Sweden (and Germany) according to their political elites, are needed as a safe spaces for people who seek refuge. As a result, these countries will no longer be safe spaces for the native inhabitants. 

Your various Nordic/Scandi nations have different ways of dealing with their sudden and massive Islamic infiltration.

Sweden is trying a total capitulation strategy:

In Sweden, a tax-funded TV ad created by a government-backed “charity” called “Individuell Manniskohjalp” (Individual Relief), or IM, informs Swedes that their old country is never coming back. 

Translated to English, the slogan for the campaign is #TheNewNation. “There is no way back,” the ad begins. “Sweden will never be like it was. Europe is changing and Sweden is needed as a safe space for people who seek refuge. Now we must look forward and find a way to live side by side.”

As African and Middle Eastern faces intermixed with Swedish faces cycle through on the screen, the ad informs viewers that Sweden is in for some dramatic changes. “It’s time to realize the new Swedes will claim their space, and will take up room with cultures, languages and customs,” the narrators say in Swedish, alternating between male and female voices. “It’s time we see this as a positive force. The new country is about shaping a new future.”

The very definition of Swedish is changing, the ad continues, adding that the old Swedes need to adapt to the new country and the customs of the “new Swedes.” “To be Swedish must be more than skin color and place of birth, it must be you, me, and everyone together,” the narrator continues. “It’s not only new Swedes that need to integrate. Everyone needs to integrate, even established Swedes.”

Norway, however, wants to remain Norwegian:

Norway’s migration and integration minister has faced calls to resign after telling the country’s Muslim immigrants they must adapt to a society in which “we eat pork, drink alcohol and show our face.” Sylvi Listhaug, a member of the country’s populist, anti-immigrant Progress Party, made the comments in a Facebook post Monday.

“I think those who come to Norway need to adapt to our society,” she wrote. “Here we eat pork, drink alcohol and show our face. You must abide by the values, laws and regulations that are in Norway when you come here.”

And Denmark’s Queen Margarethe II isn’t completely cool with Muhammad’s disciples:

The Queen, who is one of Europe’s most respected and long-serving royals, said politicians needed to “put their foot down” and strictly uphold the country’s principles of democracy and gender equality in her unprecedented rallying cry. 

She said: “It’s not a law of nature that one becomes Danish by living in Denmark. It doesn’t necessarily happen. 

“We thought that these things would take care of themselves. That if you walked through the streets of Copenhagen and drank the municipal water and rode the municipal bus, you’d soon become a Dane. 

“It was so obvious to us, and therefore we thought that it must also be obvious for those who settled and lived here. It wasn’t.”

Danish Culture Minister Bertel Haarder has learned a similar lesson:

He said: “She described precisely the development that many of us have gone through. I remember saying at the beginning of my tenure as Integration Minister that the number of immigrants and refugees did not matter meant so much, as long as they found work. 

“It sounded good, but unfortunately it was not true. It is the number that matters.”

It’s taken them a while to catch on, but catch on they have.


In addition to paying for the importation of well over a million Islamic migrants over the last year, Swedish and German taxpayers are financing advertising campaigns urging them to integrate into the new countries that the mass migration is creating. The changes are irreversible and the old way of life is not coming back, so get used to it and adapt, the natives were told.


“British” Sharia Courts?

Top sharia court ‘is protecting wife-beater suspects’

From the Sunday Times and the Mail on Sunday

Nothing “British” about the sharia. Having allowed these headbangers into the country and to operate a parallel legal system under the eyes of the British judiciary is a scandal and a disgrace for once great Britain.

British sharia court ‘protects wife-beating suspects by sabotaging criminal proceedings against them’ women’s rights group claims

  • Muslim Arbitration Tribunal (Mat) is one of 80 Islamic ‘councils’ in Britain
  • Southall Black Sisters says it protects men accused of domestic violence
  • Mat ‘uses position of power’ to persuade the CPS to drop charges brought
  • Women’s rights group has submitted evidence to sharia courts inquiry
  • Sharia courts have been dispensing Islamic justice in UK since 1982

The Muslim Arbitration Tribunal has been accused of persuading the CPS to drop domestic violence charges and encourage women to return to abusive partners

A top sharia court has been accused of using its position to ‘sabotage’ criminal charges brought against men accused of domestic violence.

