From ‘the slime from the video’ department
* Another perceived ‘moderate’ who is, when we take a closer look, not moderate at all, but much more so a ‘good Muslim’- which comes, of course, with all the mental baggage including the inbred Jew hatred.
In 2005 Lord Ahmed hosted a book launch in the House of Lords for anti-Zionist author Israel Shamir. On the 22nd March, Stephen Pollard, in a guest editorial appearing in the Times, lambasted the event. In his piece entitled ‘Lord Ahmed’s Unwelcome Guest’, Pollard opines that Shamir “is, in fact, a Swedish-domiciled anti-Semite also known as JÃ¶ran Jermas.” Pollard goes on to characterize the speech entitled ‘Jews and Empire’ as containing anti-Semitic references such as “Jews control … a big share of mass media”; ‘the Jewish supremacy drive’ as the one reason for wars in the Middle East, and that ‘Jews love Empire’. Shamir also suggested that the large Muslim population in Britain was important to turn the tide of ‘Judaic Values’ in Britain. Lord Ahmed refused to comment on the remarks of Shamir.
* “Israel Shamir” is in reality a Muhammedan parvenu and asylum parasite who sucks off the Swedish welfare department while writing anti-semitic s#*t under false flag.
In August 2006 he was a signatory to an open letter to Tony Blair, the Prime Minster, criticising the UK’s foreign policy. In 2007 he responded to the award of a knighthood to Salman Rushdie by claiming he was appalled, stating that Rushdie had ‘blood on his hands’.
Lord Ahmed reportedly said: “What would one say if the Saudi or Afghan governments honoured the martyrs of the September 11 attacks on the United States?” . He was criticized by some for apparently besmirching free speech and for showing an a lack of tolerance for criticism of Islam, something that called into question his appropriateness for the privilege of sitting in the House of Lords.
Lord Ahmed pumps out the usual drivel like “there is “a constant theme of demonisation of the Muslim community”, he told the BBC’s Sunday programme, the politicians and some people in the media have used this (presumably terrorism) for demonisation of the entire communities…’ and Lord Ahmed called on ministers to address deprivation in Muslim communities, which simply means ” you pay the jiziyah and we Muslims take care of the rest”…
* Now, Lord Ahmed is again in the news, the last time we saw him on ‘Undercover Mosques’ when he frequented the same radical mosques where channel 4 took some footage of the hate spewing clerics. This time the good lord presents himself as a good Samaritan, because he went to Sudan along with Baroness Warsi, another beknighted Muhammedan at Lord Ahmed’s behest, and singlehandedly had British school teacher Gillian Gibbons pardoned and released from gaol, because she she committed the uspeakable offence to allowe her pupils to name a teddy bear ‘Mohammed’- punishable by at least 40 lashes. But the Muhammedan mob in the Sudan screamed for her blood.
Lord Ahmed, from Britain’s ruling Labour Party, and Baroness Warsi, an opposition Conservative, visted Khartoum and had a meeting with the President of Sudan. Following this the President pardoned Ms Gibbons and she was allowed to return to the UK.
* That’s all we get in the news. Lord Ahmed the savior. See, these Muhammedans are not all bad, can’t paint them all with one brush, you know: Islam is not a monolith, you know, and if we just help them along maybe one day, one day, they might just become like us, don’tcha think?
“She was pardoned thanks to the mediation of Lord Ahmed and Baroness Warsi. She will be released in about an hour,” Mahjoub Fadl Badri told AFP.
* Always eager to help when it comes to screwing their host country out of funds to help the ummah along, those ‘British Muslims’…
Good cop, bad cop routine. Are we all suckers?
Why does this charade remind me of catmeat sheik Hilali?
FREED teddy bear row teacher Gillian Gibbons jetted out of Sudan last night, but may fly into a new danger.
She was yesterday believed to be returning home via Dubai. But senior Government sources last night warned that her ordeal may not be over.
One said: “Gillian may be coming home, but there are still fears that someone here may want to attack her.
“The threatening protests over the Danish cartoons in Britain in 2006 highlighted how many extremists are still in our midst.”
Gillian Gibbons returns to Britain
We, as Infidels, know that Lord Ahmed, unlike those Sudanese calling for the death of Mrs. Gibbons, has a much greater knowledge of the outside world, of how Infidels think, and of how Infidels can get angry, and how there are certain danger signs that possibly the Infidels are getting just a little too fast, too large a dose of the real Islam — and not what the smylers with the knyfs under their clokes present as the real Islam. He was protecting his own position, and the position of Islam, in Great Britain. Don’t let him or the well-heeled Muslimah who went with him get away with this. They are, in their own way, furthering the Jihad, indeed furthering it far better than are those who wanted Gibbons punished, or even killed, for her act of sweet innocent all-too-understandable non-Muslim ignorance of the nature, and scope, of the menace of Islam.Â
“Not to worry”, sez the Bungla-wussie of the ‘ancient rulings’
Inayat Bunglawala, spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain, agreed that the pardon was “wonderful news”.
