* The hysteria over ‘Nazi’s & white power supremacists” on LGF continues. Charles has put the bait out and the lizards are now obligingly chewing the cud: disagree and you’ll get booted.

LGF displays no more diversity and free exchange of ideas than the Kos-kidz…

The Army of Lizards’– as Charles Johnson calls his loyal cyber-warriors who blow the morally superior fanfares on LGF have turned into a lynch-mob of ankle-biters and nitpickers.

Vlaams Belang and the US White Supremacist Cesspool

One of the most troubling and disturbing things about the Vlaams Belang controversy (that erupted when I raised questions about the Belgian far-right party’s participation in the counter-jihad movement) is the incredible amount of support for the Vlaams Belang among US white power and neo-Nazi groups.

And so on and so on…

*

The comments from his fans are almost unison, like a bunch of cheerleaders on crutches:

* Thank you Charles for your moral integrity. It would be very easy to shrug and go with the enemy of my enemy cliche’. If this tainted bunch are Europe’s best defense against Islamofascism, God help them.

* Charles,
I admire your stance on this topic. I couldn’t agree more. (Where do I sign)

* why are so many counter-jihad bloggers willing to cut DeWinter, Vanhecke, and the Vlaams Belang so much slack, despite all these indications that something isn’t right?

* Charles you don’t need to report on these European neo-Nazis any more you have nothing to prove, just ignore them and wait that Pamela & co will come to their senses on them on
Charles is trying to save the anti-jihad movement. Keeping quiet will only harm us all.
Charles all ready proved they are Nazis and denounced them, keeping this fight going is just counter productive now, LGF should just lead by example and ignore this f@#%rs trying to jump the anti-jihadi bandwagon

* And then Charles himself:

*...if I had ever appeared on a radio show like this, how much slack do you think I would get from other bloggers and the media in general? And even more to the point: why are so many counter-jihad bloggers willing to cut DeWinter, Vanhecke, and the Vlaams Belang so much slack, despite all these indications that something isn’t right?

* I’m not going to ignore it, sorry. And I’m not “keeping a fight going,” I’m bringing up more evidence to support my position.

* Keep looking mate! You might find a Nazi under the sofa, one in the closet and another in the loo…

* Obviously you don’t care about black on white racism either, Charles. For you racism is a white thing only, is it not? But some of us do care about the white Zimbabwean farmers who have been driven off their land and out of their homes. We also care about the white South Africans and we don’t like the dark clouds on the horizon.

* No, we don’t watch Oprah either, and Rice is a monumental failure whichever way you look at it.

* But no matter which way you go, Charles, this is how our enemies see you:

‘Little Green Footballs’ is considered by many to be a neo-nazi, right-wing, racist, hate-speech website.

* The Islamofascists want you us dead and the Kos-kidz are laughing their sorry asses off over your moral crusaderade.

* Sheik Yer’mami already did a take on this here *

* Pamela doesn’t buy the Nazi-hysteria either and also has another take here

Dewinter in his latest interview said;

….it is very easy for our opponents who want a multicultural and left wing policies over here to put us in the same bag. They have always tried to do that. It is always us to to make a lot of distant between [these groups]…… Because always the left wing is treating us a neo fascist and so on. But is there a risk? Of course there is. We should be careful about it We should be very vigilant about it. Don’t put eveybody in the same bag. But those groups like Vlaams Belang and others who are courageous. Who are fighting against islamisation . Who are fighting against immigration invasion and those groups who are succeesful like Vlaams Belang……Don’t treat us as Neo Nazis or neo fascists just because we are conservatives, just because we are right wing. Just because we stand up for our identity and for our moral values and for our way of life……Don’t do that because it would be completely wrong.

I quite agree.

Vlaams Belang is not an anti Semitic party neither a Nazi party. Dewinter’s own father was, as a medicine student, deported to Nazi Germany to perform forced labour. His grandfather was a member of the resistance. VB’s opinions concerning Israel, revisionism, anti Semitism, etc… are well known and have been published in a range of articles and interviews. They consider Israel a front post of the free West in Islam occupied territory. Dewinter has said Jews and Israeli are our allies in the battle against Islamisation. They stand in the front lines of the battle.

The diabolising of all who criticize and turn against multiculturalism and all who consider the Islamic immigration as a Trojan horse, is proven technique, that certainly in Europe, is successful.

More

*

Boils down to this:

* The enemy of my enemy doesn’t need to be my friend.

* The counter jihad is now, 6 years after 9/11, still in its infancy. We need all the help we can get.

* A ‘Holier than Thou’ approach is damaging our cause

* There is strength in numbers

* This thing will not be won by cyber-warriors

* We need all the allies we can get. We can sort our differences out later…

* What say you?

*

* Fjordman still posts on LGF, but he is drowned out by Charles’ cheerleaders:

It’s sad to see the intellectual suicide of a blog I once respected, but it’s not my choice. I’m actually pretty shocked by the behavior of LGF over the past few days.

* Fjordman’s had enough, here he tells the LGF sycopants to shove it:

…question is, if native Europeans actually start fighting back against Islamization for real, whose side would Americans be on? Would you be on ours, or would you back the poor, Muslims victims of white European racism and xenophobia? Judging from the aggressive hostility and anti-European bigotry which is noticeable in many posts regarding this topic, I fear the latter answer.

I’ve been posting at LGF for years. There is a strong anti-European undercurrent here. I have rarely said much when confronted with it because I know the anti-American bias in much of Europe is usually worse, and I had no intention of creating more intra-Western rifts. However, I’d like to say a couple of things. I have read several times here the suggestion by some readers that Europeans are weak because the world wars, and immigration to the USA, finished off all the dynamic ones. In other words: European culture is weak because Europeans have “weak genes.” This argument would have been

unthinkable

against any other ethnic group on the planet and would have been denounced as racist immediately. It is considered acceptable for one, and only one reason, and that is because those being tarred with it are white Europeans.

More

* One poster nails it, though:

…and then the followers all patting themselves on the back about how non-racist they are.

My God .. this is getting old.

We get it.. YOU ARE SUPERIOR.. THE LEADER AND HIS FOLLOWERS ARE NOT RACIST.

