Muslim Labour MP Predicts Total Islamification of Britain Within 30 Years

* Because nothing else matters. Because Islam must dominate and not be dominated. Because every Muslim is a soldier of Allah who is religiously obliged to make the world Islamic. Muslims do not invade Western countries to become Westerners, Muslims arrive on our shores to make US Islamic.

God Allah in the Holy Quran makes jihad a duty on the shoulders of every Muslim who is able to fight”

Labour Party MP Shahid Malik has predicted the total Islamification of Britain and a Muslim prime minister, “Allah willing”, within the next thirty years.

* Muslim Cleric Anjem Choudary Encourages Mus-lims to Hide Terror Evidence…

* UK: Head teacher wins £400,000 after false accusations of “racism” and “Islamophobia”

The remarks were made at the October 2008 “Global Peace and Unity” conference held at the Excel London centre, but were deliberately withheld from the video coverage released of that event.

The video speech in which Mr Malik made his remarks has now been released on the internet — nearly five months after the event.

The suppression of the video was clearly designed to try and limit the damage to the ruling Tory and Labour elite, whose immigration policies have led to the situation where a Muslim cabinet minister can confidently predict the total Islamification of this nation.

In his speech, Mr Malik said that he was “proud of the achievements of the Muslims of this country since 1997.”

Referring to Muslim members of the British parliament, himself included, Mr Malik went on to say that: “In 1997 we got our first Muslim MP. In 2001 we had two Muslim MPs. In 2005 we had four Muslim MPs. In Å¡a Allah, in 2009 (or) 2010 we’ll have eight or ten Muslim MPs. In 2014 we’ll have 16 Muslim MPs. At this rate the whole parliament will be Muslim.”

Mr Malik then realised that he had let the cat out of the bag by being too honest, and in an embarrassed tone, he backtracked slightly, saying that was not his intention “in case any members of the press are present.”

The crowd showed no signs of reacting to his remark, and, filled with confidence, he then resumed an explanation of how Britain is to be totally Islamified.

“I am confident, as Britain’s first Muslim minister, that, in Å¡a Allah, in the next thirty years or so, we’ll see a prime minister who happens to share my faith,” Mr Malik said, in reference to the growing Third World population and immigration figures.

The people of Britain cannot say that they have not been warned.

This nation will be Islamified unless the Tory and Labour parties are rejected and the British National Party comes to power.

Mr Malik has spelled it out: the Labour/Tory aim is the destruction of Britain within thirty years.

The BNP seeks the preservation of Britain.

The choice is for the British people to make. It will be either one or the other.


Labour has deliberately destroyed British National identity.

Labour hate, detest and fear the the English working class

‘The English are potentially very  aggressive, very violent” - Jack Straw

So this is what they’ve been doing for the past twelve years…

“…..replacing traditional pride with inherited guilt: all of this could be facilitated by a large influx of migrants whose presence in the population would require the wholesale deconstruction of the country’s sense of its own identity.”

“New Labour tide brought with it in the beginning: the contempt for history and the Year Zero arrogance with which they set about “modernising” the nation’s institutions.”

“But the subtext was always self-examination and personal guilt: the indigenous Briton must be trained (literally, by the education system) always to question the acceptability of his own attitudes, to cast doubt on his own motives, to condemn his own national identity and history, to accept the blame even for the misbehaviour of new migrants – whose conduct could only be a reflection of the unfortunate way they were treated by the host population.” - Green Arrow 

Hidden agenda

When the Labour control freaks came to power twelve years ago they had a secret agenda to destroy British identity and national pride, with Englishness as public enemy number one.At the time of their election victory, anyone who suggested that Labour were setting out on a deliberate campaign of nation-wrecking would have been regarded as a loony conspiracy theorist. But recently overwhelming evidence has emerged showing that this was their intention all along.

Politically motivated attempt to radically change the country
The first revelation of their hidden agenda came from Andrew Neather, a former government adviser

“The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”, according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

He said Labour’s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to “open up the UK to mass migration” but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its core working class vote.” - Telegraph

Secret policy paper proposed a cultural jihad against Britishness
Then, confirmation came from the release of the full text of the draft policy paper composed in 2000 by a Home Office research unit – the gist of which had already been made public by a former Labour adviser – released under Freedom of Information rules. It is political dynamite.What it states quite unequivocally was that mass immigration was being encouraged at least as much for “social objectives” as for economic ones. Migration was intended specifically to alter the demographic and cultural pattern of the country: to produce by force majeure the changes in attitude that the Labour government saw itself as representing.

