How the British Establishment and Al BeBeeCeera Failed to Demonize Nick Griffin & the BNP


Ever since Griffins BBC appearance the far left slime bombers go apeshit. Quite obviously, its them who fail in the marketplace of ideas. Its his critics who fail to debate.  Even more so, these smear merchants fail to see that vilifying Griffin and the BNP  is a discredit to themselves.

B409737D-03F4-B5D0-565DA453BAE7F092 Nick Griffin

Andrew Bolt:

It’s the Hanson phenomenon, only far more serious, and shows the danger of attempts to ban the BNP leader from speaking on the BBC:

One statistic above all stands out from the YouGov opinion poll commissioned by the Telegraph. And it’s not that 22 per cent of respondents would consider voting for the BNP, amazing though that is. It’s that a majority of voters, while they may despise the BNP, think it “has a point”:

More than half of those questioned said they agreed with the BNP, or thought that it “had a point” in wishing to “speak up for the interests of the indigenous, white British people … which successive governments have done far too little to protect.” This included 43 per cent who said that, while they shared some of its concerns, they had “no sympathy for the party itself”.

I have some sympathy with the “but would you give a platform to Adolf Hitler” argument. But the BNP politicians, although unpleasant, are not the Nazis, and if half the voters think that at least this one party raises an important issue, then banning it from debates can only entrench doubt in democracy, or at least cyncism towards the existing political and media establishment.

If the BNP are as dumb and wicked as claimed, then open debates will eventually destroy it. Using violence, abuse, censorship and even the law to instead bully it into silence will only make more people determined to defend it – if only to defend their own right to be heard. That was the lesson of Hansonism.

Here’s how BNP leader Nick Griffin actually went on the BBC: Video here

Matthew Engel complains that the gang-up was exactly not what was needed. I agree, especially given what these polls say. Argument, not abuse, is the most effective antidote. I’m with Rod Liddle: don’t panic or rage, just talk.

Sheik Yer’mami noticed that “Baroness Warsi” managed to slime Griffin with some imaginary Nazi associations. But truth was never part of the Mohammedan agenda… Traditionally, the Mohammedans sided with the Nazis then and glorify Hitler even now. Its a pity that Griffin himself took the bait of “racism” instead of attacking Mohammedanism as such.

Quote of the day: “my father served in the RAF during the Second World War – yours spent it in prison for refusing to fight Adolf Hitler…”

We reported earlier today:

BNP’s Griffin on Question Time: “We are the aborigines here”

Nick Griffin of the British National Party to Jack “the burqa” Straw, the spineless Nullabor blowboy  who fathered  ” the alternative would be too horrible to contemplate” quote. (in regards to the Mohammedan invasion, meaning hope beats reality, just in case the Islamic invaders don’t  settle in and become civilized…) Indeed, Jack, the man of Straw, always his fathers son, turned ash gray when Griffin called him out on the coward he is: “my father served in the RAF during the Second World War – yours spent it in prison for refusing to fight Adolf Hitler…”


Of course, the papers are full of it today, but a truthful account is hard to come by:

Do Gooders and "International Conventions"

Ayn Rand:

We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force. 

Sink the boats of illegal immigrants!

Thanks to Counter Jihad:

Nick Griffin the leader of BNP  
Dagbladet — SIRIL K. HERSETH
Refugees the Norwegian navy rescued in 2001 ”We will not kill them, but throw out a few lifeboats they can get home with,” says British top politician. 

”The only way to stop the mass immigration to Europe, is to sink the boats with illegal refugees before they land,” said Nick Griffin to the BBC TV program The Record Europe yesterday. 

Challenging the European Union

Griffin, who is the upcoming EU-parliamentarian, says the EU should sink these boats.BBCs journalist responded by saying that the European Union do not tend to kill people on the water.     

”I do not believe that we should kill them. We can throw out a few lifeboats they can get home with,” said Griffin. He believes this course of action will save lives in the long run. 

Will close the borders 

”Immigrants are coming on boats that do not withstand the travel across the Atlantic, and many drown en route. If we let them understand that no one under any circumstances will sneak into the EU, they will eventually quit coming, he said, and added: “Sooner or later we must shut the borders of Europe, otherwise we would be flooded by the third world.”

Elisabeth Rasmussen the general secretary of Refugee help 

“Totally sick “

The General Secretary of the Refugee Support, Elisabeth Rasmussen, a perfectly good moonbat as we  can see here,  doesn’t understand  “what Islamic terrorists  can  gain by spreading fear among us.”  She “would love to have that discussion over a nice cup of coffee…”

The General Secretary of the Refugee Support, Elisabeth Rasmussen, reacted strongly to the initiative. 

”This is totally sick. It is so brutal that one almost cannot take it seriously. Yet we know that this is a trend that is spreading among politicians throughout Europe,” said Rasmussen to Dagbladet. 

The fact that Nick Griffin is upcoming EU-parliamentarian, making his initiative completely horrific, she says. 

”He does not view immigrants as people.” (Does Elisabeth Rasmussen know that Muslims regard us unbelievers are “the vilest of creatures according to that dirty book, the Koran?  Sura (8:55) - Surely the vilest of animals in Allah’s sight are those who disbelieve) 

Rasmussen:  To me, it seemed like he classifies them as  subhuman. I doubt that he would make such statements if it were Britons who sat on the boats,” said Rasmussen. [Of course, it is not the Britons, Dutch, Danes, Swedes, Norwegians, Finns, or Germans that are invading a civilized country and spreading crime and misery and depleting the culture, wealth and social services.]

