An Indonesian Muslim preacher in Japan says: “Modern Japan needs Islam. The solution to suicide, divorce, broken families, and economic problems is more Islam and more mosques. The land of cherry blossoms wants Islam. Japan wants mosques.” The land of cherry blossoms does not need Islam. It needs protection from Islam and preachers like him!
In Kitakyushu, Japan, a Muslim woman from Afghanistan submitted a petition to the city council saying that her daughter and nephew cannot eat pork or pork extract in school lunch because Islam considers it haram.
A (Musel-)man has been given a six-month jail term in France after he threatened to behead a female primary school teacher who had disciplined his son at a village primary school.
The 47-year-old was sentenced after a fast-track hearing on Thursday, six days after the events unfolded in Le Fauga, a village with a population of about 2,600 just outside the southwestern city of Toulouse.
The teacher has been granted official protection and has gone on sick leave.
According to the police, the would-be cop-killer’s motives “remain unclear.”
I beg to differ. After all, what could the motive possibly be for someone who as he attacks with a knife shouts “Allahu akbar”?
In Toulouse, a knife-wielding Muslim attacked two police officers who were sitting in their patrol car, and managed to wound both of them. One of the cuts came close to severing the victim’s carotid artery. Robert Spencer wrote about this incident here, and more on this attack, that in Europe is no longer that unusual, can be found here: “Toulouse: Two municipal police officers attacked by a man armed with knives,” translated from “Toulouse : Deux policiers municipaux attaqués par un homme armé de couteaux,” Actu 17, August 10, 2026
Democracy invites despotism. When understood as majority rule, democracy means that fifty-one of every hundred citizens can have their way with the other forty-nine.
“But I want to keep my possessions, weapons, and children.” Too bad, the majority have decided to redistribute your property to those lazy bums over there, disarm you before you can do anything about it, and indoctrinate your children in public schools, so that they learn to resent you and love the State.
Democracy is dangerous without guardrails. Unless a society has a strong sense of moral virtue that fosters personal discipline, duty, and honor, base selfishness becomes the driving motivation behind all political action. Unless certain constitutional protections exist to safeguard each individual’s inviolable rights, democratic majorities devour those rights whenever expedient.
This should surprise no-one. Political philosophers such as Hobbes and Locke described humans’ pre-government “state of nature” as a chaotic, violent clash of self-interest. Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” regards self-interest as the engine of free markets. Consequently, it is easy to understand why forms of democracy that are unshackled from both moral and constitutional restraints prompt a society to descend back into a state of nature in which humanity’s worst impulses are again indulged. Continue reading Freedom Is Much More Important Than Democracy
Welcome to Victims Anonymous, where the first step is admitting that no politician is coming to save you. He is coming for your vote, your money, and a little more control over your life.
The modern Left has built an entire political business model around convincing people they are victims. If you are struggling, the system must be rigged. If your neighbor has more, he must have taken it from you.
If you make a bad decision, someone else must be responsible. And somehow, the answer is always another government program.
Free never really means free. Free college, free health care, free housing, and free money all come with a bill. Someone works for it, someone earns it, and someone pays for it.
Government does not produce wealth. It takes wealth from the people who do, burns part of it through bureaucracy, then hands some back while demanding gratitude. Continue reading Victimhood is Political Currency
This was written when the clownish Scott Morrisson was PM of Australia. Although the current PM Albanese is much worse in every way, it shows that the parties don’t differ on policy. The import of unassimilable 3rd world savages to eliminate the white race appears to be a done deal for the uniparty corruptocrats. Your vote will not change that.
‘What do Australia’s founding fathers and cultural diversity have in common? Both celebrate this country’s great multiculturalism’, Scott Morrison believes. The Prime Minister last week visited a Buddhist temple in Berwick to bring news of a $280,000 grant for a language and religious school the local Sri Lankan community is building there. He noted approvingly that Sri Lanka, like Australia, is a ‘multicultural, multi-faith nation’.
