Litigation Jihad: Lawfare Against Truth

What we need to learn from from our enemies

A message from Pamela Geller: Truth is the new hate-speech

The Silence of the Lambs

There are lessons that we can learn from the enemy. There is little admirable in the evil machinations of the left’s tactics, but their defense of their own people is one of them. When one of their own is under attack, they circle the wagons, hunker down, dig in their heels and defend to the death, no matter how egregious the act (think John Edwards, Barney Frank, Charles Rangel, et al — a veritable rogues’ gallery).

The right lacks this quality. We tend to eat our own, and then wonder why we have no real leaders. The right allowed the jackals, the vultures to destroy Sarah Palin; even now we hear that she is unelectable (for 2012). Why? She’s perfect. Palin is the most glaring example, but she is but one in a long line. It has to stop. Would Tom DeLay have resigned if he had been a Democrat? Would Jack Ryan have pulled out of the US Senate race (against Obama, no less) if he had been a Democrat? The list is too long. The right has to man up.

Robert Spencer published this piece at Front Page magazine. He has been a staunch defender of me and my work, a rare and wondeful quality. Thanks, Robert.

* The Demonization of Pamela Geller (read it all)

Richard Warman Sues Blazingcatfur For Linking To “Far Right” Mark Steyn

Warman is suing me for $500,000.00 Dollars. A ridiculous amount for an equally ridiculous lawsuit. Nonetheless even nuisance suits such as this must be defended against. To date legal fees have run me about 10K. I’ve covered that from my own pocket. I am now asking for your help. I know times are hard for many of us but if every reader who visited daily were to contribute 5 or 10 dollars then that would go a long way to helping all of us out.

This is your fight too, well except for the lawyer stuff anyway;)   (read more, here)

Elisabeth’s Voice: Fighting for Free Speech in Austria (Thanks to Vlad Tepes)

Amsterdam Demo 30th October – Free Speech – No Sharia

Kitman TV

3 thoughts on “Litigation Jihad: Lawfare Against Truth”

  1. Jawa Defamed in WaPo:

    Yes, Let’s Follow the Money (Sticky)
    In a rather long article in the Washington Post, Frankie Martin says a number of out and out lies about the Jawa Report.

    The article attempts to refute a post by Laura Rubenfield which argued that the Founding Fathers did not care much for Islam. His refutation is laughable, missing the forest for the trees. For instance, in the course of pointing out that Franklin’s use of a story of Muslim’s taking Europeans as slaves he fails to see that the use of such an analogy was quite apt: hundreds of thousands — if not more — of Europeans were taken as slaves by Muslims who justified the practice based on Quran, hadith, and Sunnah.

    The Prophet Muhammad himself had slaves. And not just slaves: sex-slaves.

    That the Founding Fathers admired Muhammad and Islam is beyond rational argumentation. They did admire Muhammad and thought of him as “great”. In the same way they thought other great political and military leaders of the past were great. Like Alexander, Hammurabi, or Peter. (More)

  2. You are right SheikYerMami. This is our fight and the lawfare against truth will not win. I love the rise of the truth movement started to become vocal about the growing dhimmitude of the traditional media. Islam is the enemy of Democracy and I will do all I can to fight it with your wonderful blog as well as others against Islam.

Comments are closed.