Connecting the dots

Knowing what we do now, we can also make sense of a number of apparently disconnected events such as Jack Straw’s anti-English ravings and the demonisation of St George’s Day.

We can now see that the campaign to destroy our identity had (and still has) the following components:- Import huge number of Labour voting Muslim immigrants.

– Muslim immigrants are especially favoured because they areunassimilable and fast-breeding.

– The resultant population explosion will eventually destroy the countryside and much of Britain’s heritage, again helping to erode national pride and sense of identity.

– Give preferential cheap social housing to Muslims, while allowing the cost of commercial housing to rise astronomically. This makes finding a home and starting a family very difficult for the British working class.

– Denigrate all British achievements and history. Brainwash students with a sense of guilt about colonialism, slavery and the British Empire and completely airbrush British achievements out of history. This willultimately produce a nation obsessed with guilt and self-loathing.

– Wreck the educational system (while ensuring Labour MP’s own kids go to the best schools)

– Destroy all non-state controlled institutions where proles can meet and exchange unauthorised opinions (eg use of taxation and licensing legislation to destroy community centres such as pubs and village halls)

- Humiliate and demoralise the British working class by allowingaggressive Muslims unrestricted rights to attack and rape British children without risk of prosecution.

– All tensions are the result of inadequate community cohesion, which is the fault of the indigenous proles and must be remedied by vigorous brainwashing.

– Get the BBC (the Labour Party propaganda machine) to tell the British working class that they are worthless, while Muslims are the people of the future.

Cultural enrichment
Despite all the hype about cultural enrichment, this was never the intention. Tony B. Liar intended immigration to produce cultural impoverishment and inflict a very unpleasant experience on the hated indigenous proles, who would have ‘their noses rubbed in diversity’ like a puppy gets its nose rubbed into its doings – except that our noses are being rubbed into Tony B. Liar’s doings, and so will our chidren’s and grandchildren’s.

The government predicted that crime would rise, but nevertheless went ahead with their scheme of importing millions of implacably hostile jihadist predators and parasites.

Weak horse, strong horse
But what do Labour intend to do with the Muslims once they have outnumbered the British? Do they really think they can secularise them into good socialist citizens?

As Osama bin Laden said, if people have to choose between going with the strong horse or the weak horse, they will choose the strong horse. In Britain today Islam is the strong horse, and Labour’s Politically Correct Marxism is the knackered old nag. The Muslims are now getting numerous enough to know that Britain will soon be theirswithout the need to co-operate with a bunch of clapped out Marxist creeps.

The damage that Labour has inflicted is irreversible. They have planted a demographic timebomb which will only wreak its full devastation when the Muslims now being born (25% of all births in Britain and rising) reach adulthood:

To appease their post-colonial guilt and self-loathing, the Metropolitan Marxist Elite have allowed millions of jihad-crazed supremacist predators into the country. But it isn’t Tony B. Liar, Jack Strawman or Harridan Hormone who are getting their ‘noses rubbed in diversity’ – it’s the long-suffering English working class.

From the Salisbury review… 

“When one of my old Labour Party acquaintances expressed anxiety over Islamic terrorism, I asked him why he had always been so keen on getting as many immigrants here as possible. A case of foreigner good: Brit bad, immigrants had all the desirable qualities and every one of them would be a great asset to this country. He told me that he had been ‘trying to make the revolution’. So, while it had not been possible to storm Buckingham Palace and set up Soviets in Westminster, you could still change the population and supplant the hated ‘other’. Ironically, it happened that the flesh and blood other was not made up of filthy capitalists or parasitic aristocrats, but the ordinary working class people we had grown up among, and for and with whom, socialism would create a new world. […]

Throughout the decades of mass immigration the claim has ever been that migrants just take the jobs we do not want or cannot fill. In the ’60s and ’70s it was also the houses; I recall teenagers in a civics class shouting at a teacher who was trying to counter their toe-curling racism by saying that the Caribbeans moving into their streets were simply occupying houses nobody wanted. ‘We want them’, ‘we live in them’, ‘what’s wrong with them?’ the boys yelled.

What may have been wrong was that the indigenous population was not being divested of them fast enough in reparation for the sins of Empire. Labour MP Frank Dobson spoke to a mainly Bangladeshi audience in Tower Hamlets a few years ago and urged them to help themselves to benefits, education, services, housing and much, much more. All we had was rightfully theirs and we could never compensate enough for our past oppression. Dobson is one heir of that political alliance of the new left with minorities which became active in local politics from the mid 1970s. This alliance enabled white radicals to portray themselves as part of the international movement combating imperialism, with the world’s black and brown people, the downtrodden proletariat.

