History – Winds of Jihad

Fly me to the moon

She looks very intelligent. I believe her.

🇲🇾 An Islamic Malaysian professor named Solehah Yaacob is claiming that ancient Muslim Malays could fly. As in, they could literally fly.

Her other theories include that Muslims taught both the Chinese how to do kung-fu and the Romans how to fly. pic.twitter.com/68WnwKYON7

— 鈴森はるか『haruka suzumori』 🇯🇵 (@harukaawake) August 24, 2026

There never was an “ancient Muslim Malaysia”. That land was Buddhist long before Islam made a mess of it.

AUSTRALIA: BEFORE SETTLEMENT, A BLOOD-SOAKED LAND

Fairytales about Aboriginal history are annoying. The convicts did not encounter the mythical noble savage. This land was soaked in blood before the white man brought civilisation. Here’s another dose of reality.

“Welcome to Country” Historic Photo: Kerry & Co c.1901 – NSW Art Gallery.

BEFORE SETTLEMENT, A BLOOD-SOAKED LAND

Robert Hill – Quadrant Online, August 20, 2026

Australian history has been distorted by lies, fabrication, exaggeration and selective evidence. Out of that distortion has emerged one overwhelming story: that the British arrived in 1788 and turned a peaceful continent into a land of violence, massacre and war.

The truth begins in exactly the opposite place.

The British did not enter a peaceful continent.

They entered a continent occupied by peoples living in what, in the older anthropological sense, was one of the most materially primitive and socially fragmented forms of human organisation still surviving on earth: thousands of small, mobile, familial groups, without settled agriculture, cities, writing, courts, police or any authority standing above them capable of ending feud and revenge.

It is difficult to conceive of a substantially simpler enduring form of human social organisation. Below the small local group lies little more than the immediate or extended family itself.

But no human population could remain reproductively isolated at that level for generation after generation: sustained mating within such a narrow circle would inevitably produce repeated close-relative unions and increasing inbreeding. Survival therefore required some network of bestowal, female transfer, and contact between otherwise small and politically separate groups.

Revenge killing, payback, punitive expeditions, sorcery killing, ritual punishment, conflict over women and armed fighting between neighbouring groups were already part of the continent’s human landscape.

Within the societies in which these practices operated, much of this violence was not regarded as aberrant criminality but as culturally sanctioned conduct, expected, legitimate and, in some circumstances, obligatory.

I refer collectively to these recurring forms of socially embedded killing as “cultural lethal violence”. So too, in different places and circumstances, were infanticide, the abandonment or killing of elderly and incapacitated people, and other brutal responses to the material constraints of subsistence life.

Practices varied between regions, and no single pattern can be attributed uniformly to every Aboriginal group. But the underlying forms of violence are well attested.

There is nothing uniquely Aboriginal about this historical condition. For most of humanity’s existence, human beings everywhere lived in small family-based communities without states, police, courts, modern medicine, stored agricultural surpluses or institutions capable of protecting individuals independently.

Every civilisation emerged from materially and institutionally simpler forms of human organisation.

The distinction was historical, but profound. At the moment of sustained British contact, Aboriginal societies represented the continuation of a form of human organisation that had existed for tens of thousands of years largely outside the agricultural, urban, literate and state-based civilisations that transformed much of the rest of humanity.

The cultural lethal violence embedded in that older order did not largely disappear because thousands of separate communities independently chose to abandon it.

It was progressively displaced by the imposition of a new order: British law, police, courts and, ultimately, a state monopoly on legitimate force.

PLEASE READ ON

https://quadrant.org.au/…/before-settlement-a-blood…/

Continue reading AUSTRALIA: BEFORE SETTLEMENT, A BLOOD-SOAKED LAND

The Moral Disarmament of the West

Khaled Hassan

Both Christians and Jews revere what English speakers commonly call the Old Testament.

In this sacred text, God declares, “Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot” (Exodus 21:24).

This principle formed the security doctrine that shaped the world before World War II. It was a world most of us today would scarcely recognize—one in which the death penalty was the norm, even in democratic nations such as the United Kingdom, where it was typically reserved for murder and, at times, treason or rape. It was a world of leaders unashamed to project strength, a world in which friend and foe could still be clearly distinguished.

Today’s world is its opposite. We inhabit a society that has grown unfamiliar with the very concepts of justice and morality as they were understood for centuries. Foreigners who rape our daughters are often permitted, by court order and under the banner of human-rights law, to remain in the communities they have preyed upon.

