Susan Rice: U.S. Security Agencies Have Too Many White Males

During the commencement address for Florida International University, Obama national security advisor Susan Rice said that there were not enough minorities in high-ranking positions and too many elite white men.

“Minorities still make up less than 20 percent of our senior diplomats, less than 15 percent of senior military officers and senior intelligence officials,” Rice said according to prepared remarks released by the White House. ” Too often, our national security workforce has been what former Florida Senator Bob Graham called ‘white, male, and Yale.’”

Rice argued that “a diverse national security workforce enables us to unlock all of our nation’s talent. There are some 320 million people in the United States. Nearly 40 percent are minorities, and an increasing number of them are earning college and graduate degrees.”

She continued that the State Department and defense agencies would be better served by a diversity of life experiences. “Groups comprised of different people tend to question one another’s assumptions, draw on divergent perspectives and experiences, and yield better outcomes. Whether we’re confronting ISIL or Ebola, cybersecurity or climate change, solving today’s multifaceted global challenges demand more varied viewpoints and experiences than ever,” Rice argued.

Sexually obsessed Iraqi Ayatollah Al-Haeri:

People Who Will Oppose the Mahdi Will Become Slaves or Slave Girls, Who Can Be Lent Out to Friends

Iraqi Ayatollah Abdul Karim Al-Haeri, Director of the Karbala Hawza Shiite seminary, said in a video that after the arrival of the Mahdi, it would be permissible to take five or ten slave girls from among those who oppose the imam, and to offer them to friends for sex, when they come over. Al-Haeri recommended this as a means to prevent marital problems: “If his wife asks him where he was, he has no problem [telling her he was with his friend],” he said. Excerpts from the lecture were posted on April 7 on the Facebook page of Beith Al-Wujdan Al-Thaqafi, a group focused on enlightenment and extremism in the Arab and Islamic world.

The filth from their mouths gives them away, every time. But the West choses to blame the Jews….

Shaban Sherif Mady says Jerusalem will be ‘regained through blood,’ claims UN never passed a resolution against Israel

Times of Israel

Turkey Threatens To Unleash Migrant Wave On Europe

Muslims believe that the conquest of infidel lands is allah’s will and inevitable. Erdogan does what every megalomanic mufti did before him: he demands the EUro-dhimmies pay the jiziya with willing submission and demands that they keep their borders open so that the Islamic invasion can continue unhindered.

This one goes out to those who are dense, who still don’t get what Islamic jihad is all about:

“What is the conquest?” Erdogan asked his audience.

“The conquest is Hijrah [expansion of Islam through emigration, following the example of Muhammad, the founder of Islam, and his followers from Mecca to Medina]. The conquest is Mecca. It is to cleanse the Kaaba, the house of Allah on earth, of all the icons. The conquest is Jerusalem. It is when the prophet Omar stamped the seal of Islam on Al-Aqsa Mosque, our first Qibla [the direction to face when a Muslim prays during the five times daily prayers] while respecting all faiths including [those of] Christians and Jews.

“The conquest is Al-Andalus [Muslim Spain]. It is to build the most beautiful architecture, literature and culture of the world such as in Córdoba and Granada.

“The conquest is Samarkand [a city in present-day Uzbekistan and once a capital of the ancient Sogdian civilization whose main religion was Zoroastrianism.]

“The conquest is Bukhara [also in present-day Uzbekistan. It was a diverse city with Zoroastrian, Buddhist, Jewish and Nestorian Christian communities]. It is to establish one of the greatest civilizations of history in the steppes of Central Asia.

“The conquest is Salah al-Din al-Ayubbi [Saladin, who in 1187 invaded Jerusalem]. It is to hoist the flag of Islam in Jerusalem again.

“The conquest is Alp Arslan [the second Sultan of the medieval Muslim Seljuk Empire, who conquered Anatolia].”

“The conquest is to open the doors of Anatolia up to Vienna for this blessed nation. The conquest is Osman Ghazi [the first Ottoman Sultan]. It is to make the sycamore [the Ottoman Empire] meet with the ground that would cover three continents and seven climates through the enlightenment inspired by Sheikh Edebali who said, ‘Make the human live so that the state can live’.