DOWN DOWN WITH EVIL EUROPE

Inshallah

*

Little Green Lizard Unhingement Syndrome

…where the torture never stops:

Did you know that Identity, Tradition and Sovereignty is entirely bad and nothing but a who’s who of the White Nationalist movement in Europe?

If you’re waiting for the ‘lizard army’ to do something about the Islamization of Europe you may as well ‘revert’ now and be done with it. If you’re looking for solutions on LGF foggeddabbout it, there aren’t any. But if you wanna make your head spin and nitpicking is your kind o’bag go join the morally superior army of sycophants. You might even find a Nazi under your bed or a white supremacist on your front lawn which you can use as a trophy for your credentials.

*

* In the meantime, if you care where this is going, check this out:

An excerpt from the University of Delaware’s mandatory (although now of course they claim it’s not) diversity training document:

“A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities, or acts of discrimination. (This does not deny the existence of such prejudices, hostilities, acts of rage or discrimination.)” – Page 3

More

*

No Racism In Africa: ‘Lizard Army’ Has No Problem With Mugabe & Co.

Because Only White Europeans Can Be Racist….

*

*

Because that would violate his ‘human rights’-

* Blue-eyed stupidity: Justice Hodge says the attacker’s right to family life must be upheld

Anger as sex attacker stays in UK

A victim of a serial sex attacker is “appalled” that he will not be deported in order to protect his human rights.

An Asylum and Immigration Tribunal upheld a ruling which blocked moves by the Home Office to deport the man, who cannot be named for legal reasons.

* The victim’s name and picture is out and this rapist scum cannot be named?

Mr Justice Hodge said the 20-year-old should stay in the UK as he came here from Sierra Leone, aged six, and had virtually no family in West Africa.

Victim Gabrielle Browne, 42, said he had no right to stay in the country.

Family life

Ms Browne, who waived her right to anonymity as the victim of a sex attack, said she felt “devastated and let down”.

“I am appalled by the decision,” she said.

“How is it right that somebody who has offended so seriously against defenceless women is allowed to remain in this country?”

Her attacker had admitted indecently assaulting 11 women in the past five years.

He is being allowed to stay in the UK after his release under article eight of the Human Rights Act, which gives a person a right to a family life.

Ms Browne, a mother of two, was training for the London Marathon when she was attacked.

“He was hiding behind a blind corner on the canal path and could see me coming although I could not see him.

“He stepped out and blocked my way then asked me for the time.

“He threw an arm around my throat and dragged me 100 metres.”

A Home Office spokesman said: “We believe that foreign nationals who commit serious crimes should be deported.

“We are disappointed that the courts reached this decision on 1 March 2007, and as a result deportation could not proceed in this case.”

*

* Mohammed has a long record of armed robbery, theft, drug-dealing and fraud. He came to Britain when he was 6 and was in and out of jail ever since he was 15 years old.

*

Australia: Charges brought against brothers for rapes

From the ‘infidel women are war-booty’ department:

Geesche Jacobsen /SMH

THREE brothers known as the K Brothers have had charges brought against them for a number of rapes, one of which was allegedly committed in March 2002, in the midst of a gang rape rampage in Sydney.

On July 31 police laid charges against one of the brothers, known as MRK, and two of his siblings.

Yesterday the Herald succeeded in having non-publication orders lifted in relation to the charges.

It is alleged that MRK, 22, MMK, 21, and MSK, 29, raped a 13-year-old girl in late 2000 or early 2001 after plying her with alcohol so she could not move or speak.

The girl, who was in a sexual relationship with another of the brothers, MTK, who has since died, was visiting the Redfern house shared by the eight brothers, according to police documents tendered in court yesterday.

She suggested they buy some alcohol and the girl, a friend and some of the brothers started drinking, police allege.

She was starting to feel tipsy after five vodka and Cokes when she was served a sixth one, which “tasted very strong”. She became light-headed and sluggish and started losing control of her body, she told police.

She crawled on her hands and knees to an upstairs bedroom and felt she lost the ability to speak and had blurred vision with “bright flashing blotches” in front of her eyes.

The next morning she awoke and her pants and underwear had been taken off. Her boyfriend, MTK, told her they had had sex.

But she told police she later remembered that she had woken up during the night and seen MSK raping her, but could not push him off because she felt paralysed and had no control over her body.

She alleges MRK and MMK then also raped her.

She told police MSK had previously exposed himself to her and had an uncircumcised penis, which, police say, is unusual for a Muslim.

Yesterday MSK agreed to let police photograph his genitals so that they could corroborate the woman’s complaint.

In the second alleged incident, MRK allegedly repeatedly raped and indecently assaulted a 15-year-old girl in Ashfield in March 2002.

It is alleged he sexually assaulted her three times.

The cases are back in court in December.

Pakistan: Memorizing the Qur’an, but not learning multiplication or even how to write

by Colin Freeman in the Telegraph

By Colin Freeman
Like many younger pupils at Karachi’s Jamia Binoria madrassa, 12-year-old Imran Mohammed is a shy, quietly spoken child who is all but tongue-tied in front of his elders. One thing can get him talking though – for hours if need be.

“God is one and he is our creator,” he intones, his faltering voice suddenly breaking into fluent Arabic. “He has not given birth of anyone, nor did anyone give birth of him.”

It is a verse from the Koran, a tiny part of four entire chapters he has learnt by heart since arriving at the madrassa, or religious school, two years ago. Four chapters is roughly 60 pages, and to recite it fully – as he can do – takes up to two hours.
However, when it comes to non-religious learning, such as the alphabet or multiplication tables, Mohammed is somewhat behind for his age. Asked to add 10 and 11 together, he uses his fingers to reach the right answer, and the only words he can write are his own name and his father’s.

For much of the past two decades, though, this has been what passes as education for hundreds of thousands of young Pakistanis. With secular, state schools all but non existent in much of the country – six million children never see a classroom – growing numbers of parents “opt out” their children for religious education instead.

More

*

“Students chained at an Islamic school in Bangladesh”

* From “Inside a religious institution”

* many older students are known have to sexual relationships with young boys, and everybody knows that they “keep” boys. One of the boys complained of sexual abuse against a teacher but his parents refused to believe him and returned him to the religious school. He was given in charge of the same teacher who then repeatedly abused him. The boy is now under another teacher but he now talks profusely about sex with fellow students. He takes younger children to his room and some of his colleagues to video shops.

