Slavery – Winds of Jihad

Reconquista? Britain is gone beyond the point of no return

No Brit can relate to this.

No taxpayer should suffer this insult on his nation.

“The Lady in Blue” will sit atop the Fourth Plinth for two years

A sculpture inspired by a desire to bring a contemporary “everywoman” to Trafalgar Square has been unveiled on London’s Fourth Plinth.

Lady In Blue by New York artist Tschabalala Self, which pays homage to a young, metropolitan woman, is the 16th artwork to feature on the plinth since 1998.

The bronze and blue figure replaces Mil Veces un Instante (A Thousand Times in an Instant) by Teresa Margolles.

The statue has been patinated with a pigment refined from Lapis Lazuli, a semi-precious stone that has been used by artists for millennia.

Self said she had set out to put an ordinary contemporary Londoner on a site more usually associated with statues of monarchs and military commanders.

“My work Lady In Blue will bring to Trafalgar Square a woman that many can relate to,” the artist said.

“She is not an idol to venerate or a historic figurehead to commemorate.

“She is a woman walking forward into our collective future with ambition and purpose. She is a Londoner, who represents the city’s spirit.”

🚨🇬🇧Islamist in the UK proudly boasts that a university building has been turned into a mega mosque.

He says that more buildings will soon be converted into mosques.

Across England, more historic landmarks are being transformed into Islamic centers and mosques. pic.twitter.com/iQbPBgm0JP
— Mario ZNA (@MarioBojic) July 26, 2026

British Police Deploy Extra Patrols, Including Undercover and Armed Officers, to Protect Jewish Holiday

Police forces launch special patrols, including armed and plain-clothes officers, to protect Jewish communities through Rosh Hashanah.

Does the Telegraph employ only FAR LEFT scribblers?

Arab Colonialism & White Slavery

A Mother And Child Could Survive The Raid Together. Then The Market Tore Them Apart On Purpose

Surviving an Ottoman raid was never the end of the danger for a mother and her children. It was only the beginning of a different kind of loss.

THE SURVIVAL

For centuries, Ottoman and Crimean Tatar raids swept through Christian villages across Eastern Europe and the Balkans, rounding up survivors to be marched to slave markets. Families who managed to stay together through the chaos of a raid — mothers shielding children, holding on through the fear and confusion of losing everything they knew — often believed the worst was behind them once the violence stopped.

It wasn’t.

THE MARKET

At the slave markets where these families were finally sold, buyers didn’t purchase families as a unit. They purchased individuals — the people they wanted, for the purposes they wanted them for. A strong young man had different value than a small child. A mother had different value than her daughter.

Historical accounts from the era describe exactly what this looked like in practice. One eyewitness wrote of watching a mother severed from her son and daughter, sold to separate buyers “among lamentations, cries for help, weeping, and sorrow” — a scene repeated countless times across these markets, treated as routine business rather than tragedy.

This wasn’t incidental cruelty. Splitting families apart at sale reduced the chance that captives would organize an escape together, and it eliminated the risk that a family might later be ransomed or rescued as a group. The separation served the market’s interests. The grief was simply the cost of doing business.

WHAT’S LEFT

A mother who held her child through the worst night of her life — through fire, through fear, through the loss of everything she’d built — could still lose that child forever the moment a buyer’s coin changed hands.

Surviving together was never a guarantee of staying together. That was never the point.

For Three Hundred Years They Harvested Human Beings

Continue reading Arab Colonialism & White Slavery

Was Muhammad Really the ‘First Anti-Racist in Human History’?

The “white Muhammad” owned black slaves.

In June 2020, Dr. Craig Considine, a Lecturer in the Department of Sociology at Rice University, produced a video titled “Who Is the First Anti-Racist in Human History?” In this video Considine identified Muhammad as that “First Anti-Racist.” Considine noted:

Arguably, Prophet Muhammad was the first person in human history to declare, in no uncertain terms, that no person is above another by virtue of race or ethnicity. This declaration is crystallized in one of the Prophet’s notable speeches: His Last Sermon, as it is known, which was delivered on Mount Arafat in 632 A.D. In that sermon, the Prophet Muhammad unequivocally condemned racism when he said: “All mankind is descended from Adam and Eve. An Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab. And a non-Arab has no superiority over an Arab. A white person has no superiority over a black person, nor a black person has any superiority over a white person, except by piety and good action.”

Ever since then, Prophet Muhammad’s teachings on racial equality have inspired human beings to strive for racial equality and justice for all.[1]

Considine’s video and its transcript, along with numerous other articles that include variations of Muhammad’s statement about Arabs and non-Arabs, and whites and blacks, populate the internet. And Muhammad is lauded as a man who was centuries ahead of his times in terms of race relations.

For more than 1000 years, Arab Muslims raided the coasts of the Mediterranean for white slaves. Slave raids would go deep into the caucasus & into India

Continue reading Was Muhammad Really the ‘First Anti-Racist in Human History’?