too strong to let a little thing like terrorism spoil relationships.

Gave Peace a Chance (Jerusalem Post)
A Peace Now activist in Israel reluctantly admits that his country has no peace partner in the Middle East.

No Longer One Law for All (Spectator)
“Sharia law is not compatible with English law or the principles of equality and human rights that it embodies.”

Fear and Fiction (FrontPage Magazine)
The story behind the story that was deemed too hot to handle.

Losing My Religion – Continued (Islam Watch)
The second piece to the story of a Muslim who decided that believing for the sake of believing wasn’t making much sense anymore.

From Magna Carta to Sharia: Britain’s Decline (Brussels Journal)
Labour has worked hard to give the cancer a foothold.

Islam and the Barbary Pirates (Islam in Action)
How did the Tripoli ambassador justifiy the plundering of ships and the enslaving of innocent people to Thomas Jefferson? Let’s just say the man knew his Qur’an.

Fleeing Malaysia (Islamist Monitor)
Only a few short years ago, the young country of Malaysia was held up as proof that a Muslim majority didn’t necessarily mean discrimination against other religions. Wonder what it means now?

Street Warfare in Denmark (The Opinionator)
More Islam – less peace.

Wildcatting for Allah (Max Flack)
Somalis in Colorado demand special privileges for themselves, but how do they treat other religions back home?

Islam at Face Value (Europe News)
A lot of insight into Islam can be gained from the first few verses of the Qur’an. Unfortunately, little of it is good.

The Hatred within Britain (The Telegraph)
These investigators were shocked to find that hatred exists within British mosques. Other than that, there’s nothing humorous in this article.

Honor Killings in Islam (FSM)
“What kind of an ideology causes a man to show no remorse for murdering his own daughter, but then rant and rave at being served ham sandwiches while in prison?”

Fighting for the Right to Incite Murder (Pajamas Media)
The Muslim Student Union is fighting hard to keep hate alive.

The Islamic Suicide Bomber

Dead Mumbai Headbanger
“Sharia Is Hate”

By Supna Zaidi
FrontPageMagazine.com | Monday, October 06, 2008

Imagine Dodger Stadium full of loud and whooping fans cheering on, not baseball, but your weekly stoning and flogging of adulterers, thieves and other errant citizens of southern California.

This is America under Islamic law, or Shari’a, a system that everyone should fear. Or so, Alan Kornman, director of the United American Committee (UAC) thinks. He continues to fundraise for a freeway billboard in Florida stating, “Shari’a Is Hate,” to educate America before it’s too late.

As Kornman argues, “under Shari’a law if you are accused of stealing, a hand and foot from opposite sides are amputated. If you are caught having an affair, the woman is stoned to death and the man is given 80 lashes. If you change religions, you can be charged under apostasy laws and given the death sentence by a legal Sharia court.”

The implementation of Shari’a is much more subtle than the quotation from Kornman suggests, however.

Through Shari’a, Islamists govern the private lives of individuals as well as regulate the social, political, and economic aspects of society. Islamism crosses national borders, with the final goal of asserting the Muslim ummah globally, with all non-Muslims as second class citizens. It is a totalitarian ideology, and Islamists do want to make Europe and the US Islamist states.

Don’t wait for floggings in your local neighborhood. Consider the following incidences:

1. Muslim cab drivers in Minneapolis refusing fares where would-be passengers are carrying alcohol because it is a sin to drink in Islam:

This first example exemplifies the lack of tolerance Islamists have for non-Muslims. It is one thing to believe drinking is a sin; it’s quite another to enforce your opinion on others. Muslims aren’t alone in this belief. Consider Mormons, who don’t drink coffee because of the caffeine. The problem is the belief that you have the right to impose your opinion on people of a different faith, or no faith at all.

The Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC), possibly fearing charges of discrimination, tried to compromise and approached Kahlid Elmasry of the Muslim American Society, who sided with the cabbies: “it is expressly stated transportation of alcohol for Muslims is against the Islamic faith, and therefore forbidden.”

But this is not an Islamic country. The Constitution governs us, not Shari’a. Therefore, Elmasry’s defense of the cabbies’ position reinforced their notion that Islamic law trumps American secular law.  In a later lawsuit, the cabbies lost and intend to appeal.