*

UK: School orders teachers to dress in Muslim garb to celebrate Eid

* It’s OK. I’m sure they all dress as monks and nuns for Christmas.

“Teachers’ Muslim dress order,” from The Sun via DW

A SCHOOL was yesterday accused of MAKING teachers dress up as Asians for a day – to celebrate a Muslim festival.

* Dressing up as ‘Asians’ is pc-speak for Muslim-Mummenschantz

Kids at the 257-pupil primary have also been told to don ethnic garb even though most are Christians.

The morning assembly will be open to all parents – but dads are BARRED from a women-only party in the afternoon because Muslim husbands object to wives mixing with other men.

Just two members of staff – a part-time teacher and a teaching assistant – are Muslim.

Embrace

Yesterday a relative of one of the 39 others said: “Staff have got to go along with it – or let’s face it, they would be branded racist.

* Here we go again: wrap a towel ’round your head and you turn into another race. Refuse and you become a ‘racist’- this is the age of stupid…!

“Who would put their job on the line? They have been told they have to embrace the day to show their diversity. But they are not all happy.”

The day aims to belatedly mark Eid, the end of Ramadan.

Sally Bloomer, head of Rufford primary school in Lye, West Midlands, insisted: “I have not heard of any complaints.

“It’s all part of a diversity project to promote multi-culturalism.”

* You bet it is. Until one particular cult-(ure) is established. And after that there will be no more ‘diversity’-

I suspect Ms. Bloomer may be hearing a complaint or two soon.

Cleric: Women’s Sexy Clothing Distracting Muslim Men From Sleep, Prayers

* From the ‘I’m too sexy for my kaftan’ department

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — Malaysia’s Muslim men are suffering sleepless nights and cannot pray properly because their thoughts are distracted by a growing number of women who wear sexy clothes in public, a prominent cleric said.

Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat, the spiritual leader of the opposition Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party, said he wanted to speak about the “emotional abuse” that men face because it is seldom discussed, the party reported on its Web site Wednesday.

“We always [hear about] the abuse of children and wives in households, which is easily perceived by the eye, but the emotional abuse of men cannot be seen,” Nik Abdul Aziz said. “Our prayers become unfocused and our sleep is often disturbed.”

Nik Abdul Aziz has made controversial comments about women in the past, including that women should stop wearing lipstick and perfume to lower the risk of being raped. Women’s groups have slammed his statements, saying Islam teaches both men and women to be responsible for modesty. They say comments like these encourage rapes because it puts the onus on women.

Nik Abdul Aziz’s fundamentalist party has about 800,000 members. He is also the chief minister of northeastern Kelantan, the only one of Malaysia’s 13 states that is not ruled by the moderate National Front governing coalition.

His party’s Web site published an illustration Wednesday of how women should dress — in long, flowing headscarves covering their hair and chests and “baggy and loose” long-sleeved, floor-length dresses.

Most women from Malaysia’s Malay Muslim majority wear a modest form of Islamic clothing, though younger women in cities sometimes wear body-hugging dresses or tight T-shirts and jeans.

In Kelantan, the Islamic party has fined Muslim women for not wearing headscarves in workplaces and implemented separate check-out lines for men and women in supermarkets.

As the British government welcomes Saudi King Abdullah, Saudi-financed mosques in Britain are distributing the usual Muhammedan hate literature and jihad ideology. This video features our old “friend” Inayat Bunglawala, lying, spinning and twisting and evading the truth, like the Islamic agit-prop he is.

Funny: the clueless interviewer fantasizes about his own imaginary Islam, he ‘just knows’ (how?) that the ‘majority of Muslims disagree with Wahabism’ – But in a recent survey more than 60 % of British Muslims opted for sharia in the UK.

*

* The questionable books reveal nothing but mainstream Islamic teachings, based on the Koran and the hadith. There is nothing un-islamic about killing, hating and deceiving infidels.

More Bungla:

“There are many interpretations to these passages”

Yes, you can interpret them to say you must behead the infidel with a sword.
You can interpret them to say you must behead the infidel with a knife
You can interpret them to say you must behead the infidel with a box cutter.

You can interpret them to say you must behead the infidel with a double edge razor blade from Schick

Yes, you can interpret them to say you must behead the infidel with a……………

*

* A poster (infidel4ever/ 98) on LGF gets it:

* Bunglawala: “it’s acceptable within British law” is the equivalent of: “you stupid dhimmi’s, these are your own laws we are using against you, and there is nothing you can do to make us stop.”

* And he is quite right. The Western world is its own worst enemy, and if we don’t wizen up and get rid of this termite called Islam it will destroy our whole house of freedom and democracy.

*

‘Apostates must be killed’- Instructions found in many UK-mosques

“The scholars have mentioned that a person may become apostate for many reasons which can nullify his faith.

“These reasons would make someone’s blood permissible to spill [to be killed for apostasy] and his wealth permissible to be usurped, because he is no longer a Muslim.”

From Al Bebeeceera

* Would you like a close up of her boss kissing and hugging this turd?

* Okay, you asked for it:

****

‘Don’t stare at Muslims’ says advice to schools

Self-imposed dhimmitude in the UK gone overboard….

*

Demands, Nothing But Demands

Arab News:

Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Abdullah is greeted by Britain’s Prince Charles on arrival at Heathrow Airport on a state visit to the UK on Monday. (AFP)

WoJ comment:

* Sowdi oilslick with Engands idiot-prince Charles, who would like to be called ‘Defender of the Faith’s’-

‘We Want Rights Not Concessions’

Khaled Almaeena/ Thanks to Mullah

Almost every day, Muslims, acting in the name of Islam, blow up cars, buses, restaurants, etc. The leaders of Islam do not speak out to say that such Muslims do not go to paradise.

Yet it is not uncommon to see statements such as this, which appeared recently in the LA Times:

[Kody “Monster”] Scott had seemingly turned himself around, converting to Islam and telling people he was rejecting his violent ways.

Given that public places are blown up almost daily in the name of Islam, with the undeniable implicit sanction of global Islamic leaders, how is it possible for an organization such as the LA Times to make a statement like “Scott had seemingly turned himself around, converting to Islam…”?

