Naming the Enemy

According to Muhammad, a Muslim’s only sure path to paradise is Jihad.

(FrontPage Magazine)

Even before President Barack Obama assumed office, the liberal media embarked upon a massive effort to attribute the phenomena of suicide bombings to anything other than Islam. Now that Obama has begun to place his mark on the conflict formerly known as the “War on Terror” and the activities of those formerly known as “Jihadists,” these efforts have only gotten farther off of the mark. More>>

Michelle Obama?  “she’s not outright dumb….”Affirmative Action is far more harmful than admission of rich kids whose parents donated money.

“Nothing to do with Islam” links:

Fear of Muslim mob rioting growing

Call for action against Muslim sect over mega-mosque site

FBI Partners With Muslim Jihad Groups

Why did Brits waste an SAS commando for dense NYT reporter?

One dead para, one dead translator, two dead civilians: Why DID Brown authorise raid to save reporter who ignored warnings?

Siesta at the New York Times

Tim Blair

The New York Times explains why it missed the Van Jones Commie Truther story:

One reason was that our Washington bureau was somewhat short-staffed during the height of the pre-Labor Day vacation period.

The bureau evidently remained short-staffed for some considerable period.

Danish People’s Party wants stricter immigration rules

Bangladesh Destroys Hinduism, Buddhism (Seoul Times)
“Today all minorities face persecution and alienation in Bangladesh and Pakistan because of the role of radical Islam and natural Islamization based on discrimination and persecution.”

Demoting Islam’s Religion Status (Citizen Warrior)
“Islam is the antithesis of what we deem to be religious.”

Tundra Tabloids: Ad against mosques arouses indignation


Muslim woman Pleads with French panel for burqa ban

The Needle Jihad: Syringe Stabbing

Remember the Chinese Muslims (Uighurs) released from Gitmo here and here? Just an FYI.

Syringe Jihad in China. “China: Demonstrators demand security after needle attacks,” from CNN, September 3 (thanks to all who sent this in): Robert has this

5,000 Pakistani Hindus Flee Forced Conversions, Kidnappings, Rape

Thailand: Islamists Shoot, Set Fire to Three Buddhists…

Cleric Claims to Change Snakes into Men…

(US) Shots Fired into Muslim Family’s Oregon Home…

‘Muhammad’ Third Most Popular Boy’s Name in Britain…

UK: Army Outraged After British Soldier Killed Rescuing NYT Reporter Who Was Repeatedly Warned Not to Enter Taliban Stronghold….

“Dutch Jews suffered tenfold increase in anti-Semitic attacks during Gaza war”

10 thoughts on “Naming the Enemy”

  1. FrontPage Magazine – well that already shoots down the value.

    “According to Muhammad, a Muslim’s only sure path to paradise is Jihad.”

    Yes, Islam says that those that sacrifice their lives in a defensive struggle against those attacking Islam will be given the highest of honors of a direct one-way ticket to heaven.

    But of course, terrorism and unlawful jihad is a crime and such jihad is not sanctioned nor is is what was talked about. In fact Jihad has now the dubvious honor of being used, declared and mentioned more on the internet by western agenda-based bloggers than by any Muslims.

  2. FrontPage Magazine – well that already shoots down the value.

    Mohammedanism, Islam, Koran, Solkhar- well that already shoots down the value.

    See how absurd and childish your rants are, Solki?

    As for the rest of your drivel, I beg to differ. There are tens of millions of young Mohammedans worldwide who understand their Islam and their jihad correctly. And the recent debate by the highest ranking Islamic clerics supports once again jihad and suicide bombing.

    The ball is in your court, Solker troll: go ahead and straighten them out. Surely they must all be on the wrong path if ony you understand jihad and Islam correctly?

  3. “And the recent debate by the highest ranking Islamic clerics supports once again jihad and suicide bombing.”

    Oh you mean that posting of yours that are not sanctioned by any of the Five Schools of Islam but by individual clerics of known radical leanings?

    1. I ask you once again:

      Name ONE Islamic cleric of standing who unequivocally denounces the jihad ideology and the hateful 164 jihad verses in the Koran!

      Waiting, solker. Waiting!

      Notwithstanding that the Five Schools of Islam have never renounced violent jihad and the subjugation of unbelievers, the central command to wage war against the world until it is ruled by the religion of allah comes from the inventor of Mohammedanism himself. How can you question his authority, solker troll!

  4. Yes it would be good for the NYT reporter to spend some time (maybe 10 or 20 years?) with jihadist Mohammadans. His capture may have been a set-up also, that’s been done before.