The New East End by Kate Gavron, Geoff Dench and Michael Young (Profile Books, £15.99) shows how life has changed over the last half century in the area of Family and Kinship in East London, since 1957. It is a dreadful story of dispossession. […]

Cooperation between the local authorities and ethnic leaders led to blocks of flats being set aside for Bangladeshi occupation, along with a substantial proportion of new and renovated housing. Provision has come to depend upon housing associations and co-operatives, through which the local authorities collaborate with central government and local residents. Attuned to cultural sensitivities, these provide six-bedroomed houses for men with multiple wives and many children; despite angry rants to the media about housing requirements being ignored.

Strong family connections, including ties to others in Bangladesh, are useful to demonstrate a need for housing that does not apply to existing citizens. These are hard-pressed to make any case for housing at all, and are said to ‘choose’ to move out. Unless, that is, they resort to ‘strategic single parenting’. Having a child unwed may be the only route for whites to the grail of council housing. Many engage in undisclosed cohabitation which they do not want to discuss in case they lose benefits; married couples live apart to maximise entitlements and families must make their offspring ‘homeless’ if they are to stand any chance of accommodation. Not only has there been decisive support for indigent outsiders, but antipathy to married, two-parent families.

The loss of local housing-control produced sink estates along with a crescendo of applications to enter the county. In one of the most rapid settlements ever to take place in Britain, wards of Tower Hamlets where Bangladeshi occupation was virtually nil in 1991 had 40 per cent or more in 2001, as population replacement spread to neighbouring boroughs like Newham and (now) Ilford and Barking. Bangladeshi children made up one third of primary school pupils in 1981 and two thirds by 2004, as extra resources were pumped into schools with names like Bangabandhu to help minority children.

Bangladeshi respondents in The New East End recount how nobody in London has to worry where the next meal is coming from, how if you do not have a job ‘they give you money’, how you ‘can have somewhere to live, without any rent’, how your ‘children can go to school’ and, even then, they still ‘give you money’. Omitted from the text is a further observation that you are paid to have as many children as you like.

When means-tested welfare benefits increase with the number of children, they produce a very high worklessness rate. Nationally, the proportion of working age people living in workless households is highest for Pakistani and Bangladeshi groups, at 27.4 per cent in 2004, compared with 10.9 per cent for whites (where lone motherhood is concentrated). Muslims have the highest male unemployment rate at 13 per cent; three times the rate for Christian men at 4 per cent. Add to this an ‘inactivity’ rate of 31 per cent. These men are purportedly ill or disabled, as are a high proportion of Bangladeshi women, who also draw disability benefits for various mental problems. Such disparities in benefit receipt by ethnic groups raise many questions about collusion and validation, and just how much assessment is possible through the burka and in the face of ethnic awareness and anti-discrimination strictures.

With their habitat gone, there are many fewer whites in family households; the average number of children in a Bangladeshi household is more than seven times that in a white household. This helped increase the population of Tower Hamlets by 45 per cent in twenty years (national growth rate, 6 per cent). The decline in white children is steeper in Tower Hamlets than anywhere else in the country. White families are in direct competition with immigrants for scarce resources and services, especially housing and education. Those who remain often last only to the point of school transfer at eleven. Fewer children mean fewer relatives generally. Family ties no longer give white people access to those who control local resources, or links to jobs and housing. Men are no longer organised into socially useful lives as husbands and fathers, so the proportion of unwed births and lone parents among whites is also among the highest in the country, when these were lowest in the first half of the twentieth century.

A double victory for leftists and a double whammy for the white working class, who have seen their family structure smashed and their locality colonised. Highly educated ‘yuppies’ can move around freely, occupationally and geographically, and can take a high-minded view, since they are not in competition with anybody for local resources, not least because they are usually childless. Instead they can enjoy the sense of belonging to a ‘vibrant’ cosmopolitan community without any demands being made on them. It is like being on ‘one big foreign holiday’ as you eulogise — like Richard Morrison in The Times — about the cheap labour and wonderful restaurants.

The whites who oppose the rhetoric of need and rights and resent the loss of their locality are mocked as pathological inadequates who are incapable of living alongside people different from themselves. Use of the racist card both suggests that there is something wrong with the people who feel hostile and avoids the real issues. Promoting cohesion is only ever understood one way: combating white racism. No adjustment is ever demanded of newcomers who live inward-looking lives organised around a religious culture which grants little respect or merit to anyone else’s. Unlike now, immigrants had to work hard to get full admission to the nation where incorporation meant forging ties with the members of the national majority.