Or, in the words of Bill Warner, the director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI):

What accounts for the almost psychotic aversion to knowledge about Islam?

Warner provides an insightful explanation. He finds that the thought pattern taught by Islam is so antithetical to that taught by non-Islamic cultures, that non-Muslims have difficulty even beginning to consider it. He finds that Islam rejects the following things, which are inherent to non-Islamic thought.

Logic:

...the Koran […] is actually two books, the Koran of Mecca (early) and the Koran of Medina (later). The insight into the logic of the Koran comes from the large numbers of contradictions in it. On the surface, Islam resolves these contradictions by resorting to “abrogation”. This means that the verse written later supersedes the earlier verse. But in fact, since the Koran is considered by Muslims to be the perfect word of Allah, both verses are sacred and true. The later verse is “better,” but the earlier verse cannot be wrong since Allah is perfect. This is the foundation of dualism. Both verses are “right.” Both sides of the contradiction are true in dualistic logic. The circumstances govern which verse is used.

For example:

(Koran of Mecca) 73:10: Listen to what they [unbelievers] say with patience, and leave them with dignity.

From tolerance we move to the ultimate intolerance, not even the Lord of the Universe can stand the unbelievers:

(Koran of Medina) 8:12: Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, “I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the unbelievers’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!”

All of Western logic is based upon the law of contradiction-if two things contradict, then at least one of them is false. But Islamic logic is dualistic; two things can contradict each other and both are true.

…To reiterate, all of science is based upon the law of contradiction. If two things contradict each other, then at least one of them has to be false. But inside of Islamic logic, two contradictory statements can both be true. Islam uses dualistic logic and we use unitary scientific logic.

The Shared Humanity of Man:

Let’s examine the ethical basis of our civilization. All of our politics and ethics are based upon a unitary ethic that is best formulated in the Golden Rule:

Treat others as you would be treated.

The basis of this rule is the recognition that at one level, we are all the same. We are not all equal. Any game of sports will show that we do not have equal abilities. But everyone wants to be treated as a human being. In particular, we all want to be equal under the law and be treated as social equals. On the basis of the Golden Rule-the equality of human beings-we have created democracy, ended slavery and treat women and men as political equals. So the Golden Rule is a unitary ethic. All people are to be treated the same. All religions have some version of the Golden Rule except Islam.

FrontPage: So how is Islam different in this context?

Warner: The term “human being” has no meaning inside of Islam. There is no such thing as humanity, only the duality of the believer and unbeliever. Look at the ethical statements found in the Hadith. A Muslim should not lie, cheat, kill or steal from other Muslims. But a Muslim may lie, deceive or kill an unbeliever if it advances Islam.

Ethics:

There is no such thing as a universal statement of ethics in Islam. Muslims are to be treated one way and unbelievers another way. The closest Islam comes to a universal statement of ethics is that the entire world must submit to Islam. After Mohammed became a prophet, he never treated an unbeliever the same as a Muslim. Islam denies the truth of the Golden Rule.


By the way, this dualistic ethic is the basis for jihad. The ethical system sets up the unbeliever as less than human and therefore, it is easy to kill, harm or deceive the unbeliever.

Now mind you, unbelievers have frequently failed at applying the Golden Rule, but we can be judged and condemned on its basis. We do fall short, but it is our ideal.

There have been other dualistic cultures. The KKK comes to mind. But the KKK is a simplistic dualism. The KKK member hates all black people at all times; there is only one choice. This is very straightforward and easy to see.

The dualism of Islam is more deceitful and offers two choices on how to treat the unbeliever. The unbeliever can be treated nicely, in the same way a farmer treats his cattle well. So Islam can be “nice”, but in no case is the unbeliever a “brother” or a friend. In fact, there are some 14 verses of the Koran that are emphatic-a Muslim is never a friend to the unbeliever. A Muslim may be “friendly,” but he is never an actual friend. And the degree to which a Muslim is actually a true friend is the degree to which he is not a Muslim, but a hypocrite.

Westerners believe that all major religions are about finding happiness.

They find it almost incomprehensible that there may be a widely-followed religion that is a rejection of that – that is about rejecting happiness on earth – that tells you that the only way to achieve heaven is to attack those who do not share your religion — to attack them in every way, including through physical violence. And indeed, it is almost incomprehensible to us that there could be a religion that teaches its followers to act so brutally against their own earthly happiness. But many who practice Islam describe it as being precisely that, and practice it in exactly that way.

Westerners must look at Islam and find out what it is, not what we wish it was.

By Ryan Singel

The nation’s centralized watch list has grown to include 755,000 names suspected of having terrorist ties, resulting in nearly 20,000 positive matches of persons against the list in 2006, according to a new report from Congress’s investigative reporting arm. Since the list is now used in nearly all routine police stops and for domestic airline travel, Americans made up the bulk of those matches.

The Government Accountablity Office’s report was presented in a hearing to the Senate’s Homeland Security Committee Wednesday, causing senators to express concern about the size and effectiveness of the list.

More

*

‘Hate literature easily found at UK mosques’

* No one should be surprised by this. But of course they are surprised, because they refuse to look into the contents of Islamic teaching for themselves. By Toby Helm in the Telegraph

The London Central Mosque’s bookshop is not run by the mosque, as it is a franchise

*

Extremist literature that encourages hatred of gays, Christians and Jews can be easily found at many of Britain’s mosques, according to a new survey.

Researchers for the centre-Right think tank Policy Exchange claims it found the literature in a quarter of the 100 mosques and Islamic institutions they visited.

Many of the publications allegedly called on British Muslims to segregate themselves from non-Muslims and for unbelievers to be treated as second-class citizens wherever possible.

The literature also allegedly contained repeated calls for gays to be thrown from mountains and tall buildings and for women to be subjugated.

* Comment:

These things are not “extremism.” They are mainstream, traditional Islam. Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, directed his followers to “kill the one who sodomizes and the one who lets it be done to him” (‘Umdat al-Salik, p17.3). And the Qur’an says that “men are in charge of women” and that disobedient women should be beaten (4:34).

* Thus the absence of literature teaching these things in three quarters of the mosques in Britain is good, but it is not enough. If the Muslims in those mosques don’t hold these views, they should explicitly disavow and teach against them.