Multiculturalism has done a lot of “good” for Sri Lanka as the latest terrorist attacks on Easter Sunday so vividly demonstrate. And yet, the Morrison talks of the strength of Australia as a ‘multicultural’ nation, where all cultures must be celebrated and promoted by the government.
I respectfully disagree.
May I humbly suggest that our Christian Prime Minister stop promoting “multiculturalism” and instead promote the Judeo-Christian culture of Western democracy which has given the world outstanding examples of freedom and prosperity.
Christianity is the most traditional religion and culture of Australia. Christianity has unquestionably played a central role in the development of democracy and the rule of law in this nation. To ignore such an obvious fact results in a diminished understanding of our national identity.
And yet, the Christian image of Australia has already been damaged by the state-imposed ideology of multiculturalism, which is in essence an ideological movement opposed to the western concepts of democratic principles, culture, and identity. It is basically an anti-Western and an anti-Christian ideology.
Indeed, radical multiculturalists look forward to a time when Australia may never again be culturally united, if united means unified in beliefs and practise, and to a time when Australians will be less a culturally definable group. Such a multiculturalism encourages immigrants to maintain their birth country cultures and religion, granting these individuals privileges which are denied to native-born Australians, and denounce the idea of integration as “un-Australian”.
The combined effect of these efforts is to promote the complete deconstruction of the Australian cultural identity. This loss of cultural identity may cause our nation to fragment into enclaves of religion and/or ethnicity.
Take for instance the traditional cultural manifestation of Islam. In such a religious culture, no priority is given to democracy, free speech or religious freedom. Hence, if a Muslim immigrant is told to celebrate such a culture, then he will almost certainly revert to a form of religious experience that is antagonistic to the values and principles of our western democracy. Continue reading Multiculti is Not Food
Amid anxiety in industry ranks that federal Labor could crackdown on Fuel Tax Credits used by miners, farmers and builders, a CCA insights paper has revealed Mr Bowen’s Department of Climate Change and Energy is leading a government-wide push to hit back against those undermining Labor’s climate and energy policy.
The department, when contacted for comment about the working group, cited “strong and persistent public concern about the spread of climate and energy misinformation” presented to a Greens-proposed and Greens-led Senate inquiry earlier this year.
The CCA said the new working group could: establish a “more collaborative approach to addressing climate misinformation” by developing a shared message framework across agencies; translate technical policy into practical explanations; use audience insight and misinformation monitoring to identify risks; and establish a “whole-of-government rapid-response approach to climate and energy misinformation”.
The insights paper – “Misinformation: A climate policy risk” – said climate misinformation was “part of a broader challenge around information integrity that affects many policy areas … effective responses require co-ordination across government, with different agencies contributing expertise, insights and actions within their respective mandates”.
The CCA paper, which warned that climate misinformation was “already affecting how climate policy is delivered in Australia”, identified “common narratives” fuelling “uncertainty about climate policies, technologies and solutions”. These included misinformation narratives linked to “cost-of-living, energy prices and reliability, jobs, regional impacts, biodiversity and environmental impacts, whether Australia’s action matters”.
The Department of Climate Change and Energy said it was “committed to continually improving the way it communicates and providing clear factual information that is accessible to all Australians.
“The department’s communication efforts are dedicated to helping Australians to understand the facts about our energy system and the impact of climate change – so people can understand and engage with the energy transition to improve social licence and ensure community concerns are heard and considered,” a spokesman said.
As the Albanese government seeks to reclaim control over its renewables and climate change agenda, the CCA this week held a briefing call with industry representatives and groups who have advocated that fuel tax credits be abolished or wound back.
The Chinese Nepalese border site: Picture from Wikimedia
Already the Climate Porn industry is using the ghastly death and destruction in Nepal to sell Net Zero and Socialism, even though landslides have always happened, and there was a far worse one in 1190AD.
If you make your children hold up signs that say abolish Australia and other slogans which support the dissolution of this nation, you should be removed from their care.
These children will grow up with such a warped sense of reality, they will hate their European ancestry for… https://t.co/EGf0uds6Pu
An academic with historic links to the now banned Hizb ut-Tahrir terror group has been recruited by Cambridge University to the same faculty as ex-professor Jason Arday.