Middle class leftists do not learn from history and have instead been drawn by their sympathies into consolidating the rights of minorities against indigenous whites. By 1998, more whites were reporting themselves as victims of racial incidents than were reported as perpetrators. Harassment on estates has been defined by council officials in ways which effectively condones any behaviour by Bangladeshis as ‘defensive’, while white tenants are threatened with the loss of their home or delays in dealing with their claims. The fear of municipal victiminisation prevented some respondents speaking fully to the New East End researchers. In education, the bulk of conflict management is directed at white parents. As schools have become more Bangladeshi, most entrants and their parents do not speak English.

These people have been disinherited and disenfranchised and go unrepresented in a way that contravenes the basic rules of our democracy. While an elected representative is supposed to represent all those in his area, many in Tower Hamlets make it clear that they are only there for the Bangladeshis who vote them in.

Funds from the European Union to build a community centre are used to build a mosque instead. There are provisions for ‘mother tongue’ teaching to make immigrants feel at home. But when one non-Bangladeshi councillor entered a classroom to an abusive reception, he found the lesson devoted — not to Bengali — but to the development of Muslim identity around Arabic. The Muslim boys’ secondary schools are bottom for the borough; not surprising because at east a third of lesson-time is devoted to memorising the Koran. The segregation and disadvantage imposed on pupils can be blamed on them being denied chances by white racism. […]

Galloway’s Islamofascism represents the growing identity of immigrants as members of the ummah or the worldwide community of Muslims. The old Bengali Islam, softened by local Hinduism and the Sufi tradition, is giving way to jihadist Iranian and Arab models. Its integration, not into mainstream British society, but into militant Islam, is increasingly accompanied by calls for autonomous Muslim areas governed by Sharia law. The mechanisms for government funding have already encouraged local councils to take in more immigrants than their boroughs could cope with and there is not the space for Banglatowns to expand at the same pace — whether in London or elsewhere. Yet, the influx continues, not least as spouses are brought in from the homeland — which sets integration back another generation. Many on the left still embrace untrammelled immigration and insist that the houses, education and benefits can always be found for the millions who would substantially improve their chances by coming here.

The implications for security, not just national cohesion, are terrifying. There is a growing drift into a welfare dependency shared with the lower reaches of the white population whose own lives are shrivelled by the rights culture. What opens up is the kind of prospect we see in the Middle East, where unoccupied, testosterone-fuelled young men, succoured on welfare, spend their time banging guns and making babies. Those antagonistic to their own people and society are eagerly fostering the emergence of a state within a state.

Yes, Mr Dobson, they came, they saw and they are taking it.

46 thoughts on “Muslim Labour MP Predicts Total Islamification of Britain Within 30 Years”

  1. Islam is going to push western society into a situation that Muslims will regret. This is the slow burning fuse that with their actions the Islamists and the so-called moderates by their inaction have lit. As the old saying goes be careful what you wish for. This WILL come back and bite you hard. The Islamists are saying that western society is weak and dysfunctional, this is far from the truth. Western societies functions on trust, yes trust something that is in short supply in the Muslim world. We go about our daily lives with a civic sense of duty, yes we have criminality but that is dealt with by the courts, unfortunately not well enough on many occasions. But when a society as ours is threatened with an erosion of it’s core values it will galvanize. So Islamists and the people within your “religion” who you bully into submission, it is time that you had take a long hard look at your collective ambitions. If this so-called caliphate of Sharia “law” is your wish, then you must realise that your total DEFEAT will be your only reward!

  2. “allah” won’t get much say, whether is willing or not. The two dominant systems will be
    Mystery, Babylon the Great (which may or may not be islamic) and her “lover”, the Beast
    whose number is 666, who will at first respect her, and then utterly destroy her. Islam
    is doomed.

  3. Methinks Mr Malik presumes far too much, too soon.

    There is no such thing as fate. There is no such thing as kismet. Under YHWH, the Holy One, the future remains open. Anything can happen – and most probably will. It seems perfectly possible to me that, by the grace of the true and living God, reawakening courage in people’s hearts and clarity in their minds, that within thirty years every single Muslim currently in the UK will either have apostasised or been summarily evicted.

    “It is he who says not Kismet, it is he who knows not Fate/ It is Richard, it is Raymond, it is Godfrey in the gate” …G K Chesterton, ‘The Battle of Lepanto’.


  5. Lionheart,

    “But when a society as ours is threatened with an erosion of it’s core values it will galvanize. ”

    As we saw when the biggest crowds since VE Day crowded to welcome the soldiers back in response to the Muslim protest against them.

