By Macer Hall/ Daily Express

GORDON Brown’s politically correct onslaught intensifed last night as compulsory teaching of the life of Sir Winston Churchill was dropped.


* Collective insanity, cowardice, treason and appeasement rules once Great Britain. Gordon Brown, our new man in Britain; BLiar is now ‘our man in ‘Palistan’- his successor is brown nosing the enemy and defecates on Britain’s greatest statesman, Sir Winston Churchill.

A new school curriculum, unveiled as part of the Prime Minister’s barrage of initiatives, also scrapped the mandatory study of dictators Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. It was instantly branded “madness” by critics.

Instead, secondary school pupils will be taught classes in global warming, healthy eating, Arabic and Urdu. And they will get five-minute “attention-grabbing” lessons in subjects like French and mental arithmetic following claims that today’s youngsters cannot concentrate for long.

The move follows 15 days of relentless announcements by Mr Brown since he became Prime Minister, including plans for his own written constitution for Britain, raising the school leaving age to 18 and scrapping Tony Blair’s proposed supercasino at a cost of £1million to taxpayers.


* The dumbing down and wimpification of the West continues.

The education overhaul was branded “trendy nonsense” by campaigners for better schools standards last night.
And the astonishing decision to remove Churchill – whose personal determination is credited with saving Britain from Nazi tyranny – from a list of historical figures who must be studied provoked outrage.

While ministers insist the war- time Prime Minister will still feature in compulsory classes on the Second World War, the decision was widely condemned.

Tory MP Nicholas Soames, Winston Churchill’s grandson, described the move as “madness”.

He said: “It is absurd. I expect he wasn’t New Labour enough for them. This is a Government that is very careless of British history and always has been.”

* Ah yes. And rumor has it that a monument will be built for Neville Chamberline…


France Capitulates Again: Hizballah Not a Terror Group


Hizbullah is part of Lebanese politics and must not be regarded as a terror organization, said the French Foreign Ministry in a statement Thursday night.

The statement was an apparent about-turn by France after President Nicolas Sarkozy said that Hizbullah was indeed a terrorist group when he met with the captured IDF soldiers’ families in Paris last week. Thursday’s statement was prompted by protests from Hizbullah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah.


Some comments:

The French must have a surrender gene.

Right before the nazis occupied Paris – the Germans were no problem at all.

There seems to be something that separates the French from morals….

The Nazi’s were not a terrorist organization either.

They are not a terror group.

They are a terror quasi-state.

Even worse.

6 thoughts on “THE MADNESS OF BROWN”

  1. is this the same al-gordo cromwell-brown who when second in command of the british goverment, gave a lot more money for madrassas in pakistan than he has given to the victims of the latest flooding in the north of his own country….sorry, north of the country south of his own country.
    couldn’t even be bothered to declare a state of emergency when thousand lost their homes.
    his next act will be to dissolve the monarchy and declare himself emperor of all mankind …. is he the leader the muslims have been waiting for?
    as for leaving churchill out of history, that’s just the start, within a few years the england and the english will be banned and all traces of the empire stripped from history…..
    do disagree with the comment about a monument (while i understand the sentiment) for chamberlain, as no monuments will be allowed unless they contain the sickly grin of al-gordo himself!

  2. My comment is about France.
    In my youth I studied the period 1715 – 1815 and it is a very interesting period in history. I just watched a doco tonight on Marie Antoinette.

    It occurred to me that the French so “bravely” captured their monarchs, humiliated them, and guillotined them.
    (I am not saying Louis XV1 and Marie Antoinette were innocent.)

    I just wondered why they did this with such ease, and yet when their country was in danger from the Nazis they did nothing. Now they are in danger of being islamised and still they do nothing.

    Yes, people were starving before the French Revolution, and it is still a very complex issue, but somehow I doubt the nobility and the monarchs were set on destroying France.

    Were the French bullies or brave back then? What are they now? Gutless dhimmis comes to mind.

  3. Well, let’s see the positive side: in 2009, Britains may elect British National Party… if Britain still exists…


    1 – In 2001, he didn’t attack Islamism as the real within enemy in September 11. Nothing did for stop the islamfascists of ACLU and CAIR to destroy Christianism and liberal laws and judges force the students to swallow the Islamic shit in the classrooms. And still permits islamonazists publications which prepare the war against the population disseminated by the Saudi Arabia in libraries of mosques, streets and bookstores for American muslims, preaching the destruction of America with anti-American, antichristian, anti-Jewish, misogynistic, jihadist and supremacist ideology. Obvious: Bush family has oil business with the Saudi real family. Can we trust in a leader sharing interests with the enemy?