More

*

UK Ministers: ‘They May Be Terror-linked but We Won’t Comment’

At Britain’s ConservativeHome, Paul Goodman MP writes about another amazing example of UK official blindness and inaction, as the “Shadow Ministers” are asked a question about the Islamic supremacist group Hizb ut-Tahrir: They may be terror-linked but we won’t comment.

Tablighi Jamaat is a controversial organisation which wants to build a large mosque close to the site of the 2012 Olympic stadium. Its critics claim that it’s associated with extremism and terrorism. Ministers may have a view on these claims – but, if so, won’t say what it is.

“There are some 1,600 mosques in Britain, most of them exemplary houses of instruction that provide spiritual nourishment to our fellow citizens, and that teach them in a tradition that all of us would think admirable. However, there are mosques—some with direct relationships with Saudi Arabia—that do not cleave to the moderate mainstream path taken by the majority of British Muslims. I shall mention two of them. One subject of concern is the East London mosque, which is one of the largest in Britain. Its president, Dr. Muhammad Abdul Bari, is the chairman of the Muslim Council of Britain, but the speaker invited to open the mosque, Sheikh al-Sudais, had preached sermons in his native Saudi Arabia in which he described Jewish people as pigs and monkeys. He has called Hindus idol-worshippers to whom it would be wrong to speak sweetly. That is an example of Saudi influence raising profound concerns.

An even more profound concern arises in connection with the plans, in east London, for the erection of the largest mosque—indeed, the largest house of worship—in the country. It is intended to accommodate between 40,000 and 70,000 worshippers, and it is estimated that it will cost between £100 million and £300 million. The mosque, which is being built by an organisation called Tablighi Jamaat, raises profound concerns, not least because that organisation has been described by French intelligence as an “antechamber of fundamentalism”. Two of the 7/7 bombers had direct links with the Tablighi Jamaat mosque in Dewsbury. Richard Reid, the shoe-bomber, had links with the organisation, as did John Walker Lindh, the so-called American Taliban. How can an organisation that, according to the Charity Commission, records an income of just £500,000 a year, afford to build a mosque that will cost anything between £100 million and £300 million?”

Link

Our ‘Friends’ The Sowdi’s

* Abdullah (‘Slave of Allah’)

* The double dealing, backstabbing, jihad financing, misogynistic fat cats from the worlds largest petrol station are blaming the victims of Islamic terrorism for not doing enough against …Islamic terrorism:

Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah is visiting the UK. Yesterday we noted that King Abdullah chided the British for not doing enough to fight terrorism. We also noted several reasons why no Saudi ought to criticize anyone else for a substellar anti-terror effort. Here’s one more reason the King should’ve kept his opinions to himself.

Extremist literature that encourages hatred of gays, Christians and Jews can be easily found at many of Britain’s mosques, according to a new survey.

Researchers for the centre-Right think tank Policy Exchange claims it found the literature in a quarter of the 100 mosques and Islamic institutions they visited.

Many of the publications allegedly called on British Muslims to segregate themselves from non-Muslims and for unbelievers to be treated as second-class citizens wherever possible.

The literature also allegedly contained repeated calls for gays to be thrown from mountains and tall buildings and for women to be subjugated.

Policy Exchange said that among the documents were the anti-Semitic forgery, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, and other publications peddling bizarre conspiracy theories.

That’s not much of a surprise; they don’t call London “Londonistan” for nothing. But the fact is, this isn’t nearly enough of a surprise either.

Link

*

* Looks like some of the hate preachers have copped too much flack lately and the Sowdi’s fear a ‘backlash’- especially when the kuffar takes too much of an interest to learn about the vile and evil teachings of Islam:

Saudi Clerics To Mosque Preachers: Don’t Curse Peaceful Jews, Christians

Senior Saudi clerics have warned mosque preachers in the country not to curse peaceful Jews and Christians or their allies, particularly not regions that are attracting foreign investments, in new industrial cities such as Al-Jubeil and Yanbu’.

The clerics called for defaming only those who are plundering the Muslims’ rights, without harming peaceful non-Muslims.

The president of the court in Al-Jubeil, Sheikh Riyadh Al-Muhidab, said, “Cursing peaceful people who are not Muslims is not accepted in Islam…”

Source: Al-Watan, Saudi Arabia, October 29, 2007

* Damage Control. At least an attempt…

Lawyer Peter Faris facing disbarment over drugs comments

THE Bar is threatening to end the legal career of former National Crime Authority chairman Peter Faris QC because he wrote articles about drug-using lawyers.

* Interesting, isn’t it? Here’s a guy who exposes rampant drug abuse in the legal profession and the legal profession wants to burn him at the stakes instead of taking a long hard look at themselves.

*
The Australian newspaper says Mr Faris faces possible disbarment after linking the drug-related death of Melbourne silk Peter Hayes to a wider problem of cocaine use in Victoria’s legal profession.

The assertions of cocaine use within the profession have been confirmed by disgraced former solicitor Andrew Fraser, who says he witnessed widespread drug use.

Mr Faris told The Australian yesterday he had done done nothing wrong and accused the Bar of misusing its regulatory powers to intimidate a critic.

“I am a member of the Victorian Bar but I am also a journalist and media commentator,” Mr Faris said.

“I have exercised my right of free speech. This is an attempt to get rid of me by possible disbarment if they can establish it.”

But Bar Council chairman Peter Riordan SC was quoted as saying if Mr Faris has not broken the Legal Profession Act, he has nothing to fear and should give any evidence of lawyers taking drugs to the committee so it can take appropriate action.

Peter Faris Blog

* Peter Faris QC  has taken a  stand against the increasing Islamization of Australia

‘Little Green Footballs’ is considered by many to be a neo-nazi, right-wing, racist, hate-speech website.

* It’s not! Bookmark this page. From now on we will add on to this page like a separate blog. Take a look at this: A HARD LOOK AT RACISM

* Some comments from Atlas Shrugs:

It’s rather condescending and/or arrogant for LGF to accuse anyone else as ‘neo-nazi, right-wing, racists’ when LGF is considered by many in America, Europe, the Middle East to be ‘neo-nazi, right-wing, racists’ who preach hate.

* Makes sense, no?

If I am to believe the accusations that Johnson is a neo-nazi (which I don’t since exposing Islamic fascism is not ipso facto neo-nazism or racism) then it is odd to hear an accused neo-nazi racist accuse others of being neo-nazi racists.