Murderers are offered a lifetime of taxpayer-funded comfort in prison. For years the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and much of the mainstream media insisted that a woman could have a penis—until a court finally compelled them to acknowledge the most elementary facts of human biology.

We live in a world shaped by a false doctrine: “An eye for an eye would leave the whole world blind.”

This maxim has molded the modern West’s understanding—or rather its misunderstanding—of justice and security. It has been promoted by some of the most influential voices of the modern era. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote in Stride Toward Freedom: The Montgomery Story, “The old law of an eye for an eye leaves everybody blind.” King, influenced by Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolence, helped popularize the idea. The precise phrasing later appeared in the 1982 biographical film Gandhi, spoken by Ben Kingsley in the title role—though screenwriter John Briley later confirmed that he invented the line and that Gandhi himself never uttered it.
Continue reading The Moral Disarmament of the West

The Genocide of the Ottoman Greeks

“Turkey Has Never Committed Any Genocide”

Erdoğan falsely claimed Turkey’s ‘history is free from genocide, massacres, oppression, and colonialism’.

350,000 Dead. Their Villages Burned. Their Women Enslaved. Most People Have Never Heard Of It

Turkey’s Black Sea coast, 1916 to 1923. An ethnic Greek population that had lived there for nearly 3,000 years — since before the Roman Empire existed.

By the time it ended, most of them were gone.

An Ottoman commander named Rafet Bey told an Austrian diplomat exactly what was coming: “We must finish off the Greeks as we did with the Armenians.” Days later, he confirmed it further — squads had been sent out with orders to kill every Greek on sight.

By then, the region’s Greek men had already been swept into Ottoman labor battalions, where conditions were so brutal that life expectancy was measured in weeks. What remained in the villages were mostly women, children, and the elderly.

What followed was systematic. Homes burned. Communities forced onto death marches into the Anatolian interior, with documented death rates as high as 90 percent along the way. U.S. Ambassador Henry Morgenthau testified to Congress about what he’d witnessed firsthand: women driven into slavery, girls sold for as little as 80 cents each, entire villages erased from the map.

By 1923, an estimated 350,000 Pontic Greeks were dead. A population that had called that coastline home for three thousand years was nearly wiped out in less than a decade.

Turkey still officially denies it happened. Most of the world was never taught it happened at all.

Tucker Carlson has never read about the pogroms against the Greek Christians of Constantinople carried out by Muslim Turks that took place in 1955, just 70 years ago. These events took place roughly 30 years after the Greek-Armenian-Assyrian genocide, which was motivated by both… pic.twitter.com/7nfhL3QdUl

— Homer Pavlos (@HomerPavlos) June 28, 2026

The Genocide of the Armenian Christians of Turkey

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Dimitris Midas Ioannidis (@midasgreece)

The Genocide of the Ottoman Greeks: a New Book Announcement

The recent vote against the denial of the Armenian Genocide held by the French Parliament, and the discussion to recognize the same event by the Israeli Knesset, brings to the fore the issue of the Turkish government’s adverse reaction, reflecting perhaps a deep-seated sense of culpability and apparent unwillingness to accept responsibility for the first genocide of the Twentieth Century, that of the Christians of the Ottoman Empire and the early Turkish Republic. Continue reading The Genocide of the Ottoman Greeks

Iran: the only thing that you get when you negotiate with terrorists is more terrorism

Danegeld was a tax raised to pay tribute or protection money to the Viking raiders to save a land from being ravaged.

Once you paid the Dane-geld You never get rid of the Dane.

Pay the jihadis and you never get rid of the jihad.

When Has Negotiating With Islamic Terrorists Ever Worked?

Nearly 250 years ago, the United States tried negotiating with Islamic pirate states to stop the capture of American ships and the enslavement of Americans. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams all learned the painful lesson that the negotiations were a trap.

Treaties would be signed, agreements would be reached and would soon be broken because Muslims could freely lie to ‘infidels’ and had a religious obligation to wage war on them.

“The precept of the Koran is perpetual war against all who deny that Mahomet is the prophet of God,” Adams summed it up. “The command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force.”

This isn’t ancient history, it’s current events as the United States once again conducts futile negotiations with an Islamic pirate and terrorist state to stop its attacks on international shipping.

Iran Is Never Going to Stop Shutting Down the Strait of Hormuz

Iran only has one card to play and that’s shutting down the Strait of Hormuz. So it’ll never stop doing it.

Iran’s leaders, unsatisfied with billions in oil sales, access to cash, and promises of sanctions relief and $300 billion in the deal, are trying to charge for access to the strait, meanwhile despite the waivers of oil sales, they’re attacking ships passing through the strait to show they’re in charge.