2. Niqabi fails to reveal face for ID purposes.

The second example concerns Muslim women and modesty. While there is no specific definition of what modesty entails in the Quran, Islamists increasingly demand the niqab, which covers a woman’s body, hair, and her face. Islamists refuse to concede that the niqab is not a requirement of Islam, but greatly debated among Muslims. Yet, when Americans raise security concerns, Islamists call them racist.

Consider, Sultana Freeman, a niqabi in Florida. She refused to remove her veil for picture identification purposes at the DMV (Department of Motor Vehicles) citing modesty. In reality, she mocks any reasonable person’s definition of modesty since ID pictures have nothing to do with attraction and sexuality, completely ignoring Florida’s right to identify its citizenry for the sake of public safety.  Such blind adherence to Shari’a rather than the laws of the state exemplifies the disdain Islamists have for non-Muslims wherever they may live as well as common sense.

3. Polygamy in America

United States are obligated to perform their duties within the limits of American secular law. Yet, some Imams, like Siraj Wahhaj, prefer to ignore American law where it conflicts with Islamic law. Wahhaj stated in Paul Barrett’s 2007 book American Islam* that, “If a man can have a hundred girlfriends, and it’s legal, I don’t say you can’t have more than one wife.”

Rather than explain what is wrong with men having multiple relationships, Wahhaj greenlights it under the guise of polygamy despite American law against it. This is because he only sees relationships from a usurious male perspective when he should be teaching men to see women as equals and partners. Moreover, he ignores a woman’s perspective entirely. Subsequent wives have no legal rights. Family problems, domestic abuse, combined with economic dependency, forces women to remain silent when issues arise.

Wahhaj also ignores the criminal fraud behind polygamy as well. The UKCanada, like theUS, face welfare fraud every time polygamous marriages are made. Subsequent wives live in a marital household, yet can file for welfare as single women because they failure to register the marriage. The failure to register is not an accident. Polygamous couples know that if they file they will be arrested for violating local bigamy laws. Second, these couples realize the financial advantages given current welfare policy. Such fraud is occurring in the thousands and is a burden to all taxpayers.

It is time for policymakers to realize that Sharia is a system of hate and must not gain any influence in American society. It denigrates women, non-Muslims and the US Constitution. Policymakers must define the limits of religious accommodation in light of the Islamist agenda. Otherwise, democracy and true tolerance will be mere words with no meaning as Islamism spreads in the West.  The UAC billboard is a good start in bringing the danger of Sharia to the nation’s attention.

monkey3

Greetings from sheik yer’mami!

{ 622 comments… read them below or add one }

a nony mouse April 5, 2011 at 2:16 am

Why is it that Muselturds always use Jewish or Christian monikers?
the recent oz elections had ‘christian’ maes for liberal and green candidates hawatt and bill chahine I think.
tried to email you but it was rejected by the system as too many mails in your mailbox.
do write to me direct as I have tried to get in touch.
have worked out how to get a better abine [do not track] email for security. you have received a few threats I see and all of us need to be careful when we live in the ghettos.

Sulla April 6, 2011 at 3:44 am

None of you are informed or aware that all religions have spawned terrorists. It is the people who claim the religion that commit terror, and that includes you and your hate speech.

All religions arose in times that they mitigated with more compassionate doctrines. But no one on this website is informed enough to have learned that context counts. You are all behaving like terrorists yourselves, not unusual, since it is humans, not religion, that is responsible for hate.

sheikyermami April 6, 2011 at 5:36 am

“all religions have spawned terrorists.”

Really, Sulla?

“it is humans, not religion, that is responsible for hate.”

Ever read the koran, sulla?

Mullah Lodabullah April 6, 2011 at 8:49 am

* None of you are informed

BS meter wrapped around the front stop once more.

PiazzaAlimonda April 8, 2011 at 1:43 pm

This blog is all a lie!!! Shame on you……. it is not true that Islam and democracy can’t be togheter. Look at Egypt!! They fought for their democracy….all that you say about Islam here is exagerated, taken to the limit, generalized. this is not correct information, this is DISINFORMATION. This is Anti-islamic propaganda!

I am a western and I can see things from an outsider point of view, stop this hate on islam, they are good people like us!

Mullah Lodabullah April 8, 2011 at 2:31 pm

* This blog is all a lie!!!

