Paki’s, Afghan’s & Moroccan’s: are they all refugees?

Facing a wave of nearly a million people fleeing fighting in northern Syria, Turkey has thrown open its borders with Greece to thousands of refugees and other migrants trying to enter Europe and has threatened to send “millions” more. Greece responds.

No Moslem is a refugee. All Moslems are soldiers of allah.

Although the push ostensibly stems from the conflict to Turkey’s south, Greek officials say very few of the recent arrivals are Syrians. Most of those arrested Monday were Afghans, Pakistanis and Moroccans. Figures from January, before the intensified fighting in Syria, show 35 per cent of those who entered Greece from Turkey were Afghans. Syrians accounted for 14 per cent.

Few, if any of them are Syrians. They are for the most part Pakis & Afghans, but you can find among them jihadists from all around Islamistan trying to creep into Europe.

Migration as Jihad

https://twitter.com/AndySwan/status/1234846797123792897

https://twitter.com/BasedPoland/status/1235142691807039489

https://twitter.com/BasedPoland/status/1235481423810715648

White British girl held prisoner by Muslim grooming gang for 12 years and forced to have 8 abortions

https://twitter.com/FriendsOfSerbs/status/1171701332279005184

Migration is Jihad

Migration is part of the doctrine of jihad. Migration is so important that the Islamic calendar is based upon the Hijra, Mohammed’s migration from Mecca to Medina. Why? Because it was migration that lead to the creation of jihad in Medina. And it was jihad that made Islam triumphant.

In the past Muslims tended to stay in Islamic countries. Today, the new politics is to migrate to Kafir lands and immerse themselves in local politics. This is the jihad of money, writing and speech. Their politics is to bring the Sharia to Kafir culture. An example is using Islamic money is to build departments in universities that will support Sharia and never criticize Islam.

One thought on “Paki’s, Afghan’s & Moroccan’s: are they all refugees?”

  1. This problem has been slanted from the beginning; in what historical context has it ever been desirable for any state to keep its borders closed from those wanting to leave (East Germany, I’m looking at you and your Wall!) as opposed to the obvious duty of a country to keep its own damned borders closed to invaders, whether or not they come unarmed while posing as refugees?!
    Armed border guards should simply shoot trespassing invaders.
    That’s how it’s always been, throughout history … up until now.

Comments are closed.