The Muslim Arbitration Tribunal (Mat), based in Nuneaton, Warwickshire, was set up in 2007 to help resolve civil and family disputes in accordance with Islamic law.

According to the Mat website, the body cannot deal with criminal offences, but ‘where there are criminal charges such as assault within the context of domestic violence, the parties can ask Mat to assist in reaching reconciliation.

‘The terms of such a reconciliation can then be passed on to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)  through the local Police Domestic Violence Liaison Officers with a view to reconsidering the criminal charges.’

But  Southall Black Sisters, a women’s rights group, argues that Mat is effectively ‘sabotaging criminal proceedings’ against men accused of domestic violence by asking the CPS to ‘reconsider’ any charges.

Continue reading “British” Sharia Courts?

Merkel Terror, Traitors in the Church and Jihad Without Islam & Muslims

Germany: State sanctioned terror against family who refuses to let child go to “mandatory” mosque visit:


Parents of a German teenager may face a trial and fine for “truancy” after refusing to allow their son to go to a local mosque on a school field trip out of fear that it would lead to his “indoctrination” by Islamic radicals.
The Traitors Are Inside the Catholic Church

Heinrich Bedford-Strohm (second from left) and Munich’s Archbishop Kardinal Reinhard Marx took their crosses off “out of respect” for their Mohammedan hosts, during a trip to Israel.

A couple of months ago these two traitors also allowed Mohammedans to desecrate a church when they invited and allowed Mohammedans to call upon ‘allah’ during a funeral service.


Jihadis planning Paris-style gun attacks on British streets, police say

My goodness, even the Grunard starts reporting on Islamic terrorism now? No such luck. You won’t find words like ‘Islam’ or Muslims in this article, that  has nothing-to-do-with-Islam.

Armed police in central London.
British law enforcement, security and intelligence services are trying to prevent a marauding terrorist gun attack like the one that struck Paris in November 2015. Photograph: Carl Court/Getty Images
 British law enforcement, security and intelligence services are trying to prevent a marauding terrorist gun attack like the one that struck Paris in November 2015. Photograph: Carl Court/Getty Images

Terrorists tried to amass weapons to launch gun attacks on British streets in five extremist plots foiled in the last two years, police have revealed, as they admitted 800 legally-owned guns had gone missing.

In a rare joint appeal, the National Crime Agency and Scotland Yard’s counter-terrorism command urged the public to report fears about lax gun security among legal owners as well as criminals handling firearms.

The intensified activity comes as British law enforcement, security and intelligence services try to prevent a marauding terrorist gun attack, such as the one that struck Paris in November 2015, happening in the UK.

They fear terrorists getting guns from criminals and are concerned by an apparent upsurge in guns on the streets in London and some other big urban areas. (More)

France admits its “deradicalization” program for jihadis has been a failure

When will the Australian gov’t admit that our own “deradicalization” program is a failure? When will “deradicalization expert” Ann Aly be exposed as the fraud she is and asked to return the money she was given to “deradicalize” young Muslims?

Ann Aly

“Deradicalization” doesn’t work:

many such programs are based on the premise that the true teachings of Islam are peaceful, and so all that needs to be done is show the jihadis how they’re misunderstanding the Qur’an and overlooking its teachings of peace, and all will be well. But since the Qur’an and Sunnah are full of commands to make war against and subjugate unbelievers, the idea that jihadis can be “deradicalized” by reference to them is just a myth told to Infidel authorities to lull them into complacency.


“France’s De-radicalization Program Deemed a Failure,” by Patrick Dunleavy, IPT News, October 28, 2016 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

The latest attempt by Western democracies to deal with the ever-growing threat of Islamic radicalization in the prison system has been deemed an utter failure. French officials announced Tuesday that they would no longer isolate inmates with jihadists tendencies from other inmates, or offer therapeutic services or specialized counseling aimed at de-radicalizing Islamic terrorists already in prison.

They found that the program actually increased the threat of radicalizing inmates into terrorists rather than diminishing it.