Really, on your say so, Piazza? Your piazza lacks a few flag stones perhaps.

* it is not true that Islam and democracy can’t be togheter.

You are condemned for unbelief by muslims such as Abdur Rahim Green who follow allah and its false prophet quite ardently, and reject democracy as “innovation”, not campatible with islam and reject the likes of you who sit on the fence and claim otherwise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8kBSPdCtQc
Islam & Democracy by Abdur-Raheem Green

* this is DISINFORMATION. This is Anti-islamic propaganda!

Take it up with Abdur-Raheem Green and others who believe that islam is incompatible with democracy. Set them straight. Put them on the right “deen”. You are right – they are wrong & spread disinformation, but which follows allah and its false prophet most sincerely – you or Green?

Ultimately it will not matter – islam will be destroyed by the Biblical God it mocks and blasphemes against. Check out the fate of the largely islamic nations in the war of Ezekiel 38 / 39.

* I am a western and I can see things from an outsider point of view, stop this hate on islam, they are good people like us!

You are simply a useful fool, an enabler who can be beheaded when islam takes over & establishes its global caliphate under sharia ‘law’, as ii its stated intention.

Mullah Lodabullah April 8, 2011 at 2:48 pm

* it is not true that Islam and democracy can’t be togheter.

Here is another “lying” muslim contradicting you, invoking the name of allah while doing so

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIBJSlPXVv4
ISLAM & DEMOCRACY
dawahworks

One thing is for sure – islam is incompatible with Christianity, and will not be around during the millennial reign of Jesus Christ, the Son of God that allah and its false prophet mock and blaspheme against.

“I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.” (Jesus Christ – Revelation 22:12)

In comparison to such majesty, allah is toast, along with its followers.

sheikyermami April 8, 2011 at 4:14 pm

Muslim Brotherhood has already won

Reports in the Arabic press are quoting Al Hayat as saying that Mahmoud Abbas will meet with the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Mohamed Badie, today in Egypt.

Whether MB wins the next Egyptian elections or not, they have already gained the perception of being the most important political player in Cairo, and that very perception is likely to have long-term consequences.

Fatah is anxious to come to terms with Hamas in a unification deal, because if they remain divided in September then the much-heralded attempt to get the UN to recognize “Palestine” would be much more difficult.

Hamas is in the driver’s seat. Not only does Fatah need unification more than Hamas, but Hamas no longer feels as politically isolated as before Egypt’s revolution. First of all, political parties across the board in Egypt are publicly declaring their support for Gaza and implicit support of Hamas. More importantly, though, is that the MB and Hamas are cousins if not brothers, and Hamas’ stock has risen just by association with the Egyptian Islamists.

Abbas’ reported visit with the Brotherhood must be seen in this context. They will now be a major player in Palestinian Arab politics, while they were marginal before.

The Egyptian uprising therefore is causing Fatah to harden its positions with respect to negotiating with Israel and espousing a peaceful solution. Whether it likes it or not, Fatah is more dependent on Islamists than ever before in order to continue on as the supposed leader of Palestinian Arabs.

While there are indications that the MB is politically fractured, all of its factions are uncompromising towards Israel and do not support Camp David, let alone Oslo. Moreover, the gulf between Sunni and Shi’a is not as huge as some believe, and Tehran is salivating at the prospect of more Islamist influence in Egypt – and Hamas may serve as the bridge to help push that along.

The full ramifications of the rise of the MB are hard to predict. Probably they will start to strategize with their offshoots in other Arab countries, using lessons learned in Egypt to maximize the chances of success elsewhere. Jordan and Syria are key countries not only because of their already existing MB branches but also because if they fall, Israel would be surrounded by enemies who are not only politically but also ideologically and religiously opposed to Israel’s existence. Fatah doesn’t stand a chance of remaining nominally pro-Western, and Iran’s influence will explode throughout the region. Conversely, Iran’s political isolation will disappear.

Without seeing any organized, viable, liberal alternative to the MB in the Muslim world, things are looking bleak indeed for the West, and very good for Iran.

jeebus April 10, 2011 at 3:21 am

I guess since mohammed was a pedophile then god must be one too,wasnt mary about 13 when she was “gifted” with pregnancy?

