Austria face veil ban ‘criminalises Muslim women’

Only 100 or so Muslim women wear the face veil but Austria has joined other European countries in outlawing the garment.

Its “only a hundred” where there was none 10 years ago. If it is allowed to spread it will continue until the last female is forced under the burqa. Islam is a criminal cult. Those who emulate Muhammad are criminals.

Austria has followed in the footsteps of France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Bulgaria in banning the face veil [File: Getty Images]

Activists and experts have condemned a law implemented in Austria on Sunday prohibiting the face veil as “counterproductive” and as an “attack on religious freedom”.

“Activists” stands for Mohammedans and their leftist useful idiots. Of course it is meant to be “counterproductive”to the spread of Islam, which doesn’t have the “religious freedom” to force their abominable “religion” on others.

The law, commonly known as the “Burqa ban,” came into effect in advance of a general election on October 15, which could see the traditionally xenophobic far-right Freedom Party make gains.

Of approximately nine million Austrians, between 100 to 150 Muslim women – or 0.002 percent – wear the face veil.

There are around 700,000 Muslims in the country.

That’s way too many.

The garment covers the entire body and face except for the eyes, but violators may now face a fine of up to $180.

In other news:

Three-year-olds will learn about Islam: “Grandfather has four wives”.

New children’s books deal with multiplied and Somali culture. 

 The Austrian government says the law safeguards Austrian values and the concept of a free society.

Officials have carefully marketed the law, termed “Prohibition on the Covering of the Face”, as being religiously-neutral by also restricting the donning of medical masks, party masks, and scarves in public.

But activists and experts have denounced the nature of the law as “counterproductive” and “Islamophobic”.

Any kind of resistance to Islam is denounced as “counterproductive” and “Islamophobic” by the usual “activists and experts”.

Carla Amina Baghajati, a rights activist and spokeswoman for the Austrian Islamic Religious Authority, a public institution representing Muslims, says the law threatens the concept of an open society.

The “open society” is the plan by George Soros to destroy white civilization with Islamic savages from Arabia & Africa.

“They believe that they are ‘freeing these women’ and that they’re taking action to secure the identity of Austria, but this is hypocritical as the idea of an open society is that everybody has the liberty to act and dress as they please as long as nobody else is harmed,” Baghajati told Al Jazeera.

Mohammedan females do not have  “the liberty to act and dress as they please”. If they do that, they are usually murdered by their owners. 

“These ladies are being criminalised. Everybody thinks that they are victims, but you cannot be patronising them. They say that they do not want to be freed because they are already free and chose to wear the face veil,” said Baghajati.

They are not “free to choose”, they are bashed and beaten and brainwashed into it.   Baghajati is a liar.

READ MORE: Rights group to take action after Cannes burkini ban

The legislation was approved in May as part of a wider set of proposals aimed at countering the rise of the Freedom Party, which came close to winning Austria’s presidential election in January.

In those measures, Austria also banned the distribution of the Quran and required all refugees and immigrants to participate in an “integration” programme to learn the German language and “Austrian ethics”.

Vage attempts to contain the spread of Islam. Not nearly enough.

Baghajati attributed the face veil ban as an attempt by politicians to “send a message to the public that they are in control” of the security situation.

Fears over “extremism” have been fuelled by the arrival of refugees.

But Austria has taken a tough stance against the entry of refugees.

Not wanting to be invaded and subjugated is “a tough stance”.

Earlier this year, the government told the European Union that it would no longer accept any refugees, many of whom are Syrians seeking refuge from the six-year war plaguing their country.

Not even 20% of these people are Syrians. All of them are soldiers of allah.

In February, Foreign Minister Sebastian Kurz called for setting up mass camps in North Africa for refugees who fled to Europe.


Farid Hafez, senior research fellow at Georgetown University’s Bridge Initiative, says the notion of the face veil ban is reflective of the “Islamophobic imagination of what has been construed to be the ‘Muslim problem'” in several countries across Europe.

“Islamophobia” is an idiot word and an insult to every European, who is in effect depicted as mentally ill for not wanting to be subjugated under Islam. There is an undeniable Muslim problem. The invasion needs to be reversed.

“Islamophobia is a problem in Austria as it is a problem and a challenge to democracy, human rights and religious freedom in many European countries today,” Hafez, who is also a professor at the University of Salzburg, told Al Jazeera, warning that the ban could have “serious consequences”.

An Islamo agitprop like Hafez has no business being a professor s at any European university, let alone Salzburg.

“Common people on the street [will] feel enabled to act disrespectfully towards Muslim women, insult them openly on the street,” said Hafez, adding that young aspiring Muslim women would feel “obstructed”.

“Aspiring Muslim women”- in Islamic countries they are not allowed  on the street without their male guardians. Islam is an insult to every European.

Austria is the latest European country to implement such a ban.

In 2011, France and Belgium introduced such laws. In 2015, the Netherlands approved a partial ban on the veil, while Bulgaria implemented a full ban in 2016.

READ MORE: Employers allowed to ban the hijab – EU court

The bans have fuelled a debate about multiculturalism across the continent.

Supporters say the face veil threatens security and hinders interaction, while those against say a ban violates religious rights against the backdrop of Islamophobia.

Spin, spin, spin….

“At the moment, we are very worried about the political discourse against Islam, which has entered mainstream politics,” said Baghajati of the Austrian Islamic Religious Authority, expressing anxiety over the rise of the Freedom Party, which, like similar groups across Europe, pedals an anti-immigration, anti-Islam line for political gain.

The usual cries of victimhood. To be rejected out of hand.

