Victory for Serbia and Justice at the United Nations. AND: America’s Stature Revealed



                                     Bin Laden Mosque in Kosovo

By Julia Gorin

REVEALED: What the U.S. has done to its stature via the Balkans: Yesterday, while 77 countries voted in favor of the Serbian initiative requesting the ICJ to rule on the legality of the unilateral secession of its Kosovo province, take a look at the power team voting against:

Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Albania and United States of America.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

From the blog:

Statement of the Day

“Perhaps 48 countries did recognize Kosovo independence, but it may be worth mentioning that the other 144 did not.”

– Dumisani Kumalo, South Africa’s Ambassador to the UN, in response to American ambassador during General Assembly’s debate about Serbian initiative

Serbia Wins Majority Support in United Nations
Oct 8th, 2008 | By | In Current, Kosovo-Metohija Crisis

US and Albania, Part of a Painfully Small World Minority

Serbian resolution requesting an advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on “whether the unilateral declaration of independence of Kosovo is in accordance with international law” was accepted in the UN General Assembly on Wednesday, with 77 countries voting in favor and 6 against….74 countries abstained but, according to the General Assembly voting regulations, Serbia needed a simple majority, where only the votes ‘for’ and ‘against’ are being counted, while the abstentions are not taken into account.

“We are surprised with the number of states which voted for the resolution. We support the International Court of Justice opinion, but an advisory opinion cannot affect Kosovo independence”, Britain’s UN Ambassador John Sawers said after the vote.

Previously, Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic urged the representatives of the United Nations to support Serbia’s ICJ intiative.

Jeremic: Voting Against Means Secessionists Always Win

Sending the resolution to the court, Jeremic told the UN General Assembly, would reduce tensions in the region and in the rest of the world.

“The Republic of Serbia believes that sending this question to the ICJ would prevent the Kosovo crisis from serving as a deeply problematic precedent in any part of the globe where secessionist ambitions are harbored,” Jeremic said explaining Serbia’s request.

“We also believe that the ICJ advisory opinion would provide politically neutral, yet judicially authoritative guidance, to many countries still deliberating on how to approach UDI in line with international law,” Jeremic added.

He stated that Serbia believes “that recourse to the Court would strengthen the rule of law in international relations, and make the proposed course of action a symbol of the world community’s resolve to take the UN Charter as its guide”.

“Supporting this resolution would also serve to reaffirm a fundamental principle: the right of any member State of the United Nations to pose a simple, basic question — on a matter it considers vitally important — to the international court,” Jeremic set out, noting that to vote against would be in effect a vote to deny the right of any country – now or in the future – to seek judicial recourse through the UN system.

Jeremic underscored that “to vote against would also mean accepting that nothing could be done when secessionists in whichever part of the globe assert the uniqueness of their cause, and claim exception to the universal scope of the international legal order”.

“The question posed is amply clear and refrains from taking political positions on the Kosovo issue. The answer to come, in the form of an advisory opinion, will be based on international law, in accordance with the ICJ’s Statute and Rules of Procedure,” Jeremic pointed out.

Severe Blow to the Separatists and their Western Sponsors

…European Union, which aims for a united foreign policy, once again failed to reach a consensus with the UK and France abstaining, while Slovakia, Greece, Cyprus, Spain and Romania voted in favor. In the discussion that preceded the voting, Serbia was supported by Panama, Cuba, Mexico, Indonesia, Costa Rica, Algeria, Egypt, South Africa… The United States and Albania voiced their opposition to the adoption of the resolution, while Turkey abstained.

Great Britain criticized Serbian initiative, claiming it was “politically motivated”. US representative Rosemary DiCarlo said her country will vote against, since Washington considers Kosovo Albanian separatists’ declaration to have been “in line with international law”.

“United States are fully supporting the International Court of Justice, but in regards to the resolution before us, we believe the advisory opinion is unnecessary and unhelpful, and therefore we shall vote against it”, the US ambassador said, stressing that 48 countries have recognized Pristina separatists’ declaration.

“Perhaps 48 countries did recognize Kosovo independence, but it may be worth mentioning that the other 144 did not,” South Africa’s Ambassador to the UN Dumisani Kumalo said, emphasizing his country supports Serbian initiative.

The plenary session, despite Great Britain’s insistence, was not attended by the Pristina war criminals, butchers, narcodealers and separatists.

Even though mafia state on Serbian territory was recognized only 24 hours ago by one more EU member — Portugal — East River diplomats believe adoption of the Serbian resolution will represent a “severe psychological blow to the further recognitions”, being that the states which have not formed a clear stand on the issue are expected to await the ICJ opinion prior to making any moves.

According to Tanjug, the prevailing view of the UN delegates is that recent events in Georgia have made Western position more precarious, since predictions of opponents of imposed severing of southern Serbian province have proved correct — amputation of Kosovo province did create a precedent, encouraging secessionist movements throughout the world.