I wish Charles would read and study the Art of War by Sun Tzu and he would see that the division of allies is one of the greatest obstacles to winning a war. Our enemies, both near and far, are delighted at this and will use it to their advantage.

* For millennium wars were fought by alliances. Hitler allied himself with Muslims, the allies united against Hitler with communist Russia, the US allies itself with any despot or dictator that is useful to her, including Islamic Turkey, African despots and South American dictators. And the same US sees Saudi Arabia and Pakistan as allies against the misnamed ‘WoT’ – yet the lizard army is clinging to a moral buraq that is so high up in the stratosphere that the oxygen bottles explode.

* Charles Johnson himself is a rather courageous fellow. The Islamofascist’s hate him with a vengeance and would love to chop his head off, the wankers from the MSM fear him because Johnson and his ‘army of lizards’ have exposed them on several occasions as the fraudsters they are.

* But lately the ‘army of lizards’, as Johnson likes to call his fan-club, has gone gaga: ever since Pamela Geller from Atlas Shrugs and Robert Spencer from Jihad Watch went to Brussels to attend a a very worthy and substantive conference held in part by European political parties being wrongly demonized the lizards have become CANNIBALLISTIC!

*

The torture never stops:

The ‘Lizard army’,- as Charles Johnson likes to call his fan club of sycophants, boot-licker’s and cheerleaders, doesn’t tolerate dissent: its cannibal time brother, get in on the action while it lasts, nothing is more important than being a morally superior PoS.

Its the Kos-kidz all over: ankle-biters, cheerleeders & wankers: to call it a lynch-mob would be politically correct, polite even!

Fjordman took a stand, patiently, bravely, but only to cop it from the lizard king himself.

Pathetic!

Thanks but no thanks.

* Moral Superiority = the cocaine of the 21st Century.

* The Lizards fucked up, bad:

* Eddy Rollnick pours his heart out:

* The lizards see Nazi’s behind every bush. For the Lizards, the ovens in Auschwitz and Bergen Belsen are going to be fired up again. The Gestapo is on the way to round up the remaining Jews and the cattle trains are ready to roll. The Muslims are the victims who must be protected. Why don’t we bring out Neturai Karta to protect them!

* Sheik yer’mami sez:

* Call for internment and deportations of the global jihad’s 5th column and you will be booted from LGF. Call Condi Rice a ‘Picanninni’ who should be replaced with Ayaan Ali Hirsi and you will be banned: you instantly become a ‘racist’- regardless which race you are. Criticize Bush and out you go…

* More on Rice later..

* Okay, its too painful for a day. We’ll continue, or we may just drop it because it hurts the cause. The only hope there is is that Charles Johnson somehow gets the message.

More on Atlas Shrugs

*

The Brussels Journal has more of the same pain…

* The enemy of my enemy doesn’t have to be my friend. 

* You’re not the only one! More and more of us have woken up in spite of the ongoing, massive, deliberate disinformation in the main-stream media, the willful stupidity and ignorance of our leaders and the lies, the obfuscation and dissemination by he Islamofascists themselves.

* Change is on the horizon: its only a matter of time before the soldiers of Allah attack us again, kill another 50, 100, 200, 1000, perhaps 3000 or 100.000 of us. And when it happens, like on 9/11 2001, we will see them again dancing in the streets of the ‘Islamic world’- (remember all the world is Islamic!) handing out candy to each other, shooting guns in the air while shouting ‘Allahu akbar’ and praising the terrorists who did it, while telling us that ‘Islam is a religion of peace’- and that the religion has nothing to do with terrorism, nothing whatsoever. Yes, it was the Joozzz who did it, the Mossad, -they will say-, George W. Bush, little Johnny Howard, yes it was them who did it, its all a gigantic smear campaign to give islam a bad name and to oppress Muslims. But anyhow, we had it coming because we’re fighting Islam and have invaded their countries, they will say,- and the left will say that fighting terrorism makes us a target for terrorism. They will ask again ‘why do they hate us’ and ‘why can’t we all just get along’ and listen to their perceived grievances. And if you don’t, the lefty loony progressives join the Muhammedan’s and call you ‘racist’ and ‘Islamophobic’, and you are the hatemonger who’s got it all wrong. Why don’t you  cure your Islamophobia with a dose of ‘interfaith-dialogue’ at your local mosque and have some couscous, hummus and some of those delicious lamb-chops?

Now if only we were not fighting Islamic terrorism, (in EUrabia you’re not allowed to say ‘Islamic’ any more because it is feared that saying it causes …Islamic terrorism) then the Islamic terrorists would just live happily alongside us and sing kumbayah all day long. But if we don’t sing their tune (pay the jiziyah with willing submission while feeling subdued) to their liking they will bomb us again. And the progressives in our media will tell us that its all our fault anyhow, that we brought it upon ourselves because of colonialism, exploitation of ……..(fill in your favorite exploits) because of global warming and sheep flatulenza, etc.etc.

* But then there are some of us who actually do something about it. Those who have to look over their shoulders, who have to fear for their lifes, who need protection 24/7, like Ayaan Ali Hirsi,Wafa Sultan, Nonie Darvish, Geert Wilders, Robert Spencer, David Horowitz, Daniel Pipes or Raymond Ibrahim and many more. Our numbers are increasing, resistance to Islamization is growing, in spite of everything. We will not submit.

Don’t you think we have a culture worth preserving?

The Orwellian “Islam is Peace” campaign

Islamic groups in the UK have launched the slick “Islam is Peace” public relations campaign, which supporters say is aimed at showing that Muslims are ordinary British citizens. But as Robert Spencer reports, its actual aims and rhetoric line up well with many jihadist goals.

An Australian wonders about Islam…

Have we seen any changes in the last 2 years? If not, aren’t you wondering why nothing has happened? Take a look at this article from the

ANDREW BOLT /Herald Sun / Hat Tip Rosie

It’s time we accepted the difficult truth: many of the Muslims we invite to live in Australia want to destroy us.

FOR four years, since the September 11 attacks, I’ve begged our Islamic leaders to drive extremists from their mosques.

For four years I’ve also reassured you that most Muslims here are moderate.