J April 13, 2011 at 1:37 am

Arguing with Islamics is like arguing with the mentally ill.

Farid April 22, 2011 at 2:37 pm

I find it funny when you say the words Western Civilization, a civilization where you go out clubing and pubbing at the weekend and sleep with whoever you wanted to after you become intoxicated, many of the people have sex with who ever is available at the club, a civilization where covering yourself is considered a crime yet being naked and showing as many parts of your body as possible is considered high fashion. One in four children don’t know who fathered them. In many cases people get married 5,6,7,8 or more times. They marry one person while sleeping with two others, when a child is born, no one knows who fathered it. HIV Aids is at its highest in your societies, as men have sex with men and is considered democratic. It is called a disease not democracy. Teen pregnancy rate is unbelieveable where no one knows who the father is. Rape is at its peak in the US compared to the Islamic world. Corruption is the product of Western Civilization, corruption has been exported to the Islamic world through the British rulling of that region and it goes on until today. As far as democracy is concern, the real democracy was introduced by Islam when they had to choose a Khalifa to lead the muslims after the death of Prophet Muhammad PBUH and to refresh your memory that was 1400 years ago. The welfare system was introduced by this holly religion, where they had Baitul Maal, where the rich was taxed and the poor was assisted. And when you read verses from the Quran and you read them out of context make me and make so many like me more determined and more active in our duties to our society, our religion and the wider society as a whole. Shame on a culture, a system where the mass is brain washed into believing that this is the right way of life, while everything is going wrong. Islam never allows anyone to invade other country without any reason and murder millions of innocent people. Islam didn’t start it all, Iraq was invaded by a Christian country, Afghanistan is always under invasion by a Christian country, only Britian has invaded Afghanistan 4 times in this century and the past centry, and everytime it tried to enter that country, had paid a heavy price for it. Indian subcontinent was divided by the West that cost millions of lives. African countries are constantly under attack and interfered by the West in persuit of getting diamonds, oil and other precious minerals from there. But it is the innocent people who die on both sides, because of the invassion that conern me. Taliban were introduced, trained, equipped and supported by the West. So, stop your hatred, cut the crap and read the Holly and Glorious Quran properly and then talk.

sheikyermami April 22, 2011 at 3:55 pm

Funny.

You sound like all the brainwashed Islamo-drones that posted here before you.

FYI: 80 to 90 % of Mohammedans are ignorant, stoopid and poor because of Islam. Most people who post on this site are educated, know more about the Koran than you do and are totally opposed to having more of your mental baggage dumped on us.

Btw: why are you in the UK if everything is so groovy in Afghanistan?

kaw April 22, 2011 at 4:03 pm

a muslim girl,
Actually very few convert – more leave islam, and more would if they weren’t under threat of death for trying to leave. Which planet are you on again??

PS mo was a child rapist and murderer – and you want to follow him!!

Mullah Lodabullah April 22, 2011 at 5:41 pm

* And when you read verses from the Quran and you read them out of context make me and make so many like me more determined and more active in our duties to our society, our religion and the wider society as a whole.

Out of context, Sura 4.171 means that Jesus Christ (the Son of God) is no more than an apostle of allah (aka Satan / Lucifer / Devil / Beelzebub etc), and is not himself God.

In context, it means the same thing. muslims commit the gravest blasphemy by denying that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and denying that He was crucified for our sins.

islam is doomed, along with its followers – unless they repent.

Moe April 22, 2011 at 6:09 pm

Sheik Yer: “Ever read the koran, sulla?”
If Sulla reads Quran, Sulla will embrace Islam. That’s what scares you sh#tless! Bigot!

Mullah Lodabullah April 22, 2011 at 7:03 pm

If Sulla reads the Holy Bible, he may find salvation and eternal life through Jesus Christ, the Son of God.

This scares allah to the extent that Bibles are banned in some of the unfortunate lands that have fallen under its evil sway. Swordi Arabia, the stronghold of islam, being a prime example.

allah knows its time is short, and seeks to deceive as many as possible in its quest for universal domination.

In any event, if everyone is born muslim, according to the false prophet, why would Sheik Y be “scared sh#tless”, or “bigotted”?

http://www.islam101.com/dawah/newBorn.htm

[The Prophet Muhammad said, "No babe is born but upon Fitra (as a Muslim). It is his parents who make him a Jew or a Christian or a Polytheist." (Sahih Muslim, Book 033, Number 6426)]

If the false prophet was telling the truth, why is allah so bigotted against Christians and Jews (etc)?

