Libya To Europe: Give Us Money Or We'll Send You Millions Of Migrants

3 articles by Hugh Fitzgerald

Instead of spending its time trying to meddle in a squabble among Slavs where there are no heroes and no right side, the peoples of Europe, the members of NATO, should be setting up a permanent naval blockade in the Mediterranean.

The threat to the West is demographic. It grows and grows. And the most dangerous part, by far, is the entry into Europe of Arabs and other Muslims. That is the problem that could undo two thousand years, and more, of the civilization we should care most about.

The Libyan threat made explicit  here. Where are the NATO ships? Where is the blockade? When will that naval cavalry arrive?



It’s not bad, and at least there’s mention of religious books, and the Jaafari school of jurisprudence (Shi’a edition), but Alice Fordham still can’t bring herself to find out that the reason the marriageable age of girls will be reduced to nine years is because of the example of Muhammad with little Aisha. And the clerics who oppose the law can’t possibly refer to the example of Muhammad, the Model of Conduct (“uswa hasana”), the Perfect Man (“al-insan al-kamil”), and his nine-year-old child bride, as the reasons many Muslims in 2014, if they could, would reduce the marriageable age of girls to nine, so instead refer vaguely to older ideas, ideas fit for a different kind.

So the misunderstanding among Infidels continues. You can read the report, or listen to it if you prefer, here.



Abdelwahab El-Effendi, who apparently holds a post at a university, or pseudo-university, in Great Britain, worries about Islam’s image in Africa because of those “extremists” — in what they are extreme, and what non-Islamic texts they surely must be following to have gone so far astray, Abdelwahab El-Effendi does not say — of Boko Haram, and Al Shebaab,, and Al Qaeda, and… you get the idea.–Here.