“London is more Islamic than many Muslim countries put together”

Protecting “offensive” speech is crucial.

Authoritarian governments rule that criticism of them is “offensive,” therefore they censor “offensive speech.”

Get it yet?

 Londonistan: 423 new mosques, 100 Shariah courts

London —Britain has been acquiring an increasingly Islamic face, with hundreds of official Shariah courts operating in the capital and many mosques dotting many cities.

“London is more Islamic than many Muslim countries put together,” Maulana Syed Raza Rizvi, an Islamic preacher, was quoted as saying in the local media.

Never enough:

Concern over mosque safety: British Muslims call for increase to govt security grant

Mosques will be able to apply for a government grant from a £5m pot from July, but British Muslim leaders say this is not enough.
Of course not. It’s never enough.
Paul Weston – Update Re Britain’s Sharia Compliant Police

Minneapolis cop who shot dead an unarmed yoga instructor, 40, is requesting no jail time despite being convicted of her murder

It’s never a good idea to import African savages to Western countries. It’s even worse to put them in uniform and to allow them to use weapons on innocent kafirs.

  • Former Minneapolis police officer Mohamed Noor, convicted of fatally shooting an unarmed woman in 2017, plans to ask a sentencing judge for no prison time
  • If that’s not granted, his defense lawyers are seeking less prison time than state sentencing guidelines recommend which call for a prison term of 11 to 15 years
  • Noor’s lawyers filed a motion Thursday, May 30 asking for a ‘dispositional departure’ when he is sentenced June 7
  • He was found guilty of third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in the shooting of Justine Damond, 40, who called 911 to report a possible crime

One thought on ““London is more Islamic than many Muslim countries put together””

  1. This is simple binary, carrot-and-stick thought control!

    “Hurt feelings laws” (crimes) are based on the false notion that we have no free will or self control and can be “triggered” to violence by mere words, even when they aren’t direct threats.

    Who could write and enforce such crimes as “laws!?”?

    That sort of thing gives criminals more “inevitable force” alibis (“The bad words made me do it!”) to excuse their own criminal desires and actions! It gives them perpetual cover as “equally helpless fellow victims” who must always be pitied – or else!

    Ditto for all “Hate-speech crime laws” (crimes which outlaw the useful emotion of perpetual anger at criminals and crimes, aka “Hate”)!

    So, once again, our betters tell us: Pity – Good! Hate – Bad!

Comments are closed.