He said: “Gillian should never have been arrested in the first place, let alone held in jail. She had done nothing wrong.
* The truth will set you free, Bungla!
“I am sure she will be welcomed by Muslims and non-Muslims after her terrible ordeal at the hands of the Sudanese authorities.”
* Not so sure about that. I wouldn’t trust you with a ten foot pole…
Skid Marx of Melbourne sez:
We had Inayat Bunglawala laying into the man from the Sudanese Embassy on Newsnight.
We had Anjem Choudhary (the man who called 9/11 ‘magnificent’ and wants to see the UK under the heel of a Caliphate) insisting that there is nothing offensive about giving that name to an ‘item of endearment’.
We’ve had statements in support of Gillian Gibbons from the Muslim Council of Britain, the Ramadhan Foundation and the Islamic Society of Britain.
And we had a demo at the Sudanese Embassy on Saturday by Muslims carrying ‘NOT IN MY NAME’ placards and attempting to hand in a ‘goodwill teddy’ to Embassy staff, who refused to accept it.
These Muslims living in Great Britain have not for one minute ended their attempt to defend Islam from critical scrutiny, and to continue to fool and confuse Infidels. It is just that when something like this happens, and cannot be explained away, and has to be dealt with, then they go into full “war is deception” mode and act outraged, and indignant. It is nonsense. If they thought such behavior by the Sudanese government could be gotten away with, they would have done nothing. They object not morally but only in terms of public relationsâ€”the damage to the “image” of Islam in Great Britain, and possibly elsewhere in the West. Otherwise, they do not give a damn.
No one should allow himself to be fooled.
A delegation of British Muslimsâ€”having met with the Sudaneseâ€”apparently expected her to be pardoned. Muhammad Abdul Bari of the Muslim Council of Britain said: “There was clearly no intention on the part of the teacher to deliberately insult the Islamic faith.” But what if there had been? If Gibbons had named the teddy bear Muhammad in order to mock the Muslim prophet, would Muhammad Abdul Bari have approved of her being arrested, imprisoned, lashed or even executed?
This business of Muslims in this or that Infidel land taking it upon themselves to go and attempt to free non-Muslim citizens taken by Muslims elsewhere will merely give Muslims, and some Kaffirs, the idea that “our” Muslims are “our secret weapon” for they, you see, can always be sent out to prevent the worst from happening. And it will give them a quasi-official role, and instead of being regarded as part of the problem of Islam, they will be regarded as part of the solution. Lord Ahmad and Tory Baroness Sayeeda Warsi are nothing of the sort. They were merely, by attempting to free the Gibbons lady, to promote Islam, to burnish the image of Islam, in Great Britain.
We, as Infidels, know that Lord Ahmed, unlike those Sudanese calling for the death of Mrs. Gibbons, has a much greater knowledge of how Infidels think, and of how Infidels can get angry, and how there are certain danger signs that possibly the Infidels are getting just a little too fast, too large a dose of the real Islam â€“ and not what the ‘smylers with the knyfs under their clokes’ present as the real Islam. He was protecting his own position, and the position of Islam, in Great Britain. Don’t let him or the well-heeled bint who went with him, get away with this. They are, in their own way, furthering the Jihad, indeed furthering it far better than are those who wanted Gibbons punished.
Meanwhile, a clueless, non Qur’an/hadith/sira studying Gibbons said she was sorry if she caused any “distress.”
“I have a great respect for the Islamic religion and would not knowingly offend anyone,” Gibbons said.
In other news:
Quality health care. “Nurses Told To Turn Muslims’ Beds To Mecca, by Paul Jeeves in the Daily Express thanks to DW
OVERWORKED nurses have been ordered to stop all medical work five times every day to move Muslim patients’ beds so they face towards Mecca.
The lengthy procedure, which also includes providing fresh bathing water, is creating turmoil among overstretched staff on bustling NHS wards.
But despite the havoc, Mid- Yorkshire NHS Trust says the rule must be instigated whenever possible to ensure Muslim patients have “a more comfortable stay in hospital”.
Perhaps Gillian Gibbons could appease our muslim friends by doing voluntary work in the Dewsbury hospitals moving the beds round.