[A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs]

allah, on Christians and Jews and disbelievers:

Qur’an (5:51) – “O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.”

[8.12] When your Lord revealed to the angels: I am with you, therefore make firm those who believe. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.

islam is not to be feared – the Biblical God (Father, Son and Holy Spirit) will destroy it.

John Q Public April 23, 2011 at 12:17 am

What a bunch of goofy faggots that run this site.

Shout out, pull up skirt and show us your pink panties, you fucking intolerant xenophobes.

Here’s hoping a Muslim marries your sister, wouldn’t that freak your religious nutcase-ass out?

David April 25, 2011 at 4:04 pm

I was appalled that when doing a word search for the end times and Christians, I had to scroll through pages and pages of Muslim Islamic websites, before I could find a Christian commentary on the End times. Is Google Neutral or are that many Muslims crowding the net now?
How does google set up the web pages and how do they decide what to include?

yeah April 25, 2011 at 11:48 pm

Are you one of those ‘army of bloggers’ hired by CIA or ur just ignorant.
All your words are typical Muslim bashing themes find on typical Muslim bashing site/blogs. Grow up , lose the hatin’ , and go to a Muslim country and see how u are treated. Muslims are nice people , unless u dont bother us we leave u alone.

beatupstory April 26, 2011 at 7:09 am

Bottom line (note to website owner(s)) is that there are crazies and fanatics in just about all religions. You seem to be intent on bagging all muslims on this website which is just plain silly. There are good and bad people everywhere, ok I do accept that some very crazy people using Islam as a weapon have caused a great deal of havoc over the past decade but after spending some time in Malaysia (a fairly moderate muslim country) I have to say that I cannot accept that all Muslims are on a crusade (sorry jihad) to take over the world.
The far right Chistian fanatics in America scare me every bit as much as Bin Laden and his band of nut-jobs.
I know I am being a bit over optimistic but I would prefer a world where people just got on with living (surely that is hard enough anyway) rather than just spreading hate.
In case you need to know I follow no religion. When you die you are dust nothing more.

sheikyermami April 26, 2011 at 7:57 am

Thanks, but no thanks.

We are not in the market for suppository sedatives.

Mullah Lodabullah April 26, 2011 at 8:59 am

* Muslims are nice people , unless u dont bother us we leave u alone.

Convince your filthy “god”:

[9.29] Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.

http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/k/koran/koran-idx?type=DIV0&byte=282392

hadith April 30, 2011 at 11:54 pm

It’s really great to learn the amount of hatered in your heart against islam and against Allah your creator .
Yet we don’t really care about all your wars through the internet ,You can Spend all your life attacking Islam,no problem..
It will be nice to see how Allah will put your end and i am sure you are sick and dipressed, and that will be a lesson for all mis beleivers.

Informer May 1, 2011 at 9:37 pm

Islam was/is a Cult

Someone with a head May 3, 2011 at 8:40 pm

Lead and Fire

Did you hear?
They found the elixir that mends all that ails
They found the ambrosia that melts what fails
Administered to all who come in fear

Did you hear?
The common cold is gone for good
Life is as it should
At least it will be
once this smoke clears

Did you hear?
Osama was administered it himself
It was gracious of the U.S to help
It took 40 navy seals
to administer the medication
to An enemy they kept so near

Did you hear?
The heaps of searing corpses is the signal
it’s the publics pinnacle
around which they cheer

Cure me
Get me wired
Prescribe me a dose of that
Lead and Fire

Cure me
Shoot me down well
Drag the stars down with you
All the way to Hell

Someone with a head May 3, 2011 at 8:59 pm

Everyone is wrong, every one hurts, everyone dies.

All of the people that post on this website are either Muslims who believe that America masturbates non-stop and everyone here has casual sex behind the pews at a church,

a Western mind-set extremist with the same motherfucking mentality as Hitler that promotes ignorance, acting impulsivley on little evidence, and that one culture is better than another and just want to kill everyone who wears a turban and follows Allah and Muhammad,

or an atheist who wants everyone to calm the fuck down and be a fatalist like they are. Your are all fucking loony. All of you. Down to the last Sheik yer’Mami, Shakir, BeatUpStory, Farid, and Mollah Lodabullah.