Last week, the far-right nationalist Alternative for Germany (AfD) party won seats in Germany’s Bundestag, the first to do so since World War II, stirring fears of similar waves in Austria.

How terrible!  May allah burn these kaffirs in hell!

“We are worried that this will have an effect on Austria, as well,” said Baghajati. “Accusations against Muslims, prejudices, and all kinds of negative thinking have now entered the mainstream”.

There is nothing positive about Islam. Nothing whatsoever. The truth will out.

“It feels as though it is a general threat against society to be a Muslim.”

Its not about feelings. Islam, Muslims, are a threat to Western society, our culture and civilization. We need to reverse the Islamic invasion.


2 thoughts on “Austria face veil ban ‘criminalises Muslim women’”

  1. Wearing a disguise which covers one’s face is self-criminalizing for anyone – but only muslims get to cry “racism!” about it.

    Besides, in reality, the whole purpose was to criminalize muslim women, by implying that it was always their fault that men got turned on by, and attracted to, their looks!

    It is a religious mandate in Islam that women be covered up or invite sex attacks:

    (Quran 24:31) And tell the believing women to reduce of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which appears thereof and to wrap their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah in repentance, all of you, O believers, that you might succeed.

    If a woman does not cover up, she is fair game to be assaulted:

    (Quran 33:59) O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.

    Islam Teaches Irresponsibility

    Islam teaches irresponsibility. It’s nothing more than a list of victim-blaming excuses for its members’ own criminal desires and actions. In this way it is exactly like the teachings of its Western libertine “liberal” counterparts.

    Criminals in general insist there are no real crimes nor criminals, because we’re all only ever helpless victims anyway – of predestined, “inevitable” circumstances beyond our control / victims of “society” / mere “products” of our environments (or, as their god, Karl Marx put it, of “historical predeterminism”) and as their holy mobster “muslim” brethren prefer to proudly put it, “slaves of unknown and unknowable allah!”

    Literal “Psycho-paths” (Greek for “Thought-Killers”) fear fear (the thought of the mere memory of previous pains) AS more pain, and so hate thinking in both them selves and in all others. They also hate music and sex, because it induces a loss of control. Thus while Muhammad had to show his sexual strength, he also had to bow to others’ complaints about seeing his wives going potty at night.

    From Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 4, Number 148:

    Narrated ‘Aisha:

    The wives of the Prophet used to go to Al-Manasi, a vast open place (near Baqia at Medina) to answer the call of nature at night. ‘Umar used to say to the Prophet “Let your wives be veiled,” but Allah’s Apostle did not do so. One night Sauda bint Zam’a the wife of the Prophet went out at ‘Isha’ time and she was a tall lady. ‘Umar addressed her and said, “I have recognized you, O Sauda.” He said so, as he desired eagerly that the verses of Al-Hijab (the observing of veils by the Muslim women) may be revealed. So Allah revealed the verses of “Al-Hijab” (A complete body cover excluding the eyes)….!

    While any other self-respecting warlord would have had the peeping toms executed for spying on his wives at night, Muhammad agreed with Umar the peeper that they should have to cover up at all times, lest they induce lust in “unsuspecting” muslims, and that’s how the whole burka/hijab notion arose, described in Sura 33:59.

    The hijab doesn’t express cultural diversity, so enabling it isn’t an expression of inclusive tolerance. There’s nothing in islam about it concerning any false “modesty” before god!

    Libertine “liberal” criminals never investigate what they support in public, because their motive is always biased slander anyway: they are victim-blaming slanderous masochists, always trying to prevent other people’s presumed racism before it starts. Committing crimes – “pre-emptively defensive” attacks – in advance of others’ presumed attacks, is what these fraudulent virtue-signalling hypocrite criminals are all about.

    The Hijab, (or Niqab, or burka) is not a religious duty or fashion trend, it’s only a prison uniform!

    It’s also required by sura 24:31.

    It’s also a victim-blaming insult to both sexes; from Qur’an Sura 33:59, it is a slanderous statement that implies the muslim men (and all men, just like Muhammad himself allegedly was) are so at the mercy of their hormones, that they must molest and rape any and all women they can see; so it’s always the women’s own fault for not covering up.

    It also says the muslim men have a duty to molest and rape all the infidel women for not covering up!

    “O Prophet! Tell your wives and daughters and the believing women to draw their cloaks over their bodies. That will be better so that they will be known so as not to be molested. And Allâh is Most Forgiving, Most Merciful.” (Qur’ân 33:59)

    So, exactly HOW will they “be known,” in the freedom sack?!

    Certainly not as in: “Oh, I know her! Hi, Mary!” – but “known” as muslimas – as members of the gang!

    And why is this important? “So as not to be molested!”

    Which again implies that muslims DID and always WILL “molest” (i.e: rape,) all the NON-muslim (“infidel”) women!

    That it’s the infidel women’s faults, because they don’t cover up, that the muslim men “must” molest (rape) them!

    And the Qur’an itself confirms their holy right and duty to rape infidel women.

    Muhammad also said women are created by allah as domesticated animals, created for men’s pleasure, and like fields to be tilled at will by men.

    So islam is also the “Religion of Rape!”


  2. Got islams in your area …
    Treat the symptoms … ineffective
    (ban the face veil … the cause [islam] is STILL there)

    Treat the Cause
    incarcerate the islamophiles
    (ineffective …their intention is to exterminate us … so)
    exterminate the islamophiles
    exterminate the islams
    exterminate islam

    Got no face veils in your area !
    Got no islams in your area !
    Got no islam in your area !
    (w/o even having to ban the objectionable!)

Comments are closed.