I’ve even insisted they have some moderate Muslim leaders, and last week again endorsed Sheik Fehmi Naji El-Imam of Preston mosque as a man of peace.

How eager I was to praise. Heavens, I described as “moderate” the Melbourne-based Islamic Information Services Network of Australia (IISNA), which purged from its website articles I’d noted claiming democracy was a sin, Jews were behind September 11 and Western society was a pollution.

But was I just kidding myself? Isn’t it becoming terribly clear that Islam — at least the Islam of Australia’s Arab sheiks and imams — is hostile to our society?

Isn’t it now obvious we should never have let into our country those imams who now preach hate?

Isn’t the evidence that some cultures — Muslim Arab ones — pose more problems than their importation at this rate is worth? Isn’t multiculturalism making these problems worse?

I know these are dangerous, hurtful questions. I also know many Muslims will feel deeply offended, loving this country and obeying its laws, and I wish only I heard from them far more often.

But the London bombings, perpetrated by home-grown Muslims, makes our silence on such issues not a sign of civility, but suicide.

So let me admit that the past few days have been terrible for those of us who thought we could count on Muslim leaders for real help against the Muslim extremists who threaten us.

Such setbacks we’ve had.

Only last week I’d praised Sheik Fehmi as a good man, who’d condemned the London bombings. But a day later he was asked about fellow Melbourne sheik Mohammed Omran, a friend of a suspected al-Qaida boss, who’d claimed September 11 was really the work of a US-based conspiracy.

“He is entitled to his own thinking,” Fehmi replied meekly. Then, asked if Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaida terrorists had committed those attacks, he added: “We cannot say. We do not know these things.”

How can Muslim leaders fight terrorism, when the most moderate of them won’t condemn even bin Laden, or admit that monster’s self-confessed guilt?

Fehmi was not my only disappointment. I checked the IISNA site this week, and among the announcements of classes and prayers found this advice to a reader who’d asked if it was a sin to kill non-Muslims:

“In regard to non-Muslims who are at war with the Muslims and do not have a peace treaty with the Muslims or are not living under Muslim rule, then Muslims are commanded to kill them, because Allah says . . . ‘Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you.’ “

If that’s advice passed on by a “moderate” Islamic group, what must the radical ones here say?

Well, we know that, too. In a Melbourne bookshop run by Omran a Herald Sun reporter this month found books being sold that command Muslims to ready for war and to hate Jews.

In Sydney last week, the Islamic Bookshop, Australia’s largest of the kind, was found (again) selling similar poison near the Lakemba mosque, including a book with tips on how to blow yourself up and kill plenty.

“The form this usually takes nowadays is to wire up one’s body, or a vehicle or a suitcase with explosives and then to enter among a conglomeration of the enemy and to detonate,” it says.

* Yesterday’s Liberal Who Got Mugged By Reality…

*

“There is no other technique which strikes as much terror into their hearts.”

Again and again we’re told such things aren’t typical. Apologists, too often Muslim converts with little clout among ethnic groups, claim Islam means peace. But again and again we are left feeling like dupes.

The genuinely charming Waleed Aly, of the Islamic Council of Victoria, goes on 3AW to tell us the radical Mufti of Australia, Sheik Taj el-Din el-Hilaly, who has praised suicide bombers as “heroes” and called the September 11 attacks “God’s work against oppressors”, is not a big worry because he represents no one. Aly says he doesn’t even know who made the man a mufti, our highest ranking Islamic cleric.

But the truth, Waleed, is that your own council voted to make Hilaly the Mufti in a decision of the Federation of Islamic Councils of Australia. Why won’t you sack him?

Everywhere disappointment. Hilaly’s spokesman, Keysar Trad, soothes us with false claims that the Mufti is misquoted and is a proud Australian, but he turns out himself to have been a translator for the Islamic Youth Movement, a pro-bin Laden group whose leader, Bilal Khazal, now faces terrorism-related charges in Sydney.

We also find Trad has written articles with lines such as: “The criminal dregs of white society colonised this country (Australia) and . . . the descendants of these criminal dregs tell us that they are better than us.”

Faced with such evidence whichever way I turn, what else can I think about Islam — or Arab Islam, at least — but that it is an enemy of our culture, our society? And I ask: How did we come to let in the extremist preachers of such a hostile creed?

Why did we let in sheiks such as the Jordanian-born Omran, who declares Islam rejects democracy and instructs Muslims to go to Iraq to fight coalition troops? Why did we let in the Egyptian-born Hilaly?

But so much that we did in the name of multiculturalism was dangerously naive. Just think: only a few years ago the jihad-preaching Islamic Youth Movement, which met in Hilaly’s mosque, was given three grants — two state multicultural grants to run language classes and one work-for-the-dole grant to smarten up its offices.

Then there was all that other multicultural pampering to help Muslim ethnic groups here keep their distance, their “identity”.

In March, the Victorian Multicultural Commission, whose grants budget the Bracks Government has tripled, even ran a football carnival for teenagers who were split into ethnic teams — the Turks playing the Greeks, the Lebanese the Jews and so on.

Does this make any sense in a society where the urgent need now is not to reinforce old tribal loyalties, but dissolve them in a warm pool called “Australia”?

As you figure the answer, remember that Lebanese Australian children at the Muslim-dominated Moreland Secondary College, now closed after non-Muslim students fled, danced for joy at the September 11 attacks. Remember Lebanese ethnic gangs are strong in Sydney.

How hapless we’ve been, refusing to admit we were importing a problem that multiculturalism could only make worse.

For example, we have allowed into Australia Lebanese — many of them Muslim — who are often uneducated, unskilled and poor

in English. Their Islam was yet another barrier to their assimilation.

The results were as predictable as they were politely ignored — a jobless rate and imprisonment rate double that of other Australians. Gangs. Poverty. A near ghetto in Lakemba.

What an unholy recipe: First we build a vulnerable underclass of unassimilated people with a religion of rejection. Then we let loose on them imported radicals preaching a hatred of our society; teachers who instruct them in the shame of our history; and multiculturalists who pay them to keep their distance and retain their much nicer ways.

A LL this always was foolish. Now we see it was dangerous as well, since British-born Muslims bred in a similar stew of multiculturalism, ethnic enclaves and Islamist extremism, have gone to war.

We need now to change ideas once thought sacred by our cultural elite.