You are all ignorant, you are all full of the shit your parents, government, and other leaders pushed on you. None of you want progress, none of you want peace, you all want hate, you all want war, you all want your own side to win. I represent everyone who wants you to shut the fuck up and let this disturbing website die.

I know that you are probably going to respond with some bullshit about “Women are opressed over there so we are better” or “Muhammad was a pedophile dipshit” or “They are the only religion with the idea of Holy war” and by the way retards, it’s Holy, not Holly.

If all of the people like you guys went away then the world would be a place where everyone acted openly with each other and was respectful of one anothers beliefs, a place with no ism’s or dogmas or mantras. Just peace. There would still be crime, rape, murder, and I’m pretty sure some dumbass would get power and would find a way to commit genocide, but there would be none of this bullshit.

I love you, all of you.You share my blood, my breath, my name as Homo Sapien. But you really fucking piss me off.

Someone with a head May 3, 2011 at 9:05 pm

Blow me

kaw May 3, 2011 at 10:43 pm

Hadith
blah blah blah – that is all you can say. YAWN!! Which one of you twits is next????

inspector callahan May 4, 2011 at 2:21 am

some one with a head , might wanna grease those doorways and lobby entrances, be a little easier on the ears as you enter/exit into your “great big world” ! or “eat me” either one ..

Someone with a head May 5, 2011 at 11:35 pm

You didn’t even answer me

john banks May 18, 2011 at 9:10 am

Thanks for the miss conceptions u have created about ISLAM. To understand ISLAM i have read QURAN the holy book of Muslims.
And after reading & understanding it I understood ISLAM is the only true Religion of the Allmighty GOD, the religion of GOD ‘s messengers Abraham, Moses, Jesus & last messenger Muhammad ( peace be upon all).
Once again thanks…before I was a christian & now I have reverted to ISLAM the only true religion from Allmighty GOD. ALLAH U AKBAR..

Mullah Lodabullah May 18, 2011 at 9:31 am

* To understand ISLAM i have read QURAN the holy book of Muslims.

To understand islam, I have read the koran, the blasphemous book of allah and its false prophet.

kaw May 18, 2011 at 9:32 am

John,
You are a liar – you were never a Christian!! Why do you “people” have to lie – I guess islam does not look so clean in the light of day. BTW – all the site does is reprint the outrageous behavior of muslims – we dont lie – we just report the truth. It seems that you cannot handle the truth. BTW Jesus is not issa – so I guess you have not even understood Christianity – but then again you are just a muslim. Again – you were never a Christian.

Sheik – can you confirm this muslim’s ISP please?.

kaw May 18, 2011 at 9:35 am

Someone with a head,
You haven’t asked a question – so what answer are you expecting???

BoomDraw May 24, 2011 at 9:38 pm

It is with great disgust that I encounter a websites like yours on the internet that make a feeble attempt to try and justify Islam as an “purposeful” religion by way of the untruths and lies which you, and other Muslims like you, continue to expound. The fundamental foundation of Islam, by its very nature, is based upon a legacy of hate, born of deception and weaned on absolute violence. “Islam” in its absolute true definition translates to “total submission”!

The Prophet Mohammad (who himself was just an ignorant functionally illiterate pedophile and sodomite) espoused a perverted doctrine of unbridled hatred manifested by a total lack of tolerance for anyone who didn’t follow the tenets of the Koran [Qur’an] that commands all Muslims to fight non-Muslims and die in battle so they are promised forgiveness and a life in ‘Paradise’. Indeed, Mohammad personally lived a less than holy life himself having been nothing more than a common criminal and ex-caravan robber. The twisted ideology of the Koran directs Muslims to eradicate all other beliefs by whatever means necessary so that Islam will prevail and therefore remain the sole religion of the world…

“Fight and slay the pagans (infidels) wherever you find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war.” – Koran, Sura 9:5

“Fight against those who believe not in Allah…and those who acknowledge not in the religion of truth (Islam)…”
- (Surah At-Taubah 9:29)

“And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshiping of others along with Allah) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allah (alone)…”
- (Surat AI-Baqara 2:193)