Following a series of terrorist attacks in France, counterterrorism investigators found that a large number of the jihadists had previously spent time in prison for petty crimes. It was there, in the fertile soil of prison, where they were influenced by the radical Islamic teachings of incarcerated members of groups like al-Qaida, the GIA (Armed Islamic Group of Algeria) and ISIS.

In announcing the suspension of the program Justice Minister Jean Jacques Urvoas admitted the failure: “I don’t use the term de-radicalization. I don’t think we can invent a vaccine against this temptation” (Islamism).

France has produced more soldiers for ISIS than any other Western country.

But France is not the only country that has attempted to come up with an program to prevent Islamic radicalization in prison and help rehabilitate those terrorists who have been successfully prosecuted and sent to prison. The United Kingdom previously announced plans to form “specialized isolation units” within its prison system to deal with convicted Islamic terrorists, like Anjem Choudary, who were seen as a danger to the other inmates.

The United States also sought to establish a de-radicalization program for potential jihadists. Minnesota U.S. District Court Judge Michael Davis devised a de-radicalization program that included hiring researcher Daniel Koehler, who has dealt with the neo-Nazi movement in Germany, to provide counseling and training for both inmates and staff.

The first inmate placed in the program, Abdullahi Yusuf, was an example of the program’s potential for failure.

Continue reading France admits its “deradicalization” program for jihadis has been a failure

You Say You Want a Reformation …

You can’t reform Islam. Islam is ‘perfect’. Muhammad said so. 


Those calling for a Muslim reformation are overlooking the consequences of the revolt that Martin Luther prompted against Rome. Were Islam to replicate that upheaval, as many seem to wish, the world would be convulsed for bloody centuries to come

crescent IIMartin Luther unleashed his attack on the monolithic Catholic Church exactly 499 years ago on All Saints Eve Now (now popularly known as Halloween) when he nailed his 95 theological theses on the Church door of Wittenberg. Now, as we approach the quincentenary of that momentous event it is possible to gain some long-term perspective on its essential nature and impact on modern history. In particular, it is an ideal time to explore the grim implications of such a religious upheaval for the crisis of Islam, which is engulfing much of the world in the same type of internecine and sectarian violence that characterized the epochal upheaval that convulsed Christian Europe.

Continually there are demands for Islam to undergo its own ‘reformation’ akin to that endured by the West half a millennium ago. Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s polemic, Heretic: Why Islam Needs a Reformation Now (2015), exemplifies this campaign, envisaging a reformed Islam akin to liberal Christianity in its capacity to accommodate the modern world. She states the case against the savagery of fundamentalist Islamism in a defiant and optimistic fashion, drawing great encouragement from the various calls for reform that were manifest in the Muslim world during the so-called Arab Spring. Equally optimistic calls come from Muslim intellectualswho imagine that Muslims around the world could band together to overthrow Muslim despots, reject Sharia law, establish new liberal constitutions, and deploy diaspora Muslims living in Western countries like Australia as “ambassadors [to] educate their non-Muslim neighbours about the peaceful, compassionate and sharing nature of Islam in order to bring Muslims and non-Muslims closer together”.

Tragically, much of this is fanciful. In their enthusiasm, these commentators have imposed an idealised vision of the rationalism of the 18th century Enlightenment upon the brutal religious passions of the 16th century Reformation. Moreover, there seems to be little evidence that the contemporary despots, theocrats, and jihadists that dominate the Muslim world will relinquish their wealth and power or give up on their apocalyptic dreams of global conquest. Moreover, these Muslim leaders and their many supporters are heirs to an ancient intellectual counter-revolution that diverted Islam away from the rationalism that facilitated the Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment in the West. Instead they embrace a theological obscurantism that Robert R. Reilly has carefully analysed in The Closing of the Muslim Mind: How Intellectual Suicide Created the Modern Islamist Crisis (2010). As I have observed:

“Reilly details how the emerging religion of Islam initially embraced the rationality and scientific orientation of the Hellenic world to which it was a successor before it abruptly turned its back on this heritage and embraced a quite primitive form of theological irrationalism. The resulting world-view fundamentally undermined Islam’s capacity to embrace science, democracy and economic development down to the present day.”