First, we must be more wary about the dangers of importing cultures that clash with the one that has built this free, rich and democratic society.

As a former Chief Justice, the late Sir Harry Gibbs, said in 2002: “A state is entitled to prevent the immigration of persons whose culture is such that they are unlikely readily to integrate into society, or at least to ensure that persons of that kind do not enter the country in such numbers that they will be likely to form a distinct and alien section of society, with the resulting problems that we have seen in the UK.”

Second, we must ban mosques from hiring imams from overseas, or at least those who preach race hate or damn democracy. If Islam does mean peace, let only peace be preached.

And, third, we must show more pride in this country, and switch our multicultural cash from funding division to building unity.

After all, the duty of government is to make one nation out of many tribes — and not the deadly reverse.

More…

Offensive to Muslims: Koranic Toilet Seat

Update to this story: Koran toilet seat cover angers cleric

“There is a toilet seat cover on sale in local stores that features verses of the Koran. This is an insult to the Muslim faith that we must react to,” he called out.

This one comes from the Muslim Brotherhood propaganda site IslamOnline, where they applaud Italian authorities for doing the bidding of seething Islamists threatening violence over another incident of “blasphemy:” Italy Seizes Quran-printed Toilet Seats.

* It is highly questionable whether Italy has anything in its laws to ban or prohibit toilet seats or toilet paper with Arabic/Koranic writing. It seems to be just another act of successful blackmail and intimidation by the RoP.

Following Muslim complaints, police raided the four braches of the company in the town of Latina, 60km south of Rome, and seized 2,000 such pieces on sale.

Interior minister Giuliano Amato met Friday with Italian Muslim leaders at the main Rome Mosque to reassure them that Italy would not tolerate such outrageous acts.

“This is an insult to the Muslim faith,” The imam of the Lazio town of Latina’s mosque, Sheikh Yusuf, told Amato. Amato reassured Yusuf, saying: “I would like to tell our friends from Latina that we have been informed of this matter and are taking action because it is offensive.”

* Standard line from Italy’s Muslim Website:

Italy has a Muslim population of some 1.2 million, including 20,000 reverts, according to unofficial estimates.*

* That’s the scary part…

* Selected comments:

* Watch out folks: A police raid to protect Islamic sensibilities is outrageous. Soon they’re going to be kicking in doors looking for cartoons.

* “…To head off angry Muslim Reaction”

Says it all.The appropriate response would have been “This is vulgar, but we are a free country. We live with things like this for the greater goal of a free society.Your threats and many of your actions are offensive, but yet we allow your freedom. If there is any violence you will be held responsible for instigation & the violent actors will be arrested.prosecuted & jailed if I can help it. All of those eligible will be deported after serving their sentences. Now thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.We are now alerted to watch you and your cohorts very closely.

Ciao!

*

Not offensive to Muslims: Dead Serb killed by Muslims…

*

Oriana Fallaci saw it coming:

No word yet on Italian police reaction to muslims’ unprecedented blasphemous acts against Christians, as documented by Oriana Fallici in The Rage and The Pride:

“A tent put up in order to beg–condemn–insult the Italian government that hosted them but wouldn’t give them the papers necessary to rove about Europe and wouldn’t let them bring the hordes of their relatives to Italy. Mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, cousins, pregnant sisters–in–law, and if they had their way, their relatives’ relatives as well. A tent situated next to the beautiful palazzo of the Archbishop on whose sidewalk they kept the shoes or sandals that are lined up outside the mosques in their countries. And along with the shoes or sandals, the empty bottles of water they’d used to wash their feet before praying. A tent placed in front of the cathedral with Brunelleschi’s cupola and by the side of the Baptistery with Ghiberti’s golden doors. A tent, finally, furnished like a sleazy little apartment: seats, tables, chaise–lounges, mattresses for sleeping and for fucking, ovens for cooking food and plaguing the piazza with smoke and stench. And, thanks to the customary irresponsibility of ENEL, which cares about our works of art about as much as it cares about our landscape, furnished with electric light. Thanks to a radio tape player, enriched by the uncouth wailing of a muezzin who punctually exorted the faithful, deafened the infidels, and smothered the sound of the church bells. Add to all this the yellow streaks of urine that profaned the marble of the Baptistry. (My, these sons of Allah sure have a long range! However did they manage to hit the target when they were held back by a protective railing that kept it nearly two whole meters away from their urinary equipment?) And along with the yellow streaks of urine, the stench of the excrement that blocked the door of San Salvatore al Vescovo: that exquisite Romanesque church (year 1000) that stands at the rear of the Piazza del Duomo and that the sons of Allah transformed into a shithouse. You’re well aware of this.”

[Link: italian.about.com…]
And the Muslims are seething about what, a toilet seat? Can you imagine the outrage if some dared shit on the steps of a mosque? Blood would run in the streets! Yet there will be no response to the muslims defiling the holy places of Christianity, except to cower in fear. Europe’s political class has been neutered, leaving a vacuum of courage and leadership that will lead to the next World War.

*

Laura Bush: “They do not see covering as some sort of subjugation of women:” Laura Bush defends the hijab.

* Note: wearing the abaya in Saudi Arabia is not a “choice.” It’s mandatory for all women when they are in public. If they show even a little bit of ankle, they’re subject to being beaten and arrested by the Saudi religious police (mutaween).

Hijaab Befuddlement Syndrome, update:

* Does Laura Bush really think those women will be honest about their opinions on this misogynistic practice?

UPDATE at 10/28/07 11:35:26 am:

Did these girls also choose to die in a fire instead of wearing the abaya?

Saudi Arabia’s religious police stopped schoolgirls from leaving a blazing building because they were not wearing correct Islamic dress, according to Saudi newspapers.

In a rare criticism of the kingdom’s powerful “mutaween” police, the Saudi media has accused them of hindering attempts to save 15 girls who died in the fire on Monday.

About 800 pupils were inside the school in the holy city of Mecca when the tragedy occurred.

According to the al-Eqtisadiah daily, firemen confronted police after they tried to keep the girls inside because they were not wearing the headscarves and abayas (black robes) required by the kingdom’s strict interpretation of Islam.

One witness said he saw three policemen “beating young girls to prevent them from leaving the school because they were not wearing the abaya”.