These utterly barbaric practices and equally distorted customs inherent in this most uncivilized religion [as practiced by the world’s many mislead followers of the Koran], unfortunately continues to this day, including the deplorable and subhuman treatment of their women, including the brutal custom of female genital mutilation as required under Islamic Law, all of which have been indisputably memorialized throughout history. By example, Islam openly condones pedophilia as a recognized and legitimate principle to follow by encouraging the rape of little girls from the age of nine under the guise of ‘marriage’ that is both legal and an excepted practice! The Islamic promise of “accessing heaven” through the sexual abuse of very young girls clearly demonstrates a complete ignorance and total disregard for basic humanity that is displayed by its own followers (this includes even moderate Muslims and all believers of the Islamic faith in general). Any reasonable and rational thinking person who carefully scrutinizes the teachings of the Koran realizes what a true hoax it actually is. The intentional deprivation of an unbiased education for its own people, coupled by a forced abstinence of any free and personal creative expression levied upon the majority of the world’s Muslim population, including the cult-like indoctrination of their own young, innocent, and impressionable children with these radical Islamic principles (many of whom unfortunately will end up just becoming potential ‘martyrs’ as future radical Islamic terrorists basterds), continues to foster a deadly ignorance among the followers of this most misguided of all faiths.

Modern day Islamic middle-eastern societies have contributed absolutely nothing to world advancement towards the benefit of the common man based on documented history that spans several thousand years! In closing, I quote a commentary from a prominent and respected western scholar on this very subject that accurately sums up the Islamic impact and influence on the present day world:

“Muslims produce absolute nothing (other than oil which is collected using western technologies). They cure no diseases, offer up no inventions and have not improved anyone’s life, including their own, in any way. Muslims are simply lazy, jealous and uneducated bastards who have decided that it is better (and easier) to kill others rather than contribute to society in a positive way. They have continued to demonstrate nothing but total ignorance towards all of their fellow human beings, and particularly against those who have chosen not to agree with their barbaric beliefs which advocate intolerance through the use of excessive violence and the brutal killing of those who dare not follow their misguided and perverted faith. Islam has proven itself to be nothing more than a destructive force and total farce upon civilized humanity as a whole, and as such must eventually be eradicated for the continued betterment of all mankind in the future.”
BoomDraw- .i.(o_O).i.

The Will May 30, 2011 at 3:00 am

Hi Sheik. Im new to the site and have to say – its great. We as a society have an absolute duty to expose Islam as the cult that it so obviously is. Its not a religion. Mohammed was not a prophet, just a very disturbed lunatic who had a penchant for young girls. We need to educate the masses and show that this desert cult feeds on ignorance. There is no criticism of Islam because the Imams know that the whole sham religion is a contradictory fairy tale.

Loz June 4, 2011 at 4:07 am

This is a great site. Brave and resilient in the face of incredible stupidity and desperate defensiveness. Keep up the public information. It’s always a shock to hear how people defend Islam when they know nothing of its hateful doctrine and eventually psychologically damaging way of thinking.

Kaffir_Kanuck June 22, 2011 at 8:52 pm

I should mention that both overseas and through work, your site is flagged as a hate site and always blocked by the Canadian Gov’t. Way to go!

sheikyermami June 23, 2011 at 12:16 am

Really?

Are there so many Muselturds in your gov’t already?

Kaffir_Kanuck June 23, 2011 at 4:15 am

No. Just PC wankers.

Brenda West July 1, 2011 at 3:18 pm

My continued investigation of the self-styled ‘Muslim Zionist,’ false friend of the West, shows that he has lied completely about his past. He now works with underworld characters that are Islamists and mobsters and he is getting paid to promote North Korean interests. As you know, North Korea is a nuclear buddy of Iran, which has vowed to exterminate both Israel and the US.

http://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm/frm/92561/sec_id/92561

Please post and distribute as you see fit.