Arday decided to kick the bucket after being exposed as a fraud.
The Spectator reported that in the pamphlet, she wrote: ‘The Muslim community as a whole in Britain needs to recognise that western education is a threat to our beliefs and values.’
Cambridge has now told Jewish News that Ahmed says the comments were not written by her and do not represent her views.
A spokesperson for the Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, said: “These comments were made in an article to which Dr Ahmed contributed as a historical researcher more than 20 years ago. She has said that they are not her words and do not reflect her views. Dr Ahmed also reiterated that she ended her association with Hizb ut-Tahrir more than 15 years ago, long before the group was proscribed. Her appointment at Cambridge followed a standard recruitment process and complied fully with the University’s legal obligations as an employer.”
Ahmed previously said in 2010 that she no longer supported “all” the views of Hizb ut-Tahrir and had not recently been involved with the organisation.
The revelations follow separate scrutiny of an education project led by Ahmed which promotes an Islamic curriculum. The Spectator reported last week that teaching material promoted by the project described Israelis taken hostage by Hamas on 7 October as “prisoners of war”, called Hamas an “excuse” used by Israel to justify attacks on Gaza and included a map on which Israel did not appear.
Hizb ut-Tahrir was proscribed by the UK government on 19 January 2024. Announcing the ban, the government described it as an antisemitic organisation which “actively promotes and encourages terrorism” and pointed to its praise for the Hamas attacks on Israel on 7 October 2023.
“Professor Arday was a victim of a brutal, racist witch hunt,” claims Amnesia.
It depicts the serial fabulist as “Black autistic man whose journey expanded our imaginations and understanding of what we believed possible in academia”.
That last part is certainly true.
Here’s the incredible closing sentence.
“The media must be held accountable for failing to honour these boundaries. Professor Arday’s family must not be subjected to further intrusion, speculation or online abuse. The most meaningful tribute we can offer is not merely remembrance but a commitment to tangible, real-world change: building systems and enforcing laws to ensure that Black, disabled, neurodivergent and those easily excluded can live, work, contribute and flourish without being forced to bear the costs of institutional failures and public cruelty.”
“Laws to ensure that black” public figures can’t be covered by the media or have their scandals reported on. Can white conservative public figures have their scandals reported on? Obviously. This is a two-tier system in which the goal is to censor the opposition and suppress any exposure of the leftist ruling class.
“Laws to ensure that black” public figures can’t be covered by the media
Amnesty InternationalAmnesia Intentional was spawned over a hoax in which people were supposedly locked up over their speech. The actual event was based on a newspaper article, it had never actually happened, but that didn’t stop Amnesty International from raising and spending millions of dollars, and preaching to everyone about the importance of ‘human rights’ for succeeding generations.
(Also, according to its founder, secretly operating as a tool of British intelligence services, but that’s a conversation for another time.)
Much like the ACLU and other ‘human rights groups’, Amnesty became increasingly for state crackdowns on speech and civil rights. Now it has come full circle in endorsing ‘Arday’s Law’.
Meritocratie Baaaaad!
To recap, Jason Arday was a DEI professor at Cambridge whose entire bio turned out to have been made up… quite obviously so because it considered of bizarre claims about raising fortunes, winning marathons and being unable to speak until he was 18 years old.
A racist, right-wing mob is seeking to drive blacks out of wakademia
In the wake of accused plagiarist and serial fabulist Jason Arday’s death, an influential band of activists within Great Britain’s largest academic union is demanding action—not to change the policies at Cambridge that led the school to hire and defend Arday, but to “shield other black academics from scrutiny from what they view as a racist, right-wing conspiracy,” the investigative journalist Ben Ryan writes for the Free Beacon.
An activist caucus within the University and College Union held a virtual organizing meeting Tuesday night to discuss Arday’s death. “The Free Beacon obtained a recording of the raw and emotional gathering of several dozen members, during which the angry scholars repeatedly denounced the attacks on Arday as the product of a racist, right-wing mob seeking to drive blacks out of the academy,” Ryan writes.
