“Racist?” Is it ‘racist’ to wrap yourself in shrouds and spit venom at your own people or is it ‘racist’ for a policeman to make sure that such an unhinged creature is booked in accordance with the law?
Islam is not a race. The policeman who booked her is not ‘racist’ to do his job.
Carnitha Matthews is a white Anglo-Saxon ‘revert to Islam. She bought into the ‘hate the kafir’ cult and turned against her own people, in order to make Islam the dominant religion in Australia.
I’VE been around a while, but can’t recall a multiculturalist offering their deal before this sale.
I mean this deal: that if we take in more refugees and other immigrants we’ll have to suck it up if some go feral.
We’ll have to accept that a little violence and us-against-you tribalism is just the inevitable way.
I’m sure many of us would have said, well, in that case shut the doors now.
I say this because of the extraordinary explanation we got for an extraordinary outburst following an extraordinary decision in a NSW court on Monday.
Carnita Matthews is a 47-year-old Muslim who was stopped by a policeman for a random breath test.
When Sgt Paul Fogarty then booked Matthews for not properly displaying her P-plates, she exploded.
“You look at me and see me wearing this and you couldn’t handle it,” she screamed, pointing at the burqa covering her face.
“All cops are racist … I’ll take you to court.”
Two days later a woman in a hijab identifying herself as Matthews called in at the Campbelltown police station and signed a statutory declaration claiming Fogarty had tried to tear off her veil.
In fact, a camera in his car showed him reaching for a breathalyser and gesturing to Matthews to lift her veil, but not touching it.
Matthews was jailed for six months for making a false statement, but on Monday was cleared in the District Court when a judge said he was not satisfied it was she who handed in the false complaint, since the police hadn’t asked her to show her face.
Racist to even ask for a veil to be removed; powerless if you don’t.
Mad enough, and another warning that the word “racist” is now not a complaint but a weapon.
But then more than a dozen Muslim men “celebrated” the win by linking arms around Matthews, chanting Allahu Ahkbar, jostling police, shouting abuse and attacking TV cameramen.
Matthews’ lawyer, Stephen Hopper, was asked about the uproar, and replied: “They are obviously happy with the result and are expressing it in a way that is culturally appropriate to them.”
Pardon? Is manhandling police and journalists really a “culturally appropriate” way to express pleasure?
Which culture? And what else does it deem “appropriate”? I think we should have been told when we still had the chance to say “no, thanks”.