๐๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ช๐ฎ๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง ๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐๐๐ข๐๐ญ๐๐ฅ๐ฒ
๐๐ก๐๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ โ ๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ญ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฒ
๐๐ก๐๐ง ๐๐ก๐๐ฒ ๐๐ญ๐ญ๐๐๐ค๐๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐๐ญ๐ญ๐๐ซ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ
๐๐ก๐๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฉ
Madden argues that Christianity had reached a decisive moment: it could defend itself or risk being gradually absorbed. In his words:
The Mythistory of the Crusades
by Ibn Warraq (October 2013)ย thanks to the Tundra Tabloids
A new generation of Western scholars of the Middle Ages have been trying to put right the misconceptions that have grown up about the Crusades. As Jonathan Riley-Smith has argued โmodern Western public opinion, Arab nationalism, and Pan-Islamism all share perceptions of crusading that have more to do with nineteenth-century European imperialism than with actuality.โ1 Muslims in particular have developed โmythistoriesโ concerning the putative injuries they have received at the hands of the Crusaders. The first point that needs to be emphasized is that the Crusades were proclaimed not only against Muslims, but also against many groups, and communities that the Catholic Church considered heretical, and enemies of the faith, groups such as the pagan Wends, Balts and Lithuanians, shamanist Mongols, Orthodox Russians and Greeks, Cathar and Hussite heretics.2 Continue reading The Crusades






















