Like a Boomerang: New Demands for Sharia in Australia

Moderate head-chopping anyone? Moderate child marriages, FGM, burqas, polygamy and wife beatings? Moderate stoning of women anyone?  The camel  has the snout in the tent already,  so how about we allow the Muslims to apply a little public flogging like they do in Aceh, or honor killings, or murdering apostates and blasphemers?

Andrew Bolt:

One law means no sharia law as well

What fits with Australian values is the idea that we are one people bound by one law, not rival peoples with each our own:

THE nation’s peak Muslim group is using the Gillard government’s re-embracing of multiculturalism to push for the introduction of sharia in Australia, but it says it would be a more ‘moderate variety of Islamic law’ that fits with Australian values…

In an interview with The Australian, the organisation’s president, Ikebal Adam Patel, who wrote the submission, nominated family law and specifically divorce as an area where ‘moderate interpretations of sharia’ could co-exist within the Australian legal system….

Mr Patel says the AFIC, as the peak body of Islamic organisations in Australia, “strongly supports that multiculturalism should lead to legal pluralism . . . and twin tolerations”.

Whoever wants to make their own private or religious arrangements about living together can do so, provided they do not conflict with Australian law. But for the law to specifically endorse verdicts of religious groups is to give them a power and legal standing that seems at odds with not just our notion of one law for all, but with our Constitution’s insistence on a separation of church and state:

116. The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.

Note, by the way, how multiculturalism encourages those who want to retribalise Australia, rather than stress what unites us.

More on burqa advocate Patel:

10 thoughts on “Like a Boomerang: New Demands for Sharia in Australia”

  1. My response to the moonbat fools who gullibly swallow the TAQIYYA and to Mohammedans who describe themselves as “Moderates’ is ‘Please show me the ‘MODERATE” Koran that you follow because the only one I can find is the violent, misogynistic, anti semitic, self contradictory, turgid , Arab Supremacist nonsense filled one. But then I think how could mere mortals reform and change the “ACTUAL and UNALTERABLE word of God’ which is for ‘ALL men for ALL time’ as it claims for itself.’
    My take on the Incondite Kran
    This is what happens when you have what is the self proclaimed ‘clear and easy to understand’ word of God written in a primitive language which is at best ambiguous and at worst untranslatable. It seems to me that a self professing ‘Supreme being’ PREDESTINATOR and creator of all who causes his book to be disseminated in such a primitive language as 7th Century Arabic is either a ‘supreme joker’ or what is much more likely simply the invention of a 7th Century paedophilic,epileptic,megalomaniac, war lord in a cave. The fact that after 1400 years the Koran does not have a universally accepted translation and interpretation completely repudiates its claims to be ‘clear and easy to understand’ and it being ‘a book for ALL men for ALL time’ and if these claims it makes for itself are so demonstrably untrue then the whole edifice of Islam is untrue and we should not be discussing the semantic nuances of a religion just the self justifications of followers of a CULT and should treat it and its adherents in an appropriate manner.

    All of which explains why Mohammedans when cornered run and hide behind the primitive ambiguous Arabic of the Koran claiming ‘you have to read it in Arabic to understand it’ Which of course completely destroys what the KORAN bombastically and preposterously claims for itself i.e. ‘being Clear and EASILY understood and for ALL men for ALL time’

  2. Rack orf with ya sharia shit. If Islam could come up with something modern and intelligent it would be a breath of fresh air. But as always, it is some ancient evil baloney. Go blow it up your bums.

  3. Under Islamic family does it mean that a Muslim can marry a six year old girl and consummate the marriage when she is nine following the practice of al-insaan al-kamil(the perfect man)?

  4. Well, the large numbers reader comments on various articles in the Australian and Herald about islamic immigrants, sharia law etc, indicates this whole muslims- islam- sharia a hot topic with the public.

    The encouraging sign I see is firstly no body wants a bar of it, but secondly more than ever I see informed comments indicating knowledge of the evils of islam on the rise and commenter prepared to use them against islam facilitators.

    The other encouraging observation is more commentators shoot down the false ” moslems are always a victim” and “Your a racist because you don’t love islam” claims that always arise in discussion about moslems and islam.

    But I doubt the idiots in Canberra make the same observations.

  5. “legal pluralism . . . and twin tolerations”.

    Roughly translated, “legal pluralism” = sharia law alongside Australian law, initially with equal weight, eventually completely taking over.

    “twin tolerations” = you tolerate the introduction of sharia law, then you tolerate sharia law taking over.

    Seems a fair arrangement to me!

Comments are closed.