Toronto: The 'Capital of Mulitculturalism' is discovering that many Muslims stop playing along once they get their citizenship….

Toronto’s Love of Diversity Is Tested by Islamists

“If politeness and ceremony be observed toward Mohammedans, they imagine they are feared and become arrogant; but in showing severity and rudeness, they are impressed with fear and respect, and they are supple and manageable.”

–North China Herald,1867

Kathy Shaidle/Pajamas Media

A large influx of Muslim immigrants from Pakistan, Somalia, and elsewhere is putting “tolerant” Toronto to the test.

Toronto’s motto is “Diversity Our Strength.” According to the city’s official website, it is where “more than 150 languages are spoken daily and where 50 percent of [its 2.7 million] residents are born outside of Canada.”

When multiculturalism was declared official national policyin 1971, some citizens bristled, but others merely envisioned — to employ one Canadian blogger’s cynical expression — “more pavilions at Folkfest.” Already the destination of choice for many immigrants, Toronto duly appointed itself the country’s capital of multiculturalism.

Decades later, though, a large influx of Muslim immigrantsfrom Pakistan, Somalia, and elsewhere is putting “tolerant” Toronto to the test.

Like newcomers before them, Muslims are eagerly courted by politicians, who are accustomed to treating Canada’s urban “ethnics” as colorful yet mostly harmless voting blocks. And, in turn, Muslims are requesting accommodation for various religious and cultural practices, just like every group before them — except that sometimes these demands are at odds with Canada’s Judeo-Christian heritage and “liberal” self-image.

All the while, the number of Muslims in the city is growing rapidly. Unlike a comparable city such as New York, which is about 9% Jewish and 3.5% Muslim, the same demographic ratio in Toronto is reversed:6.7% Muslim to 4.2% Jewish. This is a fairly recent development and the trend seems destined to continue. According to the latest Statistics Canada report, “Toronto’s population of Arabs and West Asians could more than triple between 2006 and 2031. … People with a non-Christian religion could represent nearly 31% of the census metropolitan area’s population by 2031, up from 21% in 2006.”

Continue reading Toronto: The 'Capital of Mulitculturalism' is discovering that many Muslims stop playing along once they get their citizenship….

Netherlands: Large Scale Mohammedan Immigration Causes Economic Disaster

Immigration Islamic Invasion comes at hefty price


Lets do a profit & loss on the value of Mohammedan cultural enrichment!

Immigrants are expensive for Dutch society, but few people want to say it out loud for fear of the consequences, a study by a Dutch scientist has found.

The economic effects of immigration have become a hot-button issue in Dutch politics. The mere mention of the subject is often greeted with suspicion and loathing. But that didn’t stop scholar Jan van de Beek from writing his doctoral thesis on the issue. In his PhD research, which he defended at the University of Amsterdam on Tuesday, he answered two related questions: what kind of economic consequences did mass immigration to the Netherlands between 1960 and 2005 have, and why is it such a taboo to study the economic effects of these immigrants?

The reluctance to study the matter has done well to conceal some unpleasant facts, Van de Beek claims. For one, the Dutch policy of recruiting workers from outside of Europe in the 1960s needlessly delayed the modernisation of Dutch industry. As the Dutch economy was modernised in the 1980s, many immigrants were laid off and became dependent on welfare. Even today, the Dutch welfare state mainly attracts immigrants that impose a net cost on the Dutch economy, Van de Beek found.Van de Beek has come to conclusions the Netherlands may not like. Since the 1970s, little research has been done into the economic effects of immigration, for fear of playing into the hand of the xenophobic right. As recently as last year, populist politician Geert Wilders asked the Dutch cabinet to calculate the net costs or benefits imposed on society by immigrants. Cabinet refused to do so, which led to uproar amongst several opposition parties. The minister responsible called it “improper” to reduce citizens’ contribution to society “to a profit-loss analysis”.

Continue reading Netherlands: Large Scale Mohammedan Immigration Causes Economic Disaster

Australian lawmaker calls for debate on Muslim immigration

Outcry as MP calls for debate on Muslim enclaves Kevin Andrews calls for debate on Muslim enclaves | The Australian H/T Mullah

Of course there’s a link: between uncontrolled Muslim immigration and terrorism

LIBERAL MP Kevin Andrews has blamed political correctness for a failure to debate the Muslim “enclaves” in parts of Australia.

  • Kevin Andrews wants Muslim debate/long overdue
  • Islamic Council says its counterproductive/of course its”counterproductive” – to Islam….
  • Greens say suggestion ‘despicable’-  Remember, Bobby Brown has the most to lose….

Instantly, the usual suspects go apeshit:

Opposition frontbencher Greg Hunt distanced himself from Mr Andrews’ comments.

“Our approach should be colour-blind, ethnicity-blind, background-blind and simply focused on their ability to contribute,” he said.

“I believe in a diverse and multicultural Australia.” (Muslims believe in an Islamic Australia and are religiously obliged to make Australia Islamic/ed)

Mr Andrews told The Australian Online that it was clear that some Muslims were not “dispersing” into the community as other ethnic groups had in the past.

“I don’t think it’s happening as rapidly as with other communities in the past. I think it’s desirable,” he said.

Continue reading Australian lawmaker calls for debate on Muslim immigration

'Muslim immigration: the most radical change in European history'

Note to readers:

Apologies for slow blogging. We are changing providers and  that always causes problems. We shall be back to normal within a few days, hopefully…

‘Muslim immigration: the most radical change in European history’

“Christopher Caldwell is a mild-mannered Financial Times journalist who over the past decade has covered continental Europe (France especially) and its relationship with Islam in particular.

