Iran Orders ‘Eye for an Eye’ in Acid Attack Case…
TEHRAN, Nov 27 (Reuters) – A man who blinded a woman withÂ acid after she spurned his marriage proposals will also beÂ blinded with acid under Iran’s Islamic law, a newspaper said onÂ Thursday.
This kind of thing doesn’t deter certain f*kcwits in the UK to call for sharia, regardless:
MAKE SHARIA PART OF UK LAW, SAYS QC
Wednesday November 26,2008/ Daily Express
SHARIA law will “inevitably” become part of the legal system and work should begin now to incorporate it into British law, a leading barrister said last night.
Sharia law has become associated with executions, stonings and hands being cut off. (NOT! This kind of barbaric punishment is fundamental to sharia, as we can see above…/ed)
But Mr Hockman told the Daily Express: “Given our substantial Muslim population, it is vital that we look at ways to integrate Muslim culture into our traditions.
* You will be integrated, mr Hockman!
“Otherwise we will find that there is a significant section of our society which is increasingly alienated, with very dangerous results.Â
“There should perhaps be a standing committee comprising Parliamentarians, lawyers and religious leaders to consider how this could be achieved and what legal changes might be framed.”Â
The meeting was held at the National Liberal Club in Whitehall.
Mr Hockman added of Sharia law: “The position of women is one area where the emphasis is, to say the least, rather different.
“I am also sometimes confronted by those who point out that there are elements within the Muslim community who pose a threat to our very security.Â
“My answer is not to dispute them but to suggest that it is for those of us forming part of the majority community to take active steps to address such problems.”Â
Earlier this year, the then Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips said Sharia law could play a role in some parts of the legal system.
The Archbishop of Canter bury Dr Rowan Williams said in February that the adoption of some aspects of Sharia law seemed “unavoidable”.
8 thoughts on “Sharia works for some (Muslims)”
[Stephen Hockman] “reportedly added that the incorporation of Sharia could improve relations between faith groups and boost the countryâ€™s security.” (Jon Swaine – The Telegraph)
I never thought I would see Britain self-destruct to the point where I no longer care if it
stands or falls, but the home of the Westminster system is rapidly disintegrating, and not
a lot can be done to prevent it, if anyone could be bothered trying.
Stephen Hockman has got form for calling for sharia in the UK, probably noted in here at
the time … July 2008:
Former chairman of Britain’s Bar Council Stephen Hockman QC said last week that “It is vital and inevitable that sharia will become part of British law in some shape or form.
When are the British people going to rise up instead sitting there like lame ducks.
Start demonstrating with big masses in every city and town.
too busy watching reality TV. The population has been dumbed down to bovine stupidity.
I am all for it. Start in the British jails, where muzzies are 11% of the population, despite being only 1.5% of the general population. Cancel all those vicious Dhimi sentences like 2 years for rape and give them the good sharia inspired death sentence. Next onto thing like shoplifting, those stupid dhimis give a fine or warning if that, screw that nonsense, chop of the hand. The proper islamic practice is to dip the stump into hot oil, congeals the wound in seconds. The beauty with this system is that it could be put on pay per view and raise massive revenues. The more common punishment of lashing could also raise substantial revenue, which normal Englishman would not be willing to pay a quid for the privilege of applying a lash to some muzzie scum.
Mr Hockman should be removed from his job – he is clearly not capable of performing it.
Mr Hockman is contactable via email. Those who feel that Hockman should learn a little about what Islam and Sharia really mean should perhaps contact him.
Mr Hockman is entitled to his opinion and if he wants to sell his backside for money then so be it , who cares! However, advocating for a parallel legal system which is totally incompatible[light years away] with the British legal system, is no more than attempting to create division, which sooner or later is going lead to serious trouble. As such, it would be best if he reserved his right to remain silent.
Comments are closed.