US says if Iran tries to ‘threaten its neighbours’, Trump ‘has options’ for responding

US Vice President JD Vance says that if Iran pursues various measures he says could destabilise the region, then Trump has several ways in which he could respond to the Islamic Republic.

Former President Trump stands behind Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, who is signing a document at a table in the Oval Office, surrounded by military flags.

High-Ranking Iranian Clerics Call for Trump and Netanyahu’s Assassinations “Under Any Circumstances” as President Reportedly Weighs “Finishing The Job” in Iran

Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi says talks in Qatar’s capital, Doha, with Pakistani and Qatari officials have concluded.
US President Donald Trump has hailed the US’s own talks on Iran in Doha as “very good”.

Iran says Strait of Hormuz is its ‘greatest instrument of power’

Ships still using Oman route through Hormuz despite Iran warnings

Vessels are continuing to pass through the Strait of Hormuz using the Oman-designated route despite Iran’s rejection of the lane and warnings to ships crossing outside routes approved by Tehran.

How Muslim Turks Treated Christians

Homer Pavlos

The genocide in Anatolia, particularly against the Greek population, occurred mainly between 1914 and 1923, during and after World War I, and was characterized by systematic killings, deportations, and ethnic cleansing perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire. This campaign targeted various Christian minorities, including Greeks, Armenians, and Assyrians, leading to significant loss of life and cultural heritage in the region.

I will explain to you, in a long and historically accurate post, exactly how Muslim Turks treated Christians.

In the 1.300 years of Muslim-Arab slave trade, approximately a million Greek Christians were sold as slaves. I am Greek, so I will write you about how Islam and Muslim Turks treated Greek Christians.

On March 30, 1822, the Chios Massacre took place. The Muslim Turks slaughtered 42,000 Greek Christians: women, men & children. Additionally, 52,000 were sold as slaves in the markets of Smyrna & Constantinople.

On September 1, 1821, Samothrace was devastated by the Ottomans through a general massacre led by the Turkish Kara Ali. Approximately 10,000 men & boys were slaughtered. Women & children were sold in the markets of Constantinople & Smyrna (Holocaust of Samothrace).

On June 4, 1821, the Turks carried out a massacre against the Greeks of Kydonies in Asia Minor (modern-day Ayvalık). They did pogroms at shops and homes, looting them, while seizing women and children to sell as slaves. Simultaneously, they conducted a general massacre of the population, and the town was set ablaze and completely destroyed.

In Crete muslims carried chains with them to tie up Greek Christian women so they could take them away. They were enslaving and converting the Greek Christians of Crete for centuries.

For 300 years (1380-1680) the muslim Turks were stealing kids from their mothers. This was the most brutal thing humanity ever witnessed. They were waiting for women to birth, raise their kids, and then at the age of 8 were collecting the them. The devşirme known as “collection of children” or “blood tax” or in Greek as “paidomazoma”. The devshirme was the greatest wound inflicted on Hellenism during the period of Turkish rule. The children who were seized were considered definitively lost. In Epirus, in fact, on the first Sunday after the abduction, their parents would go to church dressed in black, where a funeral service was chanted. In this service, the names of the children were read aloud as if they were dead. Once taken, boys were circumcised, renamed with Muslim names, and forbidden from contact with their families. They were raised as Muslims, effectively erasing their Greek cultural and religious identity to foster loyalty to the sultan.

After the Ottoman conquest of Crete (1669), local officials and governors began to oppress the Christian population in every way: killing, abducting and abusing women, demanding money, and preventing the performance of the subjects’ religious duties.

We Greeks, called the Muslim Turks, “The grand masters of torture.” In 1821, in Patras, they captured a father and son and, after impaling them, lit a fire and forced the other captives to roast them like lambs. Ali Pasha at that point was more inventive: When he impaled Christians, he forced their relatives to turn the spit, threatening that otherwise he would impale them too. Continue reading How Muslim Turks Treated Christians

History: so what about the crusades?

Thank God our ancestors fought.

We have been taught to sneer at the word. “Crusade” conjures up images of fanatics in mail and steel, marching east to slaughter in the name of God. It is often offered as Exhibit A in the indictment of Christianity—proof that faith, armed with power, becomes cruelty.

But history is not a slogan. And the record, as historians like Thomas F. Madden have patiently and extensively shown, is far more complicated—and far less convenient for those in the Columbia University facility lounge.

