Lost and Found: The Treasure Drove of the Mufti Ibrahim Desai

Kitman and Taqiyya spin-doctors who peddle the ‘Islam means peace’ and ‘Jihad is inner struggle’ shlock can be tiresome. Fed up with all that ‘out of context’crap?

Had a gutfull of that ‘you have to read the Koran in Arabic’- and all the diversionary tactics of the da’awa clowns?

Of course you are. You wanna hear it from the horses mouth?


Go to ‘ask the Imam Ibrahim Desai’ and you get anything from how to suck your husbands ‘private parts’ to killing infidels and Jooozzz.


This gem here is like a revelation from Allah:

For a long time I’ve been searching for this gem from the mufti Ibrahim Desai ‘ask the imam’ site:

Save it and have it handy when needed. And you will be needing it, no doubt:

Allah Ta’ala Knows Best
by Allah Ta’ala Knows Best

I have a question about offensive Jihad. Does it mean that we are to attack even those non-Muslims which don’t do anything against Islam just because we have to propagate Islam?

I have been reading Tafsir e Usmani for the last month or so. In it I have read that offensive Jihad (first attack) should be done by Muslims for 2 reasons. 1) For the sake of Allah (in the Way of God) 2) For the sake of subjugated people under oppression like in Kashmir, Palestine etc. Now the second reason I completely understand. But the explanation given of the first reason is “For the sake of Allah includes the propagation of Islam, the survival of Islam, the extermination of those hindrances which impede the progress and expansion of Islam.” (explanation of verse 190, Surah baqara) I really don’t understand this explanation. What does propagation of Islam mean here? Does it mean that we are to attack even those non-Muslims which don’t do anything against Islam just because we have to propagate Islam? For example, there are many countries in the world which are not enemies of Islam in any way (at least I think so). Please explain to me against which Non-Muslims, the Muslims have to do Jihad and against which, Jihad is not allowed. JazakAllah Khair.

Answer 12128 2004-07-13

You should understand that we as Muslims firmly believe that the person who doesn’t believe in Allah as he is required to, is a disbeliever who would be doomed to Hell eternally. Thus one of the primary responsibilities of the Muslim ruler is to spread Islam throughout the world, thus saving people from eternal damnation.

Thus what is meant by the passage in Tafsir Uthmani, is that if a country doesn’t allow the propagation of Islam to its inhabitants in a suitable manner or creates hindrances to this, then the Muslim ruler would be justifying in waging Jihad against this country, so that the message of Islam can reach its inhabitants, thus saving them from the Fire of Jahannum. If the Kuffaar allow us to spread Islam peacefully, then we would not wage Jihad against them.

and Allah Ta’ala Knows Best

Mufti Ebrahim Desai


You see:

Our Muhammedan ‘guests’ have to kill us in order to ‘save us’-

and they will, if we let them.

Our enemies call it ‘multiculti’ and the Muhammedans call you ‘racist’, –

the Victorian government puts YOU in jail for not being politically correct, so why do you ‘resist’- You Islamophobe, you! Islam means ‘peace’- right?

Which side are you on?

5 thoughts on “Lost and Found: The Treasure Drove of the Mufti Ibrahim Desai”

  1. Sheik is not joking on this one

    Go to ‘ask the Imam Ibrahim Desai’ and you get anything from how to suck your husbands ‘private parts’ to killing infidels and JooozzzFatwa #

    11720 from Zimbabwe Date: Wednesday, May 26th 2004

    Category Marriage (Nikah)


    I would like to know, is it allowed for a wife to suck her husbands private parts if he is wearing a flavoured condom? Jazakallah


    One should maintain hayaa (modesty) while being intimate with one?s spouse.
    In the enquired case, it is permissible as long as it does not constitute oral sex.

    and Allah Ta’ala Knows Best
    Mufti Ebrahim Desai


  2. I really wish Muslims would quit being so concerned for the well being of us infidels-if we’re to go to hell for not buying into Islam why should they care? Muslims would be better off improving their own lives in their own nations. And brother, do they have one hell of a task in doing so looking at the places they live in!

  3. I also go to the Mufti for Islamic theological insight. He was asked about Jihad against infidels today (and various specific countries) and offered some Islamo doublespeak to the effect that Jihad requires endorsing fatwas and that if there is an existing one to attack citizens of specific countries, it is not appropriate to blab it on a website. My personal favorite of the mufti is his explanation of why slavery is legal today. In which to the inquiry of whether slavery in islam is legal today he argues islam is the most humane religion in the world because by making a person a slave of a moslem, you give the slave a second chance in life to avoid an infinity of torture and pain by his god allah. He argues slavery is a humane institution. This thinking on slavery shares elements with what is said here how offensive jihad is for the infidel’s good. Typical devil fatwas war, slavery, rape, murder, all customary norms of the religion of peace for adherents to practice. His fatwa is found at:


  4. My “favourite” if the fatwa where he tells a guy who asks him, if a virgin who is raped loses her blessings.

    The dear mufti answer: well if she was not wearing the hijab then she is partially to blame:

    Q: Could you please give me a detailed analysis of what a Virgin women should do after being raped.

    Please could you tell me if the Virgin female should perform any special prayers, fast etc. JazakAllah for your advise. 2)Has she lost her Vaginity as she was raped? 3)has she also lost her blessings?

    Answer 2805 2001-05-07

    A) If a female was raped due to her not maintaining the laws of Hijaab, she is partly to be blamed as the rapist will be considered as being seduced by her revealing form and shape. She should make Tawbah (sincerely repent) by also adhering to the laws of Hijaab.

    and Allah Ta’ala Knows Best

    Mufti Ebrahim Desai

    The dear mufti has now been busy removing the fatwa – strange eh? Wonder why?

    He should be proud that his words are reaching everybody! Is the “mufti” now scared of people finding out what he really thinks of rape victims and how he thinks scarfs and sex crimes are related?

Comments are closed.