  6. ملك شاهد (“Martyr King”) is Parliamentary undersecretary of state, Ministry of Justice:

    “In 1997 we got our first Muslim MP. In 2001 we had two Muslim MPs. In 2005 we had four Muslim MPs. Insh’Allah, in 2009 or 2010 we’ll have eight or ten Muslim MPs. In 2014 we’ll have 16 Muslim MPs. At this rate the whole parliament will be Muslim.

    “I am confident, as Britain’s first Muslim minister, that, insh’Allah, in the next thirty years or so, we’ll see a Prime Minister who happens to share my faith.”

    This video is from the Global Peace and Unity conference in London in October, 2008, but was edited out of the official video record of the event.

    Malik is the MP for Dewsbury.

    Lady Sayeeda Warsi is the Conservative Baroness of Dewsbury.

    Something strange (I say sarcastically, as I’ll explain forthwith …) is that few people are reposting or commenting on this video. I see it hasn’t even been mentioned on Jihad Watch or Atlas Shrugs or almost any of the so-called “anti-jiahdis” or whatever the term might be.

    One of those fools from Muslims Against Sharia posted it here, until I pointed out to him that Malik is more liberal than Obama or Pelosi or Bliar or Brown:

    He even apologised for getting upset at Malik, after how pointed out how queer-friendly and infanticidal Malik is.

    It’s not even in the news in the UK as far as I can tell.

    So there you have it. UK 100% Muslim: “No Problem”

    Now obviously the likes of Robert Spencer and Melanie Phillips, and Muslims like Pamela Gellar, you know, people who have no problem with so-called “Moderate Muslims”, people who oppose a ban on Muslim immigration, couldn’t possibly be upset about Mr Malik’s prediction, because Mr Malik is the perfect image of the thoroughly modern “Moderate Muslim”, truly Western and therefore ”enlightened” progressive.

    Naturally Mr Malik would hope that it is the will of Allah that the UK be completely Islamicized. He’s a Muslim. Why would he be opposed to that?

    [BTW, Malik had the highest expenses of any MP in 2006-2007: £185,421]

    Mr Moderate Muslim Malik:

    – Opposes anti-British Muslims
    – Opposes extremism and “Islamism”
    – Opposes Sharia law
    – Is against “Islamist” terrorism
    – Wants British Muslims to be moderate and to participate peacefully and productively in Western society
    – Is a secularist
    – Is pro-abortion
    – Was and is in favour of British participation in the Afghan War
    – Opposed British paryicipation in the Iraq War, but also opposes any investigation, and unreservedly supports British troops
    – Supports and fights for Queer Rights
    – Is opposed to all forms of racism
    – Was a member of the Commission for Racial Equality in Northern Ireland (a “Moderate Muslim” keeping those intolerant and irredentist Paddies in line)
    – Is an NSPCC [National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty against Children] parliamentary advisor
    – Is campaigning for St George’s Day to be made a national holiday in England [“St George’s Day provides a unique opportunity to celebrate collective Englishness, to take pride in heritage and to highlight the values which define modern England, such as honesty, fairness, tolerance, enterprise and equality”]
    – Delivered the keynote speech at a National Holocaust Centre memorial event,
    – Opposes antisemitism
    – Supports embryonic stem-cell research
    – Is a campaigner against Domestic Violence
    – Opposes religious schools and is in favour of strengthening the secular public school system
    – Claims he is a pacifist and opposes “extremist” politicians such as the BNP
    – Believes the UK should be “One Nation”
    – Opposes “preferential treatment or positive discrimination or political correctness”
    – Has been a keynote speaker at events organised by the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in an effort to tackle extremism and defeat terrorism
    – Is opposed to efforts to withhold IVF treatment for single women and lesbians,
    – Opposed a Muslim teacher a Dewsbury primary school who claimed she was being discriminated against because she was not allowed to wear a niqab while teaching young children
    – Calls for the swift removal of failed asylum seekers

    So, on what grounds could all these people who claim they only oppose “Islamism” and “Radical Islam” [including the predominantly Zionist Jewish group calling itself “Muslims Against Sharia”, whose motto is “Islam is Peace, Light and Love”] now upset with Mr Moderate Muslim Malik? It wouldn’t make sense.

    He should be their Dream Muslim.

    Malik’s record is here and here.,,-8710,00.html

  7. No, I have to disagree. The islamists have nothing going for them, and people will start throwing them out if they push hard enough. What has to be done is the removal of the NullLabor social engineers from the halls of political power. Vote them out Britain – they are selling your country – they are the biggest PRESENT danger.