“That Caldwell is so mainstream, well-respected and analytical makes his conclusion all the more devastating – that the mass migration of Africans and Asians into Europe since the Second World War was an unprecedented, economically unnecessary and ill-thought-out plan that has had a profoundly negative impact on our way of life. Furthermore, he says, the mass importation of Muslims at a time when Europe has lost its own faith and Islam has developed a dangerous and powerful radicalism threatens the very freedom of Europe.

“… self-loathing was at the heart of the immigration experiment and later experiments in multiculturalism and political correctness; only a society so racked with self-hatred would have invited foreign labour in such numbers despite the economic benefits being so thin….

“Can Europe be the same? Clearly not. Can we reach some happy compromise that peacefully integrates such large communities and avoids the conflicts that have plagued such multi-cultural countries in the past? Probably not.

“Pim Fortuyn in Holland offered the best hope of a non-racist [sic!], liberal Europe that believed in itself; after his murder the future lies either with Nicolas Sarkozy, who believes in republican integration, or the likes of Geert Wilders, whose implacable hostility to Islam is increasingly shared across Europe.

“This is a fascinating, earth-shattering account of the most radical change in European history.”

Yet another adulatory review of Caldwell’s paranoid anti-Muslim tract, Reflections on the Revolution in Europe, this one by Torygraph blogger Ed West in the Catholic Herald, 21 August 2009From the Bunglawussi blog…

Obama Gov’t Supports Islamic Terrorism:

DOJ reveals that Bush/CIA interrogators threatened KSM’s children; Holder to appoint special prosecutor

The Obama- bastards are on the side of our enemies…

ZIP Links:

US gives more cash to Hamas

What’s that? It isn’t going to Hamas? See here and here.

Suicidal Short-Sightedness Update: “UNRWA assistance to Palestinian refugees from Iraq,” from ReliefWeb, August 23:

Official PA news agency: a Jewish state threatens all humanity

But all those Arab states full of jihadists? No problem!

“Humanity” for Arab-Muslims of course means Muslims only. Infidels or Jews need not apply…

They Sincerely Want Peace Update: “A Jewish state threatens all humanity: Official PA news agency,” by Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook for Palestinian Media Watch, August 10

Sweden: Large Muslim population intimidates local Jews

“Strongest among men in enmity to the believers wilt thou find the Jews…” — Qur’an 5:82

Aftonbladet Blood Libel Update. “Stockholm’s rabbi: Large Muslim population intimidates local Jews,” by Matthew Wagner for the Jerusalem Post, August 24

“The release of the Abdel Basset al-Megrahi indicates to the jihadist world that their scorn for our lifestyle, for our Western values and freedoms is justifiable”

Why this was a bad idea. “Failing to learn the Lockerbie lesson,” by Laura Rosen Cohen in the National Post, August 24 (thanks to Kathy Shaidle):

[…] The release of the Abdel Basset al-Megrahi indicates to the jihadist world that their scorn for our lifestyle, for our Western values and freedoms is justifiable. Their insistence that our societies are decadent, morally inverted places are perhaps not without merit. If we do not punish the murderers of our own precious children, families and friends, if we do not extinguish the lives of the terrorists, or even incarcerate them, why should they think otherwise? Moreover, if we as a society, voluntarily send these messages of impotence and self-defeat to our enemies, why on earth do we deserve any of our remaining freedoms?

What case can be made for a society that annuls the value of its own citizens’ life and enables their murderers to live freely?

Let the Scottish example be a lesson to us all: the barbarians are at the gate. Instead of reinforcing the walls, we’ve just given them an extra set of keys and told them to make themselves at home. Inevitably, they will.

Over my dead body. Which is just the way they want it, of course!

Muslims are supplanting our culture more than enhancing it


Immigrants changing European culture more than enhancing it


Muslims’ ‘parallel society’

Through decades of mass immigration to Europe’s hospitable cities and because of a strong disinclination to assimilate, Muslims are changing the face of Europe, perhaps decisively. These Muslim immigrants are not so much enhancing European culture as they are supplanting it. The products of an adversarial culture, these immigrants and their religion, Islam, are “patiently conquering Europe’s cities, street by street.” More from counter jihad
Fitzgerald must read:

A matter of self-preservation

The crux with Islamic immigration

Like many women in Mogadishu, [Maryam Mohammed] feels less vulnerable to violence nowadays, but she is afraid it will be harder to find work under the Islamic regime.“I don’t see them as something good,” she said. “I’d like to leave Somalia if I can and do business, have a small shop or even a job with a decent salary, like a secretary or a cleaner.”


“Now I’m afraid to be arrested or beaten,” she said. “It’s safer than before, but we have no freedom. We are not happy with this Islamic Sharia law.”

She dreads donning a drab hijab before leaving the house.

– from this article

Here is the problem. Suppose this woman were allowed to emigrate to, say, Italy. Presumably she would arrive with her family — her husband, her children. Or if not, she would find a husband once in Italy.

This husband might be found from among the Muslims already resident in Italy, or else this woman might find a non-Muslim husband from among the many people, including Italians, in Italy. As a Muslimah, she cannot marry a non-Muslim, so a non-Muslim husband would have to convert to Islam. This would likely mean very little to him. He would not take it seriously. Nonetheless, once he does convert, he has now become part of the Islamic community. There is then a chance that, by degrees, he will take the whole thing seriously, after the manner of converts such as Adam Gadahn, John Walker Lindh, Richard Reid, Jose Padilla – you get the idea.

Continue reading Muslims are supplanting our culture more than enhancing it