Hezbo Tard whines he had "words shoved in his mouth"

Uthman Badar defends speech about ‘cultural imposition’

Badass babbles stupidly, lies, whines and makes it sound as if Islam wasn’t what it is. What a worm.

YT link here.

Hizbut  Badass claims decision “Islamophobic”

Hizb ut-Tahrir spokesturd Uthman Badar says the backlash against his slated Festival of Dangerous Ideas talk says more about bigotry in Australia than it does about him. … More bigotry resistance to islamisation at 7 News thanks to Mullah, pbuh

In other news:
They breed for jihad, why wouldn’t they use children for jihad?
 ….armed groups in Syria have used children as young as 15 to fight in battles, sometimes recruiting them under the guise of offering education, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today.–Syria: Armed Groups Send Children into Battle

 Split from his fiancée’ turned headbanger into jihadist  (no shiite)

  • Abdul Rakib Amin was identified this week as third Briton in Isis video
  • Former school friends and neighbours have spoken of their shock
  • It has now been claimed he turned to group following split with girlfriend

article-2668834-1F14A09700000578-8_306x423Former Aberdeen schoolboy Abdul Rakib Amin became involved with militant group Isis after breaking up with his fiancée, it has been claimed

Syria: Child soldiers used in suicide bombing missions

They’re just doing what Muhammad did, what’s wrong with that?

Religion-Of-Peace-PosterMeet “Osama bin Bieber”, the youngest jihad propagandist they’re passing around in Iraq:

Osama bin Bieber’s real name is Mohammed Hadi, an 18-year-old from Coventry, England. According to the Daily Mail, Hadi was radicalized by clerics at his local madrassa and left England with three other men. He is the youngest member of ISIS positively identified so far.

And why didn’t it occur to anyone to smoke out the clerics at his local madrassa?

5 thoughts on “Hezbo Tard whines he had "words shoved in his mouth"”

  1. Hmm…right, I noticed the harsh/death punishment for anyone convert to other religion than islam, even leaving islam (but convert into islam is perfectly fine) in the part of Hizb ut-Tahrir’s constitution and no, I didn’t learn from any media, it’s in Australian based Hizb ut-Tahrir’’s (very) own website. Uthman Bader and other muslims using a word of so-called islamophobia only as an excuse.

  2. islamonausea is the word and the feeling
    there is no such thing as islamophobia.

    There is a word Dhimmi ….
    – and refers to Australian Politicians and Politicals who by their acts of Treason and Sedition are guilty of Assisting and Enabling islam in invading Australia.

    Muhammadans (like Waleed Aly, his “revert” wife Susan Carland and (SBS’s) Nazeem Hussain) in Australia are here for one purpose and one purpose only – to (eventually) kill (or at the very least – prepare in the murders) all Australian non-Muhammadans.

    How soon will the Australian non-Muhammadans realise the “pure” intention of islam and Expel and if necessary “Expel” all Muhammadans from this Beautiful Country.

  3. Here’s the best breakdown of Islamic “peace” I’ve ever read. It’s by a Muslim scholar by the name of Bassam Tibi, a Syrian who lives in Germany. I have posted this many times on this blog, because I’ve never heard it put better:

    “At its core, Islam is a religious mission to all humanity. Muslims are religiously obliged to disseminate the Islamic faith throughout the world. “We have sent you forth to all mankind” (Q. 34:28). If non-Muslims submit to conversion or subjugation, this call (da’wa) can be pursued peacefully. If they do not, Muslims are obliged to wage war against them. In Islam, peace requires that non-Muslims submit to the call of Islam, either by converting or by accepting the status of a religious minority (dhimmi) and paying the imposed poll tax, jizya. World peace, the final stage of the da’wa, is reached only with the conversion or submission of all mankind to Islam…

    Muslims believe that expansion through war is not aggression but a fulfillment of the Qur’anic command to spread Islam as a way of peace. The resort to force to disseminate Islam is not war (harb), a word that is used only to describe the use of force by non-Muslims. Islamic wars are not hurab (the plural of harb) but rather futuhat, acts of “opening” the world to Islam and expressing Islamic jihad.

    Relations between dar al-Islam, the home of peace, and dar al-harb, the world of unbelievers, nevertheless take place in a state of war, according to the Qur’an and to the authoritative commentaries of Islamic jurists. Unbelievers who stand in the way, creating obstacles for the da’wa, are blamed for this state of war, for the da’wa can be pursued peacefully if others submit to it.

    In other words, those who resist Islam cause wars and are responsible for them.”

    You can find the quote also on page 328 of the Andrew Bostom-edited book, The Legacy of Jihad.

  4. Nicely put, Sheik! And I’ve got a copy of that book.

    Basically, then, islam believes “the ends (peace) justify the means (war).”

    But this “ends justify means” trope is really only victim-blaming slander.

    All attack-first prone “progressive” criminals, who feel entitled to have rights (like, to your stuff) without responsibilities (like, having earned or paid for them,) pretend to believe that the ends justify the means, when in fact the means really only ever define the end results: If and when you choose to lie, murder and rob others “to get ahead,” then, in the end, you’re not a “great success” – you’re still really only a lying, murdering thief!

    While this slanderous, criminal trope is inherent in the Orient, it’s also present in Western capitalism:

    Caveat Emptor (‘buyer beware’) also implicitly endorses the ‘ends-justify-means’ VICTIM-BLAMING notion!

    (i.e: if the seller fools you, the buyer, then it’s all your fault for having been fooled in the first place)!


  5. So islam believes “the ends (peace) justify the means (war).”

    That’s preposterously backwards victim-blaming slanderous criminality, exactly like saying:

    “Defense from your expected counter-attack justifies my initial attacks!”


Comments are closed.