Most not refugees, not “Rohingya”, not skilled

WTF needs these problems?

Andrew Bolt:

The Greens and Leftist activists insisted we should have taken them in as refugees. But why, and to do what?: 

Indonesia has told Australia that most of the 7000 boatpeople stranded at sea in the region are not Rohingya asylum-seekers but illegal labourers from Bangladesh...

“They (Indonesia) believe there are about 7000 people at sea (and) they think about 30-40 per cent are Rohingya, the rest are Bangladeshi; and they are not, in Indon­esia’s words, asylum-seekers, they are not refugees, they are illegal labour­ers, they’ve been promised or are seeking jobs in Malaysia,” [Foreign Minister Julie] Bishop told The Weekend ­Australian.

“They said the Rohingya have gone to Bangladesh and have mixed up with the Bangladeshis who are coming to Malaysia in particular for jobs.”…

1000
This photo provided by the Burma Information Ministry shows Burma police officers on a fishing boat with migrants at western coast, Rakhine, Burma, on Friday. Photograph: Myanmar Information Ministry/EPA

Myanmar’s… navy carried out its first rescue of an ­asylum-seeker boat, bringing 208 people to shore.

“A navy ship found two boats … on May 21 while on patrol,” said Tin Maung Swe, a senior official in the western state of Rakhine, adding “about 200 Bengalis were on one of the boats”.

Calls for Rohingya to be resettled underestimate problem – Scott Morrison

Australia’s former immigration minister says suggestions countries in the region can resettle persecuted Rohingya miss the scale of the problem

“There’s a million Rohingya in Myanmar [Burma]. The suggestion that somehow resettlement is the answer to that issue, I think completely misunderstands what is happening in that part of the world,” he said in Sydney on Saturday.

Here’s the solution:

Gambia says it will take all Rohingya refugees as part of its “sacred duty” to alleviate the suffering of fellow Muslims flooding south-east Asia to escape oppression.

3 thoughts on “Most not refugees, not “Rohingya”, not skilled”

  1. and ….
    Why is islam and its submitters (islams) STILL in Australia !

    ask our islamoamourer Politicians etc ….

    1. and also as usual …..
      not a female islam to be seen !!!!
      (in the included photo!)

      …. although the ‘she’ islams would not have survived for long among that lot of muhammadan paedophile emulators !
      (‘she’ would have been raped to death !)
      …. no sympathy though – the female islams choose who they associate with !

      …. and don’t acuse me of vilification of islam
      I’m just saying what has been observed and recorded about the islams behaviour !

  2. Gambia says it will take all Rohingya refugees as part of its “sacred duty” to alleviate the suffering of fellow Muslims flooding south-east Asia to escape oppression.

    Bangladeshis are unlikely to be interested in Gambi, until ofcourse they realsie that if they set off from Gambia in a northerly direction, the EU will be sending out naval units to bring them “home”.

Comments are closed.