  5. Solkhar the blasphemer: “Yes, Islam says that those that sacrifice their lives in a defensive struggle against those attacking Islam will be given the highest of honors of a direct one-way ticket to heaven.”

    Solkhar, you attack “my version” of the Gospel, but acknowledge a
    counterfeit that offers a one-way ticket to heaven. This is what God
    has to say about islam’s counterfeit, and any other:

    No Other Gospel

    I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned! As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be eternally condemned!

    Any muslim listening to the lies and blasphemies of the “angel gabriel”, allah, Mo and Solkhar will find that there is only one
    Gospel by which people might be saved. “Jihad” doesn’t cut it,
    whether declared by five schools of islam, or not.

    Flee from islam and its counterfeit gospel, Solkhar. Run for your life.

  6. “Name ONE Islamic cleric of standing who unequivocally denounces the jihad ideology and the hateful 164 jihad verses in the Koran!”

    First ask a legitimate question and not a incorrectly worded one. There are no hateful 164 jihad versus in the Qur’an. There are 164 references to events in the 7th century and a message that in defence of Islam if under violent attack that it is an obligation to all Muslims.

    Give a real question and I will answer, in fact you still have not, even the 10 pathetic attempts were weak and pathetic attempts on trying to be smart – from someone who says that the Qur’an was made 200 years later…. So give us a real logical question.

    Waiting, blog-owner. Waiting!

  7. “First ask a legitimate question and not a incorrectly worded one.”

    Ladies & gentlemen, meet the solker troll, self-appointed moderator @ WoJ! Are you the ‘decider’ now who decides what a legitimate question and an incorrectly worded one is, solker?

    The Koran, guidebook for perpetual warfare to be emulated by a billion Muhammad worshipers around the world, is no more than a history book: (when it suits)

    solker sez:

    “There are no hateful 164 jihad versus in the Qur’an. There are 164 references to events in the 7th century and a message that in defence of Islam if under violent attack that it is an obligation to all Muslims.”

    But here is the central command from the boss of Islam himself, Muhammad:

    [2.193] And fight with them until there is no persecution, (oppression) and religion should be only for Allah, but if they desist, then there should be no hostility except against the oppressors.


    Muslims are ALWAYS under “attack”. The existence of unbelievers and Jews calls for jihad because muslims feel oppressed. Infidel rule over moslems is oppressive to moslems. Cartoons are an attack on moslems. A torn Koran is an attack on moslems. This blog is an attack on moslems. Resisting the spread of Islam is an attack on moslems. The jihad is permanent and relentless, but always “defensive”, except when its not.

    The Koran’s 164 Jihad Verses

    The jihad ideology and the impact of Mohammedanism in India:

    The “Holy” Text and Terror – S. Gurumurthy

    “Wait only for five minutes from now! Wait for the Mujahideen and
    Fidayeen of Islam who will make you feel the terror of Jihad. And stop them if
    you can. Feel the havoc cast into your hearts by Allah, the Almighty, face His
    Dreadful Punishment, and suffer the results of fighting the Muslims and the
    Mujahideen. Await the anguish, agony, sorrow and pain. Await, only for 5
    minutes, to feel the fear of death.” Within minutes of this e-mail finding
    its way into media computers, the Jihadi bombs in Ahmedabad blew to smithereens
    over 50 persons. By the time terror hit Ahmedabad, such e-mails had become the
    pattern. The mails came ahead of the blasts in Jaipur and Bengaluru earlier.
    Also now in Delhi which was blasted on Sept 13. All in the name of Indian
    Mujahideen. See how, in its Ahmedabad
    mail, the jihadi outfit unveils its Islamic agenda against the Hindus – read India.

    “O Hindus!….Haven’ t you still realised that the falsehood of your 33
    crore mud idols and the blasphemy of your deaf, dumb, mute and naked idols of
    ram, krishna and hanuman are not going to save your necks, Insha-Alla, from
    being slaughtered by our hands? Nor is your fictitious faith in monkeys, pigs
    and nude statutes going to save you from the Wrath of Allah and His Humiliating
    Punishment. Know that it is only the true confession of the Oneness of Allah
    Alone, with no associates, that can save your blood from being spilled on the
    streets of your own cities. We call you, O Hindus, O enemies of Allah, to take
    an honest stance with yourselves lest another attack of Ibn-e-Qasim sends
    shivers down your spines, lest another Ghauri shakes your foundations, and lest
    another Ghaznawi massacres you, proving your blood to be the cheapest of all
    mankind! Have you forgotten your history full of subjugation, humiliation, and
    insult? Or do you want us to repeat it again? Take heed before it is too