Nothing has changed: Islam remains constitutionally unable to embrace the open society that the West enjoys. Instead Islamists and other devotees of ultra-reactionary Saudi-backed Salafi fundamentalism are vigorously seeking to reassert this medieval theological irrationalism throughout the Muslim world. They are never going to yield to calls for reform.

Continue reading You Say You Want a Reformation …

Government-funded ads on Swedish television ordering the natives to adapt

Are we going were Sweden went?

Salute that flag, new Swedes
Salute that flag, new Swedes

Last year about 200,000 Islamic migrants from Africa and the Middle East arrived in Sweden, which has a population of just 9.8 million people.

That would be the equivalent of more than 400,000 arriving in Australia, but within a much smaller area. Sweden is only 450,295 sq km² compared to Australia’s 7.692 million sq km. As you can imagine, certain demographic and cultural changes are occurring.

Many Swedes don’t like these changes, understandably enough, so their government is telling them they’re wrong.

Government-funded ads are running on Swedish television ordering the local population to adapt:

To imagine how chilling this must be, following is a transcript of the ad with all mentions of “Sweden” and “Swedes” replaced by “Australia” and “Australians”. If we hadn’t successfully stopped illegal immigration before the latest surge, it is very easy to believe we’d be seeing similar official directives here

(Continue reading Swedes Told.)

No, Muhammad was no ‘feminist’

PuffHo promo for Muhammad.

Robert Spencer takes this fool to the cleaners, and then some.
Since when is taking women as sex slaves considered upholding feminism? Woman’s testimony half of a mans? Beating wives?  Child-marriage, the rape of infidel women, honour-killings and all the rest?

Huffington Post: Muhammad was a feminist, “explicitly taught the radical equality of women and men”

Full post below the fold.

In other news:

Should we bother with countering the stereotypical Mohammedan obsession  with ‘islamophobia’, and their mental baggage, like the old abrogated chestnut “there is no compulsion of religion?”
Continue reading No, Muhammad was no ‘feminist’

‘My friend was wed at 13, a mum at 14’: how authorities failed child brides

Kudos to this girl for speaking out. Lets hope nothing happens to her.

Bee al-Darraj in Sydney. Picture: Renee Nowytarger

An Iraqi-born Australian who ­attended Islamic schools in Sydney’s west says she tried to report multiple counts of child marriage among her school friends to the Australian Federal Police without success.

Bee al-Darraj, now 24, has a thick file of correspondence ­between her and the AFP, as well as with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and the NSW Department of Family and Community Services, concerning girls she knew at school, who were taken out of Australia and married at age 12 or 13. Some of the girls were her relatives.

The Australian has declined to name them, but has seen some of Ms al-Darraj’s correspondence, in which she pleads for action to be taken, ­especially in relation to a girl who was 13 when she married and “14 when she gave birth in a public hospital, with a 28-year-old father signing the birth certificate”. “She was still in school but nothing was done until he started to beat her, and then she was put in a safe house,” Ms al-Darraj said.

Continue reading ‘My friend was wed at 13, a mum at 14’: how authorities failed child brides

Britain’s useful idiots vouch for radical imam who wages litigation jihad

Shakeel Begg
Shakeel Begg

There have been two fascinating developments in the case of Shakeel Begg, the Imam of the Lewisham Islamic Centre. As I described here on Friday, Begg sued the BBC for describing him as an extremist, only for the judge in the case to last week dismiss the claim and confirm for the whole world to see that Begg is indeed an extremist.

On Friday I mentioned that industry of clueless klutzes and sinister beards who make up much of the ‘interfaith’ racket in this country. Paragraphs 33 and 34 of the judgement in the case of Begg vs Beeb might serve as the purest distillation of this phenomenon.Under the heading ‘testimonials’ we read :

33 – The Claimant [Begg] also adduced an impressive number of testimonials from local faith and other leaders attesting to his inter-faith work and commitment to work in the local community. Each said that they had never heard the Claimant espousing any form of support for extremism or violence.

Continue reading Britain’s useful idiots vouch for radical imam who wages litigation jihad