“The conquest is preparation. The conquest is when the Sultan Murad II abdicated the throne to his 12-year-old son, Mehmed II. And of course, the conquest is the Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror. It is, at age 21, to embrace Istanbul, the most favorite city of the world, after destroying the millennial Byzantium.

“Mehmed the Conqueror conquered Istanbul in 1453. But the conquests always continued before and after that. They continued with Sultan Selim I the Grim, Sultan Suleiman the Lawgiver, Sultan Murad IV, and Sultan Abdul Hamid II.

“The conquest is to have the courage, tenacity and sagacity to defy the entire world even at the hardest times.

“The conquest is 1994 [when Erdogan was elected mayor of Istanbul]. It is to serve Istanbul and the legacy of the Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror. The conquest is to make Turkey stand up on its feet again.”

The crowd shouted, “Here is the army, here is the commander.”

Turkey? In the EU?
by Uzay Bulut/Gatestone Institute
Continue reading Tayyip Erdogan: “What is the conquest?”

Islamo-Ignoramus Kerry on the Syria Negotiations: “a hudna is possible over the course of these next hrs”

Andrew Bostom

Islamo-Ignoramus Secretary of State John  Kerry pronounced the following on the Syria negotiations: “a hudna is possible over the course of these next hrs”

Pace Kerry’s blathering stupidity, a compelling illustration of how well the U.S. Department of State once understood the true nature of jihad, and the related concept of a “hudna”—a tactical armistice for the advantage of the Muslims—as a normative Islamic institution—circa 1880 (see my, “Iran’s Final Solution For Israel”, pp. 73-75)—was provided by Edward A. Van Dyck, then US Consular Clerk at Cairo, Egypt.

From this duty of making war upon unbelievers, the Moslem jurists draw the inference that their rulers are never lastingly bound to peaces and truces made with the enemy, but can break them at pleasure. Il Hidayah, a work on Moslem law [also Hanafi], says: “Peace may be granted to unbelievers, but it is only a truce, and may be if advantageous, broken; notice, however, being previously given to the enemy of the rupture.” These jurists also hold that Moslem rulers cannot, if they wish, enter into a lasting peace, but can only make temporary truces, to be broken at pleasure by the prince and in the interest of the believers. Kuduri [Quduri], who was already quoted above, says: “If it is seen fit by the Imam (chief, ruler of the Muslims), to make peace with the enemies or with a potion of them, and it is, in the interests of the Moslems, advantageous to do, that is not wrong. But if he shall make peace with them, for a certain space of time, and should deem it for the good of the Moslems to break the covenant, he shall denounce it to them and renew the war.”…

Eighty years later, the great Lebanese scholar of Islamic Law Antoine Fattal (in 1958) elaborated on the origins of the “hudna” based upon the guiding behavior of Islam’s prophet Muhammad and the armistice of Hudaibiyah—broken unilaterally when Muhammad’s Muslim votaries regained their tactical advantage.

Dhimma or dhimmitude…is one of the results of the jihad or holy war. Connected with the notion of jihad is the distinction between dar al-harb (territory or ―house of war) and dar al Islam (house of Islam). The latter includes all territories subject to Moslem authority. It is in a state of perpetual war with the dar al-harb. The inhabitants of the dar al-harb are harbis, who are not answerable to the Islamic authority and whose persons and goods are mubah, that is, at the mercy of Believers. However, when Moslems are in a subordinate state, they can negotiate a truce with the Harbis lasting no more than ten years, which they are obliged to revoke unilaterally as soon as they regain the upper hand, following the example of the Prophet after Hudaibiyya

Italian police make two arrests in probe into ‘Canary Wharf terror plot

by Esmerelda Weatherwax from the London Evening Standard and The Telegraph

Scrubbing the Islam From Islamic Terror

Moonbattery

Denial is more than just the name of a river in Egypt. It is the West’s official policy for dealing with the ongoing Islamic terror war. Those who violate this policy but value their careers are quick to apologize:

Police have apologised for making a fake Islamist suicide bomber use a “religious phrase” during a counter-terror exercise in Manchester.

What about real life, where it is harder to stop maniacs from screaming “Allahu Akbar” before they murder the innocent? The solution is simple — edit the news:

Earlier [Tuesday] morning, I reported on the bloody rampage at a railway station in Munich by a Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar.” This is undeniably an Islamic attack. Well, not for CNN.