    The IM goes further, quotes the most fundamental document, the Quran,
    to validate its theological stand. “Yes! We – the terrorists of India –
    THE INDIAN MUJAHIDEEN, – the militia of Islam whose each and every Mujahid belongs to
    this very soil of India – have returned, to execute the compulsion of Allah:
    “Fight them (the disbelievers) , Allah will punish them by your hands and
    bring them to disgrace, and give you victory over them and He will heal the
    hearts of those who believe.” (Qur’an 9:14). It goes on to quote: “Fight
    those disbelievers who are near you and let them find harshness in you”. (Qur’an 9: 123).
    “Go forth light armed or heavy armed and fight with your wealth and your
    lives in the way of Allah”.[(Qu’ran 9: 41).

    So the IM claim is simply this: we are doing what the Quran commands us to do
    against the non-believers, namely those who do not believe in Islam. The
    jihadis have openly challenged the pure Islamic theologians to deny that the
    position it takes against the Hindus is not the position of pure Islam. No
    Islamic theological school, not a single Mulla or Moulvi has shown the guts to
    tell the jihadis that non-believers in Quran do not mean non-Muslims. The Islamist
    scholars have kept deafening silence. The jihadis have thus effectively shut
    the Islamists’ mouth by quotes from the holy Quran.

    But what about the secularists? The terrorists are misguided youths, angered by
    the Hindu outfits in Gujarat and elsewhere, they would counsel. The grievances
    of the terrorists need to be addressed, they would pontificate, to dissuade
    them from the wrong path. But what the seculars miss is that the jihadis claim,
    on the basis of their faith, the right to kill ordinary Hindus. Do the seculars
    have the guts to ask the Islamic scholars to come out and deny that the theological
    position of Islam is not what the terrorists claim it to be? But, not
    surprisingly, not a single secular media or editor, nor any political party or
    leader would dare ask why the Islamic theologians are silent on the terrorists’
    view of the holy book. What has their grievance against Hindu outfits or the
    governments to do with their claim that Islam mandates them to attack
    non-Muslims? The real issue is whether the Islamic faith mandates so. If the
    jihadis are aggrieved then they can take to violence against the state.
    Terrorism normally isolates the terrorists from the mainstream society. But
    when the terrorists claim that they have been directed by their Holy Text to
    kill people of other faiths and that view is not challenged by the mainstream scholars
    or the secularists, then the terrorists cannot be isolated. This is what the
    seculars seem to have preferred to miss out.

    Thus neither have the mainstream Islamic scholars challenged the jihadi’s view
    that their holy text authorizes them to kill the non-believers nor have the
    secularists asked the mainstream Islamic scholars to deny the terrorists’
    version of the Islamic faith. Emboldened the terrorists have now moved a step
    further in the Delhi terror mail. While, in the Ahmedabad mail, the jihadis
    have embarrassed the Islamic theologians by quoting the holy text, they have
    embarrassed the seculars in the Delhi terror mail by relying on the seculars’
    view to justify their terror against the Hindus. The secular enthusiasts had
    carried on a relentless hate campaign against the BJP and Narendra Modi after
    the Gujarat riots. Then had even trivialized the Godhra terror attack that had
    roasted over 60 Ramsevaks, saying that it was an accident or that the victims
    themselves had lit fire to the bogy, which enraged the Hindu outfits even more.
    Later when acts of terror increased, the secular media even rationalized them
    by citing the Gujrat riots as justification for terrorists’ anger. This secular
    largesse did not assuage the extremists. Instead it has put the Islamist terror
    on an escalator. Not surprisingly the jihadis have, in the Delhi email, used
    the very logic of the secular media, and very photographs carried by it a
    thousand times, to claim that they were taking revenge for the Gujarat carnage!

    While the Jihadis see terror as a mandate of the holy book, the secular media
    remains juvenile in its oration. It still cites Shabana Azmi’s inability to get
    a fourth flat, in the building of her choice in the place of her choice as
    illustrative of the failure of constitutional equity to minorities, and asks
    how could there be peace with such injustice! But, no section is more badly
    treated or discriminated than the untouchables
    in India. If the seculars’ logic for jihadis’ violence is applied
    to them, they can legitimately turn terrorists. But mere grievances cannot
    produce that deadly hate. It is the jihadi theological claim, uncontested by
    the Islamist clergy and the seculars, that makes terror a religious duty, and a
    deadly one at that. Injustice, minus theology, cannot breed that deadly terror.
    Unless the debate on terror transcends the trivia and gets to the root of the
    terror – the theological motive for terror – the seculars will end up promoting
    terror, not containing it. Will they introspect?

Comments are closed.