  8. Akira, im going to assume you have never heard of the second Jihad movement, known as a Fatah movement…. where muslems move in as diplomatic in order to take over a country systematicaly taking advantage of the peoples laws and tollerance for outsiders. Make no mistake about it, when muslems move in, violence will follow. The ultimate goal for Islam is Slavery or death of all infidels. You need only to look at what is happening in Africa. If Islam fundamentalists had it their way, the world would be a slave to their Ideology. Thank God Jesus will rule from Jeruslame!

  9. Randy,
    you are correct – but there seems to be a critical point which occurs when the muslims exceed a certain percentage of the total population. This is why the best solution is to limit the growth rate of the muslim population – and the most effective way is to restrict their abuse of social welfare and prevent massive muslim immigration. Violence is the last alternative and I am pretty certain that this problem can be nipped in the bud without resorting to violence. However, in undertaking any action to protect our sovereign rights, the muslim radical will almost certainly resort to violence. The last sentence is justified when one analyses current problem areas in the globe where violence in endemic – ie NW Frontier, Kashmir, etc

  10. Islam–the religion of peace will kill you if you leave the religion of peace. period.

    Multiculturism is coming crashing down in Britain upon the British people. Blood will flow through the street of every major british city as muslims will eventually push the infedel too far.

    British citizens will first get the hold of the elected leaders that promoted multiculturism and behead them like they did in the old times, then deal with the muslims.
    This will happen its just about time as all the liberal politicans are themselves taking a walk backward upon see the cancer call islam. Infact, they are scared to talk openly about islam as they promoted it and now cannot walk away as the British people will get them.

  11. The Religion of ISLAM is a LOCUST.
    The true locusts cause great damage to crops wherever they swarm. Control measures include the spreading of poison bait and the plowing under of locust eggs. Infestations threatening large regions of Britain and EU are combated with insecticides sprayed by planes and truck-mounted mist blowers provided by joint federal-state programs.

    They tend to destroy countries that feed them,nature them and eventually be swallowed up by them. These locusts will not stop for the federal-state programs and given them that right and even threathens the Monarchy (the queen of England)
    So long Britain, have a great ride in ISLAM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  12. kaw,

    I am the first one to support tighter immigration controls. In fact I am very much apposed to open and easy immigration between any country because when out of control (as it is now) puts a cultural and social-security strain on the recipient countries that obviously the economically depressed countries wish to go to.

    Though history has proven that cultures will eventually change slowly to various modifications from the interaction and introduction of others, doing so quickly is simply creates mayhem and an increase in local radicalism. In fact this is what has spurned the radical right and other nationist groups and is the catalyst for the creation of agenda groups and bloggers (with this blog as the perfect example).

    I never have a problem when anyone, say in the UK arguing that immigration is going to far and to fast – it is, and without the necessary protection and controls of vetting and demanding appropriate integration (not assimiliation).

    Having said that, the question comes to those countries that are in themselves immigrant based, such as the US, Canada, Australia and NZ? There argument should be based on the collective result of morality and standards, and they should avoid the word culture altogether – a thought anyhow, what do you think?

  13. a quiet war led by scholors using our laws to benefit there selves in our country, but we british will only take so much wont be the first civil war we do bite god bless.

  14. I wish to report to you a case of the most serious crime in the world.

    Against the Geneva Convention Ethnocide and United Nations Indigenous Peoples Rights to Identity and Culture.

    This is a case of Ethnocide and it is happening here and now in the United Kingdom.

    Labours plan of uncontrolled immigration policy has come to light and this can be proven in the statistics.

    Wikipedia lists and explains exactly the Crime of Ethnocide.

    Attacks On Culture and Displacement.

    Put simply it is the cleansing or minoritising of an indigenous population by methods other than mass extermination.
    It is a fact that by 2070 the immigrant population will be ahead of the indigenous peoples of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
    This is a Crime against humanity according to the Geneva Convention it is an equivalent crime to Genocide and is a form of ethnic Cleansing.

    I am reporting this crime to every agency in the UK to expose this crime to the British People.

    Take action Now! Reveal this Labour Plot because the hunt is on for the conspiracy that exists between labour and conservative politicians who have plotted this treason.


    [Your name Here]

    I have emailed this matter to hundreds of important people, If they ignore it and take no action then surely they by default become an accomplice to the crime.
    Organisations, QC’s, Barristers, Solicitors, Members Of Parliament, The Hague, The United Nations.

    As an Englishman, along with thousands of others we have been displaced and made to feel inferior in our own land we will have a website shortly so that the whole world can see what is being done to us. THE FIGHT BACK HAS BEGUN.

    Open Your Eyes And See Before it Is Too Late!

    IPCC Complaint Made.
    Crimes Reported to West Midlands Police and Metropolitan Police.