“Violates international rules”

She adds that this is a violation of the international laws. 

”All countries in Europe are bound by the rules in connection with the Refugee Convention. The laws are very clear that people have the right to come to Europe and seek for help. They have no right to stay, but the right to present their application, specifies Rasmussen.

*    ”All countries in Europe are bound by the rules…” why only countries in Europe?

These laws have to be changed.  Africa is for Africans, China for Chinese, Japan for Japanese.  And  since no Islamic country respects these treaties (or any treaties with unbelievers) ,  they are not worth the paper they’re written on. Were will we run to when our countries are ruined by Marxism and the sharia, “Islamic Law?”

UK: Trial of Muslim who racially abused BNP leader Nick Griffith "not in the public interest"

Lancashire News, thanks to Davey

Burnley (Muslim-) man to stand trial over allegations he racially abused abusing  BNP leader Nick Griffen

nick_griffin          Remember: only white people are ‘racist’, and  opposing Islam makes you a ‘bigot & Islamophobe’ in the eyes of our detractors…


Islamophobe (is-slahm-o-fohb) – A non-Muslim who knows too much about Islam.

A BURNLEY man is set to stand trial later this year over allegations that he racially abused BNP leader Nick Griffin.

Lawyers representing Tauriq Khalid claimed that his prosecution, relating to an alleged incident at a demonstration in Burnley last November, “might not be in the public interest.”

* Otherwise… 10 000 Muslims would go apeshit and riot against the state?

Khalid, 25, of Windermere Avenue, Burnley, pleaded not guilty to using racially abusive threatening behaviour towards Griffin on November 18.

Defence barrister Zoe Neild told Preston Crown Court that the trial may be used by people “for their own political motivations”.

“It may not have been given consideration at the highest levels within the Crown Prosecution Service and we would ask that this is done,” she added.

The incident, where Khalid is alleged to have hurled ‘racist’ abuse at Griffin, is said to have taken place while the party leader was being interviewed by the group’s internet broadcast arm, BNPTV.

But Jonathan Oultram, for the crown, said the case had been reviewed by a senior lawyer and would still proceed.

Recorder of Preston, Judge Anthony Russell QC, said he had also read the case papers and was satisified that the matter had been considered by senior CPS figures.

Khalid was released on bail by Judge Russell to face a three-day trial at Preston, beginning on November 2.

The incident is alleged to have occurred at a BNP demonstration outside Burnley Police Station, in Parker Lane, over the prospect of four party supporters from East Lancashire being charged with racial incitement offences regarding the distribution of leaflets linking Muslim gangs to the heroin trade.

*Griffin was convicted in 1998 of distributing material likely to incite racial hatred.

Poll Results: What did you think of Obama's speech in Cairo?

  1. Pathetic   15 %
  2. Whose side is he on?   15 %
  3. Peace in our time…   14 %
  4. Its clear he’s a Muslim…   14 %
  5. Obamamessiah will destroy Israel and the U.S.   41 %


New Poll starts today:

Is the BNP anti-Semitic?

nick-griffin-eggs-415x275BNP leader Nick Griffin pelted with eggs

Under attack: Nick Griffin after he was hit by eggs daubed with swastikas outside Parliament. “Anti-fascist” protesters confronted him, shouting ‘off our streets, Nazi scum,’ before chasing him…  more>>

Here’s what Ayaan Ali Hirsi has to say about Obama’s speech in Cairo:

Obama should speak truth to Islam because others can’t

Ayaan Hirsi Ali/The Australian

IT was not an April Fools’ joke. When President Barack Obama met the Queen of the Commonwealth at Buckingham Palace, he gave her an iPod. Last week, I was half expecting the president to show up in the Middle East laden with Kindles.

Continue reading Poll Results: What did you think of Obama's speech in Cairo?

UK: Open Season on the BNP Unites the Establishment

Since  the BNP secured two European seats, the  malevolent,  corrupt leftoids and the (not so different)  conservative (in name only) Tories go apeshit and do everything to silence the new kid on the block. Not much left of the once great spirit of democracy in the kingdom:

Al BeBeeCeera reports with glee:  Egg attack on BNP leader Griffin

More institutionalized idiocy:

Foreign Office minister Chris Bryant has suggested that we get rid of the Red Cross of the International Red Cross because of its connotations with the Crusades. And you do know how we mustn’t offend the ROP.

_45893690_grifegg_226                               Nick Griffin was forced to retreat from college green

BNP leader Nick Griffin has been pelted with eggs and forced to abandon a press conference outside Parliament.

Dozens of protesters disrupted the event, which follows the British National Party winning its first two seats in the European Parliament.

Chanting anti-Nazi slogans and holding placards they surrounded Mr Griffin as he was bundled into a car.

Mr Griffin was elected for the North West region – a result condemned by parties across the political spectrum.

Continue reading UK: Open Season on the BNP Unites the Establishment

Poll Results: What is the real percentage of Islamic radicals, as opposed to “moderates?”

14 % believe 15 to 25 % are radical Muslims

12 %  believe  35 to 50 % are radicals

15 % believe  between 60 and 85 % are radicals

59 % of WoJ readers don’t believe there are any ‘moderate’ Muslims at all

New Poll  Starts Now:

Will the KRudd government prevent Nick Griffin from speaking in Australia?



Continue reading Poll Results: What is the real percentage of Islamic radicals, as opposed to “moderates?”