    2 – In 2002, he didn’t denounce the responsibility of the government Clinton for CIA errors that enabled the September 11. The investigator of the Department of Defense that was following a trail that would have avoided the attack, the lieutenant-colonel Tony Shaffer, simply was prevented of pass the information to the FBI, that like this could not dismantle the Al-Qaeda cell. It stopped why? Because former president Clinton centralized the straight control of all the organs of security and blocked deliberately the communications among them. CIA, FBI and other agencies then were driving parallel inquiries about the illegal funds of given campaign to the candidate Clinton by the Chinese army, and the subsequent favors that the very grateful president lent to the service of Chinese espionage. Without exchange of information, the investigators did not be able to unite the threads of the story line.

    3 – In 2003, he did not announce that the Saddam Hussein’s Weapons of Mass Destruction were found. They are more of 500 – enough for poison to death the inhabitants of some twenty American cities. Republican senator Rick Santorum, using of the privileges of the Freedom of Information Act, obtained from the military secret service the complete relation. Reporter Richard Miniter already to have revealed the existence of those weapons, in its book “ Disinformation: 22 Average Myths that Undermine the War on Terror “. The strange point in the episode is that senator Santorum has had of pull out by force an information that Bush government should be screaming in all the media.

    4 – In 2004, he did not condemn UNO by the scandal of corruption in the Oil for Food Program, involving Saddam Hussein and Koffi Annan and his son Kojo, and the governments of countries as France, Russia, Germany, China… and others crimes of the UNO, that became the worst enemy of the U.S.A. by the simple fact that it shelters or protects all the anti-American and terrorist dictatorships in its Commissions.

    5 – In 2005, he did not defend himself neither attacked the Democrats responsible by the calamity of the hurricane Katrina: the governor of Louisiana, Kathleen Blanco, and the mayor of New Orleans, Ray Nagin.

    6 – In 2006, was discovered that he, as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) signed an agreement for dissolve the borders between the U.S.A., Canada and the Mexico, practically eliminating the American nation as an independent political unit. The idea already was old, but then a citizen appealed to the Freedom of Information Act, obliging the government to divulge the documents about the matter. Then already there was conservatives openly calling Bush “treacherous”. The report can be read in the site

    7 – AND in 2007, Bush removes National Guard from US border. May I remember the consequences?

  4. While Gordon Brown is muzzling the use of “muslim”, “islamic terror” etc to describe muslim terror attacks, Hassan Butt is a little more honest, seeing Islam itself as being the heart of the matter…

    Muslim heads stuck firmly in the sand
    Hassan Butt, a former jihadist, demands some fresh thinking

    “I disagree with those who say the pressing problem is simply how do we deal with an aberrant, extreme minority who have unleashed a reign of terror on Britain � rather, I believe the heart of the matter is Islam itself and how its teachings are interpreted. If we isolate the problem to that of the extreme fringe, then we are merely skimming the surface.”

    Ultimately, the “heart of the matter” is not Islam, but the “god” of Islam (Satan, in the guise of “Allah”, deceiving as is his nature).

  5. You can’t mention Hitler or Stalin because people can draw too many parallels with Islamania, violating the laws of PC in the process. Churchill is forbidden because he’s a symbol of resistance to tyranny-such symbols will only slow down the process of dhimmifying Britain. Ultimately, the history of WW2 will need to be revised because it simply won’t do to cast Britain in the role of victim-everyone knows how oppressive the British are.

    As for the French their problem is similar to that of the US-the foreign ministry types need to be swept out because they suffer from terminal cluelessness regarding Islamania. And that’s what the Islamaniacs are counting on.

  6. Churchill to be airbrushed out.

    e shouldn’t have written:

    “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!

    esides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as

    hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The

    effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly

    systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of

    property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A

    degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the

    next of its dignity and sanctity.

    The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must
    delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has
    ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show
    splendid qualities – but the /influence of the religion paralyses the
    social development of those who follow it/. No stronger retrograde force
    exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a
    militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout
    Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not
    that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the
    science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of

    modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”

    Guess who’s next for the airbrush ?

    “In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar (mohammed), the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent god; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE…Between these two religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred years has already raged. The war is yet flagrant…While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon the earth, and good will towards men”

    John Quincy Adams
    Sixth President of The United States of America
    Two great men who knew evil when they saw it.

Comments are closed.