  15. Hi there,

    I’d like to ask Professor Dawkins to have a debate with a great scholar of Islam and Comparative religions Dr Zakir Naik of India who can prove Evolutionism wrong by the will of Allah with scientific facts regarding the issue “Creation or Evoltionism”

    Please arrange with MCB (Muslim Council of Britain) Sir Iqbal Sacranie OBE (or) (or) to arrange this friendly debate to know each other’s view points

    Many Thanks

  16. islamification of Britain, bullsh*t, you watch as the UK and other western nations start civil wars and wipe out these terrorist basta*ds. Allah and the Quran is bullsh*t made up by braindead morons trying to control people. I for one will pick up a weapon and kill any muslim that tries to force me or my family to become muslims. You want to live in an islamic state then fu*k off back to the islamic sh*thole you can from!

  17. I Think Jo Cleary deserves the MBE or OBE for helping keep the dirt from the streets of Wootton Bassett…The dirt who wanted to march are just a bunch of extremist idiots hell bent on destroying our society and freedom. They take the tax free hand outs from our goverment and the complain about how we live..Dont they know our mothers and fathers fought two wold wars to help give the world its freedom that includes Africa, Asia and North Africa..Things would not be so good for them had Britain lost the last world war..Mr H would have sorted the scum out.

  18. Its been to long coming but i still await the nothings from the muslim planet,so they can be wiped from history again long live the pig

  19. Nazir,
    I very much doubt that your idiotic muslim scholar can prove evolution “wrong”. Actually, your email strongly suggests that you understand little about what evolution is so one is left with the question – why are you trying to arrange a debate which you will loose? You are probably trying to bring this muslim cretin into the UK under false pretence – no thanks. Why is it that you muslim scum are universally mindless dolts whose sole purpose in life is pleasing the figment of a pedophile arabs imagination?? You are the most selfish cretins around!!!

  20. Let them in their confidence expose themselves for what they really are and what they really believe, that way we dont have to resort to expensive surveys and undercover bunny to know who they are and who to arrest when their overconfidence leads them to underestimate theyre enemy the host population of this country which last time I looked was still in the majority.

  21. Lets gather as the great society that we are and have been…Long live the free western world and to hell with Islam…Let God drown them all and stop the finacial support……NO SURRENDER

  22. How come this weekend their is a ralley in Bradford by the EDL and the police state that noone is allowed to cover their face. Does this also apply to muslims men and women?….

  23. it is no coincidense that the more secular the western world has become the more tolerant and fair it has become. this is not just islam it is all religions. no one can even proove that a god exists yets there are people willing to kill others and fight to the death to be accepted by god. these people are unintellagent and brainwashed and the sooner we become a secular world the sooner we will have world peace and the faster we will advance. if you are a relious person willing to defend these mind shrinking views with no scientific proof by saying religion is good for the world then here is something to ponder- far more people have been pursecuted and killed in the name of god than in the name of hitler,pol pots, and sadam hussein put together. god does not exist! if im wrong proove it.

  24. Lets not forget 9/11 a nd what the scum did to the free world…murderers not saviors….GOD BLESS AMERICA….

  25. Here we go again. What the f**k are algerians doing in Great Britain ?. Its the holy Fathers visit the last time 28 years ago and what do the scum want to do BLOW HIM UP , Blow him up in London where this great country of ours has given them sanctury and emplyment ( plus no doubt benefits). If you dare say anything about the Quran they are out burning flags in thousands but they can try to assassinate a holy father of the christian relegion…I say its time to gather and make our voices heard…If we allow this to continue without protest, it will keep happening until it becomes a civil war ( and that we don not want). We need strength and leadership to organise future protest and I hope someone out there will agree with me..We should all be outside the algerian embassy this morning protesting at what their country men had try to carry out………EL CID……………………

  26. I have just read a copy of the Daily Mail dated 27th Sept10 ( in the christian year). Pages 20 and 21 contain a story headed TOP SUPERMARKETS SECRETLY SELL HALA L. it goes on to list all the main supermarkets and fast food outlets selling halal chicken and lamb. Most sell only halal meat, why?. It states it is part of sharia with the animal having its throat cut while the slaugtherman resites an islamic prayer ” BISMILLAH ALLAH-HU-AKBAR meaning in the name of allah, who is the greatest ( SO THEY SAY). Why have we changed our traditional ways of slaughtering animals, was it on
    any political parties manifesto, because I wouldnt vote for a party that agreed with this change or are we all thinking of changing religion to Islam. Do the indigenous population mean nothing to this country anymore…You can not blame the islamic population for these changes only the goverment that allowed them to enter and the suppliers who want to profit out of them. My old Mum and Dad would turn in theor graves if they knew the state of this country. We are approaching winter with Christmas around the corner, are we going to be allowed to say MERRY CHRISTMAS ? and when we all sit down to our dinner are we eating christian or islamic meat?….Come on gather…………..EL CID

  27. NO! Britain will fight this till the end. The day we have Muslim prime minister is the day democracy and equal rights end.