The First Crusade was not launched into a vacuum. For four centuries before a single Frankish knight set foot in Jerusalem, Christian lands had been conquered by Islamic armies. Syria. Palestine. Egypt. North Africa. Asia Minor. Once-vibrant Christian regions—home to ancient churches, bishops, and martyrs—fell one by one. People were either slaughtered or subordinated and taxed.

And by the eleventh century, the Byzantine Empire, heir to Rome in the East, was reeling. After the catastrophic defeat at Manzikert in 1071, much of Anatolia—Christian for a thousand years—was lost to Muslims. Around the same time, pilgrims traveling to Jerusalem reported harassment and far worse. Constantinople sent a desperate plea westward.

The Crusade began, not as a war of conversion, but as a war of response.

Madden and other serious scholars remind us: medieval Christians did not think of the Crusades as imperial adventures. They saw them as armed pilgrimages—acts of penance undertaken at enormous personal cost. Nobles mortgaged estates. Many never returned. There was no loot waiting in Europe; there were debts, widows, and ruined families. Continue reading

Islam is not an ‘Abrahamic’ religion

…and Islam is not a ‘religion of peace’ either.

Another senior Islamic cleric spells it out clearly:

“An Islamic state is required to carry the call of Islam to the entire world. It must be strong enough to expand militarily, ideologically, economically, and geographically.

Our main war is with America and Europe. Russia and… pic.twitter.com/yfN5TIhvRv
— Mor Edge Insight (@MorEdge_Insight) May 27, 2026

The ‘Muslim Catholic’ Who Invented the Christian-Muslim Relationship

The origins of the dangerous myth of “Abrahamic Religions.”

When Pope Leo hails Islam and when western politicians praise Islam as an “Abrahamic religion,” they are not reaching back to an ancient Christian tradition but the relatively new twentieth century invention of a man whom Pope Pius IX had described as a “Muslim Catholic”.

Traditional Christianity saw Islam as a pun for the sins of nations and Islamic rulers like Sultan Mehmed II as a “second Mohammed,” a “son of Satan” and a harbinger of the Antichrist.

One unlikely Christian ‘Islamist’ in the twentieth century helped change all that.

Louis Massignon was a French academic, intellectual, artist, officer, priest, gay man and likely spy, whose obsessive orientalism led him to spend a good deal of his time, occasionally at risk of his life, in the Muslim world, to advocate for its causes and to find spiritual meaning in Islam. Continue reading Islam is not an ‘Abrahamic’ religion

Spain: Sanchez is expected to sign the mass amnesty Royal Decree in the coming weeks

It took the Spanish 700 years to rid their country of ISLAM. But now, in less than 30 years, leftists morons are welcoming Islam back in.

An absolute majority of Spanish lawmakers on Wednesday approved a motion urging the government of socialist Prime Minster Pedro Sánchez “immediately resigns” its plans to grant amnesty to half a million illegal migrants in the country.

“No Kings” cry the socialists through their “royal decree”.

Migration Invasion Europe: It’s Worse Than Ever

Suicidal empathy

Suicidal empathy refers to the act of showing empathy for others in a way that causes significant harm to oneself. The term was coined by Canadian scholar Gad Saad to describe a societal trend where excessive empathy can lead to detrimental outcomes for individuals and communities.

Brussels Bureaucrats Push For Expanded Legal Migration Routes Into Europe To Help Those Who ‘Dream Of A Better Life’

In her speech in Brussels, at no point did von der Leyen address the rising crime rates among foreign nationals or the rising feeling of insecurity felt among Europeans

The UK 🇬🇧 has taken the top spot in rapes per capita from Sweden 🇸🇪. The UK recorded 71,227 in 2024, 900% more than the 7,801 in 2000. The rape rate has reached 114 per 100,000 people.

Biden’s Border Invasion Flooded Nation With 18,000 Known And Suspected Terrorists

In the wake of last month’s shooting of two National Guard service members just blocks from the White House by a radicalized Afghan national who entered the U.S. under the Biden-Harris regime, National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent warned the House Homeland Security Committee that the Homeland faces an elevated terrorism risk tied to years of nation-killing open border policies.

On Thursday, Kent testified that the NCTC has identified 18,000 “known and suspected terrorists that the Biden administration let come into our country.”

He continued, “These are individuals who, under normal circumstances, would never be allowed to enter our country because of their ties to jihadi groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda. Yet, the Biden administration not only let them into the country, but in many cases facilitated their entry into the country.”

“There’s no need for that we’re on the same side bruv.” “No we’re not!”

Continue reading Migration Invasion Europe: It’s Worse Than Ever