They have scrubbed all reference to the jihad murderer’s motive and mission. Despite the lack of evidence, CNN speculates that the murderer might have mental problems. A man is stabbed to death, three others seriously injured and CNN goes into “protect Islam” mode.

No wonder a patently fraudulent demagogue can secure a major party nomination in part by reversing himself 180° and promising to keep out Muslims in a shameless political stunt. People know where the authorities’ sympathies lie. Some are getting so desperate, they have given up on demanding honest, responsible leadership.

And another one:

If it waddles like a duck, and quacks like a duck, generally… it’s a duck.

Instantly, after the knife attack by an allahuakbaring assassin in Grafing, the police went into the obligatory denial that follows every jihadist attack. The lame stream media focused its reporting on the fact that the perp had a German passport. First, we were told his name was  „Paul H. from Hessen“, which is false. His name is Rafik Youssef. “Authorities” have a lot to answer for, and  the media apparatchiks are beneath contempt.

“…soundbite salesmen and carnival barkers” will not keep us safe from Islamic terrorism, (which must not be named)

But John Kerry and Hussein Obama will… by keeping the borders open. Aren’t Americans embarrassed by the idiocy of John Kerry?

.
‘There are no walls big enough to stop people’ from suicide attacks

I would have thought that if there’s a will there is a way. It appears this lunatic is willing to give it all away. 

Secretary of State John Kerry slid in a somewhat shocking statement to graduates at Northeastern University in Boston, delivering a commencement speech that included a call for them to get ready for a world without borders.

He also took a sidebar stab at Republican presumptive presidential nominee Donald Trump, who has called several times for the building of a wall on America’s southern borders – and for Mexico President Vincente Fox to pay for it – and said “soundbite salesmen” and “carnival barkers” ought not be in charge of U.S. security, Breitbart reported.

More below the fold.

In other news:

The bastard son of a Kenyan Muslim and a Gramscian whore is doubling down on his obsessions with successful entrepreneurs:

Continue reading JOHN KERRY TO GRADS: PREPARE FOR ‘BORDERLESS WORLD’

Resisting Islam makes us less safe, go figure! Open the floodgates and submit, you infidel sons of apes and swine!

Robert Spencer

Well, that didn’t take long. London elects a Muslim who opposes “extremism” as mayor, and almost immediately he issues a veiled threat: Trump must drop his “ignorant view of Islam,” i.e., he must change his stance regarding Muslim immigration, or else the U.S. and the U.K. will be less safe. So a temporary moratorium on Muslim immigration in order to try to prevent jihad terror attacks in the U.S. will only lead to jihad terror attacks in the U.S. Khan is in effect saying “Let Muslims in — or else.” Yet letting in Muslim immigrants, in light of the fact that there is no way to distinguish jihadis from peaceful Muslims, will also lead to jihad terror attacks.

Also, what “ignorant view of Islam” has Donald Trump ever expressed? He has simply made the quite sensible and true observation that there is no way to keep jihadis out while letting Muslims in. Can Sadiq Khan dispute that? Would he even care to? What an interesting statement, in any case: for Khan, ignorance of Islam is unsafe. One must have “knowledge” of Islam, that is, one must adhere to the politically correct Islam-Is-Peace and Muslims-Are-Victims line in order to be safe. The implications of this are far-reaching. Presumably then to point out that Islam has doctrines mandating warfare against unbelievers and their subjugation renders one unsafe — and unsafe in what way? Why, it makes you liable to be attacked by Muslims who are enraged because you don’t believe Islam is peaceful. So for Khan, one must believe that Islam is a Religion of Peace, or risk being attacked by violent Muslims.

“London’s New Mayor Warns Trump: Let In Muslims Or They Will Attack America,” by Blake Neff, Daily Caller, May 10, 2016 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

…“Donald Trump’s ignorant view of Islam could make both of our countries less safe – it risks alienating mainstream Muslims around the world and plays into the hands of extremists,” he said. “Donald Trump and those around him think that Western liberal values are incompatible with mainstream Islam – London has proved him wrong.”

While Khan touted the liberal values of British Muslims, some polls have found worrying indicators that their assimilation is incomplete. A poll in April, for instance, found that two-thirds of British Muslims would not tell the government if a friend or family member became involved with extremists. Half of them said homosexuality should be illegal and over 20 percent supported establishing sharia in the U.K.