  28. PETRAS…We are on the same side thak GOD ( not Allah). We need more people like you.Rally your friends, brothers, sisters, cousins to help keep the islamic wolf from our doorsteps. In the last 100 years this country has survived two world wars bombings by the IRA. Our troops fought accross North Africa and gave these people freedom and what do they give us back. Disease, members of their lazy society claiming benefit, and a religion out of date with the Western world of freedom that we live in…Say no to Sharia and say yes to NO SURRENDER>>>>>EL CID

  29. The secret is to destroy the left wing appeasers – remove them from power. Without them islam is nothing.

  30. Petras and Kaw, Thank god for people like you. Paying attention to what is happening to our society….Black and White unite in a free world…Say no to Sharia and yes to NO SURRENDER EVER…EL CID

  31. Here we go again…10.11.10 the lefty students go to the streets of London campaining along with their comy soap dodging mates and are treated with kid gloves. the Boy Scouts could have done a better job of taking care of bypassers ( windows getting smashed threataning behavior) no probs just another day…If it was the EDL or any other group against militant ISLAM the old bill would be out like a riot force..What is going on in this mad mad country???……..Come on BILL COME ON BILL its on your door step aswell…..EL CID…A posh mate of mine said have you seen the EDL members (meaning shaved heads and tatoos)..I said yes the same people on the terraces on a sturdays football and working in factories and building sites…NO SURRENDER EVER!!!!!

  32. What is being done to protect the Christian people of Iraq and other middle east and African countries..Cathedrals being burn, people being killed while in prayer and the United Nations not doing a thing about it..When it was Yugoslavia it was in the papers every day..O and sorry these are peace loving people . Say a wrong thing about Islam and its all off…Come on brothers and sisters keep in touch …EL CID

  33. Those people who made a noise during the silence of 11.11.11 in central London arnt Brithish…Kick them out along with their families who are all on benefit..

  34. Agreed El Cid – get as many people to go there and just drown them out with your chants. It is time these idiots make a choice – accept the sovereign laws of the UK or piss of back to an arab mud hole.

  35. Ive emailed the Royal Borough 0f Kensington and Chelsea. I rang them first and asked was it an offence to burn (small) items of garden or houshold contents in or on the highway. They said it was and that if I did I would be prosocuted. That being the case I asked have any members of the Islamic group who burnt the poppy on been prosocuted and if not why?. I await their reply. Also I reminded them that petrol or similar was used to ignite the fire on the footpath. What were the heath and safety requirments for this……Pleas keep on with me over this issue…

  36. Sorted..two muzzies charged and are on bail for the poppy burning(slags)….Got t youtube and tap in muslims chase the police ….scum bags them and the old bill……then watch GEORGE (ISLAM)GALLOWAY being interviewed what a wally you are GALLOWAY you traitor…. NO SURRENDER EVER to islam

  37. This country is doomed…….because of the native Britton has been persecuted to such an extent and anyone these days who utters the word immigrant is regarded a racist and before he /she knows it has the whole country against them. This is a democratic country of free speech apparently were you can’t have your own say as it ‘incites racial tention’ how come only white british people can incite racial tention and people wo burn poppies can’t ? Too long have the English public sat back, getting lazy and only complaining and doing nothing about the problems we face, but what will be done nothing. SO EITHER DO SOMETHING OR SHUT UP MOANING OK!

  38. I have no objection to muslims found guilty of crimes receiving the death penalty. I have no objection to muslims being put on ships and dumped in saudi arabia. I have no objection to muslims being removed from all regions of the planet except Saudi Arabia (where they came from–all other regions are occupied). I have no objection to muslim dictatorships being denied trade and their citizens starved into peaceful submission. I have no objections to the destruction of arab and muslim culture, of their languages, of their heritage, of the people themselves. And if any Christian or Hindu or Sikh or Buddhist (remember Tibet) does similar they should receive the same solution.

    I want to live in peace, I want a future for everyone. NO RELIGION.

  39. Sorry, Muzzrat girl but I think you will find it is your interbred, sub-human parasite peers ,that are the paedophiles. And the only people going to burn in hell are the likes of you for following a false prophet. I piss on your quran, and wipe my infidel arse on every shit bestowed page.

Comments are closed.