Countries voting in favor of Serbian initiative (77 UN member states):
Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Chile, China, Congo, Costa Rica, Cuba, Cyprus, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Fiji, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Honduras, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Jamaica, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lesotho, Liechtenstein, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mexico, Montenegro, Myanmar, Namibia, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Philippines, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Syria, Timor-Leste, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Viet Nam, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

Jesus: “Mohammed, my kingdom is not of this world”

Mohammed: “Mine is…”


We are Losing Europe to Islam

By Diana West  IHC Abstract

[ISLAM] With reference to Shari’a courts which are now officially part of the British legal system Diana West bitterly notes that tolerance has transformed British democracy into a culture that promotes a religion that is the absolute antithesis of the British value system. Five of these courts have been given legally binding authority for their decisions. These courts have already upheld male supremacy in inheritance and domestic violence against women, dropping charges against husbands for violence against their wives.

West warns that the Europe we know will be lost if its tolerance of diversity continues to encourage the incorporation of Islamic beliefs into formerly democratic bodies of law. She notes that protests against the integration of Islamic laws into democratic societies are met with responses labeling such campaigners as extremists or racist. Many Europeans, naturally adverse to such labels, are instead bending over backwards to avoid such allegations by legitimizing the incorporation of Islamic law into their societies.

Failure to protest this recent activity will not encourage multicultural diversity, rather it is an open invitation for further Islamic aggression and dominance. 

The IHC recommends that you read this article in full.

10 thoughts on “Victory for Serbia and Justice at the United Nations. AND: America’s Stature Revealed”

  1. For all the moonbats’ and Dem media-whoredom’s BDS-inspired obsessions and hatred of Bush over Iraq and Afghanistan and Guantanamo, Bush’s real negative legacy will be Kosovo and Georgia, his pointless antagonism of Russia and Serbia, and his administration’s whitewashing of Islam.

  2. Bush’s real negative legacy will be Kosovo and Georgia

    And the ultimate accord of the “Religion of peace” to Islam. Boy does he know how to fight a war.


  4. u people r so blind….who was behind the three crusade..(christians) who was behind the world war 1 (christians) who was behind world war 2 (christians) who droped the first neuclear bomb (christians) who was behind the vitnam war (christians) who occupied the world (british-frinch-italian-germany-russia) <<—(christians) who started the war on iraq for oil(christians) who killed the peopel in afghanistan (christians)…all that and u say u r people of peace…ur history if full of blood and death…no wonder that we hate u and want to kill u all for all ur crimes

  5. But najeeb,

    Don’t muslims purport to worship the same god, and thus wouldn’t it
    be the same god seeking global domination via crusades and defensive
    juhads? Aren’t you hating your own god, if your allegations against
    Christians are true? Doesn’t “allah” supposedly know best?

    Have a word in Solkhar’s shell-like – he will set you straight about
    the god of islam, Judaism and Christianity being the same god (or
    will he deflect attention by babbling about agenda-driven blog
    owners and pizzas?).

    Who declared the crusades, najeeb, and for what reason, and on
    whose authority? As far as the rest of your allegations go, can you
    substantiate any of them, or is it just hate-mongering Christianophobia on your part?

    There is no Biblical mandate for Christians to battle against flesh
    and blood, or to seek to conquer the earth via some sort of holy

    Anyway, najeeb, hate on, if you must, and you may well get your
    chance to kill us, in fulfilment of prophecies such as Revelation 17:6
    (I saw that the woman was drunk with the blood of the saints, the blood of those who bore testimony to Jesus. When I saw her, I was greatly astonished.) and Revelation 13:7 (He was given power to make war against the saints and to conquer them. And he was given authority over every tribe, people, language and nation.).

    Unfortunately, the one who makes war against the saints in Rev 13:7
    is the Antichrist, and if you join him in his blood-fest, and take his
    mark in your right hand or forehead you will be assured of spending
    eternity with “prophet” Mohammed and those like him. Unlike
    islam, the mark of the beast is irrevocable – once you take it, you
    are doomed.

    Food critics might tell you something different, but they reject the
    authority of the Bible at their own peril.

  6. our god is the god of Muslims and Christians and Jews…but in the bible today u see that the god is jesus..witch is wrong..we believe in jesus as prophet we believe in bible..but not the bible that u have today..and i am sure that u heard they found an old bible describe Jesus peace be upon him as prophet and he was sent by god.
    the message of islam was sent after what happend of change in the bible ..and what the christians said that god is three ..if u foucs u will see jews only believe in mouses but christians believe in mouses and jesus and muslims believe in all of them they complete each other.

    and about the people who started crusade..they started it in the name of god and holy land …crusaders killed every muslim in the holy land ..but see the diffrence when salah al din came…he did not kill the Christians.
    and if u look today there is alot of Christians Arabs…if we Muslims are really like what u say ..that we kill infedals ..u would not find one christian Arab!!.
    and the quran only allow us to kill in the state of war..except that no..prophet Mohamed peace be upon him..told us that Christians are closest to us and they believe in Jesus like us.
    by the way if u asked a Muslim if 9 /11 was right > he will tell u against quran …do not judge a naiton by extremest like osama binladin or alzarqawi those people are criminals
    and even in the bible and Torah there is some verses say to kill women and chilldren Deuteronomy 3:3-7 Numbers 31:17-18 Leviticus 27:28-29<…. read those verses in torah and judge if they r really from god and they have been changed.

  7. Geert Wilders wants to kick out *all* Muslims, including those that respect the Western society, and send them all back to Iraq to bomb them there. And you wonder why there are extremists in the Islamic world hating us?

Comments are closed.