For The Free World,

Brenda West

sylvie July 11, 2011 at 3:32 pm

to YOU ALL
THAT YOU LIKE IT OR NOT , ISLAM IS THE GREATST FASTEST GROWING RELIGION IN THE WORLD!!!!
very little you can do about it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mullah Lodabullah July 11, 2011 at 3:48 pm

It is God who will deal with it (Ezekiel 38 & 39), leaving Israel to clean up the mess.

kulamarva balakrishna July 12, 2011 at 7:29 am

Vienna,12-07-2011
Great discovery of the web.I will keep visiting you.winds of jihad.
you have sense and sense of humour. I may quote you some times
for use in my Taravadu Taranga Trust for Media Monitoring,
TTTMM Taravadu, Bengre,Padubidri 574 111 India ,work.
Kleistgasse 31/33,A.1030 Vienna, Austria e mail:balakr2@gmail.com
Phones: 00431-7997699 or 0043676 4953370
Kulamarva Balakrishna

Simon July 19, 2011 at 4:47 pm

The problem with Islam: I believe that there are moderate Muslims, but there is no moderate Islam. The Koran’s chapters are not printed in chronological order – it is a confusing mixture of often contradictory messages. A big problem appears to be the principle of abrogation, that is, that later verses can be said to cancel earlier verses which contradict them. This principle is recognized by Muslims themselves and has been named – “mansukh” (the abrogated) and “nasikh” (the abrogating) verses (Koran 16:101 and 2:106 or thereabouts) recognize this principle. It appears that Mohammed revealed verses which were pertinent to the situation of the Muslims at a particular time. When in a weakened situation the verses were tolerant towards “unbelievers.” I realize that all Muslims do not agree on exactly which verses have been abrogated. To me it appears obvious that “jihadists” regard surah 9 (which we are told is one of the last revealed chronologically) and one which contains exhortations to fight and kill, as a surah which cancels earlier tolerant verses including the “let there be no compulsion in religion” verse. It is verse 9:29 which talks of the “jizya” tax and the humbling of the People of the Book (Christians and Jews) by fighting them until they submit.
Another problem is that the “jihadists” believe themselves to be “divinely” enjoined to create around themselves a society which lives under one form or another of sharia law. I know there are different schools of sharia law, but I also believe that all of them are incompatible with democracy. So these two problems – abrogation in the Koran and the desire of fundamentalist Muslims to live under sharia law create problems when such people emigrate to Western countries for their own economic benefit. If “moderate” Muslims truly want peaceful coexistence these two problems must be addressed and overcome. Long live democracy.

Simon July 31, 2011 at 3:00 pm

Here is a link to a speech calling for an end to democracy and sharia law for Britain by Anjem Choudary.
http://www.muslimsagainstcrusades.com/media/press-conference

Foss August 1, 2011 at 12:18 am

Count me in to get rid of these vermin!

Ale August 10, 2011 at 9:59 pm

Each religion is guilty of controlling and demanding a behavior that is amazingly stupid and meant to scare and inflict punishment.

I grew up Roman Catholic and left disappointed that at this age in time we are still fighting to see who’s GOD is better. How sad is that. Not even the Greeks in ancient times had that problem.

Well let me tell you a little secret….THERE IS NO GOD at least not as you many believe it to be. And If God is eternal and all Good, he wouldn’t be ordering people to kill or be killed in his name. THINK ABOUT IT! don’t follow a so called SACRED BOOK just because some old bag tells you that is the truth. So far I have not seen GOD down here on Earth telling us which belief is the best.

Absurd that even the smartest minds of our time fall to this ridiculous set of beliefs….Or at least they SAY they do.

All you controlled religious masses, WAKE UP!!! and see how you have been brainwashed to believe that it is ok to hate who is different from you, who is weaker or less FAITHFUL than you.

We are all part of the same GOD. We are all in control of our own lives. And whoever decides what is wrong or right is yourself!

Your GOD would be so disappointed if HE or SHE was real…

And Sheik, tone down a bit and try using a better approach when it comes to this culture of belief. There are ways to change the world and you are in the right path. As long as you don’t judge.

One with the UNIVERSE brother.

sheikyermami August 10, 2011 at 11:14 pm

Gaia hugger?

Ale August 15, 2011 at 3:35 pm

You could say so. If you come up with another name to mask your sarcastic view of who I really am. But seriously, I like how you think.

However conflict and trying to convince by sarcasm and anger is doing the same thing that the people you are trying to fight against.

Anger and self righteousness just leads to more conflict. And believe me, you can’t change the world by telling people they are wrong, but by showing them what is right